• io9
  • science
  • overmind
  • kotaku
  • gizmodo
  • Profile logout login

#stargateuniverse#acompanyhistoryhtml

io9

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #observationdeck,
  • #tips,
  • #calendar,
  • etc.

San Francisco, 2:59 AM
Wed Dec 16
25 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |

News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |

Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |

Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |

Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |

Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |

Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |

Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |

More:
io9 on Facebook
follow io9 on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO io9 RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1428 Subscribers
io9
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of firstanointed firstanointed
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    Maybe if the writers/producers step back from the characters and instead of trying to write "Lt Dumbass, sounds/acts like Colonel Competent", they just wrote people and assigned genders to them, they could figure out what they actually want versus what they actually need. Perhaps we'd get some more solid characters in general out of that.

    I in fact recommend this as a writing excessive -- just write a character without pre-assigning a gender to them and see whether they turn out to be male or female. The results can be freakish/cool.

    But back to the show, it's fine to have characters that have sexuality, but what's the point in forcing them to put it out there and let it all hang out when that isn't something they would be doing in a realistic situation? If SGU was realistic, somebody would have gotten raped by somebody by now. How's that for sexuality? Where are the abusive relationships, the psychotic mind-jobs and vindictive revenge-sex sessions? If we have to deal in extreme sexual situations, at least make it interesting. Don't just throw random naked people at us. It's crude.
     Reply
    firstanointed was starred firstanointed was unstarred
    Image of Cjay79 Cjay79
    12/14/09

    @firstanointed: You've got a point with the writing theory - CCH Pounder's character in The Shield was written from day one as male, and they continued that long after she was cast in order to make her a formidable presence within the testosterone hothouse that was The Barn.
     Reply
    firstanointed promoted this comment Cjay79 was starred Cjay79 was unstarred
    Image of zark169 zark169
    12/14/09

    @firstanointed: And the done-to-death love triangle of "nerd loves slutty girl loves jock" really offends me. They seriously couldn't some up with a better angle?
     Reply
    Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. promoted this comment zark169 was starred zark169 was unstarred
    Image of Cash907Censored Cash907Censored
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    "There's been criticism about the female characters. Some of it seems to suggest that having characters who are at all sexual automatically makes a show sexist, that anything less than a neutered "Star Trek" ideal is somehow bad."

    Lot's of scifi shows deal with sex on a regular basis, but in an adult manner. What you do is portray women as gun toting blow up dolls, complete with lingering nipple-level POV shots and steamy shower voyeur clips. That wasn't sexual, you say? O RLY? So, where was Eli's magical scrub session? Uh huh, that's what I thought.

    "I don't think we over-use it; I directed the Kino episode."

    I don't think my sh*t stinks, and I should know, as I'm the one who just shat it.

    *rolls eyes* Whatever Cooper, keep blaming the fan base for your ineptitude.
     Reply
    Cash907Censored was starred Cash907Censored was unstarred
    Image of Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H.
    12/14/09

    @Cash907Censored: What you said.
     Reply
    Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. was starred Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. was unstarred
    Image of zhalfim zhalfim
    12/15/09

    @Cash907Censored: thank you for polluting my mind's eye with the thought of eli's scrub session...

    in any case, I totally agree!
     Reply
    Cash907Censored promoted this comment zhalfim was starred zhalfim was unstarred
    Image of Cash907Censored Cash907Censored
    12/15/09

    @zhalfim: Hey, it's what I do.
     Reply
    Cash907Censored was starred Cash907Censored was unstarred
    Image of Asbestos_Underwear Asbestos_Underwear
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    week after week, the show is just whining people dragging you down. What happened to the entertaining space adventure exploration show?

    SGU is not SciFi, it is SciWhine, or better CryFi.

    The show's producers better listen to the wisdom of Conan "lamentation of women" only AFTER crushing enemies. Not as the core plot of an entire season.
     Reply
    Asbestos_Underwear was starred Asbestos_Underwear was unstarred
    Image of Cash907Censored Cash907Censored
    12/14/09

    @Asbestos_Underwear: CryFi. New word of the year, I nominate thee.
     Reply
    Cash907Censored was starred Cash907Censored was unstarred
    Image of muppetjedi muppetjedi
    12/14/09

    @Cash907Censored: CryFi, I love it! Genius.
     Reply
    Cash907Censored promoted this comment muppetjedi was starred muppetjedi was unstarred
    Image of twophrasebark twophrasebark
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    WWMRS?

