I love space porn. But I have a question. In the last 5 years or so, I have read multiple times how earth-based telescopes have gotten sharper and more powerful than the Hubble. If that is the case, why aren't we inundated with Interstellar money shots? It seems like Hubble is the Official photographer of all things cool.
I had a long reply, but it didn't come out right so I'll sum up as follows: other people are bitches... Also I think they are privately funded or held closer to the specific research institution.
@Log1c: If that's what's holding images back, I suppose this is one argument for sometimes having large spendy government-funded programs. You know, so all the rest of us can get off on space porn too.
@burlybax: its called the 'Hubble Spectrum'.
Oxygen is mapped to Blue, Hydrogen to Green and Sulfur to Red. Its a bit shifted from what their normal emissions are.
The imager takes one black and white picture with specific filters for each of the above wavelengths. The images are then given color and combined. Sometimes with pictures from other telescopes like CHANDRA for Xray emissions and other things.
@Dayburner: And that's what a gallery format should be for. But todays samples: "A Gallery of paragraphs of what I liked on last nights episode of Glee" (Gawker); "A Gallery of Intersting Examples of Joe Wilson being an Asshole" (Gawker); Fashin Week (Jezebel) - Okay, fashion week's legit.
@nozer: I feel like we're doing the same number of galleries as ever. Only thing that's new is now if I have 20 videos to post, I can put them up as a gallery, and it doesn't crash your browser -- I hope. Posts with 20 videos sometimes mess up people's browsers otherwise.
Still a little ticked off about how the Shuttle program put big delays in a lot of robot space science in the 1980s. Never put all your eggs in one basket.
It has nothing to do with space junk. The HST orbit's angle of inclination is a completely different angle from the ISS's orbit. That means that when they launch into the HST's orbit, there's no possible way that they could dock with the ISS. If something goes wrong during the launch, like foam critically damaging the Orbiter's tiles, they'll have no place to go and no way to get home. So they launch a rescue vehicle, but since they have no "safe haven" for the original crew to hang out at like the ISS, the rescue vehicle will need to be on the second pad, ready to go. Time will be of the essence. BTW, the last shuttle mission to NOT go to the ISS...Columbia.
@estapler: Well, yes, but there is a larger chance that they'll hit something in Hubble's orbit. I mean, they've gone up to that orbit before, without the ISS's existence to fall back on, and they've never prepped a second shuttle before.
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
11/06/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
I had a long reply, but it didn't come out right so I'll sum up as follows: other people are bitches... Also I think they are privately funded or held closer to the specific research institution.
09/11/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
Oxygen is mapped to Blue, Hydrogen to Green and Sulfur to Red. Its a bit shifted from what their normal emissions are.
The imager takes one black and white picture with specific filters for each of the above wavelengths. The images are then given color and combined. Sometimes with pictures from other telescopes like CHANDRA for Xray emissions and other things.
An excellent description of the complete process is here: [astroprofspage.com]
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
05/15/09
05/15/09
+ Watch video
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
It feels like the shuttles are a decade overdue for retirement and Space is still being explored with something that seemed high-tech in 1979.
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
04/14/09
04/18/09
04/14/09
MY SPACE PR0N SUPPLY MUST NOT BE COMPROMISED.
04/14/09
04/15/09