check out the "lake" on google earth (look at Owens Lake California 93545), thats one of the little townshpis that were founded there and the rest seem to be alive (not how they should be but who said that all of the USA is 100% habitable!)
Los Angeles screwed over alot but Keeler wasn't anything to start with. Perspective a bit screwed guys.
This ruined landscape is beautiful in it's own way. Which begs me to ask, are there any photographs or images of this place BEFORE it became a dustbowl?
AND, how did the lake sustain it's waters in the first place? is there absolutely no chance for the environment to recover its lost state on its own? (albeit, over time)
@Althestane: The runoff from the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada mountain range would have to be allowed to flow back into the valley, instead of being intercepted and sent via aqueduct to Los Angeles. Not likely going to happen, short of civilization collapsing, or the ability to spontaneously create water out of nothing for free.
"Today, Keeler ranks as the second dustiest place on Earth, after Kazakhstan's Aral Sea"
As opposed to what - places like the Sahara desert? Where exactly did they come up with this statistic?
In fact, a quick google search doesn't bring up either place as 'dustiest'. The Bodélé depression in the Djourab of northern Chad is listed as the dustiest place on earth by multiple sources - including the science journal Nature. Owens Lake is however listed as the dustiest place in North America by a few sources.
Of course, being 'the dustiest' is a bit deceptive, because sand and sand storms are excluded from dust and dust storms. If one does not make such an exclusion, this former lake doesn't even come close to top ranking.
@Aaron Roberts:
This falls pretty squarely into 'Terraforming' for me.
Beyond that, it was an interesting article that I'm glad io9 posted.
In other words. stfu.
@Aaron Roberts: yeah I'd say transforming an entire region into something else entirely would merit as science fiction, considering some people still believe evolution is unproven and the earth is only X,ooo yrs old...
TheLostVikings R.O.A.C.H. promoted this comment
gravit8 : just not cool enough for...jalopnik? was starred
gravit8 : just not cool enough for...jalopnik? was unstarred
@gravit8 : just not cool enough for...jalopnik?: "I'd say transforming an entire region into something else entirely would merit as science fiction"
When activities which have been going on for thousands of years are called science fiction, it kind of makes the term meaningless. At that point ANYTHING could be considered science fiction.
Check out David Maisel's amazing photographs of Owen's Lake. The colors and shapes are unbelievable. It almost looks like some sort of alien landscape.
@ManchuCandidate: Hey now. Leave Mr. Cross alone. He's a respectable and old man. Maybe, one day, you too will be respectable, allowing that you are either a politician an ugly building or a whore.
I think the more interesting shots from Minority Report and I, Robot would have been those that show that much of those cities' current architecture is still very much intact, including brick buildings with exterior fire escapes, etc. Those shots give a much more organic sense of what happens to cities over time, rather than what the shots here imply, which is that somehow cities will be razed to the ground and built back up from scratch. I guess what I'm saying is that in envisioning urban futures, the filmmakers had a more nuanced vision than what these stills give them credit for.
09/18/09
Los Angeles screwed over alot but Keeler wasn't anything to start with. Perspective a bit screwed guys.
09/18/09
Looked pretty good, actually. Nice, big lake with flowing rivers.
Then I clicked on terrain. Still looking okay. Something must have been wrong.
Clicked on satellite. Holy crap. They got screwed over, hard.
Your argument doesn't fit your evidence.
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Try "Cadillac Desert" for those who like to read.
09/18/09
AND, how did the lake sustain it's waters in the first place? is there absolutely no chance for the environment to recover its lost state on its own? (albeit, over time)
09/18/09
09/19/09
09/21/09
09/18/09
As opposed to what - places like the Sahara desert? Where exactly did they come up with this statistic?
In fact, a quick google search doesn't bring up either place as 'dustiest'. The Bodélé depression in the Djourab of northern Chad is listed as the dustiest place on earth by multiple sources - including the science journal Nature. Owens Lake is however listed as the dustiest place in North America by a few sources.
Of course, being 'the dustiest' is a bit deceptive, because sand and sand storms are excluded from dust and dust storms. If one does not make such an exclusion, this former lake doesn't even come close to top ranking.
So all this is quite a bit of hyperbole.
09/18/09
Wow - who knew that Roman engineering was Sci-fi!
Back to the future indeed
09/18/09
09/18/09
This falls pretty squarely into 'Terraforming' for me.
Beyond that, it was an interesting article that I'm glad io9 posted.
In other words. stfu.
09/18/09
09/18/09
When activities which have been going on for thousands of years are called science fiction, it kind of makes the term meaningless. At that point ANYTHING could be considered science fiction.
09/18/09
I am sure LA water travels further by man-made means than any other water. Thanks Mulholland.
09/18/09
09/18/09
[davidmaisel.com]
09/18/09
09/18/09
09/18/09
Also, thank you for brightening my morning.
09/18/09
09/18/09
In a spooky voice, with a flashlight under my chin: "In The Year 2000"
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/17/09
09/16/09
What about New Chicago?