io9 
Enter your username and password.
San Francisco, 11:24 AM
Sun Nov 8
10 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors: tips@io9.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz | Email
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders | Email
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner | Email
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis | Email
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan | Email
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier | Email
Ed Grabianowski | Email
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan | Email
Lauren Davis | Email
Chris Hsiang | Email
Lynn Peril | Email
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins | Email
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox | Email
Interns:
Tim Barribeau | Email
Julia Carusillo | Email
Alex Eichler | Email
Cyriaque Lamar | Email
Caitlin Petrakovitz | Email
Mary Ratliff | Email
Josh Snyder | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
09/15/09
1.In the 1990s Frank Miller wanted to write a political satire. He set it in the future so it wouldn't be about any specific person but about general concepts in politics and socioeconomics.
2.In the 1990s the 21st Century was still in the future.
3.Much of the story takes place in what is now our present day --the early 21st Century.
4.Frank Miller is a good writer but not a prescient one. His fictional details of 21st Century life are entertaining but of course have no connection with the actual 21st Century we find ourselves in. They diverge quite a bit.
07/28/09
The IAU should take responsibility for the highly flawed definition adopted by only four percent of its members, most of whom are not planetary scientists, in 2006. However, the IAU should not be viewed as the sole authority on the definition of planet. Many planetary scientists do not belong to the IAU. Should they not have a say in this matter? Something does not become fact simply because a tiny group that calls itself an authority says so. It is significant that hundreds of planetary scientists led by New Horizons Principal Investgator Alan Stern immediately signed a formal petition opposing the IAU definition.
There are other venues through which a planet definition can be determined, such as last year's Great Planet Debate at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab.
07/28/09
Actually, it does. It happens all the time. It's pretty much what every form of government is based upon.
07/28/09
Besides - it was originally known as 'Planet X'. This alone gives it far more street cred than all the other so-called 'planets' combined.
07/27/09
http://www.amazon.com/Pluto-Files-Neil-deGrasse-Tyson....../dp/0393065200
07/28/09
07/27/09
07/27/09
Pluto is still there. The current definition (massive enough to become spherical and have cleared its surrounding space of planetary competitors) is sound.
And it excludes Pluto. Pluto is still there, relax, we just have a better understanding of its place in the solar system.
07/27/09
07/27/09
The definition does relate to size, but in a very complicated way, *after* we only consider bodies directly orbiting the sun. Different parts of the solar system can support different sized planets depending upon the area. The object has to be roughly spherical *and* have cleared its neighborhood of planetary competitors. Pluto fails on the latter. So do Ceres and Eris and the H and M dwarf planets whose names I can never remember how to spell.
07/27/09
07/27/09
07/27/09
They'll probably find Starbuck on Pluto, not Starbuck's.
07/27/09
07/27/09
Second, it reminds me of the interview Neil DeGrasse Tyson did on the Daily Show where he talked about getting hate mail from third grades, scrawled in crayon.
07/27/09
I have his book on that and he put a lot of the hate mail in the book. It's priceless.
Neil deGrasse Tyson always ranks on my list of favorite people.
07/24/09
07/21/09
07/21/09
07/20/09
Apparently I was beaten to it. By everyone.