San Francisco, 1:37 PM
Tue Dec 15
26 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I'm reading yet another book about John Boyd, the U.S. air force officer who, among many other amazing accomplishments any one of which would have been sufficient for one career, convinced everyone that fighter planes still needed guns, in an era where everyone else thought that dogfights would devolve into planes firing missiles at each other from miles away. (This led to the development of the F-16, which is small, light, and nimble, when official doctrine at the time called for further, higher, and faster, which meant heavier and awkward.)
Anyway, I'm becoming convinced that it's impossible to know what space battles will really look like. Maybe it will be ships of the line pounding away at one another broadsides. (Cool!) Or fighters doing high-G dogfights while firing guns at one another. (Awesome!) Or moon-sized space stations with planet-destroying anti-proton beams in an x-ray containment laser. (Yeah, baby!)
In a word, yes and no. The problem I have is that sometimes the best stuff in movies of the earlier era were due to the fact that the directors didn't have unlimited resources. When I was a kid, I remember thinking "how did the stormtroopers get onto the rebel ship? Did they have to go through space?" A few sound effects and tense looks from the actors conveyed more than CGI ever could.
For how hinky the B5 CG was, there were moments of awesome scale with incomparably-designed ships.
The White Stars (the whole Minbari fleet), Vorlons, Shadows, and The First Ones were all carefully designed to be unique (and I'm still wondering about some of those cultures/life forms on those ships/entities). The Vorlons were the only really unusual ships on television until the rest of the B5 ships were introduced. No other show had designs like that, until Farscape came around.
Put them in a blender, go PEW PEW = good TV.
@gods-n-clods: I always felt that B5 was the only show that had the humans as just another race in the galaxy. Space is a big old place and humans are just a speck in the whole scheme of things. The grand scale of the ships and the mysteries of the first ones sparked my imagination. I need to watch that series again.
The Freespace 2 computer game also had some rather awesome massive space battles, both in cutscenes and in the gameplay itself. I was flying one mission where there were some massive capital ships duking it out and I got hit by one of the capship beams...one minute there, full shields, the next minute watching my death cutscene. It was amazingly cool.
Fake? Those were clearly all real! But no, in all seriousness, as a kid, and now as an adult, I still really love those cheesy CGI battles. I remember waking up on saturday morning to try and catch B5 reruns on TNT for some shadow on vorlon action, and seriously, that DS9 battle in sacrifice of angels, blew my 12 year old mind away.
How about video game battles that aren't cutscenes? Although dramatized and prettied up (I never came out of jump in formation), it is the game engine, and some of the feel of a sov fight. Innersion 'till you can't breathe.
@AmishJohn: One of these days I plan on quitting TV and all social activities and taking up Eve online. I've met folks that play and they seem to really enjoy it. Met? Maybe I shouldn't say met, encountered would be a better word.
I never really liked the way the ships looked in B5. They truly looked too artificial, partly because there was a specular reflection quality to the textures. They were so... shiny and perfect.
On an unrelated note, the suicidal destruction of the Asgard home planet brought tears to my eyes.
@Roklimber: I just finished watching all 10 seasons of SG-1 (fingers crossed I get Atlantis for Christmas). I loved the Asgard. They were my favourite aliens - any episode with them became pure gold for me. I wanted Thor to join SG-1. I was so crushed when they actually went through with the mass suicide. Right up until the end of the episode I was convinced Carter would think of a way to save them and go far enough back in time to do it.
I share your pain. Even the clip-show episode where Hammond tells the representatives of Canada, France, China, and Great Britain about the stargate was cool, thanks to Thor's appearance.
Senator Kinsey: "Commander Thor..."
Thor (with a finger up): "Supreme Commander..."
Take that, Kinsey!
About Atlantis, I was afraid the premise of the Wraith (a vampiristic creature yadda yadda yadda) would make the show suck, but I think the writers did a great job of making them interesting.
And some of the very best episodes are McKay-oriented. "The Tao of Rodney" and "The Shrine" are amazing feats of acting by David Hewlett.
@Roklimber: Oh yes, the Stargate clip show. I'd like SG:U try to pull off something so awesomely horrible. Every time I got to one I always wanted to skip but couldn't due to a fear that I would miss something (i.e. Thor telling off Kinsey).
I'm looking forward to Atlantis, I've heard that Woolsey will eventually become even less of a dick (a process started in SG-1) and that Carter is commander for a season (Carter is my favourite).
