and the million people without power was because of a winter storm - nothing to do with the sun (in the sense of unusual solar activity)...after the doomsday freak out of page one you get, on page 2, "But scientists emphasize that this situation is improble."
First they were complaining about no sun activity now they are complaining about a Sun Katrina. Get over yourselves scientist. We discredited the heliocentric theory when we burned Galileo as witch in the Salem,Tx Witch Trials of 1906.
The ESA's probe (ie not NASA) will have an orbital period of 150 days. Which you've just confirmed. NASA's probe has varying orbital periods depending on what orbital path its taking (ie see what I wrote).
150 years isn't anywhere near correct. Its not days either.
The entire mission has a complete cycle time of 24 orbits totalling 6.4 years. The final 3 orbits within 9.5 Rs or 8.4 Rs* from the Sun's surface occur over a period of 88 days.
*Rs = 6.96x10^5 km, or (6612000 km and 5846400 km respectively)
For some reason, 15 inches is a bit thin to me. And we're sending a seemingly flimsy metal satellite to it with only a 15 inch heat shield? I dunno... I don't know the chemistry of the material they use but it seems they would use like, 4 feet-thick of this stuff. I mean it's the frickin sun!
05/06/09
05/06/09
and the million people without power was because of a winter storm - nothing to do with the sun (in the sense of unusual solar activity)...after the doomsday freak out of page one you get, on page 2, "But scientists emphasize that this situation is improble."
thanks ABC webernet news...who does this help?
05/06/09
05/06/09
05/06/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
I looked at the Telegraph article this links to, and THEY got it wrong, too.
I'm going to email them and ask where their info came from.
Here's another link to real info. Its a Power Point presentation about the mission. May take a while to download, but pretty cool.
[zeus.nascom.nasa.gov]
04/29/09
Here's the real thing.
[www.esa.int]
It says "150 days" right there.
I'm wondering if the error originated with the Telegraph writer or if he copied off someone else's paper.
04/29/09
04/29/09
The ESA's probe (ie not NASA) will have an orbital period of 150 days. Which you've just confirmed. NASA's probe has varying orbital periods depending on what orbital path its taking (ie see what I wrote).
04/29/09
04/29/09
The entire mission has a complete cycle time of 24 orbits totalling 6.4 years. The final 3 orbits within 9.5 Rs or 8.4 Rs* from the Sun's surface occur over a period of 88 days.
*Rs = 6.96x10^5 km, or (6612000 km and 5846400 km respectively)
Source: [solarprobe.gsfc.nasa.gov]
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
"Solar Probe?"
"Nah... not bombastic enough."
"Solar Probe Plus?"
"Fuck yea, bro!" *slams down a Corona*
04/29/09
Should I just wait for the reality show?
04/29/09
"WHO ATE MY RECONSTITUTED FRIES???"
04/29/09
Next time on The Real World: Sol
Bo has a blow-up. "Stop it, stop it, just stop touching me man!"
04/29/09
04/29/09
"I keep waiting on Candice to notice me, but she never does. I mean, there are only like seven of us up here..."
04/29/09
04/29/09
"Told the bitch not to disrespect me or it'd be like "Blam! Out the airlock."
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09