<![CDATA[io9: stanford]]> http://tags.lifehacker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/io9.com.png <![CDATA[io9: stanford]]> http://io9.com/tag/stanford http://io9.com/tag/stanford <![CDATA[Students and Faculty Reenact 500 Million Years of Earth History in Stanford Field]]> Somewhere around 200 students and faculty gathered on a field at Stanford University last Saturday to re-enact half a billion years of plate tectonics. Costumed and organized in color-coded groups to represent the continents and oceans, the groups moved in sync to simulate Earth undergoing continental drift, complete with asteroid impacts, mass extinctions, and Coast Guard emergency flares to simulate volcanoes.


The demonstration started at 250 million years ago, when the most of the dry land on Earth was glued together to form Pangea. The tectonic tape was run forward, continents spreading and shifting about until to 250 million years in the future, when geologists believe a new supercontinent will reassemble itself. In the middle the group paused at the present day and the people making up Antarctica opened and closed black jackets they were wearing to display white shirts underneath, simulating ice ages (bottom of the picture).

Oddly enough, it wasn't just a random idea. The leader of this strange interpretation of Earth's history, Stanford student Kat Hoffman got her inspiration from a similar (though way more psychedelic) video on protein synthesis put together by the Nobel-Prize winning chemist Paul Berg in 1971. Berg was also at Stanford, and the fact that almost forty years later members of Stanford University are willing to repeat the process tells us two things: 1) people there are dedicated to coming up with fun ways of visualizing science and 2) there is almost certainly something in the water in Northern California.

Hoffman says her video will be out later this summer.

Source: Stanford University

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=395056&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Will We Hold Robots Accountable for War Crimes?]]> Now that the military is using autonomous surveillance/combat robots created by iRobot, the company behind the Roomba robot vacuum, a strange question emerges: What do we do if a robot commits a war crime? This isn't idle speculation. An automated anti-aircraft cannon's friendly fire killed nine soldiers in South Africa last year, and computer scientists speculate that as more weapons (and aircraft) are robot-controlled that we'll need to develop new definitions of war crimes. In fact, the possibility of robot war crimes is the subject of a panel at an upcoming conference at Stanford.

The conference, called Technology in Wartime (caveat: I'm helping to organize it), will feature a panel of expert roboticists and ethicists dealing with what happens when mobile, autonomous robots become soldiers — and have the potential to malfunction catastrophically. Ronald Arkin from Georgia Tech's mobile robots lab will be speaking, as well as Rutgers techno-ethicist Peter Asaro.

Other panels at the conference will deal with recent government research into cyberterrorism, as well as ways that human rights and civil liberties workers are using sneaky software to aid dissidents in war-torn countries. Featured speakers include computer security hero Bruce Schneier, EFF's legal director Cindy Cohn, e-voting expert and former ACM president Barbara Simons, human rights software crusader Patrick Ball, National Academy of Science's Herb Lin, Danger Room's Noah Shachtman, and sly computer security expert (and Sarah Connor Chronicles hater) Kevin Poulsen.

The conference is open to the public (entrance fee gets you free lunch, a t-shirt, and serves as a donation to nonprofit Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility). Students get in cheap! There's still time to register if you want to come. Technology in Wartime [conference site]

]]>
http://io9.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346124&view=rss&microfeed=true