So... I'm supposed to bop the eldritch horrors from beyond space and time in the head with the book, then?
I mean, half of them don't even have heads, much less anatomies that would ensure any sort of success should you actually land a blow on an extrusion resembling a head...
Especially Warhammer 40k? I mean, zombie robots, soul-eating psychic demons, more aliens than the American Southwest, armored genhanced supermen, and planet-eating bugs? What more could you want?!
@RexMaximus: Hate to say it, but so far the 40K RPG books have been kind of light on material. Lots of fluff and setting and whatnot, but lacking in the raw amount of information like you'd get in the old Monster Manual.
@daveNYC: Guess you're right, though I haven't played 40k since Second Edition and back then you could still find First Edition materials on shelves. Both of them were just treasure troves of stuff on the background, setting, aliens and weapons of the 40k world.
I can't speak about the current editions, but at least the wikis tell you almost all there is to know.
Also: I know the profiled books are RPGs, but shouldn't tabletop gaming be included too?
@Dunny0: I'm gonna wax nostalgic for a moment myself. I remember my first encounter with D&D, back when it was just basic D&D, in a campaign called Teagle Manor. My 2nd level fighter was killed by a wight. I was hooked ever since. And I think I still have a copy of the Ravenloft guide somewhere. Great times.
On a side note, anyone remember Cthulhu by Gaslight? That one brings back some chills.....
Also that first campaign would have been around 1978 or 79, yikes, am I admitting something there about my age?
Anyone recall the Ravenloft update/alternate setting Masque of the Red Death? I loved the idea of that setting, at the time it sounded so fresh and new. I of coarse didn't have a clue about all the Cthulhu stuff at the time.
40 years is too soon for this kind of water depth, really.
How's the power running for that Times Square picture? Electric's mostly underground in Manhattan, and I see no evidence that they've moved the wiring overhead...
I expect Manhattan will get a seawall, if it turns out to be necessary.
-Kle. #floodednewyork
Even after the disater itself. This isnt on the scale of destruction like AI. or Waterworld were everything is 100's feet underwater. This is one of those liveable disasters!! It seems like anything over 10 feet seems to be in working order. I would forget the boats and have bridges everywhere!! And I mean everywhere!!!! #floodednewyork
I'm incredibly skeptical that we could clean the flood waters in NY enough to make habitation possible, even after 40 years. There are just too many potential sources of contamination; gas tanks/lines of all types, asbestos, cracked sewer lines, etc... #floodednewyork
@Bhockzer: But if we brought everything up a few feet above water level. We have shops and residential areas now that are many feet above this scenario given to us here!! I suppose it depends on the ferocity of the floods!! If its on an Emmerich scale of 'death flood', then it doesnt seem worth it. But if its a constant flood, like increasing rainfall. We might be able to work around that and go higher away from the contaminents. Maybe!
I suppose its also a good argument in favour of the Flying Car. Many a nerds dreams come true. All we have to do is loose a few feet in street level!!! #floodednewyork
I don't think that knowing when things are kind of like other things is as valuable a skill as most people on the internet seem to want it to be. #alexisrockman
I think all of these are interesting, but the frog in #14 is a direct rip-off of a Tim Flach photo. I recognized it because I have this print hanging in my apartment (the only thing that's different is that it's been flipped to the right--even the water droplets are copied). I'd be interested to know if Alexis Rockman bought the rights to that image... #alexisrockman
@CognitiveSystems: Like it matters! Right or wrong, Disney lawyers will just sue everyone into non-existence and bankrupt artists with legal fees. As Jafar once said: he who has the gold, makes the rules. Copyright means nothing to anyone with no money. #alexisrockman
@Mike Caprio: Actually it does matter. Tim Flach is not a household name. But say Alexis Rockman got famous off these paintings (I realize these were painted in like 2004 and she's not a household name herself yet or anything), it would kind of suck for all the other artists she "drew inspiration from" without acknowledging them. Obviously, if she had stolen an image of a crow from Van Gogh or a soup can from Warhol, those images are famous enough on their own to call upon a cultural connotation/reference.
I wonder if that's what kind of makes me bristle about this whole thing: I went to her website looking for, I don't know, like a Works Cited page. I had my students last semester create art just using images they found on databases and the interwebs, but I made them created a list of Works Cited the same way they would have if they had written a paper and used a scholar's opinion. Just because an artist doesn't think up the original image doesn't mean the way they then arrange those images isn't artistic.
