<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[io9: Nanotech]]></title>
		
		<link>http://io9.com/tag/nanotech</link>
		<description><![CDATA[io9 posts tagged 'nanotech']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Three New Medical Technologies That Could Save Your Life]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/Picture_9.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/11/500x_Picture_9.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> Three new therapies that might make their way to hospitals soon show impressive possibilities for changing the way you heal, using lasers and nanotechnology, as well as synthetic skin and superhealing nerve cells.</p>

<p><strong>Nanoboxes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://news-info.wustl.edu/news/page/normal/14996.html">Researchers at Washington University in St Louis</a> have developed tiny gold cubes called nanoboxes which could deliver drugs to precisely targeted areas of the body. How? These boxes only open up and spill their drug contents when exposed to light.</p>
<p>The nanoscale boxes will come packed with a drug, and then release it when hit by a laser. To do this, nanoscale gold boxes are created, and then coated with a polymer called poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). The polymers cling to the outer walls of the cube like hairs on a muppet, and seal the pores on the cube, thus preventing any of the payload from leaking. When the gold is hit by light of a resonant frequency, it absorbs it and converts it to heat, and when the polymer is warmed, it shrinks and collapses, releasing the medicine. Once the light is turned off, the polymers stand on end again, re-sealing the boxes.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/11/8810.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<p>According to Dr. Jingyi Chen, one of the principal investigators on the technology, the opening and closing is nearly instantaneous. The nanocubes heat up "from a nanosecond to a femtosecond, [the drugs] are released a little bit slower, that takes around a millisecond." They cool down at the same rate, which allows for extremely fine targeting of dosage. The really cool part is that both the gold and polymer can be fine tuned to work under specific conditions. By thickening the gold walls, the wavelength of light that it can absorb shifts. In this case, they're aiming for the 750-900 nanometer range. Why this wavelength? Because at this point it can penetrate the human body very easily, and can travel inches into the body, as the muscle and blood doesn't easily absorb this wavelength of light. The polymer is then tuned to react to a level of heat that won't kill any cells, but is still above the normal temperature of the body. In trials, the boxes were exposed to a laser of the correct frequency, releasing their dose, and then closing up once the light was turned off. Researchers used the boxes as a way of delivering targeted chemotherapy drugs and antibiotics to a controlled area.</p>
<p><strong>Synthetic Skin</strong></p>
<p>If you're dealing with open wounds, once you flush out any possible bacteria, you need to deal with the realities of closing the flesh. In situations where an injury is over a certain size, it can't be relied on to close normally. Through the use of collagen extracted from skin, doctors can induce new skin to <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/11/02/growing.skin/index.html">grow by giving it a framework over which to expand</a>. The collagen can be extracted and grown from a variety of sources, such as donated skin, baby's foreskins (apparently up to four football fields worth, which is an utterly disturbing mental image), or from non-human sources, such as mammal organs or reptile skin. The collagen can also be impregnated with other ingredients, such as silver, which is naturally antibiotic. For anything from burns to bedsores, this skin scaffolding can lead to impressive regrowth and healing.</p>
<p><strong>Nerve Regeneration</strong></p>
<p>With spinal injuries, on the other hand, growth is a major problem. The creation of scar tissue around damaged areas of the central nervous system can prevent nerves from healing and regaining function. Previously, the enzyme chrondroitinase ABC (chABC) was used to reduce the scar tissue, but it functioned poorly at body temperature. Within an hour of being injected, it loses half of its potency, and the rest within a few days. Due to this a catheter or pump has to be installed, so that the enzymes can be repeatedly delivered over the two weeks required for it to be effective. Researchers at <a href="http://www.gatech.edu/newsroom/release.html?nid=47259">Georgia Tech</a> have discovered away to reduce the thermal sensitivity of the enzyme, so it can stay in your body effectively for weeks, by bonding the chABC with the sugar trehalose. They also developed a new way to deliver the drug, via an injection of hydrogel filled with microtubes, which allowed deeper penetration than catheters, and slowly releases the drugs over a two week period. This means that the spinal scar tissue can be effectively reduced by a single injection, rather than weeks of constant exposure, and without requiring invasive implants.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5397953/three-new-medical-technologies-that-could-save-your-life]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5397953]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[regeneration]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:17:33 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Barribeau]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397953&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanotech Could Make Nuclear Weapons Much, Much Tinier]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/10/PacificNanotechnology-nanospheres-med-716537.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Are you ready for nano-weapons of mass destruction? Nanotechnology could be used to create "miniaturized nuclear weapons" that would have virtually no fallout, and super-efficient bioterrorism, warns Jane's Defense Quarterly. And they could be triggered with a super-laser!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/living/health/story/1273684.html">A new article in the Miami Herald</a> raises a terrifying prospect for nanotech warfare:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Jane's, the London-based research group that publishes the industry standard Jane's All the World's Aircraft, warns that nanotechnology can be used to create entirely new hazards such as miniaturized nuclear weapons that are smaller, lighter, easier to transport and hide and smuggle into unsuspecting countries. It says nano techniques designed to deliver medicines in a more-targeted way also can deliver toxic substances in a form of bioterrorism.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Nanotechnology, in which materials are machined on a molecule-by-molecule, or atom-by-atom basis, could produce super-nukes that are so tiny, they don't technically qualify as weapons of mass destruction, Jane's has warned in <a href="http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jcbw/jcbw040813_1_n.shtml">past</a> <a href="http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jcbw/jcbw030115_1_n.shtml">articles</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jcbw/jcbw030115_1_n.shtml">one 2003 article</a>, Jane's warns that "some advanced technology, such as superlaser" could trigger a relatively small thermonuclear explosion involving a deuterium-tritium mixture, in a device weighing no more than a few kilograms. The device could go from a fraction of a ton to "many tens of tons" of high-explosive equivalent yield, and because they use little to no fissionable materials, they would have "virtually no radioactive fallout." Self-replicating nanotech could also produce conventional weapons in such quantities that they would become WMDs.</p>
<p>Are you scared yet?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5377752/nanotech-could-make-nuclear-weapons-much-much-tinier]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5377752]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[future weapons]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[what a beautiful surprise]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5377752&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Woody Allen's Dream Of Giant Vegetables Comes True — Thanks To Nanotech?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/09/1093690570_45324ff15e_b.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/09/500x_1093690570_45324ff15e_b.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Fertilizer that includes carbon nanotubes makes plants grow faster and better, according to a new paper in the journal ACS Nano. So how long until we can have slapstick pratfalls with Buick-sized tomatoes? Let it be now!</p>

<p>Apparently, the carbon nanotubes help with water uptake, and seeds exposed to carbon nanotubes contain more moisture. Actually, it doesn't look like this tech will be leading to giant fruits and vegetables in the near future &mdash; for now, here's what the researchers, from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock's Nanotech Center said:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Here, we demonstrated that the exposure of carbon nanotubes to seeds of valuable crops, such as tomatoes, can increase the germination percentage and support and enhance the growth of seedlings. Furthering these findings could result in significant developments of improved plants for the area of energy, by taking advantage of the enhancement in the biomass of the plants when they are exposed to nanosized materials and fertilizers.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And here's a cool picture:<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/09/nano_fertilizer.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br clear="all"></p>
<p>[<a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nn900887m">ACS Nano</a> via <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/24161/">Technology Review</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5368117/woody-allens-dream-of-giant-vegetables-comes-true---thanks-to-nanotech]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5368117]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maxi-fruits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mega-vegetables]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sleeper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[woody allen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:56:24 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5368117&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanotech And Lasers Team Up To Cure Cancer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/08/026082L.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/08/500x_026082L.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>When nanotech and lasers team up, is there anything they can't do? Apparently not. New research shows a combined nanotube/laser treatment zaps kidney tumors in 80 percent of mice. Nanotech is teaming up with viruses to kill ovarian tumors, too.</p>
<p>Scientists at Wake Forest University injected multi-walled carbon nanotubes into tumors and then heated them up using a laser, a technique researchers have been talking about for a few years now. But what's exciting is the results of the latest study, published in the Procedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences. The mice that received the highest level of treatment saw their tumors disappear completely in 80 percent of cases.</p>
<p>Says Nanowerk:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Using a mouse model, the researchers injected kidney tumors with different quantities of MWCNTs and exposed the area to a 3-watt laser for 30 seconds. They found that the mice that received no treatment for their tumors died about 30 days into the study. Mice that received the nanotubes alone or laser treatment alone survived for a similar length of time. However, in the mice that received the MWCNTs followed by a 30-second laser treatment, the higher the quantity of nanotubes injected, the longer the mice lived and the less tumor regrowth was seen. In fact, in the group that received the highest dose of MWCNTs, tumors completely disappeared in 80% of the mice. Many of those mice continued to live tumor free through the completion of the study, about 9 months later.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You could actually watch the tumors shrinking, say researchers. And the mice maintained their weight and appeared healthy and normal.</p>
<p>A separate bit of research is also encouraging. A new method of delivering diptheria toxin-encoding DNA into ovarian tumors is at least as effective as chemotherapy &mdash; with no harmful side effects. And it could be tested in humans as soon as 18 to 24 months from now. In a nutshell, researchers injected nanoparticles into the peritoneal cavity, where ovarian cancer first starts to spread. And the nanoparticles delivered diptheria toxin that was genetically engineered to attack only ovarian cells. The toxin destroyed cells' ability to manufacture proteins.</p>
<p>In the past, scientists have worked on using viruses to deliver toxin-encoding DNA to a tumor, but using biodegradable nanoparticles instead is safer. And the treatment could also work in brain, lung and liver cancers.<br>
<em>Image from <a href="http://nanotechweb.org/cws/article/tech/22801">Nanotechweb</a>.<br></em><br>
[<a href="http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=12363.php">Nanowerk</a> and <a href="http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=12364.php">Nanowerk</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5349611/nanotech-and-lasers-team-up-to-cure-cancer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5349611]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[biotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lasers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotubes]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:20:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349611&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Two Physics Breakthroughs That Will One Day Lead to Superarmor]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/08/corkscrewsTHUMB_01.jpg" height="103" width="160">The strange field of metamaterials offers some weird optical effects, like cloaking and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superlens">superlenses</a>. Recently, two breakthroughs in the field, involving programmable materials and gold nano-corkscrews, just made this exotic nano-stuff a little more practical, and maybe even stranger.</p>

