@bookling: The first one had two editions. The first had the simpler animation, the second had a cleaner animation more in line with this one, dubbed the "Special Edition." Maybe that is what he meant?
She might not tickle everyone's boats, but one thing that you can't deny is that she's an extremely capable enterntainer. She's got that down pretty down perfect. #futurism
I was highly doubtful of Gaga until I saw her speak at the Equality March in D.C. She came out in a highly respectable ensemble and delivered a thoughtful, caring, and eloquent speech.
At least her priorities are in the right place. #futurism
@0kami: It's really really nice to see at least one celebrity who has basically made a name for herself on the gay dollar put her fame where her mouth is and actually support the community that made her famous.
I'm passive-aggressively commenting at you, Madonna, I *know* you read this. #futurism
@golddiggersof2033: Kathy Griffin is one other celebrity who has backed her gays in a big way after they helped her attain fame and fortune, so there's at least two out there. #futurism
@Batmanuel: Good point. I was thinking specifically of musicians when I was posting since there are tons of celebrities who sincerely heart teh geighs. Like Kathy Griffin. Like Margaret Cho. I just didn't see them at the HRC dinner getting pwned by the president. #futurism
She came across incredibly strange on the Johnathon Ross show!! Really diva-ish and just incredibly strange!
Is it true shes an hermaphrodite?? Im not being disrespectful, but a recent show showed something fall out. Ive also read that she went on a radio station and stood up for the fact that she was and it was nothing to be ashamed about.
Great poet and song writter. But she's picking all the wrong music to but her writting talent too!!
Edited by CoffinDodger (If the typos crap. Blame my keyboard) at 11/11/09 12:52 PM
CoffinDodger (If the typos crap. Blame my keyboard) was starred
CoffinDodger (If the typos crap. Blame my keyboard) was unstarred
@Pessimippopotamus: It is supposed to be incredibly small. She went on record saying that it was soo small that herself and the girls (her backing dancers) think its just a running joke. Apperantly she just tapes it down!!! #futurism
Given her costumes, and how many costume *changes* she makes (these don't happen in dressing rooms, there's no time), there's no doubt in my mind that if she were truly intersex, we would have definitive evidence by now. #futurism
@pH-unbalanced: Like I said..I heard it somewhere. And usually when its on the web its as false as Wiki!!! Thats why I asked the question rather than make a definitive statement. That would have beeen unwise and disrespectful!!
It also goes to show how quick and easily the rumour mill can work its magic! Especially with the internet nowdays!! Scary!! Personally I dont find her attractive. Shes small and annoying and incredibly strange!! But it doesnt detract from the fact that shes a great writter and poet! #futurism
@CoffinDodger (If the typos crap. Blame my keyboard): I'm pretty sure she's the world's biggest troll. I think she told people about the penis just to mess with them, the same way she does with the fashion magazines.
She's a girl. No doctor would allow a child to grow up a hermaphrodite without some form of sexual reassignment surgery. Too many problems with estrogen/testosterone abundance. #futurism
@Pessimippopotamus: I've seen her performances before. That's great she can play piano. As soon as she starts singing I get depressed.
Fine I'll concede your point, the actual girl has a bit of talent... but you don't see it in the music video of the OP, and you don't hear it in her songs that are recorded.
If she stuck to the stuff above, and actually focused on the music, I'd have way more respect for her. But when she puts on her GaGa "persona" she does a good job of creating the image of a non-talented hack. I guess that's the idea.
@cylon_conspiracy: when she puts on her GaGa "persona" she does a good job of creating the image of a non-talented hack. I guess that's the idea.
That is the idea. She's a satirical performance artist playing an exaggerated popstar persona in a sort of "Borat" method acting way.
It's easy to listen to Kate Bush singing about old novels and nuclear war and feel smart in your high tower away from all the commoners, getting the joke in Lady Gaga requires you to be smart and be part of the society around you. #futurism
@eviladrian: Kate Bush can sing. That's why I like her. AND, Kate Bush put on some pretty weird live performances as well, that's why I mentioned her.