Well, I won't spoil Atlantis for you, so I'm not going to comment on any details. Suffice it to say that I like Atlantis as much as SG-1 and, by that, I mean that I like them both.
One thing that was interesting about B5 was how utterly outclassed the humans were in most of the battles on their lumbering, AG-lacking ships while the Mimbari and others could twist Newton into a pretzel.
@Kamenwati: I second your desire for live action Robotech/Macross... but I see the story hopelessly molested, the award-winning mech design screwed, the movie opening strong, critically panned, and subsequent sequels scratched because of poor legs at the box office.
(Take that, Nostradamus. )
You know, I didn't get into B5 until it was on DVD. I loved those '90s space battles and I didn't care that the exterior shots were cheesy CGI f/x made on Amiga computers there was a real sense of melodrama to them. I also loved the battles from DS9. Is there anything more awesomely melodramatic than Klingons singing on the bridge as they fly off to certain doom?
You kids. You don't know what a fun, cheesey space battle is....Buck Rogers, Battlestar Galactica (the original), Star Trek (the real one), Space 1999...now that was fun. Shots used over and over and over and over again. Especially if it was a Glen Larson production.
@AngriestGeek: The space battles in "The Living Legend" episodes of the original Battlestar Galactica are still some of the most satisfying that I've seen and they include one of the funniest scenes in the entire series.
I've never understood the incessant griping about the reuse of fairly standard FX shots. The costumes aren't changed for every scene, the sets aren't redesigned and rebuilt for every episode, and the characters aren't recast every season (well, usually).
@Pessimippopotamus: Defiant had overpowered weapons which drained energy from all it's other systems. It was the Federations first crack at an assault craft. They set a premium on speed, maneuverability and firepower.
And wow whatever arguments I had against my nerd status just went poof.
@Pessimippopotamus:
Voyager also had an infinite supply of red shirt ensigns, shuttle crafts, photon torpedos, over night repair of the most incredible damages, and not to mention 1000 and 1 uses for nanoprobes to somehow solve all their problems by the end of the episode
The Battle of Corianna VI is one of my favorite space battles ever. Planet Killer Superships. The Shadows' Death Cloud of Missles. An Old One ship that looked like it was made of SPACE WOOD.
But the best part was that despite all this awesome, the resolution came down to philosophy and psychoanalysis. Hell, the whole battle can be said to be a cosmic-scale intervention. "You guys are being total dicks and hurting the ones you profess to love. Quit it."
Although, the scenes of the Battle of the Line in the B5 prequel movie were wondrous just for the sheer NUMBER of ships on screen.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: I loved DS9, and somewhere around here you can find my essay about how everything cool about BSG comes from DS9 one way or another. But I did feel DS9 lost some of its oomph in its final season.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: I liked DS9, too. I liked seeing the dark underside of the shiny Federation. And it was usually on back to back with Babylon 5 where I was.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: We almost missed dinner reservation tonight because I didn't want to leave before the end of a DS9 episode I'd already seen at least twice.
I've always thought that it was the Trek that "got it". The right mix of drama, action, humour and darkness, plus good characters, writing and storylines.
Plus I had (have) a huge crush on Dr. Julian Bashir.
@Charlie Jane Anders: Definitely. They hung on one extra season to tie up the loose ends. It was nice from a fan standpoint, but they did their best work before that. They also had the (now typical) weak Moore pseudo-religious ending.
@Xicer: I dunno. It seems that whenever I claim that DS9 was the best of Trek, I get a lot of backlash. Don't know why.
@Ghost_in_the_Machine: That was one of the things I liked about it most. They used money. They got involved in local politics. they made deals with the devil because they had no other choice and the might of the federation was too far away to give them choices. All sorts of things that Kirk and Picard would never think of.
@Charlie Jane Anders: With the establishment throwing their love toward Voyager, I think they could feel the end coming. Paramount gambled on Voyager, flashy and simplified, and we all lost.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: You won't get flamed here. I have a lot of ideas and loves that I am afraid to share around the web that invariably get met with something akin to maturity here on io9.
That said. I am a staunch detractor of DS9. I could explain why but it all boils down to: I never gave it a chance (on principle alone) and so the window of opportunity is pressure welded shut with rust and failure.
