Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #mondayhate more → The New York Times Columnist Who's Helping To Ruin The Future
| posts about #mondayhate more → |
The New York Times Columnist Who's Helping To Ruin The Future |
11/10/09
11/11/09
"If that's not a good indicator that there's problems with the science..."
It isn't, for kindergarten-obvious reasons.
"...then I don't know what is."
That part I believe. #ecology
11/11/09
11/13/09
11/10/09
It's important to remember that politics corrupts science at least as much as industry does, though. There isn't really a lot of scientific objectivity around, anymore.
-Kle. #ecology
11/09/09
"Political science" isn't meant to be taken literally.
11/09/09
11/10/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
The computer is your friend. #ecology
11/09/09
Oh really, 10,000 whole years? Wow, a species manages to stick around for a few millennia and and it's all set to discover perpetual motion, fairy dust, or whatever fantasy technology it's going to take to bring about his bright, exponentially expanding, no-strings-attached future.
Which is just going off his opening about how the critics of his Kurzweil love letter believe: "that, just as bacteria proliferating in a petri dish will eventually exhaust the resources, we too will hit a limit. I think these skeptics are missing the lessons of history"
What's the lesson? That just because humans haven't yet hit a limit on the finite amount of resources on the planet, that there must not be one?
And then there's this: "Unlike Malthus, we can look around and see that we already have the energy and technology to feed a larger population than exists on Earth today." Yes, I'm sure it's easy to see when you're sitting around in New York, in the United States, and not, say, some country where starvation is a routine occurrence. I'm sure JT can also see how much bigger a population we can feed and also when we'll have to stop the growth of the human population at its current rate, and also how to do this without hurting anybody's feelings. #ecology
11/09/09
Unfortunately this is pretty common--an unwavering faith in progress that denies the reality that nothing in this world comes without consequences. #ecology
11/09/09
11/10/09
11/09/09
(b) As I and every other mathematician keep saying, EXPONENTIAL GROWTH DOES NOT LEAD TO A SINGULARITY. THERE IS NO BLOW-UP IN FINITE TIME UNDER THESE CONDITIONS. THIS IS COVERED IN CALCULUS 2, PEOPLE! #ecology
11/09/09
The Dark Ages were a myth, expounded by Renaissance scholars and those with an axe to grind against the Roman Catholic Church.
Recent excavations and discoveries in Europe and England have revealed the whole idea that humanity dwindled into a technological and social backwater is, in the words on one scholar, pure bollocks.
Watch just one season of Time Team and you'll quickly come to realise the Europeans of that time were far from technologically and socially backwards. #ecology
11/09/09
11/09/09
Do I have your permission to use that term? #ecology
11/09/09
[en.wikipedia.org] #ecology
11/09/09
11/09/09
So the irony here is staggering, and he obviously doesn't realize it. #ecology
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
Hmmmmmm
:P
11/09/09
Wasn't "Malthus Vs. The Singularity" an episode of CHUCK? The one where Bryce Larkin bailed out for WHITE COLLAR? #ecology
11/09/09
#ecology
11/09/09
Just keep putting pollution into the air and it will do something bad.
Yes the Earth does go thru climate cycles and we all know that one but greenhouse gasses do bring as temperature up and that one is proved in labs.
As far as I think nowadays I will go on record as stating that Global Warming is due to both the natural Earth Climate along with us polluting the air.Both things are happening and both are casuing climate issues. #ecology
11/09/09
We have decades? Where's the evidence for that? Moreover, if it boils down to adapting, I'd like to remind Mr. Tierney that species do NOT adapt to significant changes to the environment in a matter of decades, not even us oh-mighty humans. #ecology
11/09/09
11/09/09
11/09/09
When there is a need to evolve or adapt with speed, biological systems will find a way. #ecology
11/10/09
Humans have none of those characteristics, so our species' "rate of evolution" is much slower than that of those examples you mentioned.