@Rocketknight: No, you're not at all... It saddens me. I loved Spectacular Spider-man and still watch it multiple times a week. I also loved the first season of Wolverine and the X-men. Now Marvel has to do this... It's a shame, really...
But onto what I was originally planning to post. The movie Mandarin should be a serious version of Lo Pan... It would be fantastic!
@Cal Hawks: I don't care much for Wolverine and the X-men either. Steven Blum just can't do Wolverine's voice. I like the X-Men: Evolution voice actor better.
Spectacular Spider-Man is awesome, though. The guy who does Spider-Man's voice in that cartoon should do his voice in every scene where he's a kid. If it's a movie, they should just dub his voice over the kid version. #ironman
@Rocketknight: I dunno, I like Steve Blum, though Scott McNeil was better... I just love the whole feel of Wolverine and the X-Men... And I can't wait for their attempts to prevent the Age of Apocalypse in season two. #ironman
I've been watching ARMORED ADVENTURES since I stumbled across it last spring and it's easily the best Marvel animated show yet. One would think that going "teen" would dumb it down, but it's the smartest show of its kind, and going "teen" breathed far more fresh air into the character than the movie did. The spins taken on most of the established characters works far more than they don't. Even the SMALLVILLE-esque spin on The Mandarin is a fun twist.
FYI - Walmart is selling the first volume for about $10. #ironman
@Allen_Richards: I've been watching both Iron Man: Armored Adventures and the Spectacular Spiderman.
Spectacular Spiderman blows it out of the water. At least in my opinion.
IM:AM just sort of took the relationships we were familiar with and "downsized" them to be kids or younger.
Spectacular Spider-Man is actually playing with the audience's expectations of what they're going to see in a Spider-Man cartoon (including readers of the comics, watchers of the original animated show, and the films) and screws with them in interesting ways.
Not to mention, it probably handles the Symbiote saga better than any other adaptation of it I've seen. #ironman
@DRaGZ: I enjoy SSP, and like you find number of the twists refreshing, especially the Symbiote and the Green Goblin, but for me it doesn't come close to the more intricate relationships found in IM:AA. The characters are more well-rounded and fleshed out, and at the end of the day doesn't feel as "cartoony" as SSP. Despite both shows having a TV7 rating, IM:AA feels more adult. Despite it being fantasy, the sense of reality applied to the heavies appeals to me as well. #ironman
@Allen_Richards: Well, this is probably where our opinions fundamentally differ.
IM:AA follows a trend Marvel has been doing lately in trying to make everything "realer". There's nothing wrong with this, after all this is how Stan Lee and co. helped revitalize the comic books industry by creating characters with flaws, but if you take it too far you get a weird juxtaposition of the very real with the fantastical which stops working.
This is unlike the Dark Knight film which goes out of its way to emphasis the fact that what Batman and the Joker is doing is crazy and against the norm of reality. But Marvel hasn't really addressed this, it's sort of just..."hey it's real and here's craziness from fantasy now I hope they mix together okay". Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. In essence, it only really works when the two parts remain separate because once you see real-life things crossing over with this fantastical world, you get all sorts of plot holes and you lose a suspension of disbelief. It's like when they decided to put 9/11 in the Spider-Man comic: where the hell were all these superheroes that could've easily stopped this mess? And why is this issue of such vast importance over all the other ridiculous world-threatening things that have happened before?
On the other hand, the editors and writers at DC embrace the absurdity of the fantasy of their universe and actually try to bring it out, make their characters less connected to reality because, let's face it, it's hard to put real-world problems in perspective with a superhero that can destroy cities in seconds. So it ends up like a Greek mythology, something you can't really relate to on a personal level but is mysterious and intriguing to analyze.
This is kind of what Spectacular Spider-Man is doing, I think. It introduces elements from many different sources and plays with a "mythologist's" expectations. It's sort of like what the story of God of War did on a smaller level: it used elements from a mythology but construed them to fit itself and to play with a viewer's expectations.
On the other hand, I concede that the "realness" is part of what makes Spectacular Spider-Man more believable than IM:AA. Since Tony Stark is so damn rich, there's no real good reason for him to continue going to school, i.e. the fantastical situation of being rich and supersmart negates any proper explanation of why going to school is necessary (a similar problem arose in X-Men Evolution). On the other hand, since Peter Parker is so down to Earth, kinda poor and still able to benefit from an education, it makes sense why he still goes to school.
