<![CDATA[io9: radio 4]]> http://cache.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/io9.com.png <![CDATA[io9: radio 4]]> http://io9.com/tag/radio 4 http://io9.com/tag/radio 4 <![CDATA[ Hugo Gernsback’s RoboCops of 1924 ]]> In the words of inventor (and father of science fiction) Hugo Gernsback, the Radio Automaton had “no superior for fighting mobs or for war purposes.” Powered by a gasoline engine and radio controlled at a distance by a police car, it glided along on caterpillar treads, shooting tear gas and using its rotating discs (equipped with “lead balls on flexible leads”) to cut a swath through mobs of angry anarchists. For night attacks, the bulletproof Automaton was equipped with “eye-lights and the loud speaker is used to shout orders to the mob,” which presumably took one look at the giant’s whirling lead balls of death and obeyed. Despite Gernsback’s assurances that the Radio Automaton was “not a wild dream” but easily “constructed by any one with means available today,” it didn’t make it out of the pages of his Science and Invention magazine. [Dirty Pirate Whores]

]]>
Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:20:00 PDT Lynn Peril http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5019894&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Michael Chabon Defends His Genre-Bending Ways ]]> If you need something to listen to during lunch, tune into this interesting edition of Wisconsin Public Radio's "To the Best of Our Knowledge," featuring writer Michael Chabon discussing his alternate history novel The Yiddish Policemen's Union. He also talks about how science fiction can be just as beautiful and intellectually rewarding as literature. Plus there is a lot of joking around and goofing off, which makes for an excellent bit of radio. You can listen to it online. [Genre Busters via To the Best of our Knowledge]

]]>
Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:02:37 PDT Annalee Newitz http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5013059&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ 7 Totally AWESOME Theories Of Evolution From Scifi ]]> If Ben Stein really wants to convince us all that evolution is a crock, he doesn't need to make a documentary and play semantic games with Richard Dawkins. He just has to sit us down and make us watch this episode of Star Trek: Voyager, where traveling at super-warp speed causes Janeway and Paris to super-evolve into lizards (and make lizard babies.) But it's not just Voyager — science fiction provides a ton of evolution theories that make intelligent design seem downright sensible.

0000042275_20070824163925.jpg7. When one person displays a new and bizarre ability, that's the work of evolution, because survival of the fittest is making only the strongest genes survive. Actually, if there's only one person in the entire world who can shoot cherry-colored death rays out of his eyes, that's not evolution — that's a mutation. It's evolution if the cherry-eyebeam guy has a easier time mating with Famke Janssen than anyone else, and thus makes tons of babies, all of whom can do the red-eyeblast thing. Mutations are only the building blocks of evolution, not the result of evolution. Go back to school, Mohinder.

300px-X-MEN_FIRST_CLASS_007.jpg6. Evolution is puberty. In the X-Men, for some reason, bizarre powers always manifest themselves whenever they first start getting hair in new and unusual places. And it's always treated as though the person's development as an individual is a form of, or a manifestation of, evolution. It's like puberty goes hand in hand with the sudden emergence of weird new genes, and your changes as an individual is confused with the transformation of your whole species. I also love the idea that there's one X-gene, which somehow activates a whole range of powers, from heat-vision to being a chicken-man.

5. Creatures with totally different ancestors will end up looking sorta the same, just because. Biologist and science fiction author Joan Slonczewski says a big problem with most science fiction is that it depicts convergent evolution as happening all the time — that's why aliens look sort of human, and aliens and humans can inter-breed. In fact, divergent evolution is way, way more common than convergent evolution. Divergent evolution is when creatures who share a single ancestor — like, say, mammals — evolve to be very different from each other over time. You're not likely to get just one unique creature in an ecosystem, like the great worm in Dune. Instead, you're likely to get a diversity of creatures from one ancestor. Convergent evolution, when creatures with different ancestors evolve to be similar because they're filling a similar evolutionary niche, is much rarer. (An example of convergent evolution, says Slonczewski: birds, bats and flying fish.)