@RandomFrequentFlierDent: I agree. And I have to say that DS9 turned around two of my least favorite characters, I HATED Quark and Dax. Anytime it was a Quark-centric show I was bummed. By the end of the series I ADORED both Dax and Quark and my favorite episodes included those that centered on Farengi politics. By the series end, I liked Jake, Rom and even Quark's Mom. That was a fantastic show.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: Garak was nice because of the "spy who poses as a tailor" mystery, and Quark, Odo, Worf, and Dax were great characters (until Dax got "resurrected" as Ezri Dax), and Sisko (who actually PUNCHED Q!) was a unique "captain," but everyone still seems to hate DS9 for the lack of a starship, and the grittier feel of the Cardassian space station. Still the weakest of the Trek shows (even behind Enterprise), IMHO.
DS9 is my favorite Trek after TOS. I doubt you'd get much in the way of disagreement.
I also loved this article. I love the capitol ship battles of the 90s. If the 80s copied the dog fights of Star Wars, the 90s copied the battle of The Wrath of Kahn. Nicholas Meyer wanted a sea battle with heavy capitol ships, not fast fighters. Later battle scenes combined fast ships and larger ships.
@Dr.Quatermass Sc.D: Purveyor of Truth, Disseminator of Lies: Badass Odo was cool. Odo mooning over Kira, not so much. I'd say you missed out (obviously). Try picking up the DVD's and giving it another chance.
@Howard Blair: It's so nice to be on a site where we can talk about this stuff without invoking godwin's rule or calling each other gay. I agree Sisko was weak, but it was such an ensemble show that the other characters picked up the slack - again turning weakness into strength. Not only do I disagree that this was the worst, I don't even agree that "Enterprise" was the worst. I enjoyed it. By far and away the worst Trek was "Voyager." After the finale I turned to my wife and said "Thank god that's over."
The official Dr Eilio Lizardo ranking of trek (tm) goes:
DS9
TOS
TNG
Enterprise
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Voyagerr
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: I loved DS9, mostly because of the characters. They were so flawed in comparison to TNG, which is all we had had at that point. They seemed like people in a way that the TNG characters weren't.
I loved the relationships that developed over the course of the series. It wasn't a 'we're the main characters so we all know each other.' Bashir and Garrick, Bashir and O'brian, the intense and fairly complicated relationship between Sisko and Dukat...
To say nothing of the character arcs. I'm thinking specifically of Dumar here. What a complete and total tool that guy was... and look where he ended up.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: As most can atest, I LOVE DS9. In the middle of a great rewatch with my girlfriend now. In the middle of season 5 and can't wait to go into the grand season 6. DS9, then TOS, TNG, ENT and The Red Headed Stepchild, VOY.
@Byronotron: Oh and Charlie is right, Moore pretty much ripped himself off left and right on BSG. So many themes and almost exact plot points are mirrored in BSG. Oh and all of the best episodes of both TNG and DS9 were written by Moore.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: I absolutely loved DS9. It's the reason I got a C my first semester at college - a friend lent me the entire series. It's also how I survived having some kind of viral illness the entire winter break.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: Gott love this site. Completely agree, DS9 was my favorite of the series, followed by TNG then TOS, Voyager and Enterprise. I have to say that I enjoyed them all, I know people nitpicked the flaws in VOY and ENT, but they were still Trek in my eyes.
It started by arriving at just the right time. When TNG premiered, I was old enough to watch it but not enough to really appreciate it. But with DS9, I was hooked from the very first episode.
Then there was the complexity of the subject matter... No zooming in, solving the aliens' problem and zooming out again... Instead, the crew of DS9 had to deal with the politics of a single planet and the ramifications of it. They had to deal with fascinating issues of science, religion and post-colonialism. They had to consistently deal with the influence of a single alien enemy. There was no zooming around anyways, safe and secure on a utopian spaceship. They had to find ways of making the diverse community of the space station work. And they still got a little first contact in there from the wormhole.
And then the series kept evolving. Though the whole Klingon war season was a bit of a waste, it did provide one of the best individual scenes in the whole series. Compare how DS9 fares against a whole fleet of Klingon warships vs. the first episode when it almost got blowed up by three Cardassian vessels. It went from being a backwards nowhere station to the most important installation after Earth itself. The Federation's relationship with Bajor kept evolving, and we saw the full breadth of war, from foreshadowing to aftermath. And the characters... The sheer scope of DS9 has actually prevented me from going back to watch it again, since I know what a huge investment of time it would be. I always thought that it should have been followed by a series that took a long, expansive view of Federation politics with a sizeable cast of characters, picking up where DS9 left off. Too bad it was followed by Voyager and it's prequel, Enterprise.