If Lady GaGa wants to be Borat, that's great. I like actual music. Like I said earlier, it's clear she is a entertainer first/songwriter second. That's fine.
I'm not in an ivory tower. I just have good taste. I'm a part of the society around me but that doesn't mean I'm going to dumb down my taste so I can slum it with you. #futurism
Whenever I see elaborate videos I always wonder if the talent knows they're paying for it? The record company merely puts it down to being taken out of your earnings down the road.
That said, I like her. She's an entertainer who's working hard to put on a show. If I want jeans and a t-shirt I'll look in the mirror. #futurism
Not that she's not creative or talented and what not but are there really people today who find her whole spiel shocking? I saw her performance at the music video awards and to paraphrase Sir West all I thought was "I'ma let you finish but Madonna, Cher, Bjork and Grace Jones were the greatest freak you out female personalities of all time, and they did it 20-30 years ago. But thanks for trying." #futurism
@Pope John Peeps II: I believe his specific words were, "Not that she's NOT creative or talented," which starts his argument off in a much better light.
Wow, you need to read all the words before you second guess someone's opinion about an artist. And for the record, I have the album, it's not bad but I'll take La Roux, Little Boots, or Ladyhawke any day in the Synthpop female artists starting with L battle. I can respect her but her main talent seems to lie in self promotion and shock tactics, which in and of itself isn't a bad thing but the way she does just feels like a remix of early Madonna, thats all. #futurism
Anyhow, the lady playing Gaga is named steffani germanotti, and she's actually amazing. She's been writing hit pop songs for different artists since something like the age of 19, and built a burlesque troop which then got famous, which then became her whole Gaga act. She turned her whole career into a single exuberant art project and it turned out amazing. I think that's brilliant. She's different than madonna and cher and all those others though - they built a personality based on themselves through a mix of arrogance and oversharing and sort of blind silliness. But everything Gaga does is calculated to reveal nothing at all about the person she really is. It's the perfection of the pop star. Something like what Marilyn Manson used to do, but with more glitz and sex. #futurism
@Plague: I mean, Gaga is nothing without clearly appreciating her points of reference. But also, please define "better". Certainly not with more success. #futurism
@Plague: Whatever man. The idea that "this artist did it first" is played out. It's been played out for about forty five thousand years, ever since the second cave painter saw the first cave painting and thought "niiiiice".
It's ART. Art is a continuum of influence and aggregation of influence. Artists who work in the same field usually work with the same themes, and often the same kinds of image. That's ALL ART. All of it.
Like every other field of endeavour. Saying "this person did this first" simply doesn't apply. #futurism
@Pope John Peeps II: agreed. It's like the goldfrapp mandonna argument. Can't we just be glad there's someone out there who is putting forth something different into the pop media? who cares who did it first, those who know, know. Those who don't, don't care. #futurism
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: Hell yes, I LOVE Ladyhawke. But she is a song first/video second type of gal.
I think people confuse entertainers with songwriters these days, and they aren't the same thing. With Lady GaGa, the song is just the "filler" to justify a sexy video.
@cylon_conspiracy: See, this is my impression. I love me some synthpop, but I can't stand GaGa's music. I totally get her schtick and it's pretty cool I suppose, but the music sounds horrible to me. #futurism
@jbq: GaGa is not synthpop. Ladyhawke is real synthpop because she is trying to emulate the best parts of that genre from the 80s and write songs that could be from that era, but are still modern. GaGa just uses the surface elements of synthpop because that is what is big in the clubs, electro, whatever you want to call it... just the real thing cannibalized. In a few years GaGa will be onto country/rap if that's where the trends go, and Ladyhawke will still be making good music because that is her goal. Not to be a buffoon. #futurism
@cylon_conspiracy: Yep. He did it too, to an extent. As did lots of people before David Bowie. As did Little Richard, to an extent... As did Liberace... to an extent. #futurism
@cylon_conspiracy: Well there you go. You and you alone have penetrated to the core of Truth with your CoreTruthCylonVision (TM). Congratulations. Now the rest of us shall bow and scrape before you. There. You win the opinion and you win the argument and you win the internet and you are handsome and smart and your penis is made of gold. #futurism
@Pope John Peeps II: Well, to an extent Marily Manson completely ripped off David Bowie, he stole his entire persona, image, and singing voice. But I thought it was cool. Just wish more people would have recognized where he got that from.
