San Francisco, 8:41 AM
Tue Dec 1
28 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
Charlie, I think you're judging this woman too harshly. She didn't ask for a way to *stop* the kid from reading sci-fi (as you suggest), but only for a way to "expand his horizons to include other genres." I think hers is a valid point of view.
Inclusion of other genres does not have to be at the exclusion of sci-fi.
My favorite thought about kids reading is actually from the Ghostbusters animated series, where Ray is describing his reading habits as a child and his parent's reaction to them.
Apparently he only read comic books, but his parents were just so grateful he was reading at all that they encouraged it. That's the key for non-geek moms and dads: just be grateful your kid reads, never mind complaining about his choice of genre.
Whenever I read something like this, I realize that I was lucky enough to have a really really good high school English curriculum. We had a good mix of "mainstream" and speculative fiction.
Every year we read one play by Shakespeare, along with one or two other books. On year it was To Kill A Mockingbird and Oliver Twist, and another year it was Wuthering Heights. One year it was even Frankenstein and Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde back to back.
But what I remember most was the year we were asked to read 1984 and Brave New World.
We spent that whole year talking about conformity and Utopian & Dystopian societies, and the language of persuasion and deception.
The first Gulf War was going on at the time, and we examined some of the language the newspaper journalists were using. American troops were called "Our boys" and "G.I.'s" and that sort of thing, while Iraqi soldiers were called "Angry hordes of death," and things like that.
More than any other subject, all the English teachers I had really made me think. I only wish I'd paid more attention.
@Anekanta: This is completely another topic for another day but I've always felt that HS English classes could do with a good shakeup. I feel like they've been reading the same books for thirty years and whislt a lot of those are great books I wish there'd be a push to include more sci-fi or fantasy. About all I remember is in 7th grade we read The Hobbit (and then for an extra credit assignment/love of The Hobbit I read Lord of the Rings)... and that was it if you exclude the Shakespeare stuff we did (the only two fantasy ones we did being The Tempest and Macbeth) but of course Shakespeare was over analyzed and decidedly made un-fun.
As a kid's bookseller you get this attitude all the time- and never as polite as that letter writer.
I suggest comics: "Oh, I want them to actually READ something SUBSTANTIAL and worthwhile.." (Cuz Bone isn't substantial apparently.)
I suggest a comic book for a girl: "Oh, but she's a little girl. She won't like a comic book..."
I suggest fantasy titles: "Oh... he reads that junk all the time., I want him to read something better."
It goes on all levels of the spectrum. When I show them the Hannah Montana novels: "Oh... that's such trash. I don't want them to read trash."
It's all just snobbery. I'm not one to espouse the old "it doesn't matter what they read as long as they READ" because I don't think that's true. But I just don't like people imposing the belief of something being "better" no matter what. If a kid wants to read nothing but Hannah Montana books- let them. If they're only interested in books with dragons: let them. And dear lord if they like comics bring them to the store every Wednesday. Stop trying to force these things.
When I was 11 my mom yelled at me for just reading Babysitters Club books. But when I was threw with the newest one I'd usually hunt around the back porch through my older sisters books and would find new and interesting things. I remember reading "In the Year of the Boar and Jackie Robinson" in one day and loving it. I also read "Jurassic Park" at that age. Kids will find these books on their own. Just let them loose in the library every now and then and don't push too hard. And check the book snobbery at the door. Hell, if your teen loves Twilight- just let them have it. They'll come to their own realizations on their own.
@Sunshineyness:
Really, it _doesn't_ matter, as long as they read. If they read, it's excersizing the brain in ways that not-reading doesn't. If they read, they'll keep looking for stuff that interests them (and those interests will probably change). Mostly though, if they read, it has to be something that interests them or they will stop reading. And once they've gone that route, it will be very hard to get them back. Best I ever heard in that respect was that the kid who got cast to play Harry Potter _hated_ to read books...until he decided that he should probably research the character that he was contracted to portray for several movies.
On a more personal note, shortly before her death I found out that my grandmother was still reading romance novels into her 80's. They're beneath contempt as far as I'm concerned, but it kept her mind active so she died a rather quick death from a disected aorta instead of a long lingering slide into oblivion from Alzheimer's. And considering she spent at least 15 years living alone as a widow, that's something worth noting.
