I enjoyed I Am Legend (the first half at least, I thought it did a good job portraying the desolate loneliness of the world) until I actually read the short story. I would have loved to see a movie that was actually based on I Am Legend. They've tried how many times now and failed to get it right?
If you like a story enough to make it into a movie, why change it so much that it's barely recognizable to the source material? Movies do this all the time and I'll never understand it.
I didn't mind Ozymandias. I thought his accent was kind of silly, but other than that, he was pretty spot on.
I liked the more stoic demeanor in the film's climax, to be honest. I always thought Veidt's "YES! I DID IT!" was unfitting for a man who always knew he would succeed, not to mention for a man who knew the world had paid a heavy price for its peace.
Ozymandias was a no win situation. There isn't an actor who could really embody everything he was supposed to be (natural athelete; smartest man in the world).
The only real life person I can think of who embodies that is Dolph Lundgren, and now that I've written that, I will be pissed that they didn't get him. Although Dolph isn't the greatest actor in the world.
Thank god for the relative anonymity of the internet.
@NerD: Blattella: I'd have a hard time thinking of Dolph as the smartest man in the world, but he definitely has the look. Right age, right physique, he even some what resembles the images from the comics.
@NerD: Blattella: No way. I vote Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson - he looks badass, and manages to play smart unexpectedly well. Unlike Dolph, who may be a brainfarm in real life, but always seems dumb as a post when he's acting.
I realize it barely counts as sci-fi, but Altman's Popeye had some of the best and worst casting. Robin Williams was not a good popeye, but Shelley Duvall was born to play Olive Oyl.
@Wookie1972: There've been worse versions of Holmes and its not like there aren't also dozens of other true-to-text interpretations of the character. It isn't like this one movie is going to erase all that.
@Gothamite88: Mebbe not, but for some this could be the first exposure to the character. I dread the idea that kids will put down the original stories because they don't have enough explosions.
@B1663R: Um, no. For someone who read the book a great many years ago, it is most defenitely not a 'good' movie. Unless 'good' is the new slang for 'kick in the junk'. Juan is supposed to be Philipino, Carl is a scientist (who dies in the raid on Pluto), not a psionic SS goon, AND THERE'S NO FRIGGIN' DROP CAPSULES OR POWERED ARMOR! I won't even get into the overall tone of the movie. This movie had all the faithfulness of 'I, Robot'.
And we don't discuss that Travolta... thing... before people have had a chance for their breakfast Scotch.
@AmishJohn: i don't want to be 'that guy' (ok fine it's like crack to me), but you're watching it wrong. the movie intentionally takes the characters and general situation of the original novel and thrusts them into the futuristic caricature of a fascist military state as a commentary on the book.
granted you do have a good point about the powered armor.
@tetracycloide: That makes it, in my book (pun intended) a crappy adaptation. Call it something else; it sure isn't ST.
Also, in the book, it didn't matter what form your service took; clerks and janitors were just as much citizens as soldiers. And "Non- Citizens" weren't exactly second class; the only thing they could not do was vote. And even the soldiers could, at any time, say 'enough', and resign.
@AmishJohn: No, what you were supposed to say was, "You're right -- if an individual isn't entitled to vote while others are, he or she is indeed a second-class citizen."
@AmishJohn: My take would be, good movie, bad adaptation of the book. If it wasn't called 'STARSHIP TROOPERS' it wouldn't have gotten half the criticism it's gotten over the years. Taken on its own merits, in full knowledge of how twisted Verhoeven is, it's actually a pretty decent flick. Especially casting Doogie Howser as a fascist telepath.
@tetracycloide: You say it was an intentional take on the book, but Verhoeven admits in the director's commentary that he never bothered reading the book. How do you make a commentary on a book you have never read? You are giving Verhoeven more credit than he deserves.
@tetracycloide: I didn't read the movies, but when I watched it (I might have been 13 or 14) I laughed my ass off and I saw it as a parody of military movies. Then I read the critics saying it was a fascist movie and I laughed even more.
Who thought, "Greek assassin? Let's get Jennifer Garner!"
I remember reading that someone involved with the production was trying to get Lucy Liu into the part, as she'd just finished some other action film and was fully trained. As terrible casting as it was, it could have been much, much worse.