Bowie was influenced by Little Richard though, 'tis true.
@cylon_conspiracy: My mistake, I'm a complete blank on what the multitudes of musical sub-genres are called these days... Except Gangstagrass. I totally know how to identify gangstagrass. #futurism
@jbq: Synthpop is just anything that has an 80s sound, and uses lots of synthesizers. Bands like Depeche Mode, Erasure, A-ha, Pet Shop Boys, etc. "New Wave" bands. So synthpop is intended to sound like, those influences.
What Lady Gaga is doing is just flat out "current pop-trend mishmash". Rap, hip-hop, rock, brittney-spears like ballads, just a bunch of gunk.
In any case if you don't like her style at least your ears are attuned for quality, no matter what it's called.
@cylon_conspiracy: @Meredith Woerner: @Plague: @Pope John Peeps II: @Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.:
I have to admit i don't really like Lady GG (too obvious - too obviously executed) BUT she is entirely ironic in her presentation. She is most definitely taking the piss (and the $$$) out of the fact she gets away with what she does.
As Pope Peeps states; "She turned her whole career into a single exuberant art project and it turned out amazing". That is a pretty accurate description of what Lady Gaga represents. Its all about what my girlfriend would describe as "the Art of Self Invention" and aesthetic identity.
She presents herself as shallow, but secretly there is another story hidden behind the appearance. This is brilliant. It creates a more stunning critical shock - and allows for intellectual debate such as this #futurism
@Jeremy Tapsell: To me she looks like a dancing hooker... which is fine because that's acceptable these days. Maybe if she had a good singing voice I'd take her more seriously, I don't know.
But hey, she's rich and famous, so she obviously did something right. #futurism
@Pope John Peeps II: I just want to re voice my opinion here. I'm fine with her doing whatever she wants regardless of who did it first... but I'm more surprised that anyone would find her shocking antics shocking in this day and age. When teenie poppers dance on stripper poles for kiddie shows is a woman covering her face with lace and latex really shocking anyone or making anyone think? Or is it just tired? It's like when I see punks with liberty spikes and Conflict Buttflaps... IT's a good look, I still think it's cool, but do they really think they're getting in anyones' face these days? Haven't people seen it all by now?
I basically want someone to actually do something new and/or shocking/different. I'm more shocked by the Duggars than I am by this video. #futurism
@cylon_conspiracy: Agreed. I only grabbed the Lady GaGa album because she got lumped in with those other artists and was all of asudden way bigger than them. It's house music as far as I can tell, which is fine sometimes but once I get past the serious catchyness there isn't much there... Like Linkin Park.
And while we're posting cool videos... #futurism
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: It's new to them so it's brand new. You can buy punk rock band shirts at Wal-Mart now, but I don't think the kids buying them see the irony.
Each generation has to have their own rebellion. When they get older they realize how they were just copying someone else. #futurism
@cylon_conspiracy: If you think Manson stole his whole persona from Bowie, I can't possibly disagree with you more. Both are totally different amalgams - in theme, in song, in imagery, in action, in sexuality, even in mythic ontology. Even in the audience both ended up reaching, and the reaction both provoked.