@Purple Dave: I've actually heard that's why a lot of older people like mysteries- particularly the puzzle kind- they keep the mind more actively engaged than just sitting there watching Family Feud.
And, yeah, I guess you're right thinking about it more carefully. I think especially with the very young and the very old. With the very young it's about the basic teaching of reading and if getting them a Transformers reader or Star Wars chapter book will keep them actively engaged in the plot to help them learn the mechanics of reading than who gives if it's a Transformers book or Star Wars book.
Actually it reads to me like she just wanted him to read more stuff + sci-fi and not instead of.
Nonetheless, the discussions bellow remind me of my English teacher in fifth grade who made us do a book report every two weeks, but had some dumbass puritanical view on what books us kids should be reading.
She was particularly upset that I was reading 'adult-level' novels and would ban me from bringing them into class or doing my projects on them even though it's what I was interested in reading and contained more content and vocabulary than the other shit people in my class were reading.
Fucking fat-ass moron.
She was also the most horribly reverse-racist person I ever met.
@omgwtflolbbqbye: That's funny. In 10th grade I showed up in a post-lunch English class early. I remember taking out a leisure reading book whilst waiting for class. My teacher came into the room and asked what I was reading. I showed him. It was a little YA book I liked called "The Unlikely Romance of Kate Bjorkman." A book about a nerdy girl (who dates the foreign exchange student just so she can practice her German) and her romance with her brother's best friend. Cute little pleasure read that upon a recent adult nostalgia re-read saw a lot of interesting and deeper things going on in.
Well, when the class started he grabbed the book out off my desk and held it up to the whole class and went on a rant about how these books were "too juvenile" and that at 15 you should be "above them." All sorts of snobbish crap that I, now as an adult, reject. (Because I think there's tons of value in YA and children's lit) Looking back now I see he was just being a jackass but still. It just seems so unnecessary to do.
And to be fair- this is a teacher that espoused the "amazing" virtues of Catcher int he Rye. So take that as it will.
@omgwtflolbbqbye:
I had the opposite experience in kindergarten. My teacher actually sent me home with the larger teacher's edition at some point because she wanted to encourage my reading. Seems I had a problem keeping track of where the class was at when it was my time to read out loud because I would just shut them all out of my little world and burn through the stories in a fraction of the time. And once I got into 1st grade, I'd get pulled from class every day to go to reading group with the next grade...where I still had problems keeping track of how far the rest of the group had gotten in the story for the exact same reason.
Now, my mom _did_ discourage my reading habits, but only to the extent that I was burning through batteries in the emergency flashlight when I was supposed to be getting a good night's sleep.
@SnehalMarten: I have to agree. While I kinda-sorta like some of his stuff, I don't think he's really in the league of the others... yet. I think the talent is there, but I'm still waiting for his Neuromancer.
Also, I always find that I like the first half of his books but by the end, I've almost lost interest. I'm not sure why his stuff does this to me.
@atrus123: In terms of pure writing talent, a simple ability with language, there's almost nobody out there who can match Mieville right now. Add to that the detailed plotting and exquisite characters of a book like The Scar... honestly, I am completely mystified as to how you can have these opinions.
I mean... if you think that Neuromancer is better than The Scar, or Iron Council, or even Perdido Street Station... you're way off base. Neuromancer was a really great book, don't get me wrong. But Mieville's work is astonishing. Far more complex and far more meaty than Gibson's work.
God bless my Mom (a school teacher) for encouraging me to read NO MATTER WHAT IT WAS. She fed my teenage addiction to post-apocalyptic pulp (Deathlands, The Guardians, The Survivalist, et al) and didn't ask any questions. She knew the key to a well rounded intellect lies in reading...even "crap" reading because it acts as a gateway to the good stuff.
Maybe she WAS being a little condescending about sci-fi, but I still think it would be beneficial to the kid to get him into something besides sci-fi.
At one point, the only books I read were detective novels. I still love them but I'm glad my teachers introduced me to Mark Twain, Ernest Hemingway, and Robert Heinlein among others.
It isn't fair to limit yourself to one genre regardless of what it might be.
I appreciate the intention and in general her examples are well-chosen, but man is Godzilla a bad choice. The original is one of the best sci-fi movies ever made.
