You know, the more I think about it, the more I think a cooking show on Siffy might not be a bad fit. Deep Fried Live, for example, would go hand-in-glove (Google it, the comment system's eating my HTML today)
Edited by HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. at 09/03/09 9:34 AM
HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. was starred
HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. was unstarred
Though... to be fair to SyFy if the talk show was a kind of Sci-Fi/Fantasy based news show (kind of like MTV News used to be) that focused on genre entertainment news (with video game news and some gadget/tech news) and the guests would be genre actor, novelists, or what have you it would probably be a good show for the network to have. Maybe make it a sort of late night thing, hire a nerdy comedian to do it and it might be a hell of a lot of fun. *Shrug*
Ya know... every time a new story like this about SyFy pops up it becomes clearer and clearer to me that working for that channel is pretty much viewed as a step in the ladder of Viacom and that the people who work for it all would rather be working for one of the other networks in the family...
Well, as predicted, SyFy president David Howe is full of crap:
In io9's interview with Howe on March 24, 2009, he stated the following regarding SyFy's name change:
"The thing that I think disturbs us most was, people, as we expected, saying 'Well this is just another opportunity to put more ECW on the air.' Or, 'This is another opportunity to do even more reality.' That isn't true and recent announcements [prove otherwise]. We've picked up Caprica, it'll launch in the new year. We've picked up Stargate Universe, the next exciting chapter of the longest running space opera in TV history. This isn't about retrenching, this is about absolutely embracing the totality of not just our core audience but actually, a new audience in the future."
I responded by saying:
Quite frankly, your comments have the same ring as speeches we've all heard as employees when a company embarks on an unpopular and universally disapproved change. A corporate manager comes and makes a speech. The executive says "We're not really doing what it seems like we're obviously doing." We all know that it's a bunch of baloney and we also he's just doing his job.
Putting on more ECW or reality programming? That's exactly what you're going to do. You're disturbed? Of course, you're disturbed - it's your job to peddle this stuff and people have called you out on it before you even introduced the logo. Nobody likes to be called out.
Let's face it. If you had any other plan, you wouldn't be saying "...this is about absolutely embracing the totality of not just our core audience but actually, a new audience in the future."
What did you just say? Absolutely nothing.
But you can't come out and say "We are making this channel less about science fiction."
@KernelG: As a fan of both wrestling and sci-fi (though I definitely agree, ECW needs a different home... and a different name so it's not an insult to the real ECW from the '90s), I find it kind of funny how you use "fake" as a prejorative term for wrestling, but then proceed to shout for more "SCIENCE FICTION".
Science fiction? Also fake. The "fiction" part is a dead giveaway.
Edited by HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. at 09/03/09 9:31 AM
HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. was starred
HeartBurnKid: Agent of R.O.A.C.H. was unstarred
Well, as long as they go for recipes on the cutting edge of culinary research, like that one place in france that does nothing but cook eggs in high-precision ovens.
The idea is so bad, that I honestly hope it turns out to be the geekiest, most badass cooking show ever. By the end of the first episode we will have weapt, laughed, and danced out of pure joy that the show has brought into our homes and hearts. We will hang our heads in shame, bow before SyFy, and kiss their toes as we sing "THEY DO IMAGINE GREATER, THEY DO!" And then soon after the kickoff of the first season, wrestling gets permanently kicked off the channel, Ghost Hunters gets cancelled, money originally used for SyFy Originals gets put into developing new and innovative sci-fi miniseries, and Joss Whedon gets hired to reboot Firefly under the condition that he'll do it however the hell he wants to do it.
All of this will only happen if a cooking show turns out to have been a good idea.
Well I don't know about anyone else, but when I hear the name Sci-Fi (sorry, my brain refuses to spell it the other way) I immediately think "oh, cooking!"
All of these channels that used to aim their programming at niche audiences are moving away from that. Narrowcasting is out, and broadcasting is back in. Ultimately, I think it's because DVDs, TiVo, online streaming, and video on demand have turned viewers into their own "narrowcasters" who, in effect, program their own, personal TV networks. There's no point for cable channels to try to do the job for us anymore.
Ya know, if SyFy filled in the void that TechTV left when they became G4 and abandoned actual TECH, the talk show could be a good thing. Or even a talk show that focused on scifi movies and events happening across the globe. Hell, there could have been an entire episode for the life sized Gundam in Japan alone! Look- two decent talk show ideas right there! Also, there are a ton of quirky, imaginative ideas that are in these comments for the cooking show. If SyFy needs help, they really should just check out this board. And "To Serve Man"? Brilliant!!
@blisskitty: I loved TechTV before G4 gutted it. What's with all those Cops and cheaters reruns? They make such a big deal about their "Movies that don't suck" how about some tv that doesn't suck?
09/03/09
09/03/09
It's probably exactly as "syence-fyctional", which is probably more relevant.
-Kle.
09/03/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
In io9's interview with Howe on March 24, 2009, he stated the following regarding SyFy's name change:
"The thing that I think disturbs us most was, people, as we expected, saying 'Well this is just another opportunity to put more ECW on the air.' Or, 'This is another opportunity to do even more reality.' That isn't true and recent announcements [prove otherwise]. We've picked up Caprica, it'll launch in the new year. We've picked up Stargate Universe, the next exciting chapter of the longest running space opera in TV history. This isn't about retrenching, this is about absolutely embracing the totality of not just our core audience but actually, a new audience in the future."
I responded by saying:
Quite frankly, your comments have the same ring as speeches we've all heard as employees when a company embarks on an unpopular and universally disapproved change. A corporate manager comes and makes a speech. The executive says "We're not really doing what it seems like we're obviously doing." We all know that it's a bunch of baloney and we also he's just doing his job.
Putting on more ECW or reality programming? That's exactly what you're going to do. You're disturbed? Of course, you're disturbed - it's your job to peddle this stuff and people have called you out on it before you even introduced the logo. Nobody likes to be called out.
Let's face it. If you had any other plan, you wouldn't be saying "...this is about absolutely embracing the totality of not just our core audience but actually, a new audience in the future."
What did you just say? Absolutely nothing.
But you can't come out and say "We are making this channel less about science fiction."
09/02/09
09/03/09
Science fiction? Also fake. The "fiction" part is a dead giveaway.
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
All of this will only happen if a cooking show turns out to have been a good idea.
09/02/09
Only, not.
09/02/09
09/02/09
This will be the Siffy cooking show -- showing how to prepare lovely meals out of the corpse of their relevance.
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09
09/02/09