Full Disclosure: I do believe Getty Images owns the rights to Frog Under Water, so it's possible Rockman bought the image from Getty. But I have no idea what their policy is in creating art from that image, as opposed to licensing the image for merchandise. #alexisrockman
@JohnnyZito: I'm not sure how the rules work for fine art (or if these images would be considered fine art or illustration) but a couple of years ago a friend's design firm had to pay off a photographer because they very loosely based an illustration background texture on one of his photos of a bunch of water droplets. They'd changed everything except a single droplet, which was upside down but otherwise untouched. Well, he recognized that droplet and was able to demand some cash for it. #alexisrockman
@CognitiveSystems: If Disney knocks on someone's door and says "We're going to bury you, so either sign this over or you'll be bankrupted by legal fees" do you think that person will just settle out of court?
Anyone who believes that "rights" mean anything more than "he who has more money wins in court" is terribly, terribly naive.
Also, you should know that "cultural reference" doesn't mean jack all when it comes to "rights". It is illegal to sing Happy Birthday anywhere without paying money to a music corporation - that's why chain restaurants all have their own invented birthday tunes that they sing. If some entity owns a work, no matter how culturally significant, and they vigorously defend it, it is effectively cut off from cultural connotation, and that's exactly what our laws allow. #alexisrockman
11/18/09
I mean, half of them don't even have heads, much less anatomies that would ensure any sort of success should you actually land a blow on an extrusion resembling a head...
11/18/09
Especially Warhammer 40k? I mean, zombie robots, soul-eating psychic demons, more aliens than the American Southwest, armored genhanced supermen, and planet-eating bugs? What more could you want?!
Oh, and pauldrons. Lots and lots of pauldrons.
11/18/09
11/18/09
I can't speak about the current editions, but at least the wikis tell you almost all there is to know.
Also: I know the profiled books are RPGs, but shouldn't tabletop gaming be included too?
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/19/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
Sure, I have no point... Just wanted to express some love for a favorite D&D setting.
11/18/09
On a side note, anyone remember Cthulhu by Gaslight? That one brings back some chills.....
Also that first campaign would have been around 1978 or 79, yikes, am I admitting something there about my age?
11/18/09
11/18/09
You ever check out Castle Forlorn mini-campaign setting? 1 very small Domain, 1 very haunted castle, 1 very cursed antagonist.
11/17/09
How's the power running for that Times Square picture? Electric's mostly underground in Manhattan, and I see no evidence that they've moved the wiring overhead...
I expect Manhattan will get a seawall, if it turns out to be necessary.
-Kle. #floodednewyork
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
I'm incredibly skeptical that we could clean the flood waters in NY enough to make habitation possible, even after 40 years. There are just too many potential sources of contamination; gas tanks/lines of all types, asbestos, cracked sewer lines, etc... #floodednewyork
11/16/09
I suppose its also a good argument in favour of the Flying Car. Many a nerds dreams come true. All we have to do is loose a few feet in street level!!! #floodednewyork
11/16/09
hang your head in /mock/ shame i09 #floodednewyork
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Just out of interest, why did you have this clip so readily to hand ? #floodednewyork
11/16/09
11/16/09
"Sunfish Boulevard"
"The Grouper of the Opera"
"Starfish Express " #floodednewyork
11/08/09
11/08/09
Amen. #alexisrockman
11/08/09
11/07/09
I think all of these are interesting, but the frog in #14 is a direct rip-off of a Tim Flach photo. I recognized it because I have this print hanging in my apartment (the only thing that's different is that it's been flipped to the right--even the water droplets are copied). I'd be interested to know if Alexis Rockman bought the rights to that image... #alexisrockman
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
I wonder if that's what kind of makes me bristle about this whole thing: I went to her website looking for, I don't know, like a Works Cited page. I had my students last semester create art just using images they found on databases and the interwebs, but I made them created a list of Works Cited the same way they would have if they had written a paper and used a scholar's opinion. Just because an artist doesn't think up the original image doesn't mean the way they then arrange those images isn't artistic.
Full Disclosure: I do believe Getty Images owns the rights to Frog Under Water, so it's possible Rockman bought the image from Getty. But I have no idea what their policy is in creating art from that image, as opposed to licensing the image for merchandise. #alexisrockman
11/08/09
11/08/09
Anyone who believes that "rights" mean anything more than "he who has more money wins in court" is terribly, terribly naive.
Also, you should know that "cultural reference" doesn't mean jack all when it comes to "rights". It is illegal to sing Happy Birthday anywhere without paying money to a music corporation - that's why chain restaurants all have their own invented birthday tunes that they sing. If some entity owns a work, no matter how culturally significant, and they vigorously defend it, it is effectively cut off from cultural connotation, and that's exactly what our laws allow. #alexisrockman
11/08/09
11/10/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/07/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/08/09
11/07/09