    (What Would Mary Ratliff Say?)
     Reply
    twophrasebark was starred twophrasebark was unstarred
    Image of Darklighter Darklighter
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    I'm looking for the "We'll see how the second half of season 1 goes" option. I'm not optimistic.
     Reply
    Darklighter was starred Darklighter was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/14/09

    @Darklighter: I'm looking for the same option, but I am optimistic.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of Darklighter Darklighter
    12/14/09

    @Roklimber: My basic requirement for a show to continue limping along is that it air two strong episodes in a row. SGU hasn't done that for me yet.
     Reply
    Darklighter was starred Darklighter was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/14/09

    @Darklighter: Fair enough.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of KeithZG KeithZG
    12/14/09

    @Darklighter: So wait. In theory then a show could air 20 episodes where 18 were crap and if ordered right you'd accept it limping along, but if it aired 20 episodes of which 10 were strong but it alternated them every other time a la Star Trek movies you'd vote nay? :P
     Reply
    Darklighter promoted this comment KeithZG was starred KeithZG was unstarred
    Image of Darklighter Darklighter
    12/14/09

    @KeithZG: Jesus, it's just a rule of thumb. Nobody likes a pedant.
     Reply
    Darklighter was starred Darklighter was unstarred
    Image of Motoki Motoki
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    No reality television is NOT part of the language of television now. It's part of the language of reality television period.

    While the suits love the idea of injecting what is popular into every show, a scripted show needs to stay a scripted show.

    One of the biggest things that made Virtuality a big fat fail to me (well that and blah characters that I didn't give a damn about) was its over reliance on the reality show gimmick.

    I don't even like real reality shows, why the hell would I want to watch a fake one?

    The creators of this show have already said they have used the kinos to provide character development to characters they otherwise haven't gotten around to yet.

    It's a cheap shortcut and an unnecessary one when they had plenty of time that they wasted on the crisis of the week because they ran out of hand wringing, only to get that item in the nick of time, and then find something else they need.

    The fact is, they are never going to get the audiences that American Idol and Dancing with the Stars have and no amount of kino cam confessionals will change that or lure those people in.

    Instead they should focus on what they do have, what the strong points of the Stargate franchise are and how they can incorporate new dramatic elements into that are not gimmicks or shortcuts.
     Reply
    Motoki was starred Motoki was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/14/09

    @Motoki: Great post.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of Blue_Thark Blue_Thark
    12/14/09

    @Motoki: It's not about attracting the same viewers as Idol or DWTS. It's simply about making the show seem more compelling to the younger generation, because that's what they're used to seeing on television shows these days - both "reality" and otherwise. SGU isn't the first scripted show to co-opt the "confessional" and handi-cam devices for dramatic purposes. They have become part of the universal TV lexicon - see "The Office," "Breaking Bad," BSG etc.

    Also, I suspect that if these first few episodes had focused on characters' backstories instead of how the hell they're managing to survive on a millenias-old derelict ship hurtling endlessly through deep space, people would instead complain about the show being unrealistic by taking the characters' survival for granted. It needs to establish a believable day-to-day reality before it can sell us believable characters. The early stories should depict the struggles they go through to maintain a livable situation aboard Destiny. The kino as a "shorthand-character-development" device is a legitimate, if imperfect, solution for the short term.
     Reply
    Motoki promoted this comment Edited by Blue_Thark at 12/14/09 11:03 AM Blue_Thark was starred Blue_Thark was unstarred
    Image of Motoki Motoki
    12/14/09

    @Blue_Thark: I think used sparingly this sort of reality cam technique can be okay. You mentioned BSG but they really only used it in one episode there and it worked because it was an episode about a reporter doing a story on the BSG crew (with the twist at the end that she was a cylon spy, so the introduction of that character wasn't just a one off).

