• io9
  • science
  • overmind
  • kotaku
  • gizmodo
  • Profile logout login

#heroes#altajrobahaldanimarkiyahhtml

io9

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #observationdeck,
  • #tips,
  • #calendar,
  • etc.

San Francisco, 8:53 PM
Tue Dec 1
29 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |

News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |

Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |

Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |

Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |

Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |

Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |

Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |

More:
io9 on Facebook
follow io9 on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO io9 RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1428 Subscribers
io9
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    07:50 PM

    In reply to On Heroes, Carnies and Cockteasing Combine into Cheese
    "Honestly, they can't pay somebody to come up with a few cool, interesting powers that we haven't seen before?"

    Mur Lafferty, in "Playing for Keeps", came up with the idea of a mutant who can produce vast amounts of shit on demand and hose them out through his hands.

    Something tells me, though, that this wouldn't look very appealing on a TV show.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of mekki mekki
    05:10 PM

    In reply to On Heroes, Carnies and Cockteasing Combine into Cheese
    "this adds further evidence to the idea that every single power on Heroes was ripped off from X-Men. Honestly,
    they can't pay somebody to come up with a few cool, interesting powers that we haven't seen before?"

    There are thousands of X-Men. Or at least it feels like there are thousands of X-Men. Anyway, it would be hard to come up with a new power that hasn't been done before. You would have to go into the weird Tick meets Warehouse 13 territory of powers.

    Like "Dialtone," with one single thought he can change anyone into a 1961 Crosley Princess phone. Oooooooo!

    Or "Lord Flavor" with the ability to make anything you eat taste like three day old lasagna. Aaaahhhhh!

    Yeah, I'd rather stick with the more normal powers of flying and healing and leave such weirdness to the likes of The Middleman. Heroes is too straight lace for that sort of thing.
     Reply
    mekki was starred mekki was unstarred
    Image of rek rek
    03:08 PM

    In reply to On Heroes, Carnies and Cockteasing Combine into Cheese
    I read the article tag as "horsecrap".
     Reply
    rek was starred rek was unstarred
    Image of mekki mekki
    05:12 PM

    @rek: Countdown until someone says, "Same thing," 3....2....1
     Reply
    mekki was starred mekki was unstarred
    Image of Dr Emilio Lizardo Dr Emilio Lizardo
    02:56 PM

    In reply to On Heroes, Carnies and Cockteasing Combine into Cheese
    Did anybody really expect Sylar to die when Peter let go of Nathan? And why do people always fall on cars. There is always plenty of nice asphalt around, why hit the car?

    And the guy playing the puppeteer, was that the same actor? He was always overweight, but it looked like he had gained about 60 pounds and a couple of chins.
     Reply
    Dr Emilio Lizardo was starred Dr Emilio Lizardo was unstarred
    Image of Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H.
    02:36 PM

    In reply to On Heroes, Carnies and Cockteasing Combine into Cheese
    Fabulous recap as always, Annalee.
     Reply
    Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. was starred Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. was unstarred
    Image of Alexis Alexis
    02:24 PM

    In reply to On Heroes, Carnies and Cockteasing Combine into Cheese
    That puppetmaster part was ridiculous. They basically make that character one of the most sociopathic villains on the show since Sylar and poof! Claire is cool with him? When did this happen? She helped him run from G-man from last season, and it certainly wasn't because she liked him, so what's changed?

    Also, it took THIS long for Peter to realize that besides Hiro, Renee has the most useful ability against Sylar? Wow.
     Reply
    Alexis was starred Alexis was unstarred
    Image of Atomictao Atomictao
    02:29 PM

    @Alexis: The affectionate hug was a huge WTF. This is the creepy dude who controlled your body, and the bodies of both your mommies. He lived in an old puppet theater. He never shaved. He was one of the more effective villains on the show because of how slimy he was.

