io9 
Enter your username and password.
San Francisco, 5:16 PM
Fri Nov 27
19 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors: tips@io9.com
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz | Email
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders | Email
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner | Email
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis | Email
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan | Email
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier | Email
Ed Grabianowski | Email
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan | Email
Lauren Davis | Email
Chris Hsiang | Email
Lynn Peril | Email
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins | Email
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox | Email
Interns:
Tim Barribeau | Email
Julia Carusillo | Email
Alex Eichler | Email
Cyriaque Lamar | Email
Caitlin Petrakovitz | Email
Mary Ratliff | Email
Josh Snyder | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
11/16/09
Wasn't Peter Petrelly on NY and Matt on Texas when he got shot? Why are both in the same hospital? #house
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/17/09
11/17/09
11/16/09
And every time I see the name of that SyFy "Fire and Ice" movie, I'm reminded of how sad it is that we don't have a movie/series based on G.R.R. Martin's awesome epic. At least the first three books anyway. #house
11/16/09
[www.imdb.com]
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Although, if they marketed it as such, that would be awesome, because then it would be canceled. #house
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
looks great . #house
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
11/16/09
Pass. #house
11/16/09
11/16/09
Or at least, the best actor. #house
11/16/09
09/26/09
A 'MeatPopsicle' in the Fifth Element.
A 'Meatbag' in Surrogates.
Where-oh-where, is that great feminist champion, of the prostituted profession, Megan Fox, when we really need her?
Oh, yeah. I forgot. Empowering Jennifer's Body.
(Was I the only one who wondered, when I heard Brucie enunciate his personal preference "No, I'm a Meat Popsicle!", in The Fifth Element, precisely how much Unilever had paid for the product placement?)
I actually really enjoyed a lot of Surrogates (as I did Gamer[and District 9 with the meatbag becoming a prawnbag]), when it let its attention to 'uncanny valley' detail, just do its thing: Make me wonder and question and think.
Why is it, that writers, directors, studios and networks, think that after they show us something that successfully does all these things, that we want to be told what to think, how to feel about it, what's going to happen next and precisely what the 'happy ending' will be?
The worst offender, by far (recently), was the execrable Terminator Salvation.
The least, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles.
I think its writer, Josh Friedman gave us a pretty good explanation, of why [io9.com] .
Then again, CJ's "ugly Terminator-esque endoskeletons" struck me as unspeakably meatbagist, so perhaps I'm not the target demographic.
Or maybe, the creators are just completely clueless as to who their consumers really are and what they really want.
09/26/09
09/25/09
09/25/09
09/25/09
well, truth be told, I like Bruce too.. (we're both harmonica players too) but sometimes I wanna just bitch-slap him and say 'snap out of it' and start making smaller indie movies and NEVER make another movie where he's some sort of law enforcement type ever again.
09/25/09
09/25/09
09/25/09
09/25/09
*sighs* Another luddite-y movie...
This picture perfectly describes how the "healthy" and "pure" nature really looks like just how our luddite and pseudo-environmentalist-friends imagine it...
09/25/09
One more thing:
So let's say the directors are all anti-technology and stuff. So I guess they made this movie just with bamboo sticks, stones and.......... wait...
ps: luddites are hypocrites.
09/25/09
"luddites" aren't people who hate technology, "luddites" are people who fight against the use of technology to replace humans, specifically human labor. They were originally a group of fabric weavers who fought against the use of the auto-loom (which requires fewer hands to operate) and were united under one of the first union organizers who's name was General Ludd. More colloquially it means one who has a difficult time or resists the implementation of NEW technologies because they introduce NEW procedures which are unfamiliar to the user.
Though, I do think you are right, they, the film makers are probably hypocrites.
09/26/09
I know the history of luddism. But today people are calling themselves luddites who just loathe technology. My comment was directed to those kind of people.
09/25/09