<![CDATA[io9: manned spaceflight]]> http://tags.lifehacker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/io9.com.png <![CDATA[io9: manned spaceflight]]> http://io9.com/tag/mannedspaceflight http://io9.com/tag/mannedspaceflight <![CDATA[1950s Rocket Sketches Envision Manned Spaceflight]]> Wernher von Braun may have been a bit mercenary in his political dealings, but his work in astronautics and rocket design was instrumental in putting American astronauts on the moon. Between 1952 and 1954, Collier’s magazine profiled von Braun’s work in the series “Man Will Conquer Space Soon!” Next week, the materials von Braun created for this series will be auctioned off, including several sketches of his rocket designs.

Collier’s editor Cornelius Ryan detailed von Braun’s plans for manned spaceflight across several issues of the magazine. Articles featured topics on manned lunar and Martian exploration, the potential for a space station, property and passage rights, and, of course, the ships themselves. The ships illustrated throughout the series were based on von Braun’s earlier designs, but he worked with the series’ artists to sketch out sleeker, sexier designs that would pop on the magazine’s pages.

New York auction agency Bonham’s will auction off von Braun’s Collier’s documents on Wednesday, which have a total estimated value of $15,000-25,000. You can see a sampling of the lot below, including a few of his vehicle designs and a letter from von Braun to “Connie” Ryan.

Von Braun Sketches to Be Auctioned [Space.com]
Space Expectations Slide Show [Scientific American]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5065395&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Dear NASA, Either Shut Your Pie Hole or Shove Some Cash In It]]> NASA officials are whining that the Russian space program is unsafe. True, the last two Soyuz capsules have had rough re-entries, but none of the crew got a scratch on them. In fact, last we checked the Russian space program hasn't had a death on their watch since 1971 (1967 Soyuz I crash pictured). NASA can't exactly say the same, (cough ::Columbia:: cough) so where do they get off pointing fingers?

It might be an inferiority complex. Soyuz capsules aren't renewable, but the Russians have been running them reliably into orbit for over forty years. NASA's space shuttle program's been going since 1981 and has had two major disasters.

But as The Washington Post's Marc Kaufman points out, they may also be nervous about relying on a program that's looked a little shaky of late:

Two consecutive chaotic and dangerous landings by Soyuz space capsules, including one with an American astronaut aboard, have NASA and space experts concerned about the spacecraft's reliability in ferrying astronauts to and from the international space station.

The worries are compounded by the fact that starting in 2010, when the space shuttle fleet will be retired, the United States will be entirely dependent on Russia's Soyuz capsules and rockets for transporting all astronauts and most cargo to the station — until at least 2015.

There's discussion later on in the article of additional funding to get NASA's new Orion capsule up and running before 2015, and that's a good idea. Way better than complaining about the one program on Earth that's reliable enough to keep human spaceflight going while it's American counterpart takes half a decade off.

Source: The Washington Post

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=392269&view=rss&microfeed=true