LOL! It's all good. It's nice to read impassioned posts with actual viewpoints - it opens up some interesting discussions. While you and I are obviously at opposite ends of the spectrum concerning what we like to get out of our animated comic book programming, I would never go call SSP "bad." It's probably the most enjoyable SP since & HIS AMAZING FRIENDS. Again, for me it all comes down to the characters, and IM:AA just has more depth, and that's not to say SSP doesn't have any, just that I prefer how IM:AA uses that depth to explore the established characters in their teenage counterparts.
I haven't watched the current X-MEN show, but it just doesn't look appealing. Based on the IM and SSP I tuned into the new F4 and quickly tuned out. It's utterly dreadful, containing none of what either you or I enjoy from our respective favorites. #ironman
@Allen_Richards: Yeah, Wolverine and the X-Men is clearly a ploy to push forward a character that Marvel has been seeking to whore out lately. From what I've seen, it manages to put a new spin on old stories but somehow make them feel old and overdone.
And, like I said, I do enjoy IM:AA as well. IM:AA and Spectacular Spider-Man are both fine shows. It's actually nice to see how far these kinds of shows have come along. I remember being impressed by the original Spider-Man series or the original Iron Man series as a kid, and now I realize just how much better these shows have gotten, sort of out of necessity in order to both appease a new generation and to satisfy the more seasoned palattes of those who remember those old shows.
And then you look at shows like Batman: TAS and the rest of the DCAU that followed and just go "man, these Marvel cartoons have finally caught up". Even though those earlier DCAU shows were a little rough around the edges, the writing was just so...damn good. That one episode of Batman: TAS where Joker, Two-Face, Penguin, Poison Ivy, and Killer Croc are discussing their various plots to kill Batman at a poker game is still one of my favorite animated anythings of all time. Makes you wonder how Bruce Timm and Paul Dini were so dang far ahead of the curve. #ironman
So, is this a Michael Moorcock Ironman crossover, where he fights Arioch? Or is he going to Middle Earth to fight Sauron? What the hell is that?
And is Ironman going to do nothing but fight other armored guys now? That's be like making Batman movies where he fought nothing but nocturnal-animal inspired villains. Mansquitos. Flying Squirrel Man. ManBat. It would get old pretty quick. #ironman
As a literary character, he is basically written to be unkillable and unstoppable, yet not a Mary Sue because he is always struggling along the way.
It's an interesting trend I've noticed that whenever you throw Batman in a group of superheroes Batman always becomes the most pivotal character (except in the case of Prometheus, where it turned out Superman was the only character Prometheus couldn't defeat for some reason). #ironman
The show is excellent. It has solid characterizations and ongoing plot threads that use very much of the Marvel Universe. A recent episode was the cumulation of quite a few threads involving The Living Laser being acquired by The Ghost for AIM to activate MODOK who then revealed one AIM agent was still working on The Controller discs. Oh, and then Tony called in Nick Fury and SHIELD for whom he just discovered his father made weapons which disappointed him.
It's just a matter of accepting IT'S NOT THE COMIC BOOK. Like the movie it only uses the book as source material, not gospel that must be followed to the letter.
@AngriestGeek: Just like every other Marvel movie change (except Spider-Man, which back-dated his "natural webs" into the comic), I view a movie as an "alternate universe" version of the same characters. Not the same, not better (definitely!), just different. Like the Ultimate Universe...same people, new and different stories. Still would like to see a Marvel movie that was 100% "canon," though. #ironman
@Howard Blair: But it never could be. Books are not films. It's a different medium with different requirements. I mean, Shakespeare gets changed, Pulitzer Prize winning novels get changed, so it's a bit much to think that Spider-Man #178 isn't going to get changed. One good thing about them utterly changing the setting of Iron Man is that immediately jettison that burden. Since it's so clearly NOT the comic, they're free to do what they want. #ironman
@AngriestGeek: Best theme song ever? I don't think so. Spectacular Spiderman's is so good, I don't even fast forward through it when I watch it on Tivo. #ironman
@Abdiel: It's good ("Spectacular, spectacular...") but Rooney's song just rocks. And I never fast forward through it either. It's even on my iPod. #ironman
@Abdiel: It's good ("Spectacular, spectacular...") but Rooney's song just rocks. And I never fast forward through it either. It's even on my iPod. #ironman
I know I stopped reading because of the crossover overkill. I'll pick up trades but I'm not putting out 20 dollars a week to still miss parts of a story.