@Plague: I'm not saying this to be cruel, but you should know that this is the kind of thing said EXCLUSIVELY by people who don't study or understand art. It's probably not something anyone should really say in public. I have never known a serious, legitimate artist or art scholar to hold this opinion. It's sort of on par with beginning a conversation with the phrase "well, fox news said that..." #futurism
@Jeremy Tapsell: See, the thing is that EVERYone self invents. Every artist. All the time. And every artist knows it somehow. The ones who don't realize it and can't handle it end up self-destructing or going into solitude or both. The ones who realize and can handle it separate themselves. They start talking about their "brand" or some nonsense. But they make it work.
The ones who surpass that realize and embrace and cherish that sort of self-abnegation, use it to further a theme. Gaga did exactly that. Look at that whole video - it's intimately human, with sexy bodies and alluring softness, but everything in it is sterile and more often than not the human identity is plasticized, defaced.
She's made herself into a posed doll, something graceful. But one with a heart of pure sex, and based honestly in some really great songwriting (which she writes herself), some great musical talent and a fabulous voice (anyone arguing that her voice isn't amazing is flat out wrong).
It's a pretty intense and singular creation. As someone who thinks a lot about art, I respect her very much. #futurism
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: What did Madonna ever do to 'freak' anyone out? I mean other than dress up in normal girl clothes for material girl and wear those bullet bras that were obviously cribbed from the 10+ year old (at the time) Rolling Stones "Some Girls" album cover?
I don't think you can count her passionless sex photo book as that didn't really suprise anyone. #futurism
@Plague: She should kill of the Lady GaGa character and come back posing as a talented singer songwriter. Now THAT would freak out her fans who don't get that they're really being made fun of. #futurism
@vinylrake: I don't know how old you are but I seem to remember quite a few people at the time being surprised by her look, her frankness with her sexuality, her in your face attitude, her heavy drubbing of religion. We can look at it now as being tame, but it's only because she did it that we can think that. #futurism
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: I was a kid when Like A Virgin came out.. at the time Madonna was a revolutionary performer, and she is the one that upset the apple cart. She really is the template for all "shocking" female artists that followed in the mainstream (because obviously the punk movement had her beat, but she made it popular). #futurism
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: Just give it another 5 years and Madonna will prolapse live on stage - that's pretty much the only way any artist can get more shocking.
Gaga does good work - it's not thought-provoking art, but in these rabidly po-mo days that pretty much is considered art, and she's witty enough to get away with it.
I'll take this over Damien Hirst's latest retread of his own fairly unoriginal past work any day. #futurism
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: Old enough to remember it all from a 'grown up' viewpoint. And sure SOME people found the whole sex with religious trappings look suprising or freaky, but some people are freaked out by wheat crust pizza. I always thought that when she wanted publicity she would set her sights on the puritanical jugular - so I'll give her credit she knew who to target to get maximum publicity, but having already lived through my impressionable teen years by the time she showed up, I don't recall her ever being shocking or freaking anyone out - but I am speaking from an urban coastal secular commie POV, to be fair she probably suprised/shocked a lot of people in the conservative mid-west and Bible Belt areas of the US. #futurism
@Plague: That's just as senseless. It's okay that you don't understand what I'm trying to say. It makes conversation easier when everyone finds their own level, and announces it broadly.
Let me just ask you: what sort of art ISN'T marketing. What is marketing? Knowing what someone wants and being able to craft a statement that resonates with them. How on earth do you get the idea that's not what artists want? An artist doesn't want to reach people? Doesn't want to attract them? Clearly they do. When I write a story or a poem, I'm crafting it to attract someone else. That's generally what artists do. I'm not sure what YOU do, but I guess it's not this.
@Pope John Peeps II: Actually it's kind of embarrassing for you my man, telling everyone how wise you are about "art", making it sound like no one knows jack shit. You sound like someone who just took a remedial college course in art history and are waking around trying to convince people you're an art professor.
You're bending over backwards trying to convince everyone she's some genius artist when she's just an average, normal girl who happened to make a few smart moves. She's not going to sleep with you. She's not going to read this thread and remember you in her dreams.
In reality you don't have a very good grasp of music history. That can be changed though.
