San Francisco, 1:45 AM
Tue Dec 22
25 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I like the concept, but as a Hobbit hole it's a failure. Cold and sterile looking, with unpainted concrete walls that make it look like the inside of a parking garage. Hobbit holes are more organically shaped, and should have round windows and doors dammit. And cozy furniture, and some warm colors.
And what's with the corrugated cardboard ceiling arches? Randomly placed/sized windows? Ugly ass fence on top? The more I look at this, the more I think the designer has no concept of aesthetics.
@J_Frank_Parnell: The fence is probably there to prevent people from falling into the patio at night, and possibly to mitigate avalanches (an issue that affects a lot of their rural landscaping).
That fence above the house looks very much like an afterthought. It gives the impression that they built the place and only then realized how easily their design could kill someone.
I don't remember the crazy hot tub parties Frodo and Sam-wise had at the Shire, but I assume that all happened after they dropped the ring in the lava.
Hobbit women are known for lettin' loose in the tub...trust me.
In a word, yes and no. The problem I have is that sometimes the best stuff in movies of the earlier era were due to the fact that the directors didn't have unlimited resources. When I was a kid, I remember thinking "how did the stormtroopers get onto the rebel ship? Did they have to go through space?" A few sound effects and tense looks from the actors conveyed more than CGI ever could.
My main complaint about CGI is that hyperrealism = less realism. That may sound paradoxical, but reality is messy and has gravitas, and CGI just doesn't quite look right. It's too visually crisp for reality. That may be an imperfection in the tech; maybe it just hasn't quite nailed reality yet, but I think it's more than that and unfortunately I can't quite put my finger on what it is.
CGI do not automatically ruin a movie. But it can't if the effects take precedence over the story. But this is true of every kind of special effetcs. You mentionned a lot of case when CGI ruined the movie. Here are some example where it helped it:
Sky Captain and the world of tomorrow
Sin City
300
T2
The Matrix
Peter Jackson King Kong (the dinosaur are crap, the gorilla is amazing)
I do, however, prefer muppets and stuntwork, like anybody. That's why I think Joe Johnston is a good choice for Cap America.
12/21/09
12/21/09
12/21/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
And what's with the corrugated cardboard ceiling arches? Randomly placed/sized windows? Ugly ass fence on top? The more I look at this, the more I think the designer has no concept of aesthetics.
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/18/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
12/17/09
Hobbit women are known for lettin' loose in the tub...trust me.
12/17/09
12/12/09
12/11/09
12/10/09
12/09/09
Sky Captain and the world of tomorrow
Sin City
300
T2
The Matrix
Peter Jackson King Kong (the dinosaur are crap, the gorilla is amazing)
I do, however, prefer muppets and stuntwork, like anybody. That's why I think Joe Johnston is a good choice for Cap America.