If any of us actually get to space and see some of the things we've seen pictures of, we'll be most likely disappointed that everything is not colorized like the photos we've seen. Not that I wouldn't take my chances...
@Gearhead_42: So you credit the variation to non-universal laws of physics, instead of the mundane possibility that each planet has unique conditions that lead to different results but follow the same universal rules?
@Gearhead_42: Nothing more depressing than a joke you have to explain...
A Universal Law (of physics, in this case) is one that, regardless of the position in the universe at which it is applied, has a similar (if not identical) effect. Yes?
To apply the term to a Law of Physics implies that the physics in question are universal and therefore unaffected by location or conditions.
If, then, you (meaning the scientist quoted above) state that the physics of a situation are unique to that location in space they can not, by definition, be universal.
@Gearhead_42: You are correct in saying that scientist's statement implies non-universal physics. I wouldn't though, "throw the statement in the face of those who insist that physics is universal". You are also correct in that a universal law has the same effect regardless of position, but you are confusing effect with result. The law of gravity has the same effect everywhere in the universe we have observed, but will have a drastically different result depending on if you are standing in chicago, or a black hole.
11/15/08
11/14/08
11/14/08
[en.wikipedia.org]
11/14/08
11/14/08
11/14/08
11/15/08
11/14/08
I so want to throw this statement in the face of those who insist that physics is universal...
11/14/08
11/14/08
11/14/08
11/14/08
I think it's the EM shroud for an alien base. Screw physics! (not really).
11/14/08
11/14/08
A Universal Law (of physics, in this case) is one that, regardless of the position in the universe at which it is applied, has a similar (if not identical) effect. Yes?
To apply the term to a Law of Physics implies that the physics in question are universal and therefore unaffected by location or conditions.
If, then, you (meaning the scientist quoted above) state that the physics of a situation are unique to that location in space they can not, by definition, be universal.
Or is my logic hopelessly flawed?
11/14/08
11/14/08
I resign.
11/14/08
11/15/08