I have to disagree with this. I recently acquired the first 500 issues of "Amazing Spider Man" starting with the '62(?) issue of "Amazing Fantasy". I've read up thru 1971 and found it interesting the integration of black characters and the stories perspective on racism.
Examples... 1) The Prowler - Hobie Brown, black villian. Hobie is first shown as a window washer, (dead end job) and frustrated with his place in life mostly due to his color. 2) "Robbie Robertson" the lead editor of the Bugle. Robbies son was involved in a strike at E.S.U. (non racist strike) and the father & son have a discussion about 'making it in a white mans world'. A few instances where Robbie convinced JJJ that he was supporting a racist (Sam Bullit). Once JJJ realized his mistake; he (Jonah) pulled the newspapers support and threw Sam out of his office.
The Sam Bullit issue (#91, "To Smash A Spider") is an excellent example. The issue touches on the racial tension of the day w/out allowing it to interfere with the story.
@justsomereportingguy: But none of these characters were leads. Your lead character here is a white kid who got bit by a radioactive spider. Nothing against Peter Parker - I'm a Spider-Man fan with the exception of the daily strip, which I only masochistically read to give myself a regular example of truly horrible writing. But he fits a larger pattern where people of color are overwhelmingly not the main protagonists in "mainstream" comics.
@Boas_MC: You have a good point which I think also happens to be the point of the article.
The reason why I disagree is because of when these comics started. Spider-man began in 63! Wrong or right a black Spider-Man simply would not have sold in 63. With that in mind I think Marvel did a good job addressing the race issue and offering their opinion on it while still working to sell a product. The prowler issue ends with Hobie Brown as the 'lucky one' (no matter your color, you get to lead a 'normal' life while I must continue being miserable) and the Sam B issue ends in a similar fashion - With Sam getting outed by JJJ & Robbie.
S-M is but one example. Many of our favorite comic super-heroes are very old, they go back as far as the 60's & 70's. Selling a product in that time almost demanded the 'white guy - leading role'. Still even with that demand, still knowing they have to sell a product (yes, Marvel employees love their job but they gotta pay the bills like the rest of us), I think Marvel has done a good job at least offering their opinion on the race issue = "It's wrong"
Stan has even mentioned (more than once but I cant find the orig reference I want) that the X-Men (Mutants) are based on racism and the struggle to live in harmony with those that are different. [newsone.com]
I've been thinking some more about this, and I'm surprised that only DocSeuss has mentioned the word "token." Part of the problem is that most of the characters that are popular these days are still the same ones that were created 30-50 years ago. The creators of the 60s and 70s were for the most part well-meaning white liberals dealing with companies that were stuck in the 40s. That doesn't excuse the tokenism, but it explains it. The creators felt that Black Panther, Black Lightning, etc were all that they could get away with (and they were probably right: in at least one case DC literally whitened a character who was going to be black.)
I think the reason Milestone failed was that they were not part of the regular DC universe. The easiest way to shore up the sales of a lagging title is to have special guest stars ("hey look! It's Static's pal Batman!")
I think what I'm saying is that this isn't a problem that can be easily solved.
Just a quick observation. It seems to me to be more of a writer issue rather than a fan-based issue. I find whenever they introduce a "non-white" character, they seem to not know what to do with them. 'Runaways" started with a black character who was very interesting but they seemed to run out of ideas on how to use him so they made him a bad guy and got rid of him. The New X-Men (the young ones) had a black character who was very interesting but they ran out of ideas on how to use him so they took away his powers. Need another example? The Sasquatch character (Black woman) on "Exiles" depowered and discarded. Some writer can take a "non-white" and do great work writing for them. The problem comes when a new writer comes in who has no idea how to speak for the character and either they mess them up or simply get rid of them. I recently read the first 25 issues of Luke Cage's series and I thought it was great. Although I like what Bendis is doing with him now, I would rather see the original Luke Cage, the way he was a originally written. He was a hard-ass but he was a "thug".
@MartinMatchu:
I agree it's a writer problem. One of the stupidest things I remember from the Secret Wars was Jim Shooter's portrayal of Rogue. Now, white Southerners are not a racial minority, but their accents are often used as examples of "stupid" by Northerners. As written by Claremont, Rogue still retained a bit of her accent but became a bit more sophisticated. When Shooter wrote her around the same time, she sounded like she belonged on hee haw.