But I generally find that, despite what was said above about Voyager, it's actually DS9 that's the red-headed stepchild. My experience is that it is a fairly divisive show with a tendency towards love-it or hate-it dialectics. It does stand out from the norm of Star Trek shows, still, and that provokes extreme reactions.
@Russell Dovey: More the actor than the character. He didn't really sell the pain of his loss and how it affected his relationship with his son. The presence of his son reminded me of the failed Wesley experiment (nothing against Wil Wheaton, just Wesley) and as was stated above, he always sounded like he was out of breath. I never liked Hawk or Spenser for hire so I was prejudiced as well.
Despite all of that, The Cisco definitely grew on me as time went by and I never despised him the way I did most of the characters on Voyager. I was always hoping Janeway, Chakotay, Neelix, Harry Kim, Seska and early Kes would die horrible, painful, slow deaths drawn out over several episodes. Paris, Tuvok and Torres were less annoying and would be permitted quick, clean deaths.
Interesting, if you check his IMDB page, Avery Brooks never acted much at all after DS9.
I like Sisko because he was shouty and unintrospective at times. Eddington, in the episode from which the above quote comes, clearly was in the right and had no qualms about letting Sisko know it. In return Sisko, got shouty and used his appointed power to silence a Federation "threat" deviating from the normal operation of Starfleet authority. I do that too sometimes (but in a non-Federation context, obviously), so it's easy to relate to Sisko.
@Dr Emilio Lizardo: Yes, there were times in later seasons when Sisko's detachment from reality (due to his inner Emissary being drawn further out as time went on by, the Prophets) looked more like Avery Brooks becoming detached from the role he was being made to play. But goddamn, in the episode where he hit his head and thought he was an early twentieth-century science-fiction writer, he was freaking brilliant. And the caper with Garak and the Romulan senator...
Regarding his relationship with his son, I thought he did pretty well in portraying how overprotective one would be of your son after you both lost the most important person in your life to a Borg attack.
Jake was okay, IMO, a little over-serious (like all kids on Star Trek except Nog, must be a Federation disease) but at times I really thought he was this guy growing up in a weird place, with no roots except his dad's cooking to keep him sane.
Mostly I agree with you about Voyager's characters, although me and my brother recently had a great time watching it all the way through, about a season per three weeks. Janeway was the exception I'd pluck from your list there, and I'd replace her with Paris.
Although Harry Kim was hilarious, because he was basically Meg from Family Guy, except in space. Doomed from the start.
I'm hoping that someone at Paramount takes a tab of LSD and decides to make a DS9 movie, so Brooks can make a comeback at least one more time. It'll never happen though.
@Charlie Jane Anders: There was an DS9 season (2, 3?) where they had a cluster of "to be continued" episode with with Kai and Vedek Bareil. I thought it was the best thing I had seen. But I get the impression that they turned back to individual episodes after that. I gave up DS9 somewhere in the last few years.
My main memory of this show was how frustrating it was to get episodes about "the kids" or some peuso-romantic episode. Bizarrely out-of-sync with the audience I think? I think this probably not as frustrating on DVD. On tv, with all the waiting, reruns and the hiatus, it was torture.
12/13/09
Anyway, I'm becoming convinced that it's impossible to know what space battles will really look like. Maybe it will be ships of the line pounding away at one another broadsides. (Cool!) Or fighters doing high-G dogfights while firing guns at one another. (Awesome!) Or moon-sized space stations with planet-destroying anti-proton beams in an x-ray containment laser. (Yeah, baby!)
Bring it on.
12/13/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
The White Stars (the whole Minbari fleet), Vorlons, Shadows, and The First Ones were all carefully designed to be unique (and I'm still wondering about some of those cultures/life forms on those ships/entities). The Vorlons were the only really unusual ships on television until the rest of the B5 ships were introduced. No other show had designs like that, until Farscape came around.
Put them in a blender, go PEW PEW = good TV.
12/14/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/14/09
12/12/09
On an unrelated note, the suicidal destruction of the Asgard home planet brought tears to my eyes.
12/12/09
12/12/09
I share your pain. Even the clip-show episode where Hammond tells the representatives of Canada, France, China, and Great Britain about the stargate was cool, thanks to Thor's appearance.
Senator Kinsey: "Commander Thor..."
Thor (with a finger up): "Supreme Commander..."
Take that, Kinsey!
About Atlantis, I was afraid the premise of the Wraith (a vampiristic creature yadda yadda yadda) would make the show suck, but I think the writers did a great job of making them interesting.