4. Your children will inherit your body-mods. Maybe the earliest evolutionary theorist was Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829) who believed in the idea of "soft inheritance," where you pass on your acquired characteristics to your kids. If your body adapts to circumstances during your life — for example, if a particular organ gets smaller because you use it less — then your children will inherit it. (That organ will be smaller in your kids.) In fact, only genetic changes are passed on. But that doesn't stop science fiction from presenting changes to a creature's body, or non-genetic adaptations that you make in the course of your life, as being heritable. (Lamarck's ideas are sometimes mischaracterized as, "if you lose a leg, you'll have one-legged children," but he wasn't that silly.) In David Cronenberg's 1979 classic The Brood, a cutting-edge psychotherapy causes patients to manifest their darkest emotions in their own bodies — and one transformed woman gives birth to monster children that she can control telepathically. Brood.jpg

218.jpg3. Humans could evolve overnight into a new species in just one generation. In Greg Bear's Darwin's Radio, humans' junk DNA suddenly starts expressing, and certain people are strongly sexually attracted to each other. These chosen people's children, the ones who survive, are a radically different species from homo sapiens. And Bear shows how this is just like when homo sapiens suddenly sprung up overnight, nearly 200,000 years ago. The new breed of humans are super-intelligent and mega-awesome. But it's pretty unlikely that super-rapid evolution would happen within only one generation.

2. It's possible to de-evolve people with rayguns or whatnot. Because evolution is a straight line and always happens in totally predictable ways, it's also a reversible process. You just need the right "de-evolution" device, like in the totally radical movie Mario Bros., where Dennis Hopper's King Koopa, who turns anyone who opposes him into a primordial sludge. Or, in the Next Generation episode "Genesis," a mutated T-virus from whiner-in-chief Reg Barclay causes everybody on the ship to start devolving — including Captain Picard, who starts turning into a lemur/pygmy/marmoset hybrid. Because Picard's too multi-faceted a guy to devolve into just one type of creature. Something similar also happens in the Doctor Who episode "Ghost Light," where an evolution-doubting clergyman is somehow de-evolved into an ape.

genesis245.jpg

(Which reminds me: How exactly did "Ghost Light"'s interplanetary explorer/surveyor character travel all the way across the galaxy to survey Earth, but manage to be unaware of evolution? Is Earth the only planet where creatures don't just stay the same forever?)

1. We can predict evolution and accelerate it with technobabble. Random weird things, like going really really fast, or getting exposed to weird radiation, or just eating some weird fish, will cause you to evolve 1,000,000 years into the future, like in that Voyager clip above. And then there's the totally AWESOME Voyager episode where the crew meets the long-distant descendants of Earth's dinosaurs, who are spacefaring and intelligent. Janeway deduces they're the great-great-great-great-grandkids of the dinos by asking the computer to predict dinosaur evolution millions of years ahead. Because, of course, evolution is completely predictable in a vacuum, and you don't need to know anything about enviornmental factors.

]]>
Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:02:00 PDT Charlie Jane Anders http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=383874&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Real-Life Casualties from "War of the Worlds" ]]> warofthe.jpgEveryone knows about Orson Welles' famous 1938 radio version of War Of The Worlds, which panicked the nation by (accidentally?) convincing those who tuned in late that New Jersey had been invaded by Martians. But how many of you knew that the same hoax succeeded two other times - and in one case, resulted in riots, the destruction of the radio station who'd broadcast the show, and a death toll between 6 and 20 people? Those stories, as well as the reason why so many people fell for Welles' original broadcast, are at the heart of a special episode of WNYC's awesome Radio Lab.

Radio Lab, an hour-long show where co-hosts Jad Abumraud and Robert Krulwich investigate the why behind subjects like The Ring Cycle, deceit and why we laugh, mixes soundscapes with conversation, humor and hard science to come up with something that's been called the best radio show in America. Their "War of The Worlds" episode - the first recorded live in front of an audience - may lack some of the more inventive remixing of interview and dialogue, but makes up for it with the amazing - and somewhat unbelievable - stories behind the various radio versions of HG Wells' story.

