Wow, this gush really makes me doubt io9's brains. I suppose I'll reserve final judgment until I'm drunk and at someone's house watching the Crank Yank 2: We Have Zero Ideas DVD, but the first film was just awful - classic jumpcut-no-story insulting idiocy that wasn't even worth watching in a "just fucking show me some stupid explosions" state.
I'm finding it really hard to believe that there's anything worth wasting time on in the sequel. But, ok...maybe someday I'll find myself in front of it and change my mind. Hope to hell not, though.
@mediareport: I think you have to take it as what it is. I mean, if you go in expecting a mainstream movie that adheres to traditional standards of craft, you're going to be disappointed. But it seems like the directors are intentionally aiming for classic jump-cut, no-story, insulting idiocy. As the A.V. Club says, in a review that's similar in tone to Annalee's: "It'd be silly to call Crank: High Voltage over the top: The top is so far below that it isn't even visible."
I dunno. I kinda liked the first one (and apparently enough other people did to warrant a sequel). It was ridiculous, but so much so that I felt like the directors were winking at us. It struck some kind of thoughtful chord in me, and it was a hell of a lot more memorable than a lot of the other movies I've seen in the past few years.
@Plague: "This drinking of beer at parties makes me seriously doubt your brains. I mean, beer is known to kill precious, precious brain cells. I have so many brain cells because I simply do not partake in beer. Also it lowers your inhibitions. Who knows, drinking beer might result in you making out with a woman! THE HORROR."
@alphanumeric1971: @Belabras Ate My Baby!: I'm glad I'm not the only one who enjoys Statham!! I know we are supposed to dislike these popcorn movies, but I have enjoyed every Statham movie that I have seen (haven't seen name of the king)
Ok...so...um...I don't know that there is a way to put this delicately, but according to IMDB she is 42 years old. How is that possible? How can she possibly...I mean...look at her...but 42? I'm stymied.
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
Next time try to actually watch the trailer and not just read the headline before you voice your reply ;)
Or shut yo mouth your ignorance is showing...
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
05/11/09
Who am I kidding. I'm still gonna see it.
05/11/09
Norks?
04/18/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
I'm finding it really hard to believe that there's anything worth wasting time on in the sequel. But, ok...maybe someday I'll find myself in front of it and change my mind. Hope to hell not, though.
04/17/09
I dunno. I kinda liked the first one (and apparently enough other people did to warrant a sequel). It was ridiculous, but so much so that I felt like the directors were winking at us. It struck some kind of thoughtful chord in me, and it was a hell of a lot more memorable than a lot of the other movies I've seen in the past few years.
04/17/09
I bet you're a real hoot a parties.
04/17/09
"Clearly the film makers are not aware that the heart is controlled by tightly regulated electrical pulses that tell it when to beat."
"..." * www.sadtrombone.com *
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
Hmm I hadn't really connected the names but are you the same person who wrote "Trannychaser"? [www.nerve.com]
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/17/09
04/15/09
"Corey Haim...
...He was so grateful to be back at work after all of this time"
Ha! ouch.
And even though he had a small part - Dwight Yoakam was really funny in the last one, glad to see he's back too.
04/15/09
04/14/09
This replaces plot, and characterization. I will be there opening day with a big bag of popcorn.
04/14/09
04/15/09
04/14/09
Even though it sounds like vampire, the way they do these movies it could be very comedic.
04/08/09
btw, what the hell is that hanging from her shorts in that pic? is that a satin holster?
04/08/09
04/08/09