@cylon_conspiracy: Wow. You really don't get anything. Do you think you somehow came out well at the end of this? That anyone who reads this will think you're anything but an imbecile? You don't even see it, do you? #futurism
@Pope John Peeps II: Yeah. I only work at the record label she's on. But sure, keep on about all that "art" you are a "scholar" of while I sit in on the marketing meetings. I can get you a pre-order for the Monster box though if you want! If they ever get done with all the photoshop work, I mean. #futurism
@Jeremy Tapsell: My argument was that Peeps said GaGa's bravura identity recreation and stage antics were much like Manson before her. I said "you mean David Bowie", because I think Manson completely copied Bowie, 100%. I even said I thought it was cool, because I am old enough to have followed Manson from the beginning. When he does the Bowie thing, his work is better. When he strays, he gets blamed for school shootings.
And just to clarify, although Bowie was a huge influence, Manson didn't steal his actual image until after he had established himself.
And I suppose a secondary point would be, GaGa is no Manson, and she is definitely no Bowie. She's a slutty chick who can play a piano, but apparently, all she has do is say "I'm kidding! This is irony!", and you guys eat it up like she's freaking Andy Warhol. No, she's just a girl selling sex. Like every other pop-star chick who does elaborate dance numbers in their underwear. She would have an advantage, if she could actually SING.... But as has been pointed out, she's like Borat. To have a good singing voice would ruin the effect.
That was pretty much, the gist of my argument. Thanks for asking. Now the argument has shifted into Peeps declaring himself official spokesperson for "art" and making people feel like fools for not seeing the inherent brilliance in Lady GaGas work, trying to convince us that a polished turd is not a turd.
What's your excuse? What the hell are you doing here? Do you have something to add?
I really wanted to see this, but Lady Gaga's music makes my skin crawl so I had to turn it off. Bejeebus it's bad. Off to the Jez to see the pics, then. #futurism
@Ajh: It's pretty awesome imagery all-round, kind of crazy, warped, occult cyber-punk meets.. I don't know, crazy, bat-shit weirdo crap. It's pretty damn cool. It's like, I'll never forget Michael Jackson's fantastic videos; never much liked the music, but damn those videos were cool. At least I had enough stamina to weather the music, though... Gettin' old, I s'pose.. #futurism
@reddingofish: I think a huge part of Gaga's appeal is that she is such a perfectly evocative blend of pop culture mega phenomena! Shades of Madonna, Michael Jackson, Cher, Cyndi Lauper, Bette Middler, Christina Aguilera, Gwen Stefani, Pink, Grace Jones, Kate Bush.... ooh, I could go on. Love this bitch. #futurism
11/12/09
Here's the original that started it all:
[www.atom.com]
and here is the remade Special Edition:
[www.atom.com]
We got Death Star *DEATH STAR* Death Star *Death Star* Death Star!!
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
@The_Sporean_Bob: There's a second one? I missed it! #starwars
11/12/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
At least her priorities are in the right place. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
I'm passive-aggressively commenting at you, Madonna, I *know* you read this. #futurism
11/11/09
11/12/09
11/11/09
Is it true shes an hermaphrodite?? Im not being disrespectful, but a recent show showed something fall out. Ive also read that she went on a radio station and stood up for the fact that she was and it was nothing to be ashamed about.
Great poet and song writter. But she's picking all the wrong music to but her writting talent too!!
11/11/09
"Is it true shes an hermaphrodite??"
Doesn't the video answer the question? I didn't see any crotchular protrusions anywhere. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
Given her costumes, and how many costume *changes* she makes (these don't happen in dressing rooms, there's no time), there's no doubt in my mind that if she were truly intersex, we would have definitive evidence by now. #futurism
11/11/09
It also goes to show how quick and easily the rumour mill can work its magic! Especially with the internet nowdays!! Scary!! Personally I dont find her attractive. Shes small and annoying and incredibly strange!! But it doesnt detract from the fact that shes a great writter and poet! #futurism
11/11/09
She's a girl. No doctor would allow a child to grow up a hermaphrodite without some form of sexual reassignment surgery. Too many problems with estrogen/testosterone abundance. #futurism
11/11/09
Which is just as well because I wouldn't actually listen to music like this, but I like the soft porn videos that come from it.