With guests including Blair Witch Project creator Daniel Myrick and the daughter of an Equadorian radio producer whose version of the play didn't end so well, creates an essential hour of listening that - as the show's website puts it - examines the "power of the mass media to create panic." Listen and wonder whatever happened to the power of science fiction.

War of the Worlds [Radiolab.org]

]]>
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:40:00 PDT Graeme McMillan http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373869&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Torchwood To Continue Without Pictures ]]> toshwood.jpgBridging the gap between an apparently apocalyptic end to its second season and the potentially-revamped third, sexy alien-hunter show Torchwood is making the jump to radio. A special one-off episode about the secret organization that guards a "temporal rift" in Cardiff will be transmitted on BBC Radio 4 this summer — and it happens to be oddly topical, if you're a science geek.

In the 45 minute episode, to be broadcast in Radio 4's traditional "Afternoon Play" slot, the Torchwood team - portrayed by their television cast - will deal with a mission revolving around a particle accelerator. Why a particle accelerator, you ask? Well, because the episode will be transmitted on the same day as the opening of the world's biggest particle accelerator in Switzerland, and if nothing else, Radio 4 likes to keep up with what's happening in the world.

The episode will be written by Joseph Lidster, who came up with the "A Day In The Death" episode of Torchwood season 2.

Radio 4 to air one-off Torchwood [Digital Spy]

]]>
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:20:00 PDT Graeme McMillan http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=373231&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Supermassive Telescope Hears What the Early Universe Looks Like ]]> Yeah, you read that headline right. This supermassive radio telescope, set to be completed in Chile in 2012 (you're seeing an artist's rendering), listens to frequencies between the infrared and radio spectrum. It tunes in particles that will give astronomers an unprecedented portrait of the early universe, as well as planetary and star formations in our current volume of space. It's called the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA for short). One of the best parts of the array is that it comes with giant antenna transporters that allow researchers to reconfigure it on the fly. Just last week, the transporters arrived in Chile. Want to see one?

According to Anneila Sargent, a Caltech professor and ALMA Board member:

Most of the photons in the Universe are in the wavelength range that ALMA will receive, and ALMA will give us our first high-resolution views at these wavelengths. This will be a tremendous advancement for astronomy and open one of our science's last frontiers.
transporter.jpg Here you can see one of the giant antenna transporters being lifted off a boat in Chile. Antenna mounted on it will move the dishes into different configurations, making the observatory more flexible and allowing researchers to conduct a wide range of studies, ranging from planets being formed to galaxies formed at the beginning of the universe. Here's one of the antennae. vertexrsi2.jpg

The National Radio Astronomy Observatory explained ALMA's capabilities in greater detail:

The millimeter and submillimeter wavelength range lies between what is traditionally considered radio waves and infrared waves. ALMA, a system using up to 66 high-precision dish antennas working together, will provide astronomers with dramatically greater sensitivity, the ability to detect faint objects, and resolving power, the ability to see fine detail, than has ever before been available in this range . . .

Astronomers expect ALMA to make extremely important contributions in a a variety of scientific specialties. The new telescope system will be a premier tool for studying the first stars and galaxies that emerged from the cosmic "dark ages" billions of years ago. These objects now are seen at great cosmic distances, with most of their light stretched out to millimeter and submillimeter wavelengths by the expansion of the Universe.

In the more nearby Universe, ALMA will provide an unprecedented ability to study the processes of star and planet formation. Unimpeded by the dust that obscures visible-light observations, ALMA will be able to reveal the details of young, still-forming stars, and is expected to show young planets still in the process of developing. In addition, ALMA will allow scientists to learn in detail about the complex chemistry of the giant clouds of gas and dust that spawn stars and planetary systems.