    I thought the episode that used the time travelling kino with a mystery of everyone dying and then the crew had to try and figure out why and how to prevent that was interesting and good use of the device. However I also feel, like the interviewer in the above referenced article, that they've overused it in these early episodes and relied on it too much for quick fix character development. I'd rather see the characters interacting with other characters than talking into a camera.

    On the idea of the resources and realism vs character development, I don't think it's an either or situation. I think there could have been a balance of both. Of course there should be some reference to trying to acquire resources, and again BSG did a good job of reminding of this without dwelling on it too much, but I also would have like to have seen more of a shift to the human interaction regarding these resources.

    Instead of the repetitive crisis of the week where we of course knew they would get what they needed at the last second and be saved, they could have, for example, featured Camille Ray (Ming Na) more and had more debate and struggle over how the resources get distributed and who gets the bulk of them, what everyone's roles are etc.

    Yes it would have made the show parallel early BSG with it's Adama/Roslin power struggle even more, but it worked there and was more compelling to watch than the generic resources crisis of the week.

    It's just like how most people thought more positive of the mid season finale because it featured the main characters interacting and actually doing something instead of running around looking for X and hand wringing over whether they would get it in time when of course we all know they will.
     Reply
    Edited by Motoki at 12/14/09 11:59 AM Motoki was starred Motoki was unstarred
    Image of Blue_Thark Blue_Thark
    12/14/09

    @Motoki: I was citing BSG as more just an example of shaky-cam photography being used as a device for cinematic storytelling. I had forgotten all about "Final Cut," but I'll grant you that that one episode wouldn't be a legit example.

    IRT using the quest for resources as an opportunity for meaningful character interaction - I think they've honestly been trying to do this to some extent, particularly in "Air, Part 3" and "Water." In the former its was more of a character-goes-on-quest-and discovers-something-about-himself kind of thing, a la Lost, and in the latter it just kind of collapsed into a pit of cliche when Scott fell into that hole. And the "Eli has an awkward moment and makes a funny" trope has gotten kind of old. Yeah, I guess the writing has been a little lazy thus far.

    You're definitely right that they should be involving more characters by now, too. Especially Camille and Lt. James.
     Reply
    Blue_Thark was starred Blue_Thark was unstarred
    Image of crosis101 crosis101
    12/14/09

    @Motoki: Well the issue is it is.

    JJ Abrams with Lens Flares EVERYWHERE! In the New Star Trek, and FRINGE.

    BSG had its shakey came style with the "Breathing" in the framing. Heck even the effects heavy shots from the pilot to the end of the show...but then again that was why i thought BSG was nigh unwatchable in the beginning. I don;t know enough about what the space dogfights were supposed to look like to deal with the "embedded reporter" style.

    Heck even Star Wars Episode Two did the "Embedded reporter, Black Hawk Down" style snap zoom shakey cam thing.

    We view our movies as we view out world, and wobbly cam is here to stay.
     Reply
    Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. promoted this comment crosis101 was starred crosis101 was unstarred
    Image of Andy Neil Andy Neil
    12/14/09

    @Motoki: I have to disagree with your assertion that reality TV is only relevant to reality TV. There have been quite a few examples of work in scripted TV and films that make use of a documentary or reality style of filmmaking. And let's face it, SGU's "kino" schtick is not so much a co-opting of reality TV as it is of documentary.

    The Office
    Paranormal
    Quarantine/REC (the Spanish original)
    Best in Show (et all)
    District 9

    ...just to name a few off the top of my head. And this doesn't even consider the many single episodes of various TV shows that made use of the technique. ER is one show that had a "reality" episode.

    And these are only examples that appear after the advent of so-called reality TV. Of course the scripted use of documentary style has been around a lot longer. I remember 2 great M*A*S*H episodes that used it.

    BTW, American Idol and Dancing with the Stars are competition shows more deserving of the moniker of variety television than reality tv.
     Reply
    Motoki promoted this comment Andy Neil was starred Andy Neil was unstarred
    Image of Motoki Motoki
    12/14/09

    @Andy Neil: You're right it's definitely been done before both before and after 'reality tv' took off.