If marvel wants to start making money introduce the writers you have exclusives with to the larger world. Three stories begging for any kind of live action are Criminal, Powers and the Hood (yes I know BKV isn't tired down by marvel.) They aren't tired IPs that everyone already knows. #disneymarvel
As a former financial specialist, economist, and still a fulltime comic fan, I sold my stake in marvel the day this deal was announced. The next few movies are still outside of the mouses house. So while there is no doubt that disney will market the crap out of every marvel brand imaginable and make some good coin, I don't see marvel doing much better.
The movies are hit and miss. For every spiderman, there is spiderman 2 and 3. 3 being the one that might have killed the franchise. For every Ironman there is Punisher and Elektra.
If they can avoid cheap productions running roughshod over decent titles, they will be ok. #disneymarvel
@HarbingerTG: Clearly, The Mouse House was in this for the IPs. I think the big issue is how much the litigation is going to cost them securing those IPs (considering how slapdash many of the contracts were), and how many properties they're going to lose/payouts to creators. Disney bought Marvel for such a high price relative to their P/E ratio that they're in this for the long haul... #disneymarvel
@PVIII: Well, IIRC, MVL was hovering near 40/share before the economy tanked so it isn't a bad call. There is so much IP they can monetize along with banana montana and the clonas bros.
And if memory serves correctly. Marvel borrowed money from itself to open their studios with 10-20 lesser titles as collateral. I still haven't figured out how they pulled that off.
I also believe some MVL shareholders petitioned to stop the buyout, but I don't know where that case is currently standing. #disneymarvel
I don't think this is really that big of a deal or should be a massive surprise.
Marvel's film branch is going to be a bigger cash cow and more popular than the original comics imprint.
Any year where they don't have any significant major film releases is naturally going to mean a lack of interest in their books and merchandising compared to a year that had 2 major movie releases.
We're still in the lull period before their ambitious cinematic gameplan starts to play out with Iron Man 2, then Thor, Captain America, Avengers, etc.
When that happens Marvel's worth could jump well past what they saw last year. Which is probably why investors wouldn't be too worried too as today the stock is still pretty much the same level as it was since the Disney buyout.
Graeme, I think you're more in the right about how big a part the movies are in the Marvel brand now; even having X-Men Origins : Wolverine in theaters is worth more than all of their comics put together.
While they will try to continue and keep the comic book end profitable with the cross-overs and big events, I think Marvel's best bet money-wise is to use the comics as a platform to develop new IPs for movies and video games - i.e. Runaways.
@Brian St. Claire: Since X-Men Origins: Wolverine was developed by Fox, I can't imagine how Marvel made money off of it, especially since those same people who saw itaren't going to go out and buy the comic after watching that abortion of a movie. #disneymarvel
You better not mean Incredible Hulk. That movie was good.
Also, why is the Hulk the first of the Marvel film series' to embrace alternate comic titles for movie sequels?
I think the Amazing Spider-Man or The Uncanny X-Men or Invincible Iron Man would have been great titles for those series instead of the usual numeric markings.
Plus, how cool would it have been if the movie posters paid better homage to classic covers from their respective series? (Spider-Man especially!)
Missed opportunities across the board if you ask me. #disneymarvel
@AldoraGreel: I rather they just gave the movies title's that corresponded with the film's specific plot or theme. In the same way an overarching comic story has a single name.
I think Batman Begins and Dark Knight sort of fit into that, although I was kinda disappointed that it wasn't "Batman: Begins" and "Batman: The Dark Knight", if only for cataloging purposes. #disneymarvel
For all its pretensions, nothing reminded you more that BSG had its feet in cheesy science fiction than the fact that hot robot women (blonde and asian, of course) continuously like to get it on with considerably less attractive men. Notice how no hot robot women wanted say, Apollo. #ironman2
11/05/09
11/05/09
But onto what I was originally planning to post. The movie Mandarin should be a serious version of Lo Pan... It would be fantastic!