    What kind of lame-ass evil carnival is this, that joining it makes you LESS creepy?!
     Reply
    Atomictao was starred Atomictao was unstarred
    Image of Atomictao Atomictao
    02:17 PM

    In reply to On Heroes, Carnies and Cockteasing Combine into Cheese
    I was pretty much expecting Samuel to freaking pull up a chunk of planet and put Asteroid M in orbit, that's how hardcore he was channeling 90s-era Claremont Magneto. 90s-era Claremont Magneto had a similar power of gaining sycophantic followers by shoveling vague separatist bullshit at them.

    Sprint!
     Reply
    Atomictao was starred Atomictao was unstarred
    Image of CmdrHunt (aka Clarence Colton) CmdrHunt (aka Clarence Colton)
    11:14 AM

    In reply to Next Year's Doctor Who Stars Won't Be Who You Think
    Jonah Hex - I'm looking forward to that.
     Reply
    CmdrHunt (aka Clarence Colton) was starred CmdrHunt (aka Clarence Colton) was unstarred
    Image of firstanointed firstanointed
    09:20 AM

    In reply to Next Year's Doctor Who Stars Won't Be Who You Think
    "And in case you didn't already know this, the CW is still hot to trot to get a tenth season of this "wake me when he's Superman" show."

    Wait, he's STILL not Superman yet?? I stopped watching 5 seasons ago. Can he at least hold flight yet or is it still a Greatest American Hero sort of deal?
     Reply
    firstanointed was starred firstanointed was unstarred
    Image of Julius Seizure - Canuck Julius Seizure - Canuck
    08:18 AM

    In reply to Next Year's Doctor Who Stars Won't Be Who You Think
    The Who pictures appear to be from the beginning of the Children In Need micro-special - I'm at work so I can't YouTube but it's in there a few times. Searching "who children in need 2009" should get you there.
     Reply
    Julius Seizure - Canuck was starred Julius Seizure - Canuck was unstarred
    Image of SJ_Edwards SJ_Edwards
    07:34 AM

    In reply to Next Year's Doctor Who Stars Won't Be Who You Think
    I know there's a lot of expectation for this Green Lantern movie (see below) but I don't think it's actually going to happen (that's probably why only Ryan Reynolds has been 'cast' in it so far).

    It's been in development hell since 2007, it looked like it was finally 'green lit' (sic) in April '09, when Warner Bros. announced it was going to be shot at Fox Studios in Australia with a budget of $150m US.

    March was the absolute low of the stock market (and high of the US dollar), since the start of the credit crisis, so it looks like that announcement (like many others) was prompted by the rocketship recovery of the stock market (up 60%+ now) that was clearly underway by April.

    'Unfortunately' it was also the point at which the US dollar started to plummet (US issuing new debt like confetti, unemployment rocketing, tax take plummeting) and the Australian dollar started to rocket (Oz, commodity producer bouncing back, fast).

    By October this added up to a 35% combined currency move, in the 'wrong' direction, filming in Oz was cancelled and no new location announced [New Orleans is now being floated as an alternate location (tax incentives, anyone?), for sometime next year, maybe, for release in mid-2011, maybe].

    What this actually means, is that Warner Bros borrowed the $150m US dollar budget (so that's where your TARP funds went!) in March, bought Oz-dollars with it, and by October this pile of Oz-dollars was worth $200m+ US dollars.

    So, Warner Bros said "Peachy!", sold the Oz-dollars for US dollars, paid off the loan (yeah, right!) and pocketed a $50m US dollar profit without ever filming a single frame of 'Green Lantern'.

    It's no coincidence that just prior to the October announcement, the upper levels of Warner Bros management was 'rearranged' and control of its previously autonomous, DC Comics division, was taken in house.

    New boss, new plan. Out with the old movie.

    It's the way of the corporate gun.

    Ryan Reynolds is an asset, he'll be reassured by Warner Bros that it's just 'delayed', until they've found a cheaper, less risky, more profitable franchise to use him in, then 'Green Lantern' will be quietly forgotten.

