@Imagism: On a more serious note though, it would have to be such a massive amount of methane that would justify advancing the technology the technology so much, that we could transport the methane back (or maybe move there) efficiently enough to be profitable.
@Imagism: Oh, yeah, I just mean we could use the methane when we get there. I wasn't thinking of trying to bring it back.
But there is some compound on the moon which could power our planets for a few hundred years. I can't remember what it is called, but that might be worth hauling back...
I think that the discovery of life on mars will be extremely disruptive religiously and culturally. It's just not in our contemporary worldview that we are not unique.
It will be SO disruptive that I think even an administration like Obama's might think twice about releasing the information. Or at least try to temper it. Yes, sounds conspiracy theory-ish, but as they say on every science fiction show: "You're world is not ready."
It won't disrupt diddly, and it won't threaten religious worldviews. Religious worldviews are generally based upon deities that are (a) omnipotent (b) mysterious. When you combine those two characteristics, nothing can contradict your beliefs.
"It will be SO disruptive that I think even an administration like Obama's might think twice about releasing the information."
Any government officials that make a decision like that should be burned alive. It's none of their business to make judgments of that nature - they work for us, not the other way around.
Besides, the idea that they might cover it up is preposterous.
I don't know what I was thinking. Can you imagine if we ever had an administration that tampered with and edited scientific reports and conclusions and pressured heads of agencies and scientists from NASA to the Energy Department?
Over abundance of methane? I think we all know what this means. Dragons. In retrospect it seems so obvious, that, at some point during the middle ages, all the Dragons packed up everything that proved they existed (other than paintings and stories, which they knew people would eventually take as fables) and moved to Mars. I feel like an idiot for not realizing this sooner.
I know everyone wants it to be microbes, but how many previous discoveries have we seen touted as "Possible Evidence Of Life On Mars!" that end up a year or two later as "Whoops, sorry, just chemistry" or geology or error.
Got a feeling this will be the same.
AFAIK, life on Mars is just a song and a couple of cop shows.
I'm firmly convinced that if there is microbial life on Mars it is ultimately going to lead to the end of life on earth.
Seriously. If it's there? Just leave it there. Test it there. You don't need to look at it in person. You don't need a sample. Do. Not. Bring. It. Back.
@92BuickLeSabre: You do have a point, but the odds are much greater that the abundance of life here on earth would kill it before it could do any damage. Maybe we could compromise and run preliminary tests in LEO?
@Hamslicer: Wasn't it? And I was able to make it from all the way over here.
@Gann: I don't know. I'm guessing anything surviving under the Martian surface could kick our wussy-atmosphere-addicted bio-organisms' asses. We may have the strength of diversity, but it's got the strength of being exposed to the universe for millions of years.
@LittleDragon: I will absolutely do that for you. I have everything ready except for the space ship and some supplies.
@92BuickLeSabre: Where as we have evolved in a place other than the universe? An organism that evolves in an extreme environment like that would likely be very specialized, and much less successful than us at living in our native environment.
@Gann: But of course, the risks (even though they are minuscule) far outweigh the benefits so I actually agree with keeping martian life at arms length for the initial decade of tests.
so none of this matters until we can find a way of exploring those areas without completely contaminating them with our Earth-Space Microbes, right? I mean, does NASA have to scrap a whole generation of space probes now or what? I am ever so curious what kind of materials one would need to use for this sort of thing. Its weird futuro ethics!
I dunno if I'd read that information and say there's a "strong likelihood" of life being there, but it's certainly becoming more and more of a possibility.
@What is a man?: Yes, it is a strong likelihood. There are basically only two possibilities, and life is one of them. In fact, both possibilities could be true: there could be life and volcanic activity. This is the very best evidence for life we've ever had.
@twDarkflame: Yah. My understanding was that Mars is pretty dormant tectonically. There are those 4 big-ass shield volcanoes but they seem to have blown their wad a long time ago. There might be some vulcanisim accounting for the methane seeping through the sands and fines but I'd rather believe that this is biology.
@What is a man?: Whether or not there is actual life, they have found the potential for it. These conditions could facilitate engineering an organism to begin a terra-forming process to make it eventually habitable.
01/20/09
I mean the life on mars.
01/19/09
Fuel = Colonization
01/20/09
Colonization = massive investment
Let the race begin!
01/20/09
01/20/09
But there is some compound on the moon which could power our planets for a few hundred years. I can't remember what it is called, but that might be worth hauling back...
01/19/09
It will be SO disruptive that I think even an administration like Obama's might think twice about releasing the information. Or at least try to temper it. Yes, sounds conspiracy theory-ish, but as they say on every science fiction show: "You're world is not ready."
01/20/09
It won't disrupt diddly, and it won't threaten religious worldviews. Religious worldviews are generally based upon deities that are (a) omnipotent (b) mysterious. When you combine those two characteristics, nothing can contradict your beliefs.
"It will be SO disruptive that I think even an administration like Obama's might think twice about releasing the information."
Any government officials that make a decision like that should be burned alive. It's none of their business to make judgments of that nature - they work for us, not the other way around.
Besides, the idea that they might cover it up is preposterous.
-Kle.
01/20/09
Your post's content makes me sad,
But your attitude makes me giggle.
01/20/09
I don't know what I was thinking. Can you imagine if we ever had an administration that tampered with and edited scientific reports and conclusions and pressured heads of agencies and scientists from NASA to the Energy Department?
That would be crazy!!!!!!
01/19/09
01/19/09
Except this time, I'm still excited after reading the article. :D
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
You sound just like my friend Paul. Who is awesome.
01/19/09
Got a feeling this will be the same.
AFAIK, life on Mars is just a song and a couple of cop shows.
01/19/09
Seriously. If it's there? Just leave it there. Test it there. You don't need to look at it in person. You don't need a sample. Do. Not. Bring. It. Back.
01/19/09
01/19/09
@Gann: I don't know. I'm guessing anything surviving under the Martian surface could kick our wussy-atmosphere-addicted bio-organisms' asses. We may have the strength of diversity, but it's got the strength of being exposed to the universe for millions of years.
@LittleDragon: I will absolutely do that for you. I have everything ready except for the space ship and some supplies.
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
[www.sciencedirect.com]
01/19/09
01/19/09
"OOOh! OOOhh! I'm just... this makes me SO...Arrgh!"
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
01/19/09
Either massively changes what we thought.
Geologicaly activity is, apperently, a bit of a puzzle if it does exist, because mars magnetic field is so weak.
01/19/09
Keeping pseudopods crossed!
01/19/09