San Francisco, 12:01 PM
Mon Dec 7
16 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
"It will be an actor you've heard of, yes. We're not ruling anything out. We're looking at both, with the very well known and the "very talented but they may not be quite there yet."
Very well known: Shia LeBoeuf.
Not quite there yet: Zak Efron, Joseph Gordon Levitt, and the werewolf kid from New Moon.
Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just passing on the rumour I heard.
@MISS MERCY STREET: Are you kidding? Zac Efron is huge. Everyone knows who he is and his pictures were everywhere for years (maybe they still are - I'm still ogling the old ones). But please god, he may be my husband, but I don't even want to THINK that he'd be considered for this. The Crow he is not.
@kelz: You might have me with Serenity. Outraged fans and dvd sales I think did play a major role in getting that movie made. Not familiar enough with the Boondock Saints to know about that one.
@mordicai: That might not be too bad, actually. Would definitely send a message that this is a different Crow, but she'd have to be actually written as a woman, not as a guy who's just stunt-casted by a woman.
MISS MERCY STREET promoted this comment
Edited by Im_your_Huckleberry at 11/23/09 11:26 AM
Im_your_Huckleberry was starred
Im_your_Huckleberry was unstarred
@TemporalSword: I'm hoping one good thing that might come from this whole Twilight situation is that Hollywood might figure out that movies can have sci-fi/fantasy movies with female roles that aren't silly add-ons or, like you say, stuntcasting.
So, by "moves forward with casting", you mean they're still looking for some sort of person, an actor perhaps, to play the role - but we don't have the slightest idea who that person is...right? That's about all I gathered from this.
@dicksson: It's not even a correct comparison. The Batmans were still about the SAME characters, he says this will be a different crow. I understand what he's trying to say, that the tone will be different, but the original Crow is hardly the same as Burton's Batman, so how much different can he really get?
@TemporalSword:
Here's the ticket. The Crow was a "supernatural" creature. After he was killed he came back from the dead to avenge his girlfriend's and his death. What I think that they'll do is turn him into a superhero, origin story and all.
James O'Barr is a really nice guy. The Crow graphic novel is about as intensely personal a work as you can get that just happened to explode into this cultural phenomenon. I saw him speak over the summer in Chicago and he's as humble and decent a creator as I've ever met, talented as all get out too.
This nonsense about a Dark Superhero? Like Batman Begins? Come on. Pull the other one son.
I hope James is getting a nice big check and moves a shit-ton of books. That would be nice.
@moifauxmail: I attended a special screening of the Crow before it came out in '94 with O'Barr in attendance. The original novel he did was a way to deal with his wife's death, and then he'd become fast friends with Brandon and then when he died... You never saw such a sad dude, but he was happy the way the first movie came out. How can anything compete with that? Still have my signed copy of the novel.
@FrankenPC: Ehhhh...I don't think that comparison holds water b\c I think comparing Ledger to Nicholson is already comparing apples to oranges....and they've pretty much said they're doing something completely different from the first Crow movie...
...so it would be like rebooting Batman (again) and not having the Joker in it at all, but a different villain, if we're going to use the Batman comparison.
@FrankenPC: The second movie is actually pretty bad. Sadly, Furlong's Crow is actually the fourth entry in the series - and the second one to go direct to DVD. It is mind-blowingly bad. However, it also has the ever-hilarious Tara Reid doing her best to "act" and David Boreanaz looking completely out of place in what I believe to be the scene-chewingest role this side of Burt Reynolds in Dukes of Hazzard... From start to finish, it is a trainwreck of the highest order.
Also, there was a slight casting error with Furlong to begin with. He looks like one of those teenagers who has no business going trick or treating on Halloween...
Please for the love of God someone tell these idiots that every Crow movie after the first one sucked it long and hard. This is one of those times where you simply cannot catch lightning in a bottle a second time. Let it go. Let this franchise rest in peace already.
Me to Hollywood: Just fucking stop with the remakes, retcons, revisionist bullshit already. Look we get it. You're trying to go with the 'sure thing' that's already got proven box office results, instead of taking a chance with something completely new. Well I'm telling you, take that chance. Try something new.
@Jrsy Devil's Advocate®:
I definitely appreciate original ideas but as far as i am concerned the new Batman movies were far better than the ones from the 90's, so if they hold up to that kind of quality for a new Crow movie I am all for it.
@Craig Dawson: Well I agree with you with on the Batman films (I still like the first Batman, the rest of that time-frame were crap) however I don't see any point in continuing this. With Batman you can tell a new story each time. He's got a rogue's gallery of villains to do battle with. The Crow story had a specific beginning, middle & ending with Eric & Shelly. Everything after it as been 'The Crow, except with some other guy'. There's nothing else new to tell or expand upon. They're just variations of the original. It's a closed story. If they want to build a franchise using comic books (or graphic novels) as the source there's plenty more left out there to choose from.