    Until the next time.
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards was starred SJ_Edwards was unstarred
    Image of goldfarb goldfarb
    08:52 AM

    @SJ_Edwards: um....I'm no studio exec. but I'm pretty sure that the budget of a movie isn't sitting in a big bag with '$' on it...all this money takes the form of loans/lines of credit/guarantees etc and is spent when it's needed...
    it's unlikely WarnerBros is pleased with the amount of money they've already spent - and now lost - in the development of this film.
     Reply
    goldfarb was starred goldfarb was unstarred
    Image of SJ_Edwards SJ_Edwards
    12:10 PM

    @goldfarb: The point with 'Green Lantern', was that its budget was specifically based on taking advantage of a 'high US dollar' and a 'low Australian dollar' at the point of it being green lit in March (announced in April), at a unique moment in exchange rates, in order to be able to make a $200m US budget film (if it had been made in the US), for $150m US in Australia (cheaper wages, costs and crapped out currency, because 'The Lucky Country' had just gone into recession for the first time in a generation).

    How Warner Bros locked in that exchange rate doesn't matter (currency futures, a custom-written over-the-counter currency option etc.), except for the fact that if they borrowed a specific sum ($150m US), for this specific purpose (making 'Green Lantern'), then "changed their plans, due to exigent circumstances" and close the production down, the $50m 'windfall profit' would be treated much more favourably, for tax purposes, as all costs incurred in the development of 'Green Lantern' would be set-off.

    A straight $50m US profit, on $150m US of capital employed, in seven months, is hugely more profitable, than going ahead and making the film.

    Warner Bros divisions were expected to meet a 17% annual growth target last year ('08), nobody cares how they make their targets this year. Just that they do.

    The announcement of the 'cancellation', of the 'Green Lantern' production, will be determined by Warner Bros's accounting purposes. Nothing else.
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards was starred SJ_Edwards was unstarred
    Image of goldfarb goldfarb
    12:25 PM

    @SJ_Edwards: as I said I'm not a studio exec. but it doesn't make any sense to me that they would get a loan for the total amount then stick in a bank + exchange rate monkey business = profit.
    these types of loans are contingent on actually using the money for the film...they are lines of credit - if you don't use all of the money you don't get all of the money...
    I sure I'm wrong on a bunch of this...but I don't see where you're getting this $50mil 'windfall profit'...I'd be very interested in any actual information you might have.
     Reply
    goldfarb was starred goldfarb was unstarred
    Image of SJ_Edwards SJ_Edwards
    01:29 PM

    @goldfarb: Traditional film financing, like lines of credit, virtually disappeared earlier this year (as it did for most businesses, whether making and selling films, clothes, airplane parts or doughnuts).

    For the very simple reason, that a line of credit is a guarantee, by a bank, that finance will be made available at some future date on specified terms.

    Bank guarantees simply became worthless.

    Those that could (Warner Bros, for example) borrowed all they could upfront (for a short time, there was a wall of 'government' bank rescue money) and hoarded it (who knew what might be coming next) and then used it to 'speculate' with.

    Those that did, made +35% on currency moves, +60% on the Dow, +1500% if they 'borrowed' from the 'right' bank and then bought stock in that bank etc. etc. etc.

    Those that tried to borrow money to run their businesses, either couldn't borrow or found that they couldn't sell what they'd made, because their customers couldn't borrow.

    Oil has doubled since March and so has unemployment, you guess which one is the better indicator for the health of the economy next year.

    Warner Bros is doing the sensible thing, realising a short term speculative profit and waiting ....

    .... waiting for Magrathea [en.wikipedia.org] to return.
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards was starred SJ_Edwards was unstarred
    Image of RenRen RenRen
    06:20 AM

    In reply to Next Year's Doctor Who Stars Won't Be Who You Think
    Hahahaha... Another joke about how Smallville ain't all that. It makes money, period. Those fat cats at the CW don't care about anything else... They don't care if they're destroying an icon. [continued rambling]...
     Reply
    RenRen was starred RenRen was unstarred
    Image of SJ_Edwards SJ_Edwards
    06:09 AM

    In reply to Next Year's Doctor Who Stars Won't Be Who You Think
    I'm finding the fact that the US is behind Australia now, when it comes to Flashforward, troubling ....