And some of the very best episodes are McKay-oriented. "The Tao of Rodney" and "The Shrine" are amazing feats of acting by David Hewlett.
12/12/09
I'm looking forward to Atlantis, I've heard that Woolsey will eventually become even less of a dick (a process started in SG-1) and that Carter is commander for a season (Carter is my favourite).
12/12/09
Well, I won't spoil Atlantis for you, so I'm not going to comment on any details. Suffice it to say that I like Atlantis as much as SG-1 and, by that, I mean that I like them both.
Enjoy your Atlantis ride.
12/12/09
What's next? Rant on how Karateka on the C-64 didn't have good shading or something?
12/12/09
Just because I didn't like the end-result it doesn't mean that I don't appreciate the effort, difficulty, and pioneering work involved.
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
12/12/09
(Take that, Nostradamus. )
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
I've never understood the incessant griping about the reuse of fairly standard FX shots. The costumes aren't changed for every scene, the sets aren't redesigned and rebuilt for every episode, and the characters aren't recast every season (well, usually).
12/12/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
And wow whatever arguments I had against my nerd status just went poof.
12/11/09
Defiant had the prototype ablative shielding that was later deployed in a more perfected form on Voyager.
12/12/09
Voyager also had an infinite supply of red shirt ensigns, shuttle crafts, photon torpedos, over night repair of the most incredible damages, and not to mention 1000 and 1 uses for nanoprobes to somehow solve all their problems by the end of the episode
12/11/09
But the best part was that despite all this awesome, the resolution came down to philosophy and psychoanalysis. Hell, the whole battle can be said to be a cosmic-scale intervention. "You guys are being total dicks and hurting the ones you profess to love. Quit it."
Although, the scenes of the Battle of the Line in the B5 prequel movie were wondrous just for the sheer NUMBER of ships on screen.
12/11/09
Mostly really good characters who evolved nicely over time. Garrick, Worf and Dax especially.
They took weaknesses like the Ferengi and the fact that they never went anywhere and turned them into strengths.
Some really good early Ron Moore exploring the importance of religion.
Great huge fleet actions like you showed above.
Sure, it wasn't perfect but it was really darn good.
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
I've always thought that it was the Trek that "got it". The right mix of drama, action, humour and darkness, plus good characters, writing and storylines.
Plus I had (have) a huge crush on Dr. Julian Bashir.
12/11/09
12/11/09
@Xicer: I dunno. It seems that whenever I claim that DS9 was the best of Trek, I get a lot of backlash. Don't know why.
@Ghost_in_the_Machine: That was one of the things I liked about it most. They used money. They got involved in local politics. they made deals with the devil because they had no other choice and the might of the federation was too far away to give them choices. All sorts of things that Kirk and Picard would never think of.
12/11/09
12/11/09
I always liked the fact that they weren't afraid to show the Federation getting their butts kicked every now and then.
12/11/09
12/11/09
That said. I am a staunch detractor of DS9. I could explain why but it all boils down to: I never gave it a chance (on principle alone) and so the window of opportunity is pressure welded shut with rust and failure.
Plus Odo. *shivers*
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
DS9 is my favorite Trek after TOS. I doubt you'd get much in the way of disagreement.
I also loved this article. I love the capitol ship battles of the 90s. If the 80s copied the dog fights of Star Wars, the 90s copied the battle of The Wrath of Kahn. Nicholas Meyer wanted a sea battle with heavy capitol ships, not fast fighters. Later battle scenes combined fast ships and larger ships.
12/11/09
@Howard Blair: It's so nice to be on a site where we can talk about this stuff without invoking godwin's rule or calling each other gay. I agree Sisko was weak, but it was such an ensemble show that the other characters picked up the slack - again turning weakness into strength. Not only do I disagree that this was the worst, I don't even agree that "Enterprise" was the worst. I enjoyed it. By far and away the worst Trek was "Voyager." After the finale I turned to my wife and said "Thank god that's over."
The official Dr Eilio Lizardo ranking of trek (tm) goes:
DS9
TOS
TNG
Enterprise
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Voyagerr
12/11/09
I loved the relationships that developed over the course of the series. It wasn't a 'we're the main characters so we all know each other.' Bashir and Garrick, Bashir and O'brian, the intense and fairly complicated relationship between Sisko and Dukat...
To say nothing of the character arcs. I'm thinking specifically of Dumar here. What a complete and total tool that guy was... and look where he ended up.