<p>Metamaterials are materials engineered to do things nature didn't intend them to do. (We've <a href="http://io9.com/5036183/secrets-of-the-metamaterials-that-will-make-you-invisible">covered them before</a>.) The most commonly built kind of metamaterials are "optically active" metamaterials, or materials that make light behave in strange ways. They do this by making light bend around tiny folds or dip into nano-sized wells.</p>
<p>The strange interactions between light and metamaterials come with limitations, though. For any seriously strong light effects you traditionally need a lot of this material, something like a hundred wavelengths thick. But researcher Justyna Gansel and a team of scientists have devised a way to get strong optic effects with a lot less metamaterial.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/08/corkscrews_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/08/500x_corkscrews_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>As revealed in their paper published in <em>Science</em>, the secret is actually tiny gold corkscrews. The team used lasers to carve these tiny nano-scale coils out of gold, and the resulting array of golden pigtails is their secret for strong optical effects. What took a hundred wavelengths' thickness of material to have the desired effect before now takes only one wavelength's thickness.</p>
<p>In practical terms (and the field of metamaterials is getting closer and closer to being practical), this means that your theoretical invisibility device just went from being an invisibility wall to an invisibility fabric.</p>
<p>Another major limitation on the metamaterial field is tunability. A material built to manipulate a certain wavelength of light can't easily do the same for another wavelength. In other words, a polarizer for blue light can't easily polarize red light.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/08/electricmaterial.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/08/500x_electricmaterial.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>A team headed by Tom Driscoll has developed a solution, also published in <em>Science</em>. They have devised a type of metamaterial that is not only tunable (it can be warped and changed to serve different wavelengths and functions), but it can remember its different states. Going back to the polarizer example, this would mean that your red light polarizer could switch easily between red and blue light, and any number of other states.</p>
<p>When taken together, these two discoveries pave an interesting path. Metamaterials have gone from custom-made, one-use, bulky set-ups to versatile, programmable, and best of all very thin materials. And the path that these discoveries delineate leads towards increasingly strange and impressive metamaterials.</p>
<p>Gold Helix Photonic Metamaterial as Broadband Circular Polarizer [<a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1177031">Science</a>]</p>
<p>Memory Metamaterials [<a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1176580">Science</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5342011/two-physics-breakthroughs-that-will-one-day-lead-to-superarmor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5342011]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[metamaterials]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[invisibility cloak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Goldmeier]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5342011&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Camera Fabric" Cloth That Takes Color Pictures]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/07/504x_flex.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">The soldier of the future might be able to see in all directions at the same time. Researchers at MIT have developed a fabric made of fibers that can "take pictures" of its surroundings.</p>

<p>The individual fibers are composed of two rolled-up semiconducting glass layers, coated in an insulator. When light interacts with the semiconductor, the current changes through the fibers, thus providing a way of measuring how much light is hitting the fabric.</p>
<p>The resulting data can be run through a computer to create a "photograph" of whatever is near the fabric. The color of the light can be determined by comparing one semiconductor sheet's data with the other.</p>
<p>All of that data eventually becomes a full scale photo of the fabric's surroundings. The researchers tested their fabric camera, too, reporting their results in <em>Nano Letters</em>. The material could take a photo of an 800 micron smiley face.</p>
<p>Further development could lead to larger fabric samples, or even military uniforms that can record what's happening all around a soldier. The possible applications of this are pretty amazing.</p>
<p>Flexible fabric that takes 'takes pictures' [via <a href="http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/39858">PhysicsWorld</a>]<br>
Paper, "Exploiting Collective Effects of Multiple Optoelectronic Devices Integrated in a Single Fiber" [<a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/nl9009606?prevSearch=%255Bauthor%253A%2Bsorin%255D&searchHistoryKey=">Nano Letters</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5316448/camera-fabric-cloth-that-takes-color-pictures]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5316448]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mad engineering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[military technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:45:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Goldmeier]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5316448&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Will G.I. Joe Be The Worst Movie Of The Year?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3703801406_4ded948200_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3703801406_4ded948200_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We're all expecting <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged G.I. JOE" href="http://io9.com/tag/g%27i%27-joe/">G.I. Joe</a></em> to be one of the worst movies of all time &mdash; but we were actually overestimating it. Judging from the novelization, <em>G.I. Joe</em> will be a masterpiece of badness, <em>Showgirls</em> meets <em>Plan 9</em>. Spoilers ahead...</p>