    Heck there are even some examples of 'reality television' in scripted stories that I liked, like The Running Man and The Truman Show, but those are almost more social commentaries on our fixation with being entertained at the expense of others and maybe that isn't such a good thing.

    I think the 'documentary' style reality technique can be and is at times certainly used to a beneficial effect in a story.

    I guess the technique being used in SGU that bugs me is the MTV Real World 'confessional' style with a bit of Blair Witch thrown in. I find it overdone and tired and I find myself wanting to get on with the story and would rather learn about the characters through the story than having them sit there as a talking had and spout out their background and feelings exposition style.
     Reply
    Motoki was starred Motoki was unstarred
    Image of Lassus Lassus
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    I really like Sanctuary, but I have to say I hope they use this vote of confidence to get better. The last couple of episodes have been kinda fun, but as they string together, especially this last one, they seem really really really dull lately.
     Reply
    Edited by Lassus at 12/14/09 9:52 AM Lassus was starred Lassus was unstarred
    Image of TheFu TheFu
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    I'm happy for Rush to be gone. Many really, really smart people behave in annoying ways and his character is over developed in that way.

    Ming Na is the hottest woman on that show. I dislike her character since she is almost always a bitch. That isn't realistic for a political position.

    They have an ensemble cast and need to share some day-in-the-life episodes to develop a deeper understanding for what everyone is doing.

    Adding some practical jokes couldn't hurt either. Humans in stressful situations joke with each other. Kino as a ghost? OTOH, watching kino footage is like watching a tv show about watching golf on tv. Boring.

    Out of curiosity, if you send a kino through, how does it get back without a human to dial the gate? Is there an auto-dialer with a delay, since you can't dial out with an active WH.
     Reply
    TheFu was starred TheFu was unstarred
    Image of Motoki Motoki
    12/14/09

    @TheFu: Do you really think Rush won't be back? They left one of the top scientists on alien technologies on a planet next to an alien ship that he seemed to think given a little time he could get inside of. Plus it's Stargate.

    Hmm, gee I wonder if we will ever see him again.
     Reply
    Motoki was starred Motoki was unstarred
    Image of twophrasebark twophrasebark
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    But that's the other big hot button — whether sex belongs in sci-fi.

    I think it's been pretty clearly addressed that this is not the issue. And Cooper is well aware of it.

    The issue is how they have used sex and sexuality. There were not complaints about the use of sex on BSG - because it was done intelligently. And contextually.

    Cooper's response to the issues is pretty much the same as the other writers, just slicker. How do you respond to something without actually responding? Why just change the terms of the conversation...

    First the other writers attack fans and critics and try to say they're "hurting the cast" even though they're the ones depicting them in demeaning ways. Manipulation 101. Then the boss says he's happy to talk about the issues and changes the discussion. Manipulation 201.

    Basically, in order to write a character like Rush you have to be a little bit like Rush. Look at the way the writers respond to the criticism of the show and compare it to other shows' writers. These guys are kind of creepy. I hope Meredith is right, but based on my experience, they're not going to change what they're doing. They'll just try to convince people to look at it differently. Or divide the fanbase. Or convince people they're being prudish. And so on...
     Reply
    Edited by twophrasebark at 12/14/09 9:58 AM twophrasebark was starred twophrasebark was unstarred
    Image of EugeniaBSG EugeniaBSG
    12/15/09

    @twophrasebark: The issue is how they have used sex and sexuality. There were not complaints about the use of sex on BSG - because it was done intelligently. And contextually.

    Yes, there were complaints about how the "re-imagined" BSG used sex and sexuality.

    I sent an e-mail to SciFi telling them if they ever combined graphic sex and torture again and aired it before 10:00 PM, I would be filing a FCC complaint. I highly doubt my one lousy e-mail motivated them to move the rest of Season 3 to late night Sundays.

    And I will never forget Ron Moore's creepy little giggle when he boasted how he got an extended rape scene into the DVDs of Season 2.