@Jrsy Devil's Advocate®:
Very true that there is not a whole lot to expand upon.
I have a feeling they are going to try and start a new franchise by giving his origin story and return from the dead in the first movie but instead of allowing him to defeat the bad guy and rest in peace by the end of the first movie they will probably stretch it to 3 movies and he fights new villains and that same villain that killed him through out the 3 movies. That seems to be what they are doing in these types of comic book movie franchises.
So they definitely can go majorly wrong with this reboot, but we can only hope they make a new Crow movie with the quality of the newer Batman's.
I also liked the first Batman movie from the late 80's but I also feel the two newer ones are much better.
@Jrsy Devil's Advocate®: I actually like "Batman Returns" cuz of Michelle Pfiefher's turn as Catwomen. I thought she did an amazing job with that character.
@jmg134: She was fine. The Penguin's character was melded into some other character that Tim Burton must have dreamt about. Also there wasn't anything cool about a penguin army. It's not like they were sharks with frikken' lasers..
@Craig Dawson: I have to admit I did like the series, Crow: Stairway to Heaven. It had a good premise with Eric's character not just getting vengeance but also having to redeem his own prior bad acts so that he could move on and join Shelly. That was an interesting angle to explore unfortunately the series was canceled prematurely.
11/23/09
Very well known: Shia LeBoeuf.
Not quite there yet: Zak Efron, Joseph Gordon Levitt, and the werewolf kid from New Moon.
Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just passing on the rumour I heard.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
Its Lee's swan song, its gritty, dark, funny and twisted. Everything points towards leaving it the hell alone.
They want to make it darker!! Maybe film the whole thing with the fuckin lights out!! Idiots.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
Yes
11/23/09
Lots of emo kids
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
Summer Glau just called her agent.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
"...You know how Batman is compared to Batman Begins."
Does every douche hollywood producer/director say this now?
11/23/09
11/23/09
Here's the ticket. The Crow was a "supernatural" creature. After he was killed he came back from the dead to avenge his girlfriend's and his death. What I think that they'll do is turn him into a superhero, origin story and all.
11/23/09
Please don't be Bale, please don't be Bale, please don't be Bale!
11/23/09
11/23/09
2. DARK. MORE DARK THAN THE CROW?!
11/23/09
This nonsense about a Dark Superhero? Like Batman Begins? Come on. Pull the other one son.
I hope James is getting a nice big check and moves a shit-ton of books. That would be nice.
11/23/09
11/23/09
Hollyweird must be bats**t insane.
11/23/09
...so it would be like rebooting Batman (again) and not having the Joker in it at all, but a different villain, if we're going to use the Batman comparison.
If I'm reading them correctly.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
@FrankenPC: The second movie is actually pretty bad. Sadly, Furlong's Crow is actually the fourth entry in the series - and the second one to go direct to DVD. It is mind-blowingly bad. However, it also has the ever-hilarious Tara Reid doing her best to "act" and David Boreanaz looking completely out of place in what I believe to be the scene-chewingest role this side of Burt Reynolds in Dukes of Hazzard... From start to finish, it is a trainwreck of the highest order.
Also, there was a slight casting error with Furlong to begin with. He looks like one of those teenagers who has no business going trick or treating on Halloween...
11/23/09
Wait, there were FOUR? Who are these producers and where are their brains?
11/23/09
11/23/09
Wow- looks like the front man for DISCIPLINE, Matthew Parmenter. I bet Matt sings better too.
11/23/09
Please for the love of God someone tell these idiots that every Crow movie after the first one sucked it long and hard. This is one of those times where you simply cannot catch lightning in a bottle a second time. Let it go. Let this franchise rest in peace already.
Me to Hollywood: Just fucking stop with the remakes, retcons, revisionist bullshit already. Look we get it. You're trying to go with the 'sure thing' that's already got proven box office results, instead of taking a chance with something completely new. Well I'm telling you, take that chance. Try something new.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
#@!
11/23/09
I definitely appreciate original ideas but as far as i am concerned the new Batman movies were far better than the ones from the 90's, so if they hold up to that kind of quality for a new Crow movie I am all for it.
11/23/09
11/23/09
Very true that there is not a whole lot to expand upon.
I have a feeling they are going to try and start a new franchise by giving his origin story and return from the dead in the first movie but instead of allowing him to defeat the bad guy and rest in peace by the end of the first movie they will probably stretch it to 3 movies and he fights new villains and that same villain that killed him through out the 3 movies. That seems to be what they are doing in these types of comic book movie franchises.
So they definitely can go majorly wrong with this reboot, but we can only hope they make a new Crow movie with the quality of the newer Batman's.
I also liked the first Batman movie from the late 80's but I also feel the two newer ones are much better.
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
11/23/09
And the actual following lyric: Beelzebub has the devil put aside for me, for me, for me! (seems quite apropos to me for the producers and such)