San Francisco, 7:26 AM
Mon Dec 21
12 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
So, let's just pretend that this isn't an obvious fake.
What's the difference, functionally? Who cares (well, other than him) if he's in a coma, or conscious but unable to move or communicate? Same thing, really...
-Kle.
@Klebert L. Hall: It just seems remarkably cold to say "who cares if a man is living a tortured life or if he's braindead." It is rather depressing to know there's people like you who seem to posess no empathy.
@LastAndLeast:
If someone isn't braindead, (or dead, for that matter) but is indistinguishable in every way from someone with the braindead (or dead) condition . Then what is the functional difference?
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we might as well call it a duck.
The logical result of your "empathic" thinking, is that we should be all torn up about the idea that rocks might be compassionate intelligent beings, and we just can't tell ... My god, we've been cutting and grinding them up for millennia! Oh, the Humanity!
-Kle.
@Klebert L. Hall: Except they scanned his brain and it showed activity. Also, your rock example is specious, because we have never had reason to believe rocks had the capability of thought.
@LastAndLeast:
We've never had reason to believe people in vegetative states are capable of thought, either - and we still don't.
This whole event is a flight of fancy and wish-fulfillment fantasy.
Note that the doctor (I use the term loosely) that did the "brain scan" refuses to release the details of the results. Science is based upon repeatable experiments and data transparency, not making ridiculous claims and repeating them often.
-Kle.
@Klebert L. Hall: and yet it seems you took little to no time to actually read the excerpt of the article. Even if at current, the doctor refuses to release details of the results, the man can communicate. Obviously he is conscious, unless you want to assume people in vegetative states can communicate.
@Klebert L. Hall: Congratulations, you again infer what you cannot possibly infer from the article. "Houben, who communicates via a computer with a special keyboard activated with the slightest movement of his right hand". Obviously it indicates he communicated.
You're quite good at putting words where none exist though. Let's compare Ouija Boards with Ghosts... with LASERS!
Wow. I started out thinking that this was tragic, but once I read the comments (and the James Randi piece linked earlier) now I'm on the horrible farce side. Either way, I'm shuddering.
Which just goes to support those family members who visit comatose patients and talk to them, care for them, let them experience human touch, and read to them. Can you imagine being completely aware, and unable to respond to anything....and neglected for 15+ hours a day? (Assuming you sleep 8 hours a day and get an hour a day's worth of attention from your caretakers.)
Even if someone turns on a TV and you end up listening to Barney and soap operas all day long...isn't that better than perpetual boredom?
@Elorin: actually no.i would rather be dead and have made sure that will happen with my wishes should i ever end up paralyzed like that man.
i feel real bad for him.what a bummer to live like that.
@gorehound: I can certainly empathize with that! An advanced directive is preferable for many reasons to years of a vegetative state.
It reads like a sci fi novel, actually...I wonder what amazing kinds of distractions and fictional worlds someone would create with 20 years of time to his/herself and no entertainment but the mind.
The facilitated communication stuff is pure crap that cannot be verified through scientific scrutiny. In the 70's desperate parents invested tons of money in facilitated communication in hopes of allowing their children to speak--all of it wasted that could have been spent on real research.
This man may be suffering from locked in syndrome but the person typing his supposed words is a charlatan. As somebody below said, if she's really doing what she says she is doing then put a blindfold on her, hold up three common items to the patient, and have him tell her what those items are. You won't see that experiment happen because then the charlatan couldn't write and profit from the absurdly easy to market and sell book supposedly written by a man locked into a coma for over 23 years. Whether the charlatan is a pathetic self-sesrving human or a delusional self-serving human remains to be seen.
ShamelessSingingRennie promoted this comment
brentbent: C.O.C.K.R.O.A.C.H. )for all the queer super villians out there( was starred
brentbent: C.O.C.K.R.O.A.C.H. )for all the queer super villians out there( was unstarred
look at the footage of the person "assisting " him type and you will see that this is just bullshit. He is paralyzed, he cannot move his hands yet the "assistant" is typing faster than me! This is just cruel. There is no explanation as to how this communication between him and the "assistant" occurs, he is still unable to move and these horrible people are manipulating him, giving false hope to his family and must have ulterior motives for behaving in such a horrific and exploitive way.
Hold off judgment a bit- the case is pretty well rife with issues that suggest there may be some fishy bits at work here. The alleged brain scan (either a PET or fMRI) is nowhere to be found, was performed out of the blue and far too long ago for this to be the first stabs at communication made. He communicates with a "facilitator" who apparently just supports and guides his hand and elbow- and is always staring at his keyboard and also speaks Flemish. Pull this off with an blind-folded English-speaking nurse as he describes objects in the room, or just give him an interface he can handle, and we'll see. It's not that his case is impossible, or even improbable, and if true it is indeed a tremendously sad situation. I'm just saying that right now, the murmurings in some circles have concerns this is more akin to autism "cures" and a Ouija board then some grand breakthrough. I will be happy for them (and me) to be proven wrong, and the standards for doing so are clear- one just wonders why they haven't met them yet.
@Scotland: It is so clear that the lady is punching in the messages. This is a scam. I bet she'll come out with a book, and put his name on it. Such a travesty, being taken advantage like that. These people should be ashamed!
@Jonny_eh: This video is unbelievable! How could anyone watch it and think the coma man is the one typing? The blond woman is so obviously reading the screen and pushing his hand around.