    Never mind, once I've had it explained to me over-and-over-and-over again, I'll stop caring.

    So that's alright then.
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards was starred SJ_Edwards was unstarred
    Image of Jogfrog Jogfrog
    06:13 AM

    @SJ_Edwards: Britain should be ahead since they're providing most of the cast.
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards promoted this comment Jogfrog was starred Jogfrog was unstarred
    Image of SJ_Edwards SJ_Edwards
    06:25 AM

    @Jogfrog: We are, we do, but I wasn't going to tell you .... because .... well, because I'm evil .... "It's the accent, don't ya know."
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards was starred SJ_Edwards was unstarred
    Image of Alasdair5000 Alasdair5000
    08:38 AM

    @SJ_Edwards: And of course the only thing MORE evil than telling them what's going to happen....IS NOT TELLING THEM! A HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! RUPERT! THE HORSES! AWAY!

    Or...something like that...
     Reply
    Alasdair5000 was starred Alasdair5000 was unstarred
    Image of Jogfrog Jogfrog
    12:45 PM

    @SJ_Edwards: I shall go cry in my corner and not look for torrents of the British broadcasts
     Reply
    Jogfrog was starred Jogfrog was unstarred
    Image of shrynx shrynx
    04:04 PM

    @SJ_Edwards: I thought it may have had something to do with Thanksgiving and some American shows not being played over the week?
    But now I have a problem... watch it a couple of days early with ads or wait and stream it?
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards promoted this comment shrynx was starred shrynx was unstarred
    Image of SJ_Edwards SJ_Edwards
    05:12 PM

    @shrynx: You think that's a quandry?
    Between now and next monday (when the next episode comes out) it will be repeated seven times (seven ******* times!) on network television.
    Which ones will I choose not to watch?
    Will I see them all (over-and-over-again)?
    Will it change anything if I do?
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards was starred SJ_Edwards was unstarred
    Image of shrynx shrynx
    05:47 PM

    @SJ_Edwards: You don't know until you try.
    And I find this kind of little quandary more palatable to mull over than the 'how to stop global warming' and 'what to do when one of the major parties in a two party system effectively self-destructs' variety. I didn't finish my Arts degree so I could spend all my time giving myself an even greater anxiety disorder. I finished it so I could stop thinking for a while.
    And now I return to work, where my biggest problem, err, quandary, is whether or not to tell anyone I burnt the milk.
     Reply
    shrynx was starred shrynx was unstarred
    Image of TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H. TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H.
    11/30/09

    In reply to Little Girls Lost Rule This Week's Television
    Flash Forward episode 10 actually aired already in Australia, so of course it's already all over the usual sites for people who are interested.

    It's pretty good... compared to the other FF episodes anyhow, but shit actually happens, and we get quite a few answers.

    So not to shabby overall.
     Reply
    TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H. was starred TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H. was unstarred
    Image of Lassus Lassus
    11/30/09

    In reply to Little Girls Lost Rule This Week's Television
    "(And am I the only person who spent the last episode waiting for a big lizard reveal, only to be thwarted? They even talked about skinning an alien just to tease us, the bastards)

    Seeing as how it was already revealed they were lizards, I wasn't disappointed.

    What I'm hoping for is that Anna is part of a mammoth warning plot where she has already turned against her whole race and wants to save earth, and that she'll reveal her real motives to the fifth column once the revealed BIG fleet is in range. I'm not holding my breath. It's probably going to be stupid.

    I'm not really intrigued by Alice. "NEW, MODERN, EDGY, OOOH!" if you want to be new, modern, and edgy, make something new, modern, and edgy.
     Reply
    Edited by Lassus at 11/30/09 11:23 AM Lassus was starred Lassus was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or io9 account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.