I think Manga scares the crap out of the Big Two, because they can't understand it. But I would actually say that Manga kind of ignores race - that's the only way I can understand that, for example, Sailor Moon (yeah, not really Manga, but whatever) is supposed to be a blonde Japanese girl.
@Wookie1972: Manga scares the big 2? Highly doubtful. Most manga is crap and most comic book artists (i.e. everyone but Joey Mad) draw in a style that 'scares' people who are devoted to a japanimation style. It's not being afraid, it's that most of that stuff is crap, and the market in America shows that.
Whether or not most of it is "crap" (a strange thing to say about a genre that encompasses a much wider swath than anything in North American comics) the fact is that if you go to a bookstore, you're going to find a hell of a lot more manga than mainstream graphic novel collections. There is a whole generation for whom comics = Naruto and Shonen Jump.
I would got as far as saying (I'm sorry) that American comic fans have a woeful ignorance of comics outside their own continent. I was on another forum where people were discussing the Tintin movies, which is something I am greatly anticipating. The posters acted as if Tintin were the comic book equivalent of Wasa bread - bizarrely European - instead of one of the most influential comics of all time.
The irony is that the world of North American comic *artists* is far more integrated that that of comic characters. If superhero artists' drew themselves, we would have a lot more Filipino, Korean, and African-American characters than we already do. (Filipino artists in particular have been popular since the 1970s)
There are a lot of just completely false ideas circulating in this thread. I'm not going to get into the whole "we are all one race" or "why do we have to say African-American" issues here, as those kinds of tedious conversation sinks comment boards throughout the internet, and aren''t relevant to this particular discussion. But the idea that minorities aren't interested in, or can't relate to, white superheroes? Utter crap, being perpetuated by well-meaning white collegians. Do you honestly think that only white people love Spider-man, Batman, and Wolverine? Get a grip. Sure, tons of kids of all different ethnicities, nationalities, sexual orientations, etc., wish that more characters reflected their own background. And yes, it would be awesome if their were more strong, prominent minority heroes. But the big characters that are already out there are iconic because of their broad appeal and relatability.
You really think black and latino kids need minority characters to have an interest in comics? That kind of condescension carries as much racism as anything else discussed here. A good character is a good character, and outside of very narrow, closeminded groups, readers of any ethnicity are totally willing to embrace characters of any background, provided they are engaging.
@David Alvaro: I think you mean well, but kind of miss the point. Why would you expect readers of color to be drawn to an industry that either ignores them or otherizes them? Confronted with an overwhelmingly white, male, and racist body of work, why would a person of color bother spending money or time on the comics industry?
Yes, there are readers who can get past that, obviously. I know a few of them. But I think that when most of the readers of Batman or Wolverine are white males of a certain age, you're not talking about characters with 'broad appeal and relatability'.
@taxbaby: batman and wolverine do have 'broad appeal' though... as the dark knight was an unprecedented success and wolverine already has a sequel in the works
That said relatability is important to crafting popular characters. So from a strictly business sense (not that I espouse it), if it makes a character substantially more popular, make him/her/it white. It IS a business. And no, engaging and creative stories DO NOT guarantee new readership or even success with the built in fans.
And if you have the conversation about the American comic industry, why not manga? Its FAR FAR more popular and, in all honesty, SUBSTANTIALLY more racist (and very open about it). Yet manga fandom crosses all racial boundaries. Somehow, I think the law of cause and effect isn't being met here.
Besides comic readership is so negligible. I mean, top books sell between 60 and 150 thousand (on the very upside) copies. Thats an absurdly small number. The insignificance of this debate borders on the inane. I'd wager there are more neo-nazis running around than serious comic fans.
Most people enjoy characters they can associate with. It doesn't mean that Latinos are going to completely ignore Spider-Man or African Americans are going to hate on Batman 'cause he's white (I mean, I suppose some might, but not rational people), but it does mean that
However, I think the big problem isn't the lack of a market as much as it is the fact that most minority characters seem to exist solely for the fact that they're a member of a minority. If people can get characters to the point of "Hi, this is John," and resist the urge to scream "ALSO HE'S BLACK SO THERE'S MY TOKEN MINORITY CHARACTER!" then things might be better.
Also, Dwayne McDuffie's JLA and Hudlin's (?) Black Panther were comics that seemed to go the extreme opposite route and throw in a bunch of black characters like it was some sort of catharsis.
Me, my comic's featuring a female as the main character, and I'm avoiding the "super feminist icon" route just as much as I'm avoiding the "sex object" route, which seem to be the only ways that women leads can be portrayed in comics anymore (Ms. Marvel aside).