I'm more of a Kylie Minogue kind of guy. Sexy + actual talent.
11/11/09
Or is that her being unsexy?
11/11/09
11/11/09
Fine I'll concede your point, the actual girl has a bit of talent... but you don't see it in the music video of the OP, and you don't hear it in her songs that are recorded.
If she stuck to the stuff above, and actually focused on the music, I'd have way more respect for her. But when she puts on her GaGa "persona" she does a good job of creating the image of a non-talented hack. I guess that's the idea.
Now I'm going to listen to Kate Bush.
11/11/09
11/11/09
That is the idea. She's a satirical performance artist playing an exaggerated popstar persona in a sort of "Borat" method acting way.
It's easy to listen to Kate Bush singing about old novels and nuclear war and feel smart in your high tower away from all the commoners, getting the joke in Lady Gaga requires you to be smart and be part of the society around you. #futurism
11/11/09
If Lady GaGa wants to be Borat, that's great. I like actual music. Like I said earlier, it's clear she is a entertainer first/songwriter second. That's fine.
I'm not in an ivory tower. I just have good taste. I'm a part of the society around me but that doesn't mean I'm going to dumb down my taste so I can slum it with you. #futurism
11/11/09
That said, I like her. She's an entertainer who's working hard to put on a show. If I want jeans and a t-shirt I'll look in the mirror. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
Wow. You don't know a thing about the person playing Lady Gaga. I'd really suggest you look up her career so far before you keep on talking. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
Wow, you need to read all the words before you second guess someone's opinion about an artist. And for the record, I have the album, it's not bad but I'll take La Roux, Little Boots, or Ladyhawke any day in the Synthpop female artists starting with L battle. I can respect her but her main talent seems to lie in self promotion and shock tactics, which in and of itself isn't a bad thing but the way she does just feels like a remix of early Madonna, thats all. #futurism
11/11/09
Anyhow, the lady playing Gaga is named steffani germanotti, and she's actually amazing. She's been writing hit pop songs for different artists since something like the age of 19, and built a burlesque troop which then got famous, which then became her whole Gaga act. She turned her whole career into a single exuberant art project and it turned out amazing. I think that's brilliant. She's different than madonna and cher and all those others though - they built a personality based on themselves through a mix of arrogance and oversharing and sort of blind silliness. But everything Gaga does is calculated to reveal nothing at all about the person she really is. It's the perfection of the pop star. Something like what Marilyn Manson used to do, but with more glitz and sex. #futurism
11/11/09
It's just a shame that Roisin Murphy did it first and better. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
It's ART. Art is a continuum of influence and aggregation of influence. Artists who work in the same field usually work with the same themes, and often the same kinds of image. That's ALL ART. All of it.
Like every other field of endeavour. Saying "this person did this first" simply doesn't apply. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
I think people confuse entertainers with songwriters these days, and they aren't the same thing. With Lady GaGa, the song is just the "filler" to justify a sexy video.
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
Bowie was influenced by Little Richard though, 'tis true.
11/11/09
11/11/09
What Lady Gaga is doing is just flat out "current pop-trend mishmash". Rap, hip-hop, rock, brittney-spears like ballads, just a bunch of gunk.
In any case if you don't like her style at least your ears are attuned for quality, no matter what it's called.
11/11/09
I have to admit i don't really like Lady GG (too obvious - too obviously executed) BUT she is entirely ironic in her presentation. She is most definitely taking the piss (and the $$$) out of the fact she gets away with what she does.
As Pope Peeps states; "She turned her whole career into a single exuberant art project and it turned out amazing". That is a pretty accurate description of what Lady Gaga represents. Its all about what my girlfriend would describe as "the Art of Self Invention" and aesthetic identity.