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
Ugh, so many typos. Time to go read "Santa Olivia" for #io9Bookclub, then to bed.
This has been a lot of fun.
12/11/09
Yepp....
12/11/09
12/11/09
It started by arriving at just the right time. When TNG premiered, I was old enough to watch it but not enough to really appreciate it. But with DS9, I was hooked from the very first episode.
Then there was the complexity of the subject matter... No zooming in, solving the aliens' problem and zooming out again... Instead, the crew of DS9 had to deal with the politics of a single planet and the ramifications of it. They had to deal with fascinating issues of science, religion and post-colonialism. They had to consistently deal with the influence of a single alien enemy. There was no zooming around anyways, safe and secure on a utopian spaceship. They had to find ways of making the diverse community of the space station work. And they still got a little first contact in there from the wormhole.
And then the series kept evolving. Though the whole Klingon war season was a bit of a waste, it did provide one of the best individual scenes in the whole series. Compare how DS9 fares against a whole fleet of Klingon warships vs. the first episode when it almost got blowed up by three Cardassian vessels. It went from being a backwards nowhere station to the most important installation after Earth itself. The Federation's relationship with Bajor kept evolving, and we saw the full breadth of war, from foreshadowing to aftermath. And the characters... The sheer scope of DS9 has actually prevented me from going back to watch it again, since I know what a huge investment of time it would be. I always thought that it should have been followed by a series that took a long, expansive view of Federation politics with a sizeable cast of characters, picking up where DS9 left off. Too bad it was followed by Voyager and it's prequel, Enterprise.
But I generally find that, despite what was said above about Voyager, it's actually DS9 that's the red-headed stepchild. My experience is that it is a fairly divisive show with a tendency towards love-it or hate-it dialectics. It does stand out from the norm of Star Trek shows, still, and that provokes extreme reactions.
12/12/09
Sisko... was... weak...
Sisko... weak...
I'm sorry, I don't understand the idea you're trying to communicate, because it makes no fucking sense no matter how many times I read it.
12/12/09
@Russell Dovey: More the actor than the character. He didn't really sell the pain of his loss and how it affected his relationship with his son. The presence of his son reminded me of the failed Wesley experiment (nothing against Wil Wheaton, just Wesley) and as was stated above, he always sounded like he was out of breath. I never liked Hawk or Spenser for hire so I was prejudiced as well.
Despite all of that, The Cisco definitely grew on me as time went by and I never despised him the way I did most of the characters on Voyager. I was always hoping Janeway, Chakotay, Neelix, Harry Kim, Seska and early Kes would die horrible, painful, slow deaths drawn out over several episodes. Paris, Tuvok and Torres were less annoying and would be permitted quick, clean deaths.
Interesting, if you check his IMDB page, Avery Brooks never acted much at all after DS9.
12/12/09
I like Sisko because he was shouty and unintrospective at times. Eddington, in the episode from which the above quote comes, clearly was in the right and had no qualms about letting Sisko know it. In return Sisko, got shouty and used his appointed power to silence a Federation "threat" deviating from the normal operation of Starfleet authority. I do that too sometimes (but in a non-Federation context, obviously), so it's easy to relate to Sisko.
12/12/09
Regarding his relationship with his son, I thought he did pretty well in portraying how overprotective one would be of your son after you both lost the most important person in your life to a Borg attack.
Jake was okay, IMO, a little over-serious (like all kids on Star Trek except Nog, must be a Federation disease) but at times I really thought he was this guy growing up in a weird place, with no roots except his dad's cooking to keep him sane.
Mostly I agree with you about Voyager's characters, although me and my brother recently had a great time watching it all the way through, about a season per three weeks. Janeway was the exception I'd pluck from your list there, and I'd replace her with Paris.
Although Harry Kim was hilarious, because he was basically Meg from Family Guy, except in space. Doomed from the start.
I'm hoping that someone at Paramount takes a tab of LSD and decides to make a DS9 movie, so Brooks can make a comeback at least one more time. It'll never happen though.
12/12/09
My main memory of this show was how frustrating it was to get episodes about "the kids" or some peuso-romantic episode. Bizarrely out-of-sync with the audience I think? I think this probably not as frustrating on DVD. On tv, with all the waiting, reruns and the hiatus, it was torture.
12/12/09
And of course Odo's latinum bucket.
Woot.
12/11/09
Some of those battles would have been the best *film* battles had they been on the big screen.