11/06/09
Spectacular Spider-Man is awesome, though. The guy who does Spider-Man's voice in that cartoon should do his voice in every scene where he's a kid. If it's a movie, they should just dub his voice over the kid version. #ironman
11/06/09
11/05/09
FYI - Walmart is selling the first volume for about $10. #ironman
11/05/09
Spectacular Spiderman blows it out of the water. At least in my opinion.
IM:AM just sort of took the relationships we were familiar with and "downsized" them to be kids or younger.
Spectacular Spider-Man is actually playing with the audience's expectations of what they're going to see in a Spider-Man cartoon (including readers of the comics, watchers of the original animated show, and the films) and screws with them in interesting ways.
Not to mention, it probably handles the Symbiote saga better than any other adaptation of it I've seen. #ironman
11/05/09
11/05/09
IM:AA follows a trend Marvel has been doing lately in trying to make everything "realer". There's nothing wrong with this, after all this is how Stan Lee and co. helped revitalize the comic books industry by creating characters with flaws, but if you take it too far you get a weird juxtaposition of the very real with the fantastical which stops working.
This is unlike the Dark Knight film which goes out of its way to emphasis the fact that what Batman and the Joker is doing is crazy and against the norm of reality. But Marvel hasn't really addressed this, it's sort of just..."hey it's real and here's craziness from fantasy now I hope they mix together okay". Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. In essence, it only really works when the two parts remain separate because once you see real-life things crossing over with this fantastical world, you get all sorts of plot holes and you lose a suspension of disbelief. It's like when they decided to put 9/11 in the Spider-Man comic: where the hell were all these superheroes that could've easily stopped this mess? And why is this issue of such vast importance over all the other ridiculous world-threatening things that have happened before?
On the other hand, the editors and writers at DC embrace the absurdity of the fantasy of their universe and actually try to bring it out, make their characters less connected to reality because, let's face it, it's hard to put real-world problems in perspective with a superhero that can destroy cities in seconds. So it ends up like a Greek mythology, something you can't really relate to on a personal level but is mysterious and intriguing to analyze.
This is kind of what Spectacular Spider-Man is doing, I think. It introduces elements from many different sources and plays with a "mythologist's" expectations. It's sort of like what the story of God of War did on a smaller level: it used elements from a mythology but construed them to fit itself and to play with a viewer's expectations.
On the other hand, I concede that the "realness" is part of what makes Spectacular Spider-Man more believable than IM:AA. Since Tony Stark is so damn rich, there's no real good reason for him to continue going to school, i.e. the fantastical situation of being rich and supersmart negates any proper explanation of why going to school is necessary (a similar problem arose in X-Men Evolution). On the other hand, since Peter Parker is so down to Earth, kinda poor and still able to benefit from an education, it makes sense why he still goes to school.
Wow, I just ranted for a moment there.
11/05/09
LOL! It's all good. It's nice to read impassioned posts with actual viewpoints - it opens up some interesting discussions. While you and I are obviously at opposite ends of the spectrum concerning what we like to get out of our animated comic book programming, I would never go call SSP "bad." It's probably the most enjoyable SP since & HIS AMAZING FRIENDS. Again, for me it all comes down to the characters, and IM:AA just has more depth, and that's not to say SSP doesn't have any, just that I prefer how IM:AA uses that depth to explore the established characters in their teenage counterparts.
I haven't watched the current X-MEN show, but it just doesn't look appealing. Based on the IM and SSP I tuned into the new F4 and quickly tuned out. It's utterly dreadful, containing none of what either you or I enjoy from our respective favorites. #ironman
11/05/09
And, like I said, I do enjoy IM:AA as well. IM:AA and Spectacular Spider-Man are both fine shows. It's actually nice to see how far these kinds of shows have come along. I remember being impressed by the original Spider-Man series or the original Iron Man series as a kid, and now I realize just how much better these shows have gotten, sort of out of necessity in order to both appease a new generation and to satisfy the more seasoned palattes of those who remember those old shows.