She presents herself as shallow, but secretly there is another story hidden behind the appearance. This is brilliant. It creates a more stunning critical shock - and allows for intellectual debate such as this #futurism
11/11/09
How did you know about my penis? #futurism
11/11/09
But hey, she's rich and famous, so she obviously did something right. #futurism
11/11/09
I basically want someone to actually do something new and/or shocking/different. I'm more shocked by the Duggars than I am by this video. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
And while we're posting cool videos... #futurism
11/11/09
Each generation has to have their own rebellion. When they get older they realize how they were just copying someone else. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
@Plague: I'm not saying this to be cruel, but you should know that this is the kind of thing said EXCLUSIVELY by people who don't study or understand art. It's probably not something anyone should really say in public. I have never known a serious, legitimate artist or art scholar to hold this opinion. It's sort of on par with beginning a conversation with the phrase "well, fox news said that..." #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
The ones who surpass that realize and embrace and cherish that sort of self-abnegation, use it to further a theme. Gaga did exactly that. Look at that whole video - it's intimately human, with sexy bodies and alluring softness, but everything in it is sterile and more often than not the human identity is plasticized, defaced.
She's made herself into a posed doll, something graceful. But one with a heart of pure sex, and based honestly in some really great songwriting (which she writes herself), some great musical talent and a fabulous voice (anyone arguing that her voice isn't amazing is flat out wrong).
It's a pretty intense and singular creation. As someone who thinks a lot about art, I respect her very much. #futurism
11/11/09
It's not art. It's marketing. #futurism
11/11/09
I don't think you can count her passionless sex photo book as that didn't really suprise anyone. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
Gaga does good work - it's not thought-provoking art, but in these rabidly po-mo days that pretty much is considered art, and she's witty enough to get away with it.
I'll take this over Damien Hirst's latest retread of his own fairly unoriginal past work any day. #futurism
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
Let me just ask you: what sort of art ISN'T marketing. What is marketing? Knowing what someone wants and being able to craft a statement that resonates with them. How on earth do you get the idea that's not what artists want? An artist doesn't want to reach people? Doesn't want to attract them? Clearly they do. When I write a story or a poem, I'm crafting it to attract someone else. That's generally what artists do. I'm not sure what YOU do, but I guess it's not this.
11/11/09
11/11/09
You're bending over backwards trying to convince everyone she's some genius artist when she's just an average, normal girl who happened to make a few smart moves. She's not going to sleep with you. She's not going to read this thread and remember you in her dreams.
In reality you don't have a very good grasp of music history. That can be changed though.
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
OK buddy. Enjoy your tenure as the head of the Lady Gaga Fan Club. #futurism
11/12/09
11/12/09
Your argument is what? Marilyn Manson copied Bowie? and this means...?
At least its not as bad as Trent Rezmor copying Gary Numan #futurism
11/12/09
And just to clarify, although Bowie was a huge influence, Manson didn't steal his actual image until after he had established himself.
And I suppose a secondary point would be, GaGa is no Manson, and she is definitely no Bowie. She's a slutty chick who can play a piano, but apparently, all she has do is say "I'm kidding! This is irony!", and you guys eat it up like she's freaking Andy Warhol. No, she's just a girl selling sex. Like every other pop-star chick who does elaborate dance numbers in their underwear. She would have an advantage, if she could actually SING.... But as has been pointed out, she's like Borat. To have a good singing voice would ruin the effect.
That was pretty much, the gist of my argument. Thanks for asking. Now the argument has shifted into Peeps declaring himself official spokesperson for "art" and making people feel like fools for not seeing the inherent brilliance in Lady GaGas work, trying to convince us that a polished turd is not a turd.
What's your excuse? What the hell are you doing here? Do you have something to add?
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
With a little Marylin Manson and blowup rubber doll thrown in. #futurism
11/11/09