@zerobus: "the dark knight was an unprecedented success and wolverine already has a sequel in the works"
Problems with your premise: 1) we're talking about comics, not movies, and 2) you're assuming that because a movie made money, it was successful in all demographics. Until we see a sales breakdown, you can't assume that.
And yes, manga are also racist. No arguments on that point. But I don't agree that manga fandom crosses racial boundaries in a meaningful way; go to any convention (or fandom community) and you can usually count the number of non-Asian people of color on both hands.
Again, just because there are a few fans who happen to be people of color does NOT mean that the industry is sufficiently inclusive. And good luck saying that discussions about racism are inane simply because the industry in question is small.
@taxbaby: "go to any convention (or fandom community) and you can usually count the number of non-Asian people of color on both hands."
But the very success of Manga has been as a crossover to white kids. It's not everything, but it's a step. (And actually, not so much Manga but asian pop culture has often been adopted by African-Americans cf Wu Tang Clan.)
As well, Manga crosses the gender barrier better than any other mainstream comics outside of Archie (and interestingly, I have held the suspicion that Archie's "new look" - the major redesign in 40 years - was a response to Manga)
The thing about Hudlin's Black Panther (actually, the character in general) is that it seems to be a noble attempt at creating a sort of African utopia. I haven't read the entire run of the Hudlin series, but it seemed to me that it had no bearing on what is really happening in Africa. (Of course, such a comic would be pretty depressing)
As an African American comic reader I have always found it disheartening that when ever a book with a non white lead hits the market it is usually only a mini-series or one shot. Most of the non white characters are poorly written or depicted in a stereotypical manner. Blacks usually speak in slang, asians are scientist, ninja's, hispanic's fare about as well as blacks. the only race shown in a diverse light are caucasians.
@BobbinBrain: Those characters evolved over time. Look at the first appearance of Luke Cage, the way Wakanda was depicted when it was first shown, the only one who comes close to being depicted in a semi-positive light is Storm. Cyborg of the Titans when he was introduced was simply a slang sprouting jock, overtime his character has evolved. Maybe I was not making my point clearly enough. Those that you have mentioned have grown past their original depiction and that is great, but it does not change the general depiction of race in comics.
I can think of a few exceptions, but yeah, it's pretty bad. One interesting exception is Gotham Central, although you could argue that it is essentially a Law and Order-style TV series done as a comic.
Secondly, I have a blog about Black female superheroes and comic book characters and I choose not talk about issues of racism there when possible - but of course, that's not always avoidable. In some cases, racism is blatant (Captain Confederacy being married to a Black woman, who later BECOMES Captain Confederacy comes to mind). I prefer for my blog to be about celebrating the existence of these characters.
My interest in Black female comic book characters began last year and I was SHOCKED to find that there are at least several hundred. Still, somehow, Black women are criminally underrepresented in the world of comics - characters, creators, and consumers. [blacksuperheroines.blogspot.com]
When it comes to American vs. Non-American, Non-Americans are often villains. There seem to be A LOT of characters from Africa whenever a Black character is invented. Like Black from America and Black from Africa are inherently different and imbued with different traits. Who can say why that is...
The worst examples are the token characters from the 70s and 80s. Remember the Contest OF Champions? We had Sabra from Israel, Arabian Knight, Collective Man (from China, natch, because they're all commies, right?) Shamrock, Blitzkrieg, Peregrine (from France). Even the "white" foreign characters were pathetically stereotyped.
Oddly enough, one more thing to admire Neil Gaiman for: a lot of his characters were non-American, and some of them were significantly non-white. He did entire story arcs in countries which weren't America and people LOVED it. Sandman him (it?) self *was* white, but not caucasian - more talcum powder.
All that foreignness and he was still successful; if not an immediate bestseller, then an enduring and powerful franchise with multiple spinoffs and great staying power.
So - much as the comics industry would like to believe it isn't so - it might *not* be entirely a failure of the buying public, but a failure of the writers (mostly white american males) to realistically and engagingly imagine stories involving non-white, non-american people and cultures.
I think Gaiman has lived long enough in the US to qualify as an "expatriate." Although such things are up to the person to define themselves.
That said, I think that Gaiman is able to do that because he's already established. The thing is, like I wrote above, the world of creators, even among the major companies, is a lot more heterogenuous than the world of characters. Filipino artists, for example, have been a major force at Marvel and DC since the 70s. There some very good African-American artists - Kyle Baker, Dwayne McDuffie, Denys Cowan, Christopher Priest. George Perez is Puerto Rican, and, of course, Jim Lee is Korean.
