io9 
Enter your username and password.
San Francisco, 1:16 PM
Sun Nov 8
11 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors: tips@io9.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz | Email
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders | Email
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner | Email
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis | Email
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan | Email
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier | Email
Ed Grabianowski | Email
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan | Email
Lauren Davis | Email
Chris Hsiang | Email
Lynn Peril | Email
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins | Email
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox | Email
Interns:
Tim Barribeau | Email
Julia Carusillo | Email
Alex Eichler | Email
Cyriaque Lamar | Email
Caitlin Petrakovitz | Email
Mary Ratliff | Email
Josh Snyder | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
07/30/09
Hi, I'm Wood, I wrote it (you know that), and Ed, thank you. With that line, I feel completely affirmed, because you went right to the heart of what I was writing about.
Thanks for the wonderful review. Seriously.
07/30/09
07/30/09
It already is.
07/30/09
There is an actual equation for this.
iA=nRT
The variables are:
T = Absolute Time Spent Altered
R = Robotic Constant which is 8.314472 JK^(−1)mol^(−1) in SI units
n = Amount of cybernetic enhancements (usually measured in moles)
A = Awesomeness (nuff said)
i = Indifference (conversely, inhumanity)
As you can see hear, the amount of cybernetic material in a subject is directly proportional to how awesome said subject is at time of study. As a side effect, the subject's Inhumanity rises but Inhumanity holds the same value as the Indifference such a kick ass subject should feel knowing that they can jump higher than anyone else at the party.
:) I like Thursday.
07/30/09
07/30/09
11/01/08
11/01/08