And then you look at shows like Batman: TAS and the rest of the DCAU that followed and just go "man, these Marvel cartoons have finally caught up". Even though those earlier DCAU shows were a little rough around the edges, the writing was just so...damn good. That one episode of Batman: TAS where Joker, Two-Face, Penguin, Poison Ivy, and Killer Croc are discussing their various plots to kill Batman at a poker game is still one of my favorite animated anythings of all time. Makes you wonder how Bruce Timm and Paul Dini were so dang far ahead of the curve. #ironman
11/05/09
And is Ironman going to do nothing but fight other armored guys now? That's be like making Batman movies where he fought nothing but nocturnal-animal inspired villains. Mansquitos. Flying Squirrel Man. ManBat. It would get old pretty quick. #ironman
11/05/09
11/05/09
As a literary character, he is basically written to be unkillable and unstoppable, yet not a Mary Sue because he is always struggling along the way.
It's an interesting trend I've noticed that whenever you throw Batman in a group of superheroes Batman always becomes the most pivotal character (except in the case of Prometheus, where it turned out Superman was the only character Prometheus couldn't defeat for some reason). #ironman
11/05/09
"YOU'RE A LOOSE CANNON BATMAN!! I want your cowl and your grappling gun."
BATMAN: 70's Detective! #ironman
11/05/09
It's just a matter of accepting IT'S NOT THE COMIC BOOK. Like the movie it only uses the book as source material, not gospel that must be followed to the letter.
And it has the best theme song ever;
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! #ironman
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
If marvel wants to start making money introduce the writers you have exclusives with to the larger world. Three stories begging for any kind of live action are Criminal, Powers and the Hood (yes I know BKV isn't tired down by marvel.) They aren't tired IPs that everyone already knows. #disneymarvel
11/03/09
The movies are hit and miss. For every spiderman, there is spiderman 2 and 3. 3 being the one that might have killed the franchise. For every Ironman there is Punisher and Elektra.
If they can avoid cheap productions running roughshod over decent titles, they will be ok. #disneymarvel
11/03/09
11/03/09
And if memory serves correctly. Marvel borrowed money from itself to open their studios with 10-20 lesser titles as collateral. I still haven't figured out how they pulled that off.
I also believe some MVL shareholders petitioned to stop the buyout, but I don't know where that case is currently standing. #disneymarvel
11/03/09
Marvel's film branch is going to be a bigger cash cow and more popular than the original comics imprint.
Any year where they don't have any significant major film releases is naturally going to mean a lack of interest in their books and merchandising compared to a year that had 2 major movie releases.
We're still in the lull period before their ambitious cinematic gameplan starts to play out with Iron Man 2, then Thor, Captain America, Avengers, etc.
When that happens Marvel's worth could jump well past what they saw last year. Which is probably why investors wouldn't be too worried too as today the stock is still pretty much the same level as it was since the Disney buyout.
11/03/09
While they will try to continue and keep the comic book end profitable with the cross-overs and big events, I think Marvel's best bet money-wise is to use the comics as a platform to develop new IPs for movies and video games - i.e. Runaways.
(Where IS my Runaways movie, anyway?) #disneymarvel
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/03/09
11/04/09
11/03/09
Also, why is the Hulk the first of the Marvel film series' to embrace alternate comic titles for movie sequels?
I think the Amazing Spider-Man or The Uncanny X-Men or Invincible Iron Man would have been great titles for those series instead of the usual numeric markings.
Plus, how cool would it have been if the movie posters paid better homage to classic covers from their respective series? (Spider-Man especially!)
Missed opportunities across the board if you ask me. #disneymarvel
11/03/09
I think Batman Begins and Dark Knight sort of fit into that, although I was kinda disappointed that it wasn't "Batman: Begins" and "Batman: The Dark Knight", if only for cataloging purposes. #disneymarvel
11/03/09
Sigh. #disneymarvel
11/03/09
10/19/09
I think we need to cram a few more genres in there. #ironman2
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
In Space!!! #ironman2
10/19/09
How about making it a musical? #ironman2
10/19/09
10/19/09
Can I buy tickets for the sequel now too? (yes that was a double tap)
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
10/19/09
Nothing ruins a geek fantasy like a cold splash of reality. #ironman2
10/19/09
10/19/09
It's just geek wish fulfillment and I get it, but it's funny next to analogies for Palestine. #ironman2
10/19/09
tigh was a robot himself so i dont know if that fits.
and caville as well was a robot. and 8s were pretty damned easy on the show. sharon models were pretty much just giving it away. #ironman2
10/19/09