I'm all for it, but any significant extension has to be;
a) Tied to a no-child-if-you-have-the-treatment-polic.... (or purhapes simply only childless people above 40 are able too have it).
b) Has to be done together with anti-cancer research. Living longer and encouraging regeneration of the body is strongly linked to increaseing cancer likelyhood. (ie, the more your cells regenerate the more chance they will go wrong).
@twDarkflame: Why the no child policy? If you're going to limit reproduction, shouldn't it be based on something like genetic value? IE, stronger, smarter, etc?
As it is most of the world happens to be seeing a population crunch in our lifetime. [en.wikipedia.org]
@Louis Wang: Exactly.. First world populations are ALL decreasing. Population limits are the last thing they need.
Unlikely that poor people around the world are going to be spending money on optional life extension drugs over basic necessities.
As for cancer concerns.. sure people are working on cancer solutions but it has nothing to do with anti-aging per se. Besides from what I've read, animals that live longer via SIRT1 (and other genes) have enhanced immune systems that do not spur cancer production.
@damndirtyape: I'm sorry, but we don't need more old people for demographic reasons, we need more YOUNG people. There's no point in having twice the old population if you have the same workforce paying for their health care.
And... eermm... I maybe wrong, but I think cancer has nothing to do with the inmune system
@Dirk Anger: Well I'm guessing that if people are living to 100+ on a regular basis then the age of retirement will be set at 85 + thus adding more taxpaying years for each person.
The way that CR works its not like you age normally to 80 then from 80 to 120 you'd be old and weak. At 80 you'd be as vigorous as people in their 50s now.
You ever notice in Star Trek TNG that they never avoid the actual harm, they just have a pill that will fix it. Like they don't wear radiation suits, they just take radiation drugs.
Hey, Riker, instead of taking a regimen of drugs for the rest of your extended life, why don't you just pass on the morning cream puff, dude.
What I see as amazing about this is that it seems like the type of thing that health insurance companies would love. You would have less problems later in life, which is where they get hit the hardest.
@solOptimus: They might start mandating that everybody take the drug... but something will go horribly wrong, and that's how Corvus-Corax's Zombie scenario will come to pass!
@solOptimus: Well if we got 20% longer lifespans that'd make the average age of death for a woman 91 from 76, which would mean 15 more years of covering costs so I doubt insurers would mandate it unless it significantly reduced overall outlays for treating issues.
twDarkflame promoted this comment
brentbent: C.O.C.K.R.O.A.C.H. )for all the queer super villians out there( was starred
brentbent: C.O.C.K.R.O.A.C.H. )for all the queer super villians out there( was unstarred
@solOptimus: (most)health insurance companies wont last that long.
Scare mongering aside, people are starting to see how mad the current system is.
I dought it will have much support left in 10 years.
Efficiency for a insurance company means paying out the least, while having the most people ""covered"". Its one of the few clear examples of capitalist/competition not working at all for the benefit of consumers.
Sorry to get political, but if we want a hope of most of us living longer without us all going bankrupt, we need patent free mass produced drugs and care to go with it.
Any extension in life massively increases cancer chances too, remember.
I sit here reading io9 with a bowl of ice-cream in front of me, thinking about how I should go on a calorie-restricted diet to extend my lifespan. *sigh*
Curses! Now I want sushi. There's no sushi place where I live, and I live for sushi!
I'll have to wait until I travel to the big city, or learn how to make it myself by: a) using locally available seafood (which ain't much), and b) overcoming my incredible laziness--and Jebus knows that ain't happening...
Meh. I love my ice cream. And sushi. And lasagna. And bacon-blue cheese cheeseburgers. It's not the length of life, it's the quality; if you live a hundred years but most of them are boring and suck because you're hungry, I don't see the improvement.
10/02/09
10/02/09
[www.sens.org]
There was a ted talk awhile back too.
I'm all for it, but any significant extension has to be;
a) Tied to a no-child-if-you-have-the-treatment-polic.... (or purhapes simply only childless people above 40 are able too have it).
b) Has to be done together with anti-cancer research. Living longer and encouraging regeneration of the body is strongly linked to increaseing cancer likelyhood. (ie, the more your cells regenerate the more chance they will go wrong).
10/02/09
As it is most of the world happens to be seeing a population crunch in our lifetime. [en.wikipedia.org]
10/02/09
Unlikely that poor people around the world are going to be spending money on optional life extension drugs over basic necessities.
As for cancer concerns.. sure people are working on cancer solutions but it has nothing to do with anti-aging per se. Besides from what I've read, animals that live longer via SIRT1 (and other genes) have enhanced immune systems that do not spur cancer production.
10/02/09
And... eermm... I maybe wrong, but I think cancer has nothing to do with the inmune system
10/02/09
The way that CR works its not like you age normally to 80 then from 80 to 120 you'd be old and weak. At 80 you'd be as vigorous as people in their 50s now.
10/01/09
Hey, Riker, instead of taking a regimen of drugs for the rest of your extended life, why don't you just pass on the morning cream puff, dude.
10/02/09
There was recent major radiation drug that had massively successfull (monkey based) trails.
10/02/09
10/02/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/02/09
Scare mongering aside, people are starting to see how mad the current system is.
I dought it will have much support left in 10 years.
Efficiency for a insurance company means paying out the least, while having the most people ""covered"". Its one of the few clear examples of capitalist/competition not working at all for the benefit of consumers.
Sorry to get political, but if we want a hope of most of us living longer without us all going bankrupt, we need patent free mass produced drugs and care to go with it.
Any extension in life massively increases cancer chances too, remember.
10/01/09
10/01/09
Super runaway!
10/01/09
10/02/09
10/01/09
It'll be the greatest boon ever to the donut industry.
Providing, of course, it works in people and not just inbred lab mice.
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/02/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
10/02/09
10/01/09
10/01/09
Mouse adipose babies must be adorable!
07/09/09
07/09/09
I'll have to wait until I travel to the big city, or learn how to make it myself by: a) using locally available seafood (which ain't much), and b) overcoming my incredible laziness--and Jebus knows that ain't happening...
07/09/09
07/09/09