<p>We were lucky enough to get a copy of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAX ALLAN COLLINS" href="http://io9.com/tag/max-allan-collins/">Max Allan Collins</a>' novelization of <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged G.I. JOE: THE RISE OF COBRA" href="http://io9.com/tag/g%27i%27-joe%7c-the-rise-of-cobra/">G.I. Joe: The Rise Of COBRA</a></em>. And we had not fully appreciated the dementia of this storyline, which really is all about nanotech and how it'll eat the world.</p>
<p>In the <em>G.I. Joe</em> universe, nanotech can do almost anything &mdash; turn regular people into super-soldiers, control your mind, devour the Eiffel Tower. I wouldn't be surprised if this movie's script was actually written by nanobots, which sliced up a million other action-movie scripts and mashed them up into a wonderfully incoherent mess. There are undigested scraps of Sho Kosugi movies and bad war movies floating around this gray goo of a story, and it's nice to watch them sail past.</p>
<p>This might actually be the most prominent nanotech action movie ever &mdash; I'm straining to think of another movie where nanotechnology is so central to the plot.</p>
<p>The central villain of the movie, of course, is the Scottish James McCullen (Christopher Eccleston), an arms merchant who secretly hungers for power. In a flashback, his ancestor gets tortured by the French by being fitted with a searing-hot metal mask, and so McCullen has a special hatred for French people. When we meet the present-day McCullen, he's selling the NATO brass on his latest weapon &mdash; nanomites, which are basically nanomachines that eat anything metal, until you hit their "Kill Switch" and turn them off. They can disarm an opponent without the need for bloodshed, and so one NATO suit jokes that McCullen may be the first arms merchant to win a Nobel Peace Prize.</p>
<p>But McCullen, of course, has other plans &mdash; after he delivers the nanomites to NATO, he launches an attack of his Neo-Vipers to steal them back. The Neo-Vipers are supersoldiers who have been enhanced by nanotechnology &mdash; which also controls their minds. At one point, McCullen gloats that his troops still have their own thoughts, but they're incapable of doing anything but obey his orders. The convoy escorting the nanomites is led by Conrad "Duke" Hauser and Wallace "Ripcord" Weems, and they're the only ones who are prepared when the Neo-Vipers attack.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/scarlettgijoe.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/scarlettgijoe.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>The convoy gets wiped out, but luckily the G.I. JOE squad shows up &mdash; an international team of super-experts who don't officially exist, but appear as if by magic when they're needed. There's Heavy Duty, who's heavy and does his duty. There's Scarlett, who has red hair. There's Cover Girl, who's blonde. There's Breaker, who... uh, breaks things. And there's Snake Eyes, a ninja who's taken a vow of silence. And then their leader, General Hawk. The JOEs save the day, but Duke is loath to hand over his hard-won nanomite cargo to them, so they take him and Ripcord back to their secret base. And of course, Duke and Ripcord wind up joining the team, to the sound of people shouting "Yo JOE!" (That's their rallying cry.)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, McCullen has his own colorful squad. There's Zartan, a fiendishly exotic killer who can impersonate anyone. The Baroness, who turns out to be Duke's ex-fiancee &mdash; but now she's married to a Baron, who's not allowed to touch her, or a ninja will kill him. (Seriously, it's a running subplot: if her husband so much as kisses her, the always-watchful ninja will kill him. Try bringing THAT up in marriage counseling.) There's the ninja, Storm Shadow, who's taken a vow of nastiness towards Snake Eyes. And finally, the Doctor, the fiendish nanotechnology genius with a crazy mask who makes the whole wacky operation possible.</p>
<p>When Storm Shadow and Snake Eyes finally face off, Storm Shadow hisses in Japanese, "<em>You took a vow of silence... Now you will die without a word.</em>" Sho Kosugi, eat your heart out.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716183070_02680c0022_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716183070_02680c0022_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>There's also this great bit, towards the end:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Heavy Duty told them: "You know the mission: Find Duke..."</p>
<p>"...grab the warheads," Rip said.</p>
<p>"And kill all the bad guys," Scarlett said.</p>
<p>"Roger that," Heavy D said.</p>
<p>Snake Eyes, of course, said nothing.</p>
<p>But they all knew that when it came to killing bad guys, he was the man.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/2431378747_33c4bd37ec_o.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Snake Eyes can't talk, but he can send text messages, which is kind of cute.</p>
<p>Eventually, we learn that the reason why Duke and the Baroness are no longer together is because Duke got the Baroness' brother killed on a mission. Except that there's a shocking twist, and if you can't see it coming a mile off, I have no hope for you.</p>
<p>Last year's summer movies were all about the relentless advances of weapons technology, and what they cost us. <em>Iron Man</em> was about a remorseful weapons maker, <em>Incredible Hulk</em> was about a remorseful military experiment, and <em>The Dark Knight</em> bemoaned the fact that all of Bruce Wayne's fancy armaments only spurred on the homicidal maniacs. This year, though, it's gung-ho militarism season, spearheaded by toy movies &mdash; literally, movies based on toys.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716184088_bda1dc8d8d_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716184088_bda1dc8d8d_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>The advantage that <em>G.I. Joe</em> has over this summer's other Hasbro movie, <em>Transformers 2</em>, is that its human characters are action figures. In Transformers, the robots were toys but the people were just standard movie characters &mdash; almost every movie nowadays has an Italian Jewish male stripper who blogs about killer robots, after all. But in <em>G.I. Joe</em>, every single character feels like an action figure walking around &mdash; reading the novelization is like watching a five-year-old play with figurines, while a middle-aged guy narrates portentously. In other words, it's probably the most perfect action-adventure novel ever.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716182956_10aab4ea08_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716182956_10aab4ea08_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>So because this is all about toys, there are lots and lots of loving descriptions of military hardware, from flying drones to fighter jets to a stealth van called the Scarab. You've already seen the ridiculous <em>Iron Man</em>-esque power suits which Duke and Ripcord wear in one crucial Paris sequence, but the story is loaded with insane hardware. Scarlett gets to wear a special combat suit, which renders her totally invisible.</p>
<p>At one point, Collins refers to Heavy Duty as wielding a massive "machine-gun-cum-grenade-launcher," which put a mental image in my mind that I don't think he intended.</p>
<p>When the Vipers attack the convoy, they arrive in a super-armored stealth ship called a Typhoon, shooting pulse lasers that fling the dead bodies of Duke's Special Forces squad "like discarded refuse." And then there's this great description of the Baroness, who shows up on the scene:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3715372101_18e0c771e5_o.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The neckline of the body armor exposed the upper part of her swelling bosom, an exposure of flesh that arrogantly dared bullets to try for her, as if she could walk blithely across the battlescape.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Even amidst an army of plastic characters and silly dialogue, the biggest problem is probably Ripcord, who's played by Marlon Wayans in the movie and is exactly as emasculated as you might have feared. Towards the beginning, when the convoy is attacked, Ripcord gets startled by a shape coming up behind him, and squeals "like a Girl Scout whose cookies had been snatched from her" &mdash; before he realizes it's just a stray cow. Later, in the big Paris chase scene, Ripcord runs through a lingerie store and winds up with a bra on his powersuit helmet. He's the one who spouts the jokes about "kung-fu grip," and he's the dumb one who needs everything explained to him. He's constantly saying things like "I'm livin' a brother's dream, man." To be fair, though, he does get to save the day in the end, and he has a quasi-romance with Scarlett.</p>
<p>Here's my favorite passage in the whole book, after the JOE squad gets back to their base:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/2432284718_8e79d1f85d_o.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<blockquote>
<p>In his stateroom, General Hawk was in the office area, at his desk, humming a jaunty military tune.</p>
<p>He was going over the paperwork regarding the new JOEs, Hauser and Weems, when a crisp knock came at the door. He rose, answered it, and found his lovely blonde aide, with the smart tablet in one hand and a stylus in the other.</p>
<p>"Sorry to disturb you, sir."</p>
<p>"Not at all, Cover Girl."</p>
<p>"I just need you to sign here, here, and here..."</p>
<p>He did so.</p>
<p>Then she said, "And here, and here."</p>
<p>This he also did.</p>
<p>"Anything else?" he asked.</p>
<p>"No, sir, just this..." She gave him a rare, unguarded smile. "And another thirty-six pages."</p>
<p>He grinned at her. "Maybe you should step inside."</p>
<p>She hugged the smart tablet to her, and began to say something, but it never got said, because the tip of a Katar dagger thrust through the tablet, having taken a path through Cover Girl's back.</p>
<p>As she fell to her knees, eyes large with the shock of dying, the figure of Zartan in camo-cap and jacket revealed the source of the blade.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Her name is Cover Girl... but she gets stabbed in the back. Get it? Get it??</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/2432193194_b8062ff045_o.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />A lot of the violence is amazingly sexualized, actually &mdash; there are several scenes between Duke and Baroness where they're so close they can feel each other's breath, as they grapple or wield guns at each other, and it's the nearest and hottest they've been since they used to make love. When the Baroness and Scarlett have their inevitable girl fight, Collins describes the two women as being "locked in a violent embrace." There's a flashback where the young Storm Shadow and Snake Eyes train together and vie for the approval of their teacher, the Hard Master.</p>
<p>Oh, and I should mention that Max Allan Collins is one of my fave writers, and he does a great job with an incredibly silly story. His <em>Ms. Tree</em> is one of my favorite comics of all time, and I love his work on Batman. Here, he occasionally manages to channel the great Mickey Spillane, his idol with whom he collaborated on the underrated <em>Mike Danger</em> series, with some very loopy prose and action-packed jaw-gritting.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716184170_97709fc7cf_o.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/07/3716184170_97709fc7cf_o.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>It all explodes into a James Bond villain-esque climax where McCullen plans to wipe out three major cities and do something unspeakable to the U.S. president. (And it ends on a genuinely lunatic cliffhanger, which I won't spoil.) The nanotech threatens to devour everything, unless our heroes can hit the kill switches, or unless Ripcord can shoot down the nanotech warheads in mid-air. And as you've probably heard, James McCullen's face gets hideously scarred, and he winds up with a new mask made out of nanotech. A mask made out of nanotech! Sadly, it doesn't reshape itself into new forms or create emoticons or anything.</p>
<p>In the end, that's the thing that still gives me hope for G.I. Joe &mdash; with Christopher Eccleston playing McCullen/Destro and Joseph Gordon Levitt playing The Doctor/Cobra Commander, all of this over-the-top growling about using nanotech warheads to blow up the world may actually cure our recent villain ennui. Like so much else about this film, it really depends on whether flesh-and-blood actors can fully embody the plastic miens and jerky-limbed heroism of the toys of your youth. If not, you can always buy the newest line of toys and zoom them around your bed while you read Collins' musky prose.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5315524/will-gi-joe-be-the-worst-movie-of-the-year]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5315524]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[annals of mediocre villainy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cheese]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g.i. joe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[g.i. joe: the rise of cobra]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[max allan collins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[overmind]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[supervillains]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:43:36 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5315524&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Awesome New Showtune Explains Nanotechnology... With Puppets]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LFoC-uxRqCg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LFoC-uxRqCg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>If Sesame Street taught us to love nanotechnology, it might look a bit like "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE NANO SONG" href="http://io9.com/tag/the-nano-song/">The Nano Song</a>," from U.C. Berkeley and singer Glory Liu. It's easy to see why <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-6378-Baltimore-Science-News-Examiner~y2009m6d25-Ridiculous-nanotech-video-lift-spirits-in-a-world-of-hurt">it won</a> ACS-Nanonation's nano-video contest: you'll be singing it all weekend.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5302975/awesome-new-showtune-explains-nanotechnology-with-puppets]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5302975]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[the nano song]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[grey goo has a theme song]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano song]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5302975&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New Tiny Robots Can Crawl Through Your Veins]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/06/340x_blood-robot.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Imagine tiny robots crawling inside of you, diagnosing problems and imaging your body. Israel's Technion has developed just the tool: the ViRob, a robot with a diameter of 1mm. It's controlled by external magnetic fields, and it crawls through veins.</p>

<p>The minuscule robot is powered and directed by external magnetic fields. That means no wires or batteries. The robot uses its tiny arms to grip walls and propel itself forward. Once it's in, it can operate essentially autonomously, relentlessly trolling through the desired areas of a human body.</p>
<p>The ViRob can crawl at 9mm per second through openings no wider than 3mm. To put this in perspective, the average ear canal is about 7mm in diameter, while veins can be up to 6mm in diameter. The ViRob would have no problem with either of those.</p>
<p>The Technion is still working on actual applications, but they postulate that the ViRob will be useful in microsurgery and imaging. It's also useful as a frightening glimpse at future nano-tech gone wild.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0K3wXfSkhl8">The ViRob in action</a> [YouTube]<br>
<a href="http://t3.technion.ac.il/pdf_files/1220767440.pdf">White paper</a> [Technion]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5280536/new-tiny-robots-can-crawl-through-your-veins]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5280536]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medical-bots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Goldmeier]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5280536&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[There's A Hole In The Microverse!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/05/Aesthetic_Imperfections-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/05/Aesthetic_Imperfections-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>This awesome piece of nano-art shows dislocations in an arrangement of nano-crystals, each one 300 times smaller than a human hair. But it looks like the micro-universe is about to break into our own.</p>

