just a comment from an urbanist: there's a difference between built environment and the society that inhibits it (although you can see it as combine function) - the social aspects are reflections of the built environment (and vice versa) but one should be careful to correlate them in a one-dimensional way. seeing either or both together as technology is a singular viewpoint; it's an engineer's viewpoint. for others, cities are anything from artifact to, well, text, and can be "read" in different ways. interesting to see that bruce uses the past tense in the sentence i'm referring to. in any case, one core idea of the city is proximity, and people will need that in the future too, even if it takes on other, new shapes. or they'll cease being people. my two cents. love the future metro series!
Well, Jeff VanderMeer knows what he's talking about. His Ambergris, the City of Saints and Madmen is one of the most fascinating cities I've seen in speculative fiction. It's at the same time infuriating and pleasant to know that he'll probably never reveal all its secrets.
I think that there is a lack of historical buildings in future city-scapes. So many old buildings gain that vaunted "historical" status that they can never be torn down/modified in exterior appearance.
I can't imagine a Coruscant type city-scape, that totally displaces these structures. A group of 10 citizens will stop it from happening.
@Ruthless, If you let me: In the case of Coruscant it seems stranger that there are no *new* buildings. The Jedi Temple is apparently thousands of years old, yet its architecture doesn't seem significantly different from the rest of the city. The implication seems to be that now new buildings have been made in a millennia.
@Ruthless, If you let me: Those sorts of cities really only appear after wars. Rotterdam, in the Netherlands, was essentially flattened by the Nazis. With no historical sites to work around, the city is almost surreal in the quantity of glass and modern architecture it contains. It's not that any one building is notably exceptional, although there are a few. Instead, the unremitting expanse of skyscrapers, plazas and modern art make walking through the city unlike any other I've been to.
I think it's important to remember, too, how economic realities affect the organization of a city--the banks are here because they want to be near the marketplace which is here, which is where it is for god only knows what reason, probably because it was the flattest part of the are six hundred years ago, and it's where all the cows stopped to graze.
@Belabras ate my dingo!: Don't be too ashamed. I was an English major and I'm reading them. It's not a meal, just a very, very enjoyable, cheese-like snack. Enjoy!
@Belabras ate my dingo!: IRL she's charming as all get-out, and funny and sweet and very authentically Southern. And genuinely surprised and thrilled to have such a big hit.
@Will Nickelson: Well this wasn't just a True Blood gig. At the beginning there was Amanda Tapping and her Daniel Jackson clone from Sanctuary. I am more curious about who to bald dude in the hat following Claudia was. Its sad, but I watched that video just to see what you were talking about.
So how many works of "literature" take place in a series of alternate worlds?
I'm not trying to start a fight. Well, not the one you think I am. It just seems that if SF gets labeled as literature, those that do the labeling always come up with reasons why it isn't SF. Why can't it be both? 1984, Brave New World, Farenheit 451 are all SF and literature, but I sometimes see people saying they are not. The main thrust of the argument is usually that they can't be SF because they are literature. Basically they are insulting the SF community by saying that anything good couldn't be SF and that bothers me.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: Lit snobbery and ghetto pride aside, the big problem is that too many people try to seriously define razor sharp borders between one kind of writing and another. Useless pursuit, like herding cats. The phrase "difference without distinction" comes to mind.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: Standard literature is generally concerned with people's relationships with people, precisely drawn characters, social relationships. Of course this comes in an intensely large number of varieties.
Science fiction or speculative fiction is generally seen as being concerned with how a particular THING, or an IDEA reacts on a character or system of characters. There's no particular border other than the vaguest. What's the difference between "fiction" and "historical fiction"? Well.... it's probably the "historical" part. It's not ghettoizing it, that's just what its nature is.
When I rule the world good authors will have a free house and monthly allowance as long as they continue to write decent stuff. I will even be lenient on how quickly they have to finish books. And all those unhelpful-help department people will be beaten with bats by the people they put on hold for hours. And the channel that is supposed to show Science Fiction will SHOW science fiction. And every person will be granted one 2 week cruise or stay in resort a year (they can to cover costs to departure port). And there is other stuff but I want you to like me and make me your leader so I will say nothing of harvesting human brains for my super computer and stealing people's life forces to make myself immortal. Drat. You will forget that last bit. I COMMAND IT.
@Grey_Area: Check the desks of most modern publishing houses and most literary agents. There are still way, way more people writing standard literature than there are writing sci fi or spec lit, even though those genres have grown over the past decade. Add to that the fact that the audience for spec/sci fi lit has grown while that of standard literature has declined, and I think you'll find that on average, a science fiction author makes a bit more money than a standard lit author.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
I can't imagine a Coruscant type city-scape, that totally displaces these structures. A group of 10 citizens will stop it from happening.
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
Which explains the entire layout of Boston.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
bring on the blood,sex,and intersting stories
09/11/09
09/11/09
That said, I think it's charming that Harris is just a nice older lady who writes about vampires and telepaths.
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/08/09
I'm not trying to start a fight. Well, not the one you think I am. It just seems that if SF gets labeled as literature, those that do the labeling always come up with reasons why it isn't SF. Why can't it be both? 1984, Brave New World, Farenheit 451 are all SF and literature, but I sometimes see people saying they are not. The main thrust of the argument is usually that they can't be SF because they are literature. Basically they are insulting the SF community by saying that anything good couldn't be SF and that bothers me.
09/08/09
09/08/09
Science fiction or speculative fiction is generally seen as being concerned with how a particular THING, or an IDEA reacts on a character or system of characters. There's no particular border other than the vaguest. What's the difference between "fiction" and "historical fiction"? Well.... it's probably the "historical" part. It's not ghettoizing it, that's just what its nature is.
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
This makes me kind of sad.
If his culture output hasn't put him up for life by now, where is SF really in the grand scheme of things?
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
09/08/09
Selfishly, I'd be happy if all he ever turned out were Culture novels. I'm sad that I have no more to read of that world. :-(
09/08/09
09/08/09
[www.amazon.com]
09/08/09
09/08/09