@Bootknife-Jackson: Me to. One of my favorite films. I haven't read the book but i don't think that matters. The movie is incredible as is even thou it might not be the same thing as the book.
@Communist Pope: I don't know why but whenever Batman Forever is on TV I watch it. I love laughing at it and then crying when I realize it's a real movie. And then I cry again when I realize that it's being played on TV. And one more tear for the one person I know who likes it.
Why would you even bother to put Emma Frost in here? If you picked any character from Wolverine it should have been the Weapon 11/Deadpool crap.
I like Bicentennial Man, wasn't to awful and Daredevil was okay. The question that should be asked is why they decided to make Elektra it's own movie after Daredevil was shit on by everyone and their brother, her character included. I don't think Jennifer Garner should be in action movie, she is far too annoying.
@Makidian: yeah they definatly messed up with deadpool. "lets put the most smartass/funny character and make him mute". right there they shoulda stopped
@Makidian: How they destroyed Wade Wilson/Deadpool angered me for WEEKS. What was that awful Weapon XI they came up with? I mean, Ryan Reynolds brings the snark soo well and then to do THAT... what a waste.
Like others before me here, I like Bicentennial Man. The only "defect" I see with that movie is that it raised several interesting questions but didn't really answer them. Instead, it became a love story. Even then, however, it's a good movie and Williams did a great job, in my view.
Perhaps you (people in charge) should start a poll to see how many people like the movie, just for kicks. :)
@Jrsy Devil's Advocate®: Do you mean the classic Van Damme flick from 1994 that also starred Raul Julia, Ming Na & Kylie Minogue or that one they made this year with that chick who isn't as hot as she thinks ?
@Jrsy Devil's Advocate®: ahh but see, it' s not just a "classic" flick it's a "classic van damme" flick and as such you can only compare it to other classic van damme flicks like Universal Soldier.
11/23/09
If you like a story enough to make it into a movie, why change it so much that it's barely recognizable to the source material? Movies do this all the time and I'll never understand it.
11/23/09
I liked the more stoic demeanor in the film's climax, to be honest. I always thought Veidt's "YES! I DID IT!" was unfitting for a man who always knew he would succeed, not to mention for a man who knew the world had paid a heavy price for its peace.
11/21/09
11/21/09
The only real life person I can think of who embodies that is Dolph Lundgren, and now that I've written that, I will be pissed that they didn't get him. Although Dolph isn't the greatest actor in the world.
Thank god for the relative anonymity of the internet.
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/22/09
11/22/09
11/22/09
11/23/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/22/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/21/09
"We're making a movie; and all we're gonna use from the book is the character names, and perhaps 3 lines of backstory..."
11/21/09
11/21/09
And we don't discuss that Travolta... thing... before people have had a chance for their breakfast Scotch.
11/21/09
granted you do have a good point about the powered armor.
11/21/09
Also, in the book, it didn't matter what form your service took; clerks and janitors were just as much citizens as soldiers. And "Non- Citizens" weren't exactly second class; the only thing they could not do was vote. And even the soldiers could, at any time, say 'enough', and resign.
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/22/09
11/22/09
11/23/09
@dirk anger: it's absolutely a parody of violent, military films. i don't see how anyone could possibly come to any other conclusion to be honest.
11/23/09
11/21/09
I remember reading that someone involved with the production was trying to get Lucy Liu into the part, as she'd just finished some other action film and was fully trained. As terrible casting as it was, it could have been much, much worse.
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
#calendar
11/21/09
#calendar
11/21/09
11/22/09
11/21/09
I like Bicentennial Man, wasn't to awful and Daredevil was okay. The question that should be asked is why they decided to make Elektra it's own movie after Daredevil was shit on by everyone and their brother, her character included. I don't think Jennifer Garner should be in action movie, she is far too annoying.
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
Perhaps you (people in charge) should start a poll to see how many people like the movie, just for kicks. :)
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
YOU LOSE THIS BATTLE, MEREDITH! BWAH HA HA HA HA!!!!
11/21/09
Meredith, how about a follow up article on Live-Action versions of video games? I vote Street Fighter as number 1 on that list.
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/21/09
11/20/09
You know who else kicked ass in Alias?
Isabella Rossellini.
11/21/09
11/21/09