<p>"Aesthetic Imperfections" by Dr. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HANS DANZEBRINK" href="http://io9.com/tag/hans-danzebrink/">Hans Danzebrink</a> was <a href="http://www.rit.edu/cias/ritphoto/ifs-2008/photo_gallery/pages/15_danzebrink_1.htm">chosen as part of last fall's "Science As Art" exhibition</a>, and purchased by Jennifer Millar, who <a href="http://bridge8.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/inspirational-nano-art/">blogged about it</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Entitled "Aesthetic Imperfections", the atomic force photomicrograph reveals dislocations in a photonic crystal arrangement of polystyrene nanospheres. Without the vivid colours generated by computer software, these transparent structures are instead defined by their topography, geometry and symmetry. It is these characteristics which give rise to the optical effects in the material, visible to the human eye. It is fascinating to ponder the interplay between different faces of the same object- the colourless world of the nano scale, and the iridescent play of colours on the macro scale.</p>
<p>The creator of "Aesthetic Imperfections" is Dr Hans Danzebrink of the German metrology institute, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Upon seeing the artwork exhibited as part of RIT's "Images From Science", I contacted Dr Danzebrink to ask him more about it. I was thrilled by his prompt response- he was only too happy to impart his experience, and pronounced himself honoured by my request to reproduce the image. It was refreshing to encounter a research scientist so willing to share his work! The exhibition recognises the impact of photography in science, which is perhaps not appreciated to the same degree as in the art world. The plethora of images presents scientific data artistically, thus making scientific concepts accessible to society at large.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here's the full image, plus another Hanzebrink original, "Data Channels," showing data moving through a computer chip:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('danzebrink', 2, '');
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5251152/theres-a-hole-in-the-microverse]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5251152]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Hans Danzebrink]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-crystals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 May 2009 13:23:41 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5251152&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hamsters And Teeny Factory Workers Show Us Our Nanotech Future]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YqzNMxyILbY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YqzNMxyILbY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="506" height="311" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>Two new nano-bio breakthroughs give us hope that our shining nanotech future could be closer than we think. One researcher harnessed the power of crazed hamsters, while another one has perfected ambidextrous DNA-based nano-machines.</p>

<p>I totally love the video, above, of the hamster hooked up to the nanowire, generating enough power to drive some nano-devices. If you attached four nanowires to the plucky critter, you'd have 200 millivolts, and you'd be in business. I'm picturing a whole program of bagging and tagging, with nanowires being attached to tons of forest creatures to provide a power source for devices that bag and tag other forest creatures. The ultimate perpetual motion machine!<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/03/hamster.jpg" width="500" height="321" style="display:block;"><br clear="all"></p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Christian Science Monitor has an interview with Nadrian Seeman, a New York University professor who may be the "Henry Ford of nanotechnology." Seeman talks about his struggle to create cheap, easily replicated nanomachines out of DNA, with two arms and error correction on the fly:</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/03/image007.jpg" class="right" width="400" height="320" style="display:block;"><br></p>
<blockquote>Seeman has been working on nanorobotics for several years. He first perfected a one-armed version in 2006. It was the first time anyone had put together such a device in a DNA array, he says.
<p>Now, that he's pulled off a two-arm design, Seeman says that his team can finally build things.</p>
<p>The big leap in Seeman's work is the ability to "remote control" the DNA arms, says Milan Stojanovic, a professor of medicine at Columbia University and director of the National Science Foundation's Center for Molecular Cybernetics. Finally, his team can set up a protocol to fix errors along the way.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Seeman says he got inspiration from an M.C. Escher print to think about ways to create nanomachines from DNA rather than from inorganic materials, which was the standard back in the 1980s.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/03/nanogenerator.html">Wired</a> and Christian Science Monitor]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5187278/hamsters-and-teeny-factory-workers-show-us-our-nanotech-future]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5187278]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hamster on a piano eating popcorn with a nanowire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hamsters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-tech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanomachines]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:16:53 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5187278&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Haunting Beauty At The Heart Of A Cell's Wounded Monolayer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/03/normal_jan_schmoranzer_Wounded_Monolayer2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2009/03/normal_jan_schmoranzer_Wounded_Monolayer2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;"/></a>Here's a microscopy image of a fibroblast, stained with a few different antibodies. The green is microtubuli, the red is cell-contacts and the blue is DNA. It's just one of Jan Schmoranzer's amazing nano-art images.</p>

<p>Schmoranzer's microscopy images of "wounded monolayers," "starved fibroblasts" and a "nuclear face" come from the <a href="http://nanoart21.org/nanoart2006/index.php?cat=13">2008-2009 NanoArt competition</a> organized by <a href="http://NanoArt21.org">NanoArt21.org</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://nanoart21.org/nanoart2006/thumbnails.php?album=102">Schmoranzer</a> is a group leader and head of the BioImaging facility at the Molecular Cancer Research Center of Charite Berlin. He says:<br></p>
<blockquote>Seeing the beauty of cellular structures, like microtubules, after many hours of tiring and repetitive lab-work often gives me the kick to go on. I am glad that scientist like me receive public attention for display of scientific imagery and I am excited to expand on projects like ‘Cell Portraits' by exploring different cellular structures and cell types. I believe that visualizing science – the process of research as well as its end products – will gain importance in the future, not only to draw attention to a particular scientific subject, but also for science education itself.</blockquote>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('nanojan', 5, '');
</script></p>
<p>You can see the rest of the gorgeous nano-art <a href="http://nanoart21.org/nanoart2006/index.php?cat=13">here</a>. [via <a href="http://www.azonano.com/news.asp?newsID=10211">AzoNano</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5164721/the-haunting-beauty-at-the-heart-of-a-cells-wounded-monolayer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5164721]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microscopy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-scale research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science as art]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:30:00 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5164721&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Your Twitter Stream Could Soon Be Printed On Your Skin]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2009/01/340x_ttft.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Check out that piece of cellophane-like material: it's actually filled with transparent circuits, using carbon nanotube transistors. Scientists have been fabricating transparent circuits for years, but now they're getting way closer to commercial viability.</p>

<p>Researchers at the University of Southern California say, in a new paper, that they've succeeded in fabricating transparent thin-film transistors (TTFTs) at low temperatures, by using carbon nanotubes. Colder fabrication means it's cheaper to make them, and it also raises the "device mobility," which enables fast operation and lowers power consumption. It also allows you to put the TTFTs into more flexible substances, as opposed to just panes of glass.</p>
<p>In other words, low-temperature fabrication and high mobility is the key to dream applications, like "e-paper, wearable display, smart tag, and artificial skin (E-skin)." I totally want my skin to have tattoos that change color or shape depending on my mood or level of drunkenness. Can we have that by next week, please? [<a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/nn800434d?cookieSet=1">ACS Nano</a> via <a href="http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=8787.php">Nanowerk</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5124710/your-twitter-stream-could-soon-be-printed-on-your-skin]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5124710]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gray goo will become you]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:30:00 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5124710&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Where Are My Medical Nanobots?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/nanotech-05_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /> Reader Wendy asks: <strong>When will nanobots clean out my arteries?</strong> While medical molecular machines are not likely to appear in the clinic soon, there's a decent amount of research going into the development of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanobot">nanoscale robotics</a>, and not only for therapeutic use. One could easily imagine these widgets appearing in diagnostic assays and nano-scale manufacturing. Before we can hope to command tiny robots to crawl or swim to a damaged or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stenosis">stenotic</a> artery to effect repairs, we first need to build tiny robots capable of crawling or swimming.</p>