@HerrIssyvoo: She was talking about books, I'm sure she meant "Stuff with big, noisy and gross stuff that a 5 years old would love" and chose a bad example
*If the movie is really that good, because I haven't watched it*
@Dirk Anger: True that she was talking about books and not movies. Although then I wonder why she mentioned Godzilla at all. Oh well, it's not a huge deal.
And yeah, you should watch Godzilla. Just don't accidentally watch the one with Raymond Burr shoved in. Watch the original version.
@Zyg: I read exclusively scat porn and the writings of Bill O'Reilly. Some people say that this would be detrimental to my character, but then I remind them that I'M READING AND READING IS ALWAYS MAGICALLY GOOD FOR YOU, and they realize how misguided they've been.
@Lewen Stonewar: Agreed. Dune is probably a little advanced for a 13 year old, depending on his reading level. Though, if he's handling Huxley, he might be ready for it by the time he's 15 or 16.
Verne and Wells are prime material for this kid. I was about that age when I devoured just about everything by them I could lay hands on. In a way, I'm slightly jealous, because the joy of reading those books for the first time is past for me. The experience is like having your brains scooped out, rejiggered by benevolent aliens and dropped back in your head. You are changed at the molecular level. That feeling is so wonderful.
I would even argue that the success and mainstream acceptance of authors like Audrey Niffenegger, Alice Sebold and Michael Chabon prove that genre distinctions are rapidly dying out. It's a pointless exercise in splitting when the world (and especially teen readers) need more lumping. Read whatever the heck you want, just read something damn it!
I've got a two year old who is in love with Gamera and Gorgo the great because of clips from this site. When he gets older I totally intend to get him reading HG Wells and Tolkien.
The education system can force him to read other stuff for a while, but I am going to make sure he gets his imagination filled with the impossible as well.
09/26/09
Inclusion of other genres does not have to be at the exclusion of sci-fi.
09/26/09
Apparently he only read comic books, but his parents were just so grateful he was reading at all that they encouraged it. That's the key for non-geek moms and dads: just be grateful your kid reads, never mind complaining about his choice of genre.
09/25/09
Every year we read one play by Shakespeare, along with one or two other books. On year it was To Kill A Mockingbird and Oliver Twist, and another year it was Wuthering Heights. One year it was even Frankenstein and Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde back to back.
But what I remember most was the year we were asked to read 1984 and Brave New World.
We spent that whole year talking about conformity and Utopian & Dystopian societies, and the language of persuasion and deception.
The first Gulf War was going on at the time, and we examined some of the language the newspaper journalists were using. American troops were called "Our boys" and "G.I.'s" and that sort of thing, while Iraqi soldiers were called "Angry hordes of death," and things like that.
More than any other subject, all the English teachers I had really made me think. I only wish I'd paid more attention.
09/25/09
We spent that whole year talking about conformity and Utopian & Dystopian societies, and the language of persuasion and deception."
Hopefully my class this year will be like that, we are reading 1984.
09/25/09
09/25/09
I suggest comics: "Oh, I want them to actually READ something SUBSTANTIAL and worthwhile.." (Cuz Bone isn't substantial apparently.)
I suggest a comic book for a girl: "Oh, but she's a little girl. She won't like a comic book..."
I suggest fantasy titles: "Oh... he reads that junk all the time., I want him to read something better."
It goes on all levels of the spectrum. When I show them the Hannah Montana novels: "Oh... that's such trash. I don't want them to read trash."
It's all just snobbery. I'm not one to espouse the old "it doesn't matter what they read as long as they READ" because I don't think that's true. But I just don't like people imposing the belief of something being "better" no matter what. If a kid wants to read nothing but Hannah Montana books- let them. If they're only interested in books with dragons: let them. And dear lord if they like comics bring them to the store every Wednesday. Stop trying to force these things.
When I was 11 my mom yelled at me for just reading Babysitters Club books. But when I was threw with the newest one I'd usually hunt around the back porch through my older sisters books and would find new and interesting things. I remember reading "In the Year of the Boar and Jackie Robinson" in one day and loving it. I also read "Jurassic Park" at that age. Kids will find these books on their own. Just let them loose in the library every now and then and don't push too hard. And check the book snobbery at the door. Hell, if your teen loves Twilight- just let them have it. They'll come to their own realizations on their own.
