San Francisco, 5:08 AM
Tue Dec 8
26 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I used to be in genetics: they should use a plasmid targeted specifically for this DNA region; simply using a compound known to make the DNA knockout that will in turn undo the knockout that de-activated the RNA transcription of the intron, is like dumping a vat of EDTH into a living cell to kill one bacterium.
For those of you that didn't understand that, I'll use Egon's "Twinkie analogy": your typical DNA strand, lets say, is represented by a Twinkie. Now, a bug is on part of the Twinkie, so what I'd normally do is cut off the part of the twinkie that has the bug on it, carefully using a knife.
This is using a shotgun to tank out the bug on the twinkie.
@CodenameV: It would be great to use plasmids except for the fact that they don't work in humans... much harder to do gene therapy in us large mammals. From my brief glace at it they've only got proof of concept in certain cell types for us, so there's a whole slew of problems that open up if these retrocyclins have any ill effects on other signaling pathways in different systems.
The article is wonderful for what it is, but we are far far away from human application until people become less afraid of gene therapy again.
@Jojitsu: To make an alteration in the evolvement of an organic life system is fatal. A coding sequence cannot be revised once its been established. Because by the second day of incubation, any cells that have undergone reversion mutations give rise to revertant colonies like rats leaving a sinking ship; then the ship sinks. You could try EMS recombination, Ethyl methane sulfonate, but it is an alkylating agent and a potent mutagen. It would create a virus so lethal the subject would die before he left the table. A repressor protein that blocks the operating cells, wouldn't obstruct replication, but it does give rise to an error in replication so that the newly formed DNA strand carries a mutation and you've got a virus again.
@CodenameV: EMS recombination does not exist. That was in the movie Bladerunner.
And I agree, no one would use EMS to induce mutations in the hope it would turn on an inert gene. Who said anything about doing EMS? And since I assume you are talking about people here as you refer to "the subject", EMS does not create a virus (proteins themselves are not viruses), it is a mutagen, and will lead to either cell death or cancer because of it, it's more akin to Xray irridation.
But if you really are into this stuff, pubmed actually has a whole bunch of genetics books for free you can read into if you want to learn more, it's really neat stuff!
@ZetaCrossfire: What if we grow an extra torso? Or gills? Honestly, I'm in favor of all kinds of mutation as long as it's consensual. But I don't think you can mess with somebody's developmental genes and get their permission at the same time. Since, um, they'll be developing in a womb at the moment you introduce those mutations.
@ZetaCrossfire: Doesn't work that way. Any instances of extra limbs can usually be traced to some sort of chemically-induced mutation (like that whole "children of thalidamide" thing). Turning on unused DNA just shows up in other weird ways. For instance, people of African descent are known to be at high risk for sickle-cell anemia, but what is less commonly known is that the gene that increases that risk has a somewhat beneficial effect. It also makes the individual more resistant to malaria.
04/27/09
For those of you that didn't understand that, I'll use Egon's "Twinkie analogy": your typical DNA strand, lets say, is represented by a Twinkie. Now, a bug is on part of the Twinkie, so what I'd normally do is cut off the part of the twinkie that has the bug on it, carefully using a knife.
This is using a shotgun to tank out the bug on the twinkie.
Tell them about the Twinkie.
04/27/09
The article is wonderful for what it is, but we are far far away from human application until people become less afraid of gene therapy again.
04/28/09
But this...all of this is academic.
04/28/09
04/28/09
And I agree, no one would use EMS to induce mutations in the hope it would turn on an inert gene. Who said anything about doing EMS? And since I assume you are talking about people here as you refer to "the subject", EMS does not create a virus (proteins themselves are not viruses), it is a mutagen, and will lead to either cell death or cancer because of it, it's more akin to Xray irridation.
But if you really are into this stuff, pubmed actually has a whole bunch of genetics books for free you can read into if you want to learn more, it's really neat stuff!
04/28/09
04/27/09
Seriously though - this is very cool news, if we don't all turn into spiders.
04/27/09
04/27/09
04/27/09
"TERN ON YUOR JUNK DNA AND WACH YOUR JUNK GROW 3112 PLEASE YOUR GIRL"
04/27/09
04/27/09
It would be very hard to outwit, unless the spammers are time travelers too.
04/27/09
04/27/09
04/27/09
04/27/09
04/28/09
Doesn't work that way. Any instances of extra limbs can usually be traced to some sort of chemically-induced mutation (like that whole "children of thalidamide" thing). Turning on unused DNA just shows up in other weird ways. For instance, people of African descent are known to be at high risk for sickle-cell anemia, but what is less commonly known is that the gene that increases that risk has a somewhat beneficial effect. It also makes the individual more resistant to malaria.
04/28/09
04/28/09
Resistent =/= immune. Just not "Hey, a mosquito just bit me...*thud*".