<p>Luckily, molecules that can crawl already exist in nature. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinesin">Kinesin</a>, for example, is a protein that crawls along microtubules in our cells - hitch a bit of cellular cargo to it, and it'll go along for the ride.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/686qX5yzksU&hl=en&fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/686qX5yzksU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object></p>
<p>Molecules with "legs" made of DNA <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4958">can be coaxed into a vaguely similar "walk"</a> on a surface also composed of DNA, while <a href="http://newsroom.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/display.cgi?id=1166">less biological variations</a> could be useful in the computing industry. There are a number of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_molecular_motors">molecular motors</a> that can convert chemical or light energy into motion - getting useful work out of that motion, however, can be tricky.</p>
<p>Not all tiny robots are nano, of course. <a href="http://www.dartmouth.edu/~news/releases/2005/09/14.html">Dartmouth's "inchworm"</a> is relatively huge at over a hundred microns in length, and this six-legged crab-bot is even larger - the chassis is made of polymer with an engine composed of rat heart tissue. When the tissue contracts, it provides power to crawl the 'bot <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/feb/tiny-robot-walks-using-rat-heart-muscle">at about 0.002 miles per hour</a>. Not bad for a ride less than a millimeter long.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XJZ_jejWDfc">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XJZ_jejWDfc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"></object></p>
<p>When nature provides a convenient source of motility, like heart tissue or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacterial_gliding">bacterial gliding</a>, harnessing it can be a lot easier than building a molecular machine from scratch. The <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/103/37/13618.short">micromotor below</a> harnesses bacteria to turn its rotors.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/0011q46d.jpg" width="702" height="407"></p>
<p>The bacteria move from the center of A into the channels. When they meet the circle at the end (B, C) , they tend to be going in one direction (D). The rotor (E, F) fits into the circle and is coated with sialic protein which the bacteria stick to and push. It's like the beginning of <em>Conan: The Barbarian</em>, except microscopic, and with better acting.</p>
<p>While true nanobots would have to be even smaller than the crab or this rotor, they do show an interest in producing useful locomotion in increasingly smaller packages. Besides, to produce a useful bot may require a collection of various nanoscale parts that assembled together produce a larger-than-nanoscale 'bot.</p>
<p>If you can't crawl, you're going to have to swim. Again, nature is ahead of us with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flagella">flagellum</a> - basically, a propeller for microbes.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/350px-Ecoli_flagellum_01.jpg" width="350" height="200"></p>
<p>The adaptability and motility of these bacteria are a few of the reasons why researchers are using them <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/02/08/ft.nanobots/index.html">as inspiration for their own devices</a> and working to modify them <a href="http://www.news-medical.net/?id=739">to deliver drugs to cancer cells</a>, and perhaps heart disease follow. If it's not bacterial in origin, don't be surprised if the world's first medical nanobot is <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2008/jun/29-3-ideas-that-are-pushing-the-edge-of-science">sperm-propelled</a>.</p>
<p>Building nanoscale machines from scratch that can swim is harder than it sounds (and it ought to sound pretty hard). For one thing, our physical intuition about swimming breaks down at the nanoscale. If you were to shrink, <em>Fantastic Voyage</em>-style and find yourself swimming in water, <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/jun08/6271/2">you'd think the water had turned into a highly viscous liquid like molasses</a>. This has to do with the dynamics of fluids at different length scales, as E.M. Purcell discussed in his <a href="http://brodylab.eng.uci.edu/~jpbrody/reynolds/lowpurcell.html">Life at Low Reynold's Number</a> talk. Simply shrinking a design that swims well at the macroscale is no guarantee that it'll zoom along at the micro- or nanoscale.</p>
<p>Once you have a nanoswimmer or nanocrawler (or have appropriated one from nature), you're going to have to figure out how to guide it towards your target and either release its payload or do whatever repairs need to be done. As far as heart disease is concerned, it's going to be a race between the nanobots and extensive genetic tinkering to prevent the problem in the first place.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5066893/where-are-my-medical-nanobots]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5066893]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ask a biogeek]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fantastic voyage]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Johnson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5066893&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanofarm Your Body for Fun and Profit]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/nanotopia3_02.gif"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/nanotopia3_02.gif" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you've ever thought that selling your kidney, ova, or sperm sounded like a handy way to make some cash, it's time to consider body farming. Michael Burton's photographs show how advances in biotech will change the way humans treat and relate to their bodies. After all, if we can sell our organs, gametes, and hair, what's to stop us from growing extra ones all over our bodies?</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/clinical_trials_back.gif" height="379" width="506"></p>
<p>Burton notes that, while there are certain taboos against the commodification of the human body, there are places in the world that permit the sale of organs, spawning a transplant tourism industry. And some people already treat their bodies as farms, growing out and lopping off their hair for sale. But if nanotechnology gives us the ability to grow body parts and pharmaceuticals directly on our skin, more humans would be able, and perhaps encouraged, to participate in that commodification:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Do we really have a choice in our future?</p>
<p>How will future technologies indirectly influence the evolution of the body in certain social-economic extremes?</p>
<p>What circumstances would it take to reconsider your body as a source of income?</p>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/footgrowths.gif" height="369" width="506"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/membrane4_lowres721.jpg" height="383" width="506"><br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/stem3_02.gif" height="325" width="506"></p>
<p>A subset of pictures, entitled “Stem,” was inspired at recent advances in harvesting stem cell from adipose fat, supposing that it could be an early form of body farming. It also calls to mind a more fantastical scenario from recent science fiction:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hb-UZzleKEc&hl=en&fs=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hb-UZzleKEc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></object></p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.michael-burton.co.uk/index2.htm">Michael Burton</a> via <a href="http://www.nextnature.net/?p=2864">Next Nature</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5067052/nanofarm-your-body-for-fun-and-profit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5067052]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[biotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[farming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[human]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michael burton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lauren Davis]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5067052&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Titan 80-300 Cubed is the Most Badass of All Microscopes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2008/10/340x_Titan_80-300_Cubed.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> You are looking at the most powerful electron microscope on Earth. Housed at MacMaster University in Ontario, Canada, the <strong>Titan 80-300 Cubed</strong> will allow researchers to peer into the workings of molecules and atoms on a scale never before possible. What they find with the ultra microscope could revolutionize material science, medicine and energy production.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/io9/2008/10/Mesh-50c_3.jpg" width="789" height="615" class="center"> A transmission electron microscope like the Titan doesn't produce a visual image directly. Instead, it fires a focused electron beam through the viewing material. Some electrons pass through, some are deflected. Sensors on the other side detect the electrons and can produce a spatial image, like the image of a surgical mesh above. The Titan achieves amazingly high resolution by using devices that correct spherical aberration and can produce an extremely narrow wavelength electron beam. It's so sensitive that the building will be isolated from sound and vibration, and the operator can't even be in the same room as the microscope.</p>
<p>Seeing the molecular structure of objects with such fine detail will be a boon to nanotech. MacMaster reports that the Titan will be used for research in a variety of fields:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The microscope will be used to help produce more efficient lighting and better solar cells, study proteins and drug-delivery materials to target cancers. It will assess atmospheric particulates, and help create lighter and stronger automotive materials, more effective cosmetics, and higher density memory storage for faster electronic and telecommunication devices.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Image by: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-10/mu-muu102008.php">McMaster University unveils world's most advanced microscope.</a> [EurekAlerts!]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5066249/titan-80+300-cubed-is-the-most-badass-of-all-microscopes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5066249]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mega microscope]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[electron microscope]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macmaster university]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[titan 80-300 cubed]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:13:26 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Grabianowski]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5066249&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Instant DNA Scan is SMRT, I Mean S-M-A-R-T]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/images/io9/2008/09/highly_parallel_optics_system_lg.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/images/io9/2008/09/highly_parallel_optics_system_lg.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Medcal treatments will take a quantum leap forward once we can develop drugs that are genetically tailored to a specific individual. But to do that, we need a way to sequence someone's DNA quickly and cheaply. Today, it takes months and costs six figures. Pacific Biosciences' Single-Molecule, Real-Time (SMRT) DNA sequencer is going to change that.</p>

<p>DNA sequencing is slow and takes a lot of computational power. To put it into Homer Simpson terms, the DNA is replicated, torn into little pieces, sorted out and analyzed bit by bit, then reassembled by a computer. The SMRT sequencer improves on the process because it "watches" the DNA as it is being replicated by the polymerase, reading each piece of DNA in something called the Zero-Mode Waveguide. The ZMW is a "nanophotonic visualization chamber" made by making a hole just a few tens of nanometers across in a metal film just 100 nanometers thick. Chemicals introduced into the reaction give off tiny flashes of colored light, which are detected by the highly parallel optics system (pictured). The CCD can detect the lights, and computers use that information to figure out which base pairs are in which ZMW window, decoding long strands of DNA in real-time. You could be running down to the DNA-Mart for a quick DNA scan as soon as 2013. <em>Image by: Pacific Biosciences.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pacificbiosciences.com/index.php?q=technology-introduction">Long Reads, Short Run Time, and High Quality Data at Lower Cost.</a> [Pacific Biosciences]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/5049979/instant-dna-scan-is-smrt-i-mean-s+m+a+r+t]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-5049979]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dna sequencing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[genome]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[homer simpson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pacific biosciences]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[polymerase]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smrt]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:20:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Grabianowski]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5049979&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nano-Iron Is Perfect for an Armored Battlesuit]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2008/05/thumb160x_nanoiron.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /> Sure, an armored suit made of iron is great, but what if you could make it out of <em>nano-iron</em>? Nano-iron is harder and stronger than plain old iron, with a sweet crystalline structure sure to impress supermodels. That's probably exactly what researchers at NC State were thinking when they developed this new form of super-iron.</p>

<p><br>
<br>
We've actually had nano-iron for a while - the crystalline structure that gives iron its physical properties is improved, making it significantly harder and stronger. One problem: at moderately high temperatures, the stuff is about as durable as an ice cream cone on a summer day. Since most manufacturing methods using iron involve high temperatures and pressures, that made previous versions of nano-iron even <em>less</em> useful than an ice cream cone on a summer day (melty nano-iron is neither tasty nor refreshing).</p>
<p>The NC State team's solution was to add one percent zirconium to the iron, giving it heat resistance somewhere near the melting point of regular iron, but all the awesomeness of nano-iron. They even gave the stuff a catchy name: Nanocrystalline FeZr Alloy (those are the chemical symbols for iron and zirconium, for those playing along at home).</p>
<p>We ran that by Tony Stark, but he says "FeZr Man" has poor branding potential. <em>Image by: Marvel Studios.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080527155512.htm">Super-hard Nanocrystalline Iron Developed That Can Take The Heat</a>. [Science Daily]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/393862/nano+iron-is-perfect-for-an-armored-battlesuit]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-393862]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iron man]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[metallurgy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-iron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tony stark]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 29 May 2008 08:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Grabianowski]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=393862&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Artificial Virus with Nanotech Tentacles]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2008/05/340x_0101110101.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> The first artificial virus was created in 2003 &mdash; to cure people, not kill them. A virus can deliver cures to cells just as easily as it delivers death. The problem with artificial viruses is that no one has been able to make them the proper shape to serve as a therapeutic delivery system. But now, Korean scientists have created a virus that could deliver a remedy directly to a patient's cells with far greater efficiency than past attempts. The key lies in those Lovecraftian tentacles extending from the virus.</p>