So, to me anyway, it's not about a dearth of creators, it's about the fact that the media is still culturally conservative.
@David Alvaro: Significantly Non-White means that quite a few of his characters were Black, Arabic, Asian, Alien, Feline, or Other. There were a lot of white people as a whole, but entire chapters of his stories didn't have a single paleface in them. The incarnations themselves weren't actually inherently white either, although they were mostly drawn that way - they had differing appearances depending on who was looking.
I always thought it was more of just the tone of some of the comics with non WALs (White American Leads). I mean until fairly recently a lot of the comics I'd read with non WALs have just seemed cliched and niched to stereotype and not broad enough to be relateable to those in a certain ethic group who didn't fit that persona.
Side note: It's interesting that you mention both the Marvel-Disney deal and Boom! Studios. Boom! is one of the companies that stands to be most-screwed by the Marvel deal, as many of their lead titles are Disney properties. In fact, some of the most important ones (Uncle Scrooge, Mickey Mouse & Friends) haven't even hit the shelves yet, and that's a license that won't be renewed. It's unfortunate, as the company seems to have handled the Muppets titles well, and look like they plan to do the Disney books justice.
@Wookie1972: Donald Duck has been the best-selling weekly comic in Norway for nigh-on 50 years. It's even one of the most sold magazines of any genre, and is miles ahead of other comics.
One of my favorite comics growing up was Green Lantern: Mosaic... An introspective Sci-Fi narrative starring an African American leading an ethnically diverse alien cast. Of course, that was about the same time I was into Deep Space Nine, so there ya' go.
Now, as a white, male Canadian, what I would love to see is a version of Alpha Flight that was actually, y'know, written by a Canadian and didn't rely on American stereotypes. Like, seriously, a midget who dresses in black and is called Puck. REALLY?! I'm surprised they didn't throw a girl with red pigtails and a straw hat in there too.
Disney, reduce racism? Change? Ha! Before you know it, even Nightcrawler will have white skin or suffer slurs.
Kidding, obviously, but Disney was, and still is, inherently racist. Didn't a Gawker site recently complain about their Princess and the Frog game site?
As for comics, it's a mixed bag. The issue has so many sides to it, I'm not even going to go into it here.
@kasviel: For sure! Like, did no one notice how there wasn't any difference at all between Native Americans in Peter Pan vs. Native Americans in Pocahontas?
Depictions of minorities and women in comics are usually hamfisted because the writers are most often white men. So they're not appealing to minorities and women, or anyone really, because there's no authenticity. Asking minorities and women to read books by white men is putting the cart before the horse, in my opinion. But getting more minority and women writers into comics isn't going to solve the problem either, since comics shops are about as lily-white as any place you could find. It's possible that digital distribution may broaden the audience--one can only hope. Otherwise comics readership will eventually be a bunch of old white guys meeting in church basements to wax nostalgic about the good old days.
09/08/09
Examples... 1) The Prowler - Hobie Brown, black villian. Hobie is first shown as a window washer, (dead end job) and frustrated with his place in life mostly due to his color. 2) "Robbie Robertson" the lead editor of the Bugle. Robbies son was involved in a strike at E.S.U. (non racist strike) and the father & son have a discussion about 'making it in a white mans world'. A few instances where Robbie convinced JJJ that he was supporting a racist (Sam Bullit). Once JJJ realized his mistake; he (Jonah) pulled the newspapers support and threw Sam out of his office.
The Sam Bullit issue (#91, "To Smash A Spider") is an excellent example. The issue touches on the racial tension of the day w/out allowing it to interfere with the story.
09/08/09
09/08/09
The reason why I disagree is because of when these comics started. Spider-man began in 63! Wrong or right a black Spider-Man simply would not have sold in 63. With that in mind I think Marvel did a good job addressing the race issue and offering their opinion on it while still working to sell a product. The prowler issue ends with Hobie Brown as the 'lucky one' (no matter your color, you get to lead a 'normal' life while I must continue being miserable) and the Sam B issue ends in a similar fashion - With Sam getting outed by JJJ & Robbie.