Images courtesy of ALMA/ESO/NRAO/NAOJ.

Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array [Official Site]

]]>
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:00:49 PST Annalee Newitz http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=360241&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ The Rise and Fall of the Biggest Radio in the World ]]> The Arecibo Radio Telescope in Puerto Rico is the most sensitive and gigantic radio telescope in the world, used to do radar studies on objects in our local solar system. Despite its long history of excellent operation - it was built in the early 1960s - the National Science Foundation is threatening to cut its funding down to almost nothing by 2011. Nevertheless, the massive radio apparatus just got a fresh coat of paint, as you can see in the picture, and the Arecibo Observatory is scrambling for fresh funding sources. See the telescope in its glory days in 1962 below the fold.



This is the enormous radio dish seen from above in 1962. The guy painting you see above is standing over the dish on a catwalk.
arecibo63.jpg
Top image via AP. Bottom image courtesy of the NAIC - Arecibo Observatory, a facility (at least for now) of the NSF.

Arecibo Back in Operation [NYT]



]]>
Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:58:43 PST Annalee Newitz http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=337488&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Green Hornet Wasn't Always a Paunchy Jewish Canadian ]]> Everybody's buzzing about how Seth Rogen is attached to play superhero Green Hornet in the movie adaptation he's also writing. That means most people will think of the Green Hornet as a paunchy, Jewish hero if this thing actually gets made. Since most audiences today aren't familiar with The Green Hornet, we've put a shorthand guide together for your edification.
  • The Green Hornet appeared on the radio back in 1936, pre-dating the first appearance of Batman by only three years. However, both men wear masks, have cars that do neat tricks, and feature sidekicks who save their bacon on more than one occasion.
  • Britt Reid, newspaper magnate by day, masked crimefighter by night, is The Green Hornet. He's a distant relative of The Lone Ranger (no, we aren't making this up) who travels around in a car he calls "Black Beauty." Hi-yo.
  • The Green Hornet is a wanted criminal in the city, and he uses that notoriety as leverage when dealing with criminals.
  • The only people who know the Hornet's identity are his secretary Lenore Case and the district attorney, Frank Scanlon.
  • The Green Hornet's sidekick and chauffeur Kato was changed from Japanese, to Filipino, to Korean during the run of the show, although he was famously played by Bruce Lee when the series came to television.
  • While he may not have worn a utility belt, The Green Hornet did use two specialized guns. One fired knockout gas, and the other one delivered "Hornet Stings" in the form of electric shocks.
  • His car featured drop-down tubes that could fire rockets, had a knockout gas nozzle, could launch a flying surveillance device from its trunk, and even featured "infra-green" headlights that could let the driver see in the dark.
  • On the radio, the Green Hornet's theme song was "The Flight of the Bumblebee," complete with a theremin providing the sound of a buzzing hornet.
  • When The Green Hornet came to television in 1966, it was on the heels of the success of Batman, and both programs aired on ABC. Although Batman was played up to be campy, The Green Hornet was played straight. Both series featured the same announcer, were made by the same production company, and wouldn't you know it... Batman met The Green Hornet on his show.
  • Sadly, The Green Hornet never had the sticking power that Batman did, probably because a newspaper publisher who punches people just isn't all that exciting. Batman had scads of nifty gadgets and a Batcave, but all The Green Hornet has is a couple of funky guns and a car that looks... like a car. As a radio serial, The Green Hornet worked best in your imagination, just like The Shadow did. When Alec Baldwin brought that character to the screen in 1994, it tanked pretty hard. Billy Zane's 1930's comic-strip movie adaptation The Phantom did even worse in 1996.

    So maybe instead of trying to make film adaptations of popular radio dramas and comic strips from the 1930's, Hollywood should create something new and cool. As much as we love our imagination, there is just no way we can picture Seth Rogen as a pugilistic publisher with a secret identity.

]]>
Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:30:30 PST Kevin Kelly http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=327419&view=rss&microfeed=true