<p><br>
The Korean researchers used nanotechnology to build the shape of the virus, then added self-assembling molecules. The result: an artificial virus with the filament shapes seen in the image. Such a shape will allow it to last longer inside a person's body.</p>
<p>Why is this important? Medication delivered directly to cells with an artificial virus is like using a professional assassin to take out your target. By comparison, conventional medication techniques are more like running around a city firing a shotgun in random directions. The other major bonus? That thing totally looks like some kind of microscopic spawn of Cthulhu. <em>Image by: Angewandte Chemie International Edition.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119053732/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0">Filamentous Artificial Virus from a Self-Assembled Discrete Nanoribbon</a> [Angewandte Chemie International Edition] via <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/science.ars">Nobel Intent</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/392281/the-artificial-virus-with-nanotech-tentacles]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-392281]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mad science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apocalypse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[artificial virus]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cthulhu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playing god]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 May 2008 08:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Grabianowski]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=392281&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanotech Precisely Measures Spiciness So Your Tongue Doesn't Have To]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/05/chilisb.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/05/chilisb.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> The Scoville Units you see on the side of chili sauce bottles are measured subjectively by taste testers, who determine how hot a given hot sauce really is. But now a new nanotechnology will allow food scientists to quickly and cheaply measure the exact amount of capsaicinoids &mdash; the active component in chili peppers &mdash; in each spicy sample. Science gives us many wondrous things, but you probably never thought it would help prevent you from making bland chili.</p>

<p><br>
The usual Scoville test involves diluting a sauce until taste testers can't detect heat anymore &mdash; the amount required to dilute it gives it a rating on the Scoville Scale. Chromatography can give you an accurate reading of capsaicinoids, but it's neither cheap nor easy. The new test uses carbon nanotube electrodes to draw in capsaicin molecules, which have a unique electrochemical response. When the capsaicinoids react, the device measures the current change and determines exactly how many were present. It can even translate this number into Scoville Units.</p>
<p>While the developers think this will be very useful in the food industry, where it can be deployed right on the production line, I've got a better idea. We can use it to develop a hot sauce so intense that we can cover our bodies with it to protect us from <a href="http://io9.com/387866/killer-robots-can-now-eat-us-and-enjoy-the-flavor">hungry robots</a>. <em>Image by: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/view/">Viewoftheworld</a>.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080506115604.htm">Chemists Measure Chilli Sauce Hotness With Nanotubes</a>. [Science Daily]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/388790/nanotech-precisely-measures-spiciness-so-your-tongue-doesnt-have-to]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-388790]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[capsaicin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotubes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scoville units]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 09 May 2008 08:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Grabianowski]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=388790&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Natural Landscape in Microns]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/nanolandscape.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> It looks like an alien city on the edge of a canal. But this is actually just a few microns across &mdash; it's a scanning electron microscope image by Fatih Buyukserin. What you're seeing are polymers stuck to a silicon mold full of beehive-like cells. This nano-city even has its own flowers made of wire.</p>

<p>These "sunflowers" are actually nanowires arranged in a naturally-occurring pattern.</p>
<p><img alt="sunflowenano.jpg" src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/sunflowenano.jpg" width="580" height="386" class="center"> Wired's Aaron Rowe writes:</p>
<blockquote>When S.K. Hark, a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, looked at some [nanowires] under a scanning electron microscope, he saw flowers. Unlike plants, their fertilizers were gallium and gold catalysts &mdash; which allowed them to grow to several microns in length while maintaining a roughly 10-nanometer diameter.</blockquote>
You can see more nanoart in Wired's gallery of the Materials Research Society picture winners. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/multimedia/2008/04/gallery_nano_art?slide=1&slideView=3">Wired</a>]]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/385068/a-natural-landscape-in-microns]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-385068]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[materials science art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[materials science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=385068&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanogauze Uses Ancient Tech to Staunch Blood]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the main reasons why people with deep wounds die is blood loss. But now a company is marketing an amazing new form of gauze, made with nanotech, that can induce fast blood-clotting in a wound to stop bleeding and save lives. The truly weird part? The nanotech involved is actually an ancient technology: kaolin clay, integrated into the gauze. Wired's Aaron Rowe explains that the clay is rich in aluminosilicate nanoparticles, which cause human blood to clot. This is one form of nano medicine that has gone through nature's own trial trials already. Humans have been working with this kind of clay for thousands of years. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2008/04/blood_clotting">Wired</a>]</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/384307/nanogauze-uses-ancient-tech-to-staunch-blood]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-384307]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:08:55 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=384307&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[All the Nanotech You Can Eat]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/consumernano.png"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/consumernano.png" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> Right now you can buy over 600 consumer products that contain some kind of nanomaterial or nanotechnology, and it turns out that a lot of them are edible. The Emerging Nanotechnology Project has compiled a comprehensive list of consumer items that companies are billing as "nanotech," grouping them into categories like "health" (which includes food) and "electronics." Here you can see their chart showing the breakdown of which products you can buy that contain something that can be called "nano." The E-Nano site also lets you search the products for all kinds of keywords. Needless to say, you can find some pretty bizarre shit if you search under "food."</p>

<p>While there are several bizarre items in the nano-cookware category such as "antibacterial cookware," and the "<a href="http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/browse/products/5307/">nano silver teapot</a>," the best items are the nano health supplements that just reek of futuristic quackery. How about the "LifePak Nano" supplement, that promises:</p>
<blockquote>Lifepak® nano is a nutritional anti-aging program formulated to nourish and protect cells, tissues, and organs in the body with the specific purpose to guard against the ravages of aging. Lifepak® nano offers the highest bioavailability with a first-ever nanotechnology process and advanced levels of key anti-aging nutrients in a comprehensive formula.</blockquote>
Yeah, you guessed it: "patent pending technology." And then there's the alarmingly-named "Canola Active Oil," which its manufacturer describes thusly:
<blockquote>This technology is called NSSL (Nano-sized self assembled structured liquids), which is a development of minute compressed micelles, which are called nanodrops. These minute micelles serve as a liquid carrier, which allows penetration of healthy components (such as vitamins, minerals and phytochemicals) that are insoluble in water or fats. The micelles are added to the food product, and thus pass through the digestive system effectively, without sinking or breaking up, to the absorption site. The minute micelles carry the phytosterols to the large micelles that the body produces from the bile acid, where they compete with cholesterol for entry into the micelle. The phytosterols enter the micelle, thereby inhibiting transportation of cholesterol from the digestive system into the bloodstream. This advanced technology was applied in the development of Canola Active oil, produced by Shemen Industries.</blockquote>
Wow, really? I've always wanted to eat something with "self-assembling" as one of its attributes. Plus, doesn't this sound sort of like olestra?
<p>You can search through the nano-product goldmine at the E-Nano Project for yourself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/">Consumer Products</a> [Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/384154/all-the-nanotech-you-can-eat]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-384154]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[consumer nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:24:10 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=384154&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Power-Armor Vs. Nano-Tech Super Soldiers, In G.I. Joe]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/scarlettgijoe.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/scarlettgijoe.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><em>Starship Troopers 3</em> may finally show us a glimpse of the powered armor Heinlein talks about in the novel &mdash; but we'll get our <em>real</em> power armor fix from the <em>G.I. Joe</em> movie, coming in 2009. I haven't been sure whether Joe really counted as science fiction, but a new script review gives plenty of reasons to accept it as belonging to the genre, including armor with invisibility powers, miraculous nano-technology, and super-soldiers created by a mad scientist. The costumes may look a bit <em>Batman And Robin</em>-esque (power-armor-breasts!) but the storyline sounds awesomely pulpy enough for ten sawmills. Spoilers, and a gallery, below.</p>