S-M is but one example. Many of our favorite comic super-heroes are very old, they go back as far as the 60's & 70's. Selling a product in that time almost demanded the 'white guy - leading role'. Still even with that demand, still knowing they have to sell a product (yes, Marvel employees love their job but they gotta pay the bills like the rest of us), I think Marvel has done a good job at least offering their opinion on the race issue = "It's wrong"
Stan has even mentioned (more than once but I cant find the orig reference I want) that the X-Men (Mutants) are based on racism and the struggle to live in harmony with those that are different. [newsone.com]
09/07/09
I think the reason Milestone failed was that they were not part of the regular DC universe. The easiest way to shore up the sales of a lagging title is to have special guest stars ("hey look! It's Static's pal Batman!")
I think what I'm saying is that this isn't a problem that can be easily solved.
09/05/09
09/07/09
I agree it's a writer problem. One of the stupidest things I remember from the Secret Wars was Jim Shooter's portrayal of Rogue. Now, white Southerners are not a racial minority, but their accents are often used as examples of "stupid" by Northerners. As written by Claremont, Rogue still retained a bit of her accent but became a bit more sophisticated. When Shooter wrote her around the same time, she sounded like she belonged on hee haw.
09/05/09
Not too important, they're freakin' comics ...
That's kind of like the Earth-shattering cultural influence of chewing gum ads.
-Kle.
09/05/09
I think I can understand why Naruto is so popular...
09/05/09
I think Manga scares the crap out of the Big Two, because they can't understand it. But I would actually say that Manga kind of ignores race - that's the only way I can understand that, for example, Sailor Moon (yeah, not really Manga, but whatever) is supposed to be a blonde Japanese girl.
09/05/09
09/06/09
Whether or not most of it is "crap" (a strange thing to say about a genre that encompasses a much wider swath than anything in North American comics) the fact is that if you go to a bookstore, you're going to find a hell of a lot more manga than mainstream graphic novel collections. There is a whole generation for whom comics = Naruto and Shonen Jump.
09/05/09
The irony is that the world of North American comic *artists* is far more integrated that that of comic characters. If superhero artists' drew themselves, we would have a lot more Filipino, Korean, and African-American characters than we already do. (Filipino artists in particular have been popular since the 1970s)
09/04/09
You really think black and latino kids need minority characters to have an interest in comics? That kind of condescension carries as much racism as anything else discussed here. A good character is a good character, and outside of very narrow, closeminded groups, readers of any ethnicity are totally willing to embrace characters of any background, provided they are engaging.
09/04/09
Yes, there are readers who can get past that, obviously. I know a few of them. But I think that when most of the readers of Batman or Wolverine are white males of a certain age, you're not talking about characters with 'broad appeal and relatability'.
09/05/09
That said relatability is important to crafting popular characters. So from a strictly business sense (not that I espouse it), if it makes a character substantially more popular, make him/her/it white. It IS a business. And no, engaging and creative stories DO NOT guarantee new readership or even success with the built in fans.
And if you have the conversation about the American comic industry, why not manga? Its FAR FAR more popular and, in all honesty, SUBSTANTIALLY more racist (and very open about it). Yet manga fandom crosses all racial boundaries. Somehow, I think the law of cause and effect isn't being met here.
Besides comic readership is so negligible. I mean, top books sell between 60 and 150 thousand (on the very upside) copies. Thats an absurdly small number. The insignificance of this debate borders on the inane. I'd wager there are more neo-nazis running around than serious comic fans.
09/05/09
Most people enjoy characters they can associate with. It doesn't mean that Latinos are going to completely ignore Spider-Man or African Americans are going to hate on Batman 'cause he's white (I mean, I suppose some might, but not rational people), but it does mean that
However, I think the big problem isn't the lack of a market as much as it is the fact that most minority characters seem to exist solely for the fact that they're a member of a minority. If people can get characters to the point of "Hi, this is John," and resist the urge to scream "ALSO HE'S BLACK SO THERE'S MY TOKEN MINORITY CHARACTER!" then things might be better.
Also, Dwayne McDuffie's JLA and Hudlin's (?) Black Panther were comics that seemed to go the extreme opposite route and throw in a bunch of black characters like it was some sort of catharsis.
Me, my comic's featuring a female as the main character, and I'm avoiding the "super feminist icon" route just as much as I'm avoiding the "sex object" route, which seem to be the only ways that women leads can be portrayed in comics anymore (Ms. Marvel aside).
09/05/09
Problems with your premise: 1) we're talking about comics, not movies, and 2) you're assuming that because a movie made money, it was successful in all demographics. Until we see a sales breakdown, you can't assume that.
And yes, manga are also racist. No arguments on that point. But I don't agree that manga fandom crosses racial boundaries in a meaningful way; go to any convention (or fandom community) and you can usually count the number of non-Asian people of color on both hands.