    Given the amount of scenes that advanced the plot Moore edited out of episodes to get his "moments" in, the sex scenes were largely gratuitous and often boring. Quadrangle of Doom, anyone?
     Reply
    twophrasebark promoted this comment EugeniaBSG was starred EugeniaBSG was unstarred
    Image of twophrasebark twophrasebark
    12/15/09

    @EugeniaBSG: I believe this is called "the exception to the rule."

    By and large, there were not complaints about BSG and sexuality.
     Reply
    twophrasebark was starred twophrasebark was unstarred
    Image of EBone EBone
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    Can we have an option in the poll for "Yes, I'll watch another season, mostly because there is nothing better on right now"?
     Reply
    EBone was starred EBone was unstarred
    Image of daveNYC daveNYC
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    Young, Rush, Eli, and either Lantern Jaw or Mr. Angry. Those are your main four characters, and Stargate has been all about having four core characters with everyone else revolving around them. Probably a variation on Monkey Sphere theory. Good luck building up the stature of the other characters.
     Reply
    daveNYC was starred daveNYC was unstarred
    Image of GreyHammer GreyHammer
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    yes kino director we so need more reality tv in our sci fi. worked great for... wait... oh no it hasn't worked.
     Reply
    GreyHammer was starred GreyHammer was unstarred
    Image of mekki mekki
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    Can we change that to: Yes! I want to see Young's Ass Kicked?

    Because there are a few of us who hate that schmuck.
     Reply
    mekki was starred mekki was unstarred
    Image of Makidian Makidian
    12/14/09

    @mekki: I do like Young but I like Rush better even if he is kinda sociopathic. I can't wait to see him get back on the Destiny. Too bad the break between shows is ridiculously too long. If they were going to wait until April they should have been woring on getting Eureka season 4 up and running with Caprica.
     Reply
    Makidian was starred Makidian was unstarred
    Image of mekki mekki
    12/14/09

    @Makidian: The thing with Rush is that he makes no apologies for who he is. He knows he is a prick. Young tries to play up that he is a good guy who does what he does in the best interest of everyone when in reality it's what is in the best interest for himself.

    And, yeah, these gaps are insanely long.
     Reply
    mekki was starred mekki was unstarred
    Image of Makidian Makidian
    12/14/09

    @mekki: Exactly, it just sucks that the only person who can see that is Rush. Young should reallly take a step back and look at how things are run when he isn't in charge because when Camille and TJ have been running things, they seem to go reasonably smooth. Except for that whole chair situation but that was bound to happen eventually anyway.
     Reply
    Makidian was starred Makidian was unstarred
    Image of AngriestGeek AngriestGeek
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    Neutered Star Trek? What Star Trek was that, because from day one "going where no man has gone before" included more than a few alien bedrooms.
     Reply
    AngriestGeek was starred AngriestGeek was unstarred
    Image of KhaiJB KhaiJB
    12/14/09

    In reply to SGU Gets Another Season And Takes Responsibility For Sexism-Gate
    no more Rush and thats it.. I'm off to watch something else... he's the only one of the crew I like..
     Reply
    KhaiJB was starred KhaiJB was unstarred
    Image of reddingofish reddingofish
    12/14/09

    @KhaiJB: Oh, come on. This is Stargate. No one ever dies in Stargate.
    I was just sayin' the other day while we were watching Sanctuary, Michael Shanks can't be dead because he is a Stargate actor. He'll be back.
     Reply
    reddingofish was starred reddingofish was unstarred
    Image of comrade_leviathan comrade_leviathan
    12/14/09

    @KhaiJB: Haha, nice try.

    The whole ship would have died by episode 3 without Rush. Not every genius in television can be warm and fuzzy.
     Reply
    KhaiJB approved this comment comrade_leviathan was starred comrade_leviathan was unstarred
    Image of GreyHammer GreyHammer
    12/14/09

    @reddingofish: there is always a sarcophigus. just ask daniel jackson
     Reply
    GreyHammer was starred GreyHammer was unstarred
    Image of KhaiJB KhaiJB
    12/14/09

    @comrade_leviathan: "nice try"? I mean it!
     Reply
    KhaiJB was starred KhaiJB was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or io9 account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.