<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('gijoeohnoe', 17);
</script>Here's the movie's premise: the G.I. Joe team, led by Duke (Channing Tatum), fights for freedom wherever there is trouble. And their arch nemesis is Cobra Commander and his Cobra Force. The movie is based on a Hasbro line of toys, but also on a comic-book series from the 1980s, which had the Joe squad working out of "The Pit."</p>
<p>CC2K has an early review of the movie's script, and apparently it includes:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>"Accelerator suits,"</strong> which allow the G.I. Joe squad to run faster, jump super-high, smash through walls, and shrug off bullets.</li>
<li><strong>A "nano-bomb"</strong> that the Cobra Commander wants to launch &mdash; which launches a swarm of nanites that eat all of the buildings and machinery, without harming any of the people. (And how do the nanites know when to stop eating all the non-organic matter? Will this be explained at all?)</li>
<li><strong>The Neo-Vipers</strong>, super-soldiers enhanced by nanotech, so they can't feel pain or remorse. (And maybe they can actually regenerate from injuries? It's not clear.) A mad scientist, known only as the Doctor, creates these soldiers for Destro, who's horribly disfigured after a fight with Duke. Destro wears a mask made out of nanotechnology, which allows the Doctor, aka Commander, to control his mind.</li>
<li><strong>hawt babe Scarlett</strong> (Rachel Nichols, see pic above) who is a virgin, despite wearing breast-exaggerating armor (which can turn invisible.) Marlon Wayans' wacky sidekick character Ripcord has the hots for Scarlett, who says she'll date him if he can shoot her on an obstacle course. He fails to hit her, and later realizes he was actually shooting real arrows instead of "training arrows." Also, Dennis Quaid plays "Hawk," their leader, and The Rock is rumored to play Shipwreck, another one of the good guys.</li>
<li><strong>a weird backstory</strong> involving a romance between Channing Tatum's Duke and Sienna Miller's evil Baroness. They almost got married, and now she's a Nazi or something. The Baroness says things like, "Deep down, you're still the man I fell in love with." And "Do it, Duke. You've already killed me once."</li>
<li><strong>futuristic killer ninjas</strong>, as <a href="http://io9.com/372471/new-pictures-of-snake+eyes-costume-meet-your-futuristic-ninja-needs">we already mentioned</a> a while back. [<a href="http://www.cincity2000.com/content/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1157&Itemid=2">CinCity2000</a>]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/382289/power+armor-vs-nano+tech-super-soldiers-in-gi-joe]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-382289]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[g.i. joe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cobra commander]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[duke]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hasbro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hawk]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[movies made from toys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotechnology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[power armor]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=382289&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Gonorrhea-Based Molecular Machine]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("superbacteria.flv", 463, 387,"");
</script> Gonorrhea, a bacteria that's transmitted via sexual intercourse and causes painful swelling, may turn out to be the perfect molecular machine. A group of researchers at Columbia University have announced findings proving that the bacteria can use its pili, long filaments that act like limbs, to pull with a force equivalent to 100,000 times its weight, and hold it for hours. Here you can see a video of a gonorrhea bacterium pulling on tiny, flexible columns around it (the pili, which you can't see, can stretch up to ten times the length of the bacterium, and you can see several columns moving rather far away from the bacteria). I've added some music by <a href="http://honestbob.net/">Honest Bob and the Factory-to-Dealer Incentives</a> that might express what the bacteria is secretly thinking.</p>

<p><br>
This superstrength could make the bacteria the perfect ingredient in nanotech devices that have to exert strong pulls on objects around them. Many scientists are already repurposing viruses and bacteria for use in nanotech machines, and now bacteria's mega-power may make it the killer app.</p>
<p>According to New Scientist:</p>
<blockquote>Scientists knew that Neisseria gonorhoeae bacteria use "type four" pili to crawl along a surface and to attach to cells and infect them.
<p>What they didn't know was that these bacteria can bundle pili together to exert long, strong pulls. Michael Sheetz and colleagues at Columbia University in New York put the bacteria in a field of tiny gel "pillars" and measured the amount the bacteria could bend them as a way of measuring the force of their pull.</p>
<p>They mostly saw a lot of short grabs. But one pull in a hundred started out at the same strength as these short pulls, then increased in increments about equal to the force of the original pull, as if the bacteria were calling in more individual pili to help out the first.</p>
<p>This eventually resulted in a pull that was up to ten times stronger than the initial short grab, and it could last for several hours.</p>
</blockquote>
Can't wait for my first gonorrhea-operated molecular machine.
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13666-sexually-transmitted-bug-is-the-strongest-organism.html">Sexually-transmitted bug is the strongest organism</a> [New Scientist]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/381737/a-gonorrhea+based-molecular-machine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-381737]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[mad nano-engineering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gonorrhea]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microscopy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=381737&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanoparticles Causing Heart Attacks, Kidney Stones?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/heart2.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> And you thought the <a href="http://io9.com/376642/nanoparticle-gym-socks-poison-wildlife">nanotoxic gym socks</a> were bad. Researchers from the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine have found nanoparticles in kidney stones, gall stones, and in the hardened arteries which can lead to heart attacks. All of these conditions are caused by calcium build up, and researchers believe nanoparticles may be the seeds that set the calcium deposits growing.</p>

<p>There's still a lot of uncertainty flying around about just how toxic nanomaterials that make their way into air, soil, and water supplies (or whether they're even toxic at all). And the researchers &mdash; Virginia Miller and John Lieske, say they're not sure whether these nanoparticles are naturally formed in the body, or if they're picked up from the environment. You can listen to an interview called with them <a href="http://www.lifelines.tv/">here</a> called "Nanoparticles and Disease." They'll also be heading up a session on nanotech and physiology at the Experimental Biology 2008 conference on Wednesday.</p>
<p>In her work, Miller injected lab animals' artery walls with nanoparticles and the walls became inflamed. Inflammatory response is a first step towards hardening, but clearly a lot more work is going to be needed before the issue of nanotoxicity is laid to rest. Still, would it hurt if Britta started making water filters that we could set to "nano"?</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://nanotechwire.com/news.asp?nid=5755">NanoTechWire</a></p>
<p>Image: <a href="http://www.3dscience.com/">3dscience.com</a>, via <a href="http://www.ScienceBlog.com">ScienceBlog</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/376643/nanoparticles-causing-heart-attacks-kidney-stones]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-376643]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[heart attack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kidney stone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad medicine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:30:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Reilly]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=376643&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanoparticle Gym Socks Poison Wildlife]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/8/2008/04/thumb160x_silver.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" /> Your socks are creating an insidious form of nanotech pollution. Sure, nanotechnology holds great promise for everything from treating <a href="http://nano.cancer.gov/">cancer</a> to making <a href="http://io9.com/337405/one-step-closer-to-a-true-cloaking-device">cloaking devices</a> a reality. But critics have argued for a while it poses huge risks to the environment, and now engineers from Arizona State University are reporting that silver nanoparticles are almost certainly finding their way into local waterways courtesy of our washing machines. The source? Socks impregnated with the silver bits, which are known for their anti-microbial and anti-odor properties.</p>

<p>Products laced with silver nanoparticles have become <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver#In_clothing">popular</a> in running shoes, socks, and even mice (the kind used for surfing the web). But silver is also highly toxic in some forms. The researchers, Paul Westerhoff and Troy Benn, say that ionic silver is "a pretty efficient" fish killer because it migrates in through the animals' gills, <a href="http://ajpregu.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/277/5/R1385">disrupting blood and tissue chemistries</a>. Westerhoff and Benn note that no one's sure whether nanoparticle silver is as poisonous as its ionic form (which usually comes in the form of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_nitrate">silver nitrate</a>), but in simulated sock-washing experiments they found silver leaching into the water.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/539070/?sc=rssn">American Chemical Society</a></p>
<p>Photo: <a href="http://www.futurehi.net/archives/cat_life_extension.html">Future Hi</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/376642/nanoparticle-gym-socks-poison-wildlife]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-376642]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:36:15 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Reilly]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=376642&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanopaper Can Identify Deadly Bacteria in the Water]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/nanoparticles.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/nanoparticles.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a> Worried about the bacteria in your water? Just dip a test-strip coated with a special mix of nanoparticles into your glass, and watch the result. If the strip changes color, don't drink. Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Massachusetts have devised a way to instantly identify several species of bacteria using a blend of charged polymers and gold dust. The implications are fairly staggering for medicine, but also for national security.</p>

<p>I spoke with one of the researchers, Professor Vincent M. Rotello of the UMass Department of Chemistry, who foresees its use in medicine as a far more efficient bacteria test than today's "put it in a petri dish and wait" method. He also explained plans for a device usable in the fields of environmental protection or homeland security:</p>
<blockquote>Our methodology should also be useful for environmental applications, including contamination of water and food through bioterrorism or less nefarious routes. We are thinking of a test-strip method, where you dip the strip into the solution to be analyzed, or alternatively rub against a surface, put it in the instrument and read out [the result].</blockquote>
<p>Here's how it works: The researchers took a negatively charged polymer that fluoresces and combined it with gold nanoparticles, which suppressed the fluorescence. When the substance came in contact with bacteria, which are inherently negatively charged, the polymer was displaced from the gold nanoparticles, allowing it to fluoresce again. <em>Photo by: Argonne National Laboratory.</em><br>
<a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/117900994/ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0"><br>
Rapid and Efficient Identification of Bacteria Using Gold-Nanoparticle-Poly(para-phenyleneethynylene) Constructs.</a> [Angewandte Chemie International Edition.]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/375707/nanopaper-can-identify-deadly-bacteria-in-the-water]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-375707]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bacteria]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medical]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:40:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Grabianowski]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=375707&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanowire Power Shirt Generates Electricity While You Wear It]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/powershirt.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /> Now you can power your cell phone just by wearing a special shirt made of two tiny layers of nanowires that rub against each other as you move. These super-conductive wires are "piezoelectric," generating energy through pressure and movement. The result is a shirt that generates more electricity the more you move around. A few weeks ago, a research team at Georgia Tech announced the first generation power shirt (you can see the two layers of nano wires above), speculating that it could someday power small electronic devices like iPods or mobiles.</p>