Again, just because there are a few fans who happen to be people of color does NOT mean that the industry is sufficiently inclusive. And good luck saying that discussions about racism are inane simply because the industry in question is small.
09/07/09
But the very success of Manga has been as a crossover to white kids. It's not everything, but it's a step. (And actually, not so much Manga but asian pop culture has often been adopted by African-Americans cf Wu Tang Clan.)
As well, Manga crosses the gender barrier better than any other mainstream comics outside of Archie (and interestingly, I have held the suspicion that Archie's "new look" - the major redesign in 40 years - was a response to Manga)
09/07/09
The thing about Hudlin's Black Panther (actually, the character in general) is that it seems to be a noble attempt at creating a sort of African utopia. I haven't read the entire run of the Hudlin series, but it seemed to me that it had no bearing on what is really happening in Africa. (Of course, such a comic would be pretty depressing)
09/04/09
09/05/09
09/06/09
09/07/09
I can think of a few exceptions, but yeah, it's pretty bad. One interesting exception is Gotham Central, although you could argue that it is essentially a Law and Order-style TV series done as a comic.
09/04/09
Secondly, I have a blog about Black female superheroes and comic book characters and I choose not talk about issues of racism there when possible - but of course, that's not always avoidable. In some cases, racism is blatant (Captain Confederacy being married to a Black woman, who later BECOMES Captain Confederacy comes to mind). I prefer for my blog to be about celebrating the existence of these characters.
My interest in Black female comic book characters began last year and I was SHOCKED to find that there are at least several hundred. Still, somehow, Black women are criminally underrepresented in the world of comics - characters, creators, and consumers.
[blacksuperheroines.blogspot.com]
When it comes to American vs. Non-American, Non-Americans are often villains. There seem to be A LOT of characters from Africa whenever a Black character is invented. Like Black from America and Black from Africa are inherently different and imbued with different traits. Who can say why that is...
09/04/09
09/05/09
My first thought when I saw the panel was "Superdickery"!
In all seriousness, the Superman Family comics were among the most freakish things I've ever seen put to paper.
09/07/09
The worst examples are the token characters from the 70s and 80s. Remember the Contest OF Champions? We had Sabra from Israel, Arabian Knight, Collective Man (from China, natch, because they're all commies, right?) Shamrock, Blitzkrieg, Peregrine (from France). Even the "white" foreign characters were pathetically stereotyped.
09/04/09
All that foreignness and he was still successful; if not an immediate bestseller, then an enduring and powerful franchise with multiple spinoffs and great staying power.
So - much as the comics industry would like to believe it isn't so - it might *not* be entirely a failure of the buying public, but a failure of the writers (mostly white american males) to realistically and engagingly imagine stories involving non-white, non-american people and cultures.
09/04/09
09/05/09
09/05/09
I think Gaiman has lived long enough in the US to qualify as an "expatriate." Although such things are up to the person to define themselves.
That said, I think that Gaiman is able to do that because he's already established. The thing is, like I wrote above, the world of creators, even among the major companies, is a lot more heterogenuous than the world of characters. Filipino artists, for example, have been a major force at Marvel and DC since the 70s. There some very good African-American artists - Kyle Baker, Dwayne McDuffie, Denys Cowan, Christopher Priest. George Perez is Puerto Rican, and, of course, Jim Lee is Korean.
So, to me anyway, it's not about a dearth of creators, it's about the fact that the media is still culturally conservative.
09/05/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
09/04/09
What's really interesting is that outside of North America, Mickey and (especially) Donald Duck are much more popular in comics.
09/05/09
09/05/09
Not to mention that the Carl Barks comics were brilliant. Without them, Jeff Smith's work would have been very different.
09/05/09
09/04/09
Now, as a white, male Canadian, what I would love to see is a version of Alpha Flight that was actually, y'know, written by a Canadian and didn't rely on American stereotypes. Like, seriously, a midget who dresses in black and is called Puck. REALLY?! I'm surprised they didn't throw a girl with red pigtails and a straw hat in there too.
09/05/09
@Cory Gross:
Don't forget this classic moment. "Bon Jour," indeed.
09/04/09
Kidding, obviously, but Disney was, and still is, inherently racist. Didn't a Gawker site recently complain about their Princess and the Frog game site?
As for comics, it's a mixed bag. The issue has so many sides to it, I'm not even going to go into it here.
09/04/09
09/04/09