09/25/09
Really, it _doesn't_ matter, as long as they read. If they read, it's excersizing the brain in ways that not-reading doesn't. If they read, they'll keep looking for stuff that interests them (and those interests will probably change). Mostly though, if they read, it has to be something that interests them or they will stop reading. And once they've gone that route, it will be very hard to get them back. Best I ever heard in that respect was that the kid who got cast to play Harry Potter _hated_ to read books...until he decided that he should probably research the character that he was contracted to portray for several movies.
On a more personal note, shortly before her death I found out that my grandmother was still reading romance novels into her 80's. They're beneath contempt as far as I'm concerned, but it kept her mind active so she died a rather quick death from a disected aorta instead of a long lingering slide into oblivion from Alzheimer's. And considering she spent at least 15 years living alone as a widow, that's something worth noting.
09/25/09
And, yeah, I guess you're right thinking about it more carefully. I think especially with the very young and the very old. With the very young it's about the basic teaching of reading and if getting them a Transformers reader or Star Wars chapter book will keep them actively engaged in the plot to help them learn the mechanics of reading than who gives if it's a Transformers book or Star Wars book.
09/25/09
Nonetheless, the discussions bellow remind me of my English teacher in fifth grade who made us do a book report every two weeks, but had some dumbass puritanical view on what books us kids should be reading.
She was particularly upset that I was reading 'adult-level' novels and would ban me from bringing them into class or doing my projects on them even though it's what I was interested in reading and contained more content and vocabulary than the other shit people in my class were reading.
Fucking fat-ass moron.
She was also the most horribly reverse-racist person I ever met.
09/25/09
Well, when the class started he grabbed the book out off my desk and held it up to the whole class and went on a rant about how these books were "too juvenile" and that at 15 you should be "above them." All sorts of snobbish crap that I, now as an adult, reject. (Because I think there's tons of value in YA and children's lit) Looking back now I see he was just being a jackass but still. It just seems so unnecessary to do.
And to be fair- this is a teacher that espoused the "amazing" virtues of Catcher int he Rye. So take that as it will.
09/25/09
I had the opposite experience in kindergarten. My teacher actually sent me home with the larger teacher's edition at some point because she wanted to encourage my reading. Seems I had a problem keeping track of where the class was at when it was my time to read out loud because I would just shut them all out of my little world and burn through the stories in a fraction of the time. And once I got into 1st grade, I'd get pulled from class every day to go to reading group with the next grade...where I still had problems keeping track of how far the rest of the group had gotten in the story for the exact same reason.
Now, my mom _did_ discourage my reading habits, but only to the extent that I was burning through batteries in the emergency flashlight when I was supposed to be getting a good night's sleep.
09/25/09
09/25/09
09/25/09
Also, I always find that I like the first half of his books but by the end, I've almost lost interest. I'm not sure why his stuff does this to me.
09/25/09
I mean... if you think that Neuromancer is better than The Scar, or Iron Council, or even Perdido Street Station... you're way off base. Neuromancer was a really great book, don't get me wrong. But Mieville's work is astonishing. Far more complex and far more meaty than Gibson's work.
09/25/09
09/25/09
At one point, the only books I read were detective novels. I still love them but I'm glad my teachers introduced me to Mark Twain, Ernest Hemingway, and Robert Heinlein among others.
It isn't fair to limit yourself to one genre regardless of what it might be.
09/25/09
09/25/09
*If the movie is really that good, because I haven't watched it*
09/25/09
And yeah, you should watch Godzilla. Just don't accidentally watch the one with Raymond Burr shoved in. Watch the original version.
09/25/09
09/25/09
09/25/09
09/25/09
They're not the same thing?
09/25/09
09/25/09
Verne and Wells are prime material for this kid. I was about that age when I devoured just about everything by them I could lay hands on. In a way, I'm slightly jealous, because the joy of reading those books for the first time is past for me. The experience is like having your brains scooped out, rejiggered by benevolent aliens and dropped back in your head. You are changed at the molecular level. That feeling is so wonderful.
09/25/09
09/25/09
Why would I want to stop that? None of the other kids he knows can read/comprehend nearly as much as he can.
09/25/09
That's about the age when I read LotR. Hated it. Tolkien desperately needed a more proactive editor.
09/25/09
09/25/09
I've got a two year old who is in love with Gamera and Gorgo the great because of clips from this site. When he gets older I totally intend to get him reading HG Wells and Tolkien.
The education system can force him to read other stuff for a while, but I am going to make sure he gets his imagination filled with the impossible as well.