<p>According to a release from the National Science Foundation, which partially funded the research:</p>
<blockquote>Zhong Lin Wang and collaborators Xudong Wang and Yong Qin have made more than 200 of the fiber nanogenerators. Each is tested on an apparatus that uses a spring and wheel to move one fiber against the other. The fibers are rubbed together for up to 30 minutes to test their durability and power production.
<p>The researchers have measured current of about four nanoamperes and output voltage of about four millivolts from a nanogenerator that included two fibers that were each one centimeter long. With a much improved design, Wang estimates that a square meter of fabric made from the special fibers could theoretically generate as much as 80 milliwatts of power.</p>
<p>So far, there is only one wrinkle in the fabric, so to speak - washing it. Zinc oxide is sensitive to moisture, so in real shirts or jackets, the nanowires would have to be protected from the effects of the washing machine.</p>
</blockquote>
I guess that means no sweating either. So you have to power your shirt up by moving around, but if you sweat on it you'll blow the generator. We might need to rethink this one.
<p><a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=111038&org=NSF&from=news">Nanowire Shirt</a> [NSF]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/375386/nanowire-power-shirt-generates-electricity-while-you-wear-it]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-375386]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sci fashion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[materials science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[power shirt]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:31:51 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=375386&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A View Of Tumors, From The Inside Out]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/nanotech_news_2006-03-27b_c.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/04/nanotech_news_2006-03-27b_c.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This image looks like an explosion in space, but it's actually gold nanorods bonding with a cancer cell. This type of gold nanoparticle could help researchers to watch a tumor grow in real time, within a few years, according to a new study. Researchers at Stanford implanted nanoparticles into living mice and were able to image their tumors in 1,000 times more detail than you could with current imaging techniques. And the technique, using Raman spectroscopy, will allow doctors to measure 10, 20 or even 30 molecular targets simultaneously, instead of just one or two. Researchers say it'll revolutionize cancer diagnosis and treatment within a decade. <em>Image from <a href="http://nano.cancer.gov/news_center/nanotech_news_2006-03-27b.asp">Cancer.gov</a>.</em> [<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080331172528.htm">Science Daily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/374856/a-view-of-tumors-from-the-inside-out]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-374856]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imaging]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[raman spectroscopy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tumor]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:00:00 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Jane Anders]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=374856&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[NASA Wants To Slice Your Brain With Nanoknife]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/01/retrieve.cfm.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Carbon nano-tubes aren't just <a href="http://io9.com/342273/nanotubes-make-synthetic-skin-feel-your-pain">gorgeous</a>, they might also save your brain one day. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory is teaming up with a cancer center, City Of Hope, to develop a new minimally invasive type of brain surgery using carbon nanotubes. Researchers hope that these sharp-tipped tubes, 50,000 times narrower than a human hair, can deliver cancer-fighting agents directly to the brain. Tests in mice found the nanotubes were non-toxic and could deliver actual genetic information to the brain. Here's an image of <a href="http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/techbeat/tb2006_1122.htm#nanotube">the first "nanoknife,"</a> developed by NIST and University of Colorado in 2006. [<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080123182213.htm">ScienceDaily</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/348739/nasa-wants-to-slice-your-brain-with-nanoknife]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-348739]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brain surgery]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jpl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[medical technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-tubes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nasa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:30:34 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[charliejane]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=348739&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Get Your Cheap Nanotubes Right Here!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/01/cheaptubes.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/01/cheaptubes.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Want some of those cool carbon nanotubes we showed you earlier? Get some dirt cheap at Cheap Tubes Inc., a site that specializes in selling CNTs at bargain basement prices. They're practically giving them away!</p>

<p><img alt="cheaptoobs.jpg" src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/01/cheaptoobs.jpg" width="605" height="134" class="center"></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cheaptubesinc.com/">[Cheap Tubes Inc.]</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/342336/get-your-cheap-nanotubes-right-here]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-342336]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[carbon nanotubes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cheap tubes inc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:00:23 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[charliejane]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=342336&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nanotubes Make Synthetic Skin Feel Your Pain]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/01/carbon-nanotube-on-top-of-4.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2008/01/carbon-nanotube-on-top-of-4.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Carbon nanotubes can conduct sensations through artificial skin back to the brain, making prosthetic limbs feel like the real thing. A nanotube like this one, delicately balanced on top of gold filaments, is threaded through a rubbery polymer. This nanotube-infused polymer generates electricity in response to pressure or force, creating signals that can be routed to your brain. That's why this synthetic skin can "feel." Researchers want to build a prosthetic limb out of this stuff by 2010. Click through for more images of carbon nanotubes, the artificial nervous systems of tomorrow.</p>

<p><em>Image of carbon nanotube on gold filaments from Singapore Nanotech Institute.</em> [<a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/01/synth-skin.html">Wired</a>]</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8">
galleryPost('carbonnanotubes', 6);
</script></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/342273/nanotubes-make-synthetic-skin-feel-your-pain]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-342273]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[assistive technology]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[carbon nanotubes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[prosthetic limbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:00:23 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[charliejane]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=342273&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[When Nano-Wires Explode]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2007/12/F07FirstPlace-FannyBeron_1.jpg"><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2007/12/F07FirstPlace-FannyBeron_1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>This image of "Nano-Explosions" won first prize in this year's "Science As Art" competition. Fanny Beron from the École Polytechnique de Montréal used an electron scanning micrograph to record the explosion that happened when a <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TG0-4FNDS3G-1&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=d44dafc24594582a8bed0781cef597d1">CoFeB magnetic array</a> was overloaded. The chaotic blasts are a "reminder that nanoscale research can have unpredicted consequences at a high level." Beron has also been a <a href="http://www.universitysport.ca/e/w_soccer/story_detail.cfm?id=560">star soccer goalie</a>. [<a href="http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=3811.php">NanoWerk</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/337132/when-nano+wires-explode]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-337132]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[science art]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[explosions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fanny beron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nano-scale research]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science as art]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:00:23 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[charliejane]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=337132&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[One Step Closer to a True Cloaking Device]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2007/12/cloakme.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> Last year, a team at Duke announced a beta cloaking material whose special nano-properties make it "invisible" to microwaves. Today, however, researchers in Stuttgart have got something even better &mdash; a "metamaterial" that can cloak objects in the visible light spectrum. Made of gold nano-mesh, the material has a negative refraction index for visible light &mdash; that means it doesn't reflect light, and could give the illusion of blending into the background. I can't wait for my metamaterial full body suit for doing futuristic spy shit. <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071221231539.htm">Towards Cloaking Visible Light</a> [Science Daily]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/337405/one-step-closer-to-a-true-cloaking-device]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-337405]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[invisibility]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[materials science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:30:45 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=337405&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[March of the Spermbots]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://io9.com/assets/resources/2007/12/nanosperm.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> Spunk-seeking nanotechnology experts at Cornell say that sperm would make the perfect nanobots of the future. Robot sperm (pictured here in an artist's rendering) would deliver new DNA or other molecules to your body by scooting through your bloodstream using a tail powered by its own energy source. Find out why sperm are self-contained power-houses after the jump.</p>
<p>Apparently, sperm tails contain their own energy-producing system that grabs glucose out of your blood and coverts it instantly to fuel. That special engine is why Cornell scientists are saying they want to model nanobots on sperm: spermbots will manufacture energy from their host bodies. <em>Image courtesy of Azonano.com.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/12/scientists-say.html">Sperm is the ideal model</a> [The Daily Galaxy]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/330084/march-of-the-spermbots]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-330084]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bioengineering]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sperm]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:00:02 PST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annalee Newitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=330084&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 50 Million Dollar Dame. Episode 3.]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript">newVideoPlayer("bionicdrama.flv", 475, 376);</script><BR>If I was a high-paid Hollywood writer, this is what my version of the Bionic Woman would look like. Upon realizing that her boyfriend has not only been keeping a dossier on her but apparently waiting to pounce upon her first near fatal mishap to implant her with $50 million of his employer's goods, Jamie Sommers tells Will and his boss Jonas they can stick it in their bionic ear. Then she and Sarah Corvus declare a truce. They meet for cocktails and decide to form their own alliance. The rest of the series would turn upon their feats of daring as they fight crime, the military-industrial complex, the Berkut Group, and men who underestimate or are afraid of true female power. </p>

<p>Rather than buying her sister's affection with $175 jeans and red wine, Jamie would try to set boundaries for Becca&mdash;and impress upon her the repercussions for bad behavior. Becca might still act out, but we'd believe she liked 70s punk and Broadway musicals. In fact, everybody would have a believably complex personality, not just the appurtenances of one; a show can buy all the Yeah Yeah Yeahs and New York Dolls songs and vintage GTOS it wants, but these aren't a substitute for good writing. The word "Good!" shouldn't be the first to spring to a viewer's mind when a character collapses after being poisoned. </p>

<p>Because Jamie wouldn't be working for the Berkut Group, she wouldn't have a boss like Antonio, who plays the Wise Black Man one week, and the Scary Black Man Threatening A White Woman the next. Ruth's authoritative manner and short haircut wouldn't immediately rate the questioning of her sexuality ("Is she a lesbian?"). </p>

<p>Would it be a better show? I don't know&mdash;but I think I'd rather watch it than this one. <br />
</p>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://io9.com/309567/the-50-million-dollar-dame-episode-3]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[io9-309567]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bionic woman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[commentary]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cyborgs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[david eick]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nanotech]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:28:46 PDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[peril]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=309567&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