I feel bad for the coma man's mother. You can tell she believes it.
Now that I think about it, maybe that's even more depressing.
EDIT: Whoops, was already referenced below. In answer to Atomsmoosher, I don't think it can be said definitively either way as of yet, but there are such things as motion sensors available to a micron of pressure, you'd think they could do some more testing.
I'm not gonna pretend that I know a lot about medical science, because I don't, but why did it take them 20+ years to run a brainscan on the guy to determine that he was conscious? Were brainscans not available until recently?
@korybing: Think about it. He's alive. He's non-responsive. Why scan? In 1986 there were a number of external tests thought a reliable means to determine consciousness. Based on the technology and experience of the time, there was no reason to believe the man was suffering from 'locked-in' syndrome or anything other than a persistent vegetative state. Likely, it took a few scans over the years before the right technology and activity combined to demonstrate that the mans was indeed awake.
Since then brain imaging and monitoring has advanced tremedously. In 1986, you might have seen alpha waves and other measurable activity and not really been able to tell what exactly was going one. Realize also that there can easily be a lot of activity while none of it could be considered organized thought.
You are right that imaging, monitoring and non-invasive scanning is the way of the future. Hopefully as we are better able to sense, measure and see our inner workings, medicine will make fewer misdiagnosis like this. In the not too distant future we will be able to take a status snapshot of a living body and know everything that is going on inside down to the molecular level. This is just an extension of technologies like MRI.
@DJAbeLincoln: Indeed. I just watched The Diving Bell and the Butterfly a couple of weeks ago. Only able to blink one eye, he ultimately wrote a memoir with an assistant and a tedious one-letter-at-a-time technique.
11/25/09
What's the difference, functionally? Who cares (well, other than him) if he's in a coma, or conscious but unable to move or communicate? Same thing, really...
-Kle.
11/25/09
11/26/09
You are correct. If I was completely unable to communicate, I wouldn't say anything, at all.
-Kle.
11/26/09
11/27/09
If someone isn't braindead, (or dead, for that matter) but is indistinguishable in every way from someone with the braindead (or dead) condition . Then what is the functional difference?
If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we might as well call it a duck.
The logical result of your "empathic" thinking, is that we should be all torn up about the idea that rocks might be compassionate intelligent beings, and we just can't tell ... My god, we've been cutting and grinding them up for millennia! Oh, the Humanity!
-Kle.
11/27/09
11/28/09
We've never had reason to believe people in vegetative states are capable of thought, either - and we still don't.
This whole event is a flight of fancy and wish-fulfillment fantasy.
Note that the doctor (I use the term loosely) that did the "brain scan" refuses to release the details of the results. Science is based upon repeatable experiments and data transparency, not making ridiculous claims and repeating them often.
-Kle.
12/02/09
12/03/09
He can only communicate while someone holds his hand while he types.
By that standard, a Ouija Board communicates with ghosts.
-Kle.
12/03/09
You're quite good at putting words where none exist though. Let's compare Ouija Boards with Ghosts... with LASERS!
12/04/09
You know, there are more references to this story than the text at the top of the page...
-Kle.
11/24/09
[www.randi.org]
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
Even if someone turns on a TV and you end up listening to Barney and soap operas all day long...isn't that better than perpetual boredom?
11/24/09
i feel real bad for him.what a bummer to live like that.
11/24/09
It reads like a sci fi novel, actually...I wonder what amazing kinds of distractions and fictional worlds someone would create with 20 years of time to his/herself and no entertainment but the mind.
11/24/09
This man may be suffering from locked in syndrome but the person typing his supposed words is a charlatan. As somebody below said, if she's really doing what she says she is doing then put a blindfold on her, hold up three common items to the patient, and have him tell her what those items are. You won't see that experiment happen because then the charlatan couldn't write and profit from the absurdly easy to market and sell book supposedly written by a man locked into a coma for over 23 years. Whether the charlatan is a pathetic self-sesrving human or a delusional self-serving human remains to be seen.
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
And where the hell did the name ' Glasgow coma scale' come from?? How hard you get headbutted in Scottland!
11/24/09
too soon?
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
If there's a computer involved that measures electrical signals in his brain, I'm willing to believe that he can use it to type out letters.
If it's a human facilitator, then no way. He's just a human Ouija board.
11/24/09
[news.yahoo.com]
11/24/09
11/24/09
11/24/09
I feel bad for the coma man's mother. You can tell she believes it.
11/24/09
[news.yahoo.com]
Now that I think about it, maybe that's even more depressing.
EDIT: Whoops, was already referenced below. In answer to Atomsmoosher, I don't think it can be said definitively either way as of yet, but there are such things as motion sensors available to a micron of pressure, you'd think they could do some more testing.
11/24/09
11/24/09
Since then brain imaging and monitoring has advanced tremedously. In 1986, you might have seen alpha waves and other measurable activity and not really been able to tell what exactly was going one. Realize also that there can easily be a lot of activity while none of it could be considered organized thought.
You are right that imaging, monitoring and non-invasive scanning is the way of the future. Hopefully as we are better able to sense, measure and see our inner workings, medicine will make fewer misdiagnosis like this. In the not too distant future we will be able to take a status snapshot of a living body and know everything that is going on inside down to the molecular level. This is just an extension of technologies like MRI.
11/24/09
I imagine it would have been like a prison...just sitting there, watching it all.
11/24/09
11/24/09