I think this is an excellent time to mention another relevant study, which proved that people are more likely to believe articles about neuroscience if they include color pictures of the brain. [www.sciencedaily.com]
In fact, they specifically cite that article against the "God Spot"!
Am I the only one who can see the face of jeeeeeezus in the two bottom pictures? Clearly, the god spot is not a spot, it's a face, and therein lies the proof that god exists. You science fools.
See, with the discovery of the god spot and the god particle, god is revealing himself to science. Soon enough, scientists will admit that ID is correct, evolution is wrong, and Chuck Norris is Jeeeezus reincarnated.
neurology as a whole should focus on an interactive, dynamic brain rather than singularities (spots)[although most journals already practice this way of thinking of... thinking]. from say a love "spot" to a love pattern of neural firing, but even that is very difficult to discern from other patterns of firing and stimulation of the same pathways can produce different results. very few or if any brain signaling is focused on just one part of the brain.
Charlie Jane Anders promoted this comment
Edited by ithyphallus, bonks morrigan at 08/11/09 11:06 PM
ithyphallus, bonks morrigan was starred
ithyphallus, bonks morrigan was unstarred
People, people. Let's get to the important point of this piece, namely: When will the "worship me now, fools" raygun be available for purchase at Amazon.com? Can i pre-order?
This is similar to the journalistic nonsense that there is a single gene responsible for something or another... like a gene for criminal behaviour, or a gene for longevity.
The God spot idea always struck me as silly, because religious experience is far too complex and diverse to be the product of a single structure in the brain. I've also seen evangelical anti-theists use it as "evidence" that religious people's brains are damaged compared to atheist's brains. I'm glad that myth is more or less debunked by actual science.
Grey_Area promoted this comment
Edited by Anekanta - former space marine at 08/11/09 7:15 PM
Anekanta - former space marine was starred
Anekanta - former space marine was unstarred
@Anekanta: I think a lot of the problems relating to the issue of one gene = one trait come from the misconception that all hereditary characteristics in humans are Mendelian traits (a misconception probably reinforced by that fact that some fairly well known diseases like sickle-cell anaemia and cystic fibrosis are). The general public probably isn’t aware that most hereditary characteristics are control by multiple, interacting alleles; just like they aren’t aware that no one spot of the brain controls a certain function. As it is easier to understand and more sensational to say that one gene = one particular trait, lazy or uninformed journalist make use of the public’s ignorance. Just like they tried to do for the God spot stories. I'm glad they're being called out.
@RandomFrequentFlierDent: Yes--unfortunately I think that's true. A headline by definition oversimplifies the subject matter. It's a bummer though--it seems like a bad feedback loop between journalists and large segments of the public who crave simple explanations because they don't really care about the deeper story, or don't have time to care.
@it must be bunnies: Ernest Hogan used a similar virus in his 1992 High Aztech. Really worth hunting down. Pity that Hogan only did 3 novels. I like his wicked wit and inclusion of Hispanic/La Raza culture and issues.
Isn’t the God spot underneath the bump that indicates whether or not you have an untrustworthy character.
Seriously though, is anyone shocked that the headline writers might not be entirely straightforward and honest?
Re: Cartesian Duality Wow. He really went for the top there. Makes me giggle, a scientist silently nudging the Father of Philosophy. To quote my father: Je pense donc je suis...je pense.
Sounds like hip hop in general have nothing to do with this, and a throw off subculture of hip hop does.
I suspect Death Proof was left out because there is actually a sense of danger when she does it. And I'm not ashamed to admit that I loved that movie.
Sure, Tarantino made it look like it was gonna be different movie, but I found it a pleasant surprise.
Oh lord, more uncool people trying to scientifically prove that youth culture will kill you. Video games make you a murderer, hip hop makes you car surf, rock and roll is the devil, etc. etc. Why can't we all just go back to watching Lawrence Whelk, listening to big band music and reading - wait, no reading - that causes civil disobedience.
08/12/09
[www.sciencedaily.com]
In fact, they specifically cite that article against the "God Spot"!
08/12/09
See, with the discovery of the god spot and the god particle, god is revealing himself to science. Soon enough, scientists will admit that ID is correct, evolution is wrong, and Chuck Norris is Jeeeezus reincarnated.
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/12/09
08/11/09
+1
08/11/09
The God spot idea always struck me as silly, because religious experience is far too complex and diverse to be the product of a single structure in the brain. I've also seen evangelical anti-theists use it as "evidence" that religious people's brains are damaged compared to atheist's brains. I'm glad that myth is more or less debunked by actual science.
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
[www.amazon.com]
08/11/09
08/11/09
08/11/09
[www.youtube.com]
08/11/09
Seriously though, is anyone shocked that the headline writers might not be entirely straightforward and honest?
08/11/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
I suspect Death Proof was left out because there is actually a sense of danger when she does it. And I'm not ashamed to admit that I loved that movie.
Sure, Tarantino made it look like it was gonna be different movie, but I found it a pleasant surprise.
07/21/09
07/21/09
I thought it just fell into the 'generic stupid stunt that adolescents instinctively want to try'.
Cause I did it before and I sure as hell wasn't listening to any of that stuff.
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/21/09