Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #tomzoellner more →
A History of Uranium, the Rock That Nuked the World
| posts about #tomzoellner more → |
A History of Uranium, the Rock That Nuked the World |
04/29/09
I once startled some government officials on a train we were traveling on through the PRC that I had some tritium. It was in my wristwatch dial. Not the smartest thing I've ever said under the circumstances.
04/29/09
Tritium, eh? Do you, by any chance, wear goggles and sport mechanical arms attached directly to your cerebellum through an inhibitor chip? :)
04/29/09
04/29/09
Yes, the one and only.
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
The Europeans have experimented with vitrification, running current through the waste until it becomes glass. No leaking! Mr. Atom IS our friend!
04/29/09
04/29/09
Can you suggest any books with a more objective take on the subject?
04/29/09
One point that a friend of mine noted is that the book is simply about Uranium, not about nuclear technology, which might account for some of this lack of viewpoints, but the two are so inseparable, it's hard to talk about one without talking about the other.
04/29/09
The waste problem isn't trivial, but it's blown somewhat out of proportion. The biggest problems with nuclear power continue to be the cost of mining the fuel - and the fact that there's relatively little uranium in the United States, making us dependent on foreign trade for power.
04/29/09
So we have to replace these older plants, much money but quite the wise investment.
The waste: big ol' case of NIMBY right?
Launch it out of the gravity well? Yeah, right. Very expensive and one botched launch would be a big PR problem to say the least. Is there any way to recycle it besides as ordnance?
The reliance to different foreign sources, hmmm, this sounds depressingly familiar.
Who are we talking about? A quick search tells me Canada and Australia have the most, okay cool, they are pretty level-headed cats. After that is Kazakhstan, Russia, Namibia, and Niger- could be tricky but not as annoying as dealing with the Middle East or Venezuala.
Food for thought, thanks again.
04/29/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
04/29/09
Hipsters might support Pebble Bed Reactors, they love PBR, right?
04/29/09
Also, nuclear power shouldn't be evaluated in a vacuum. Nuclear power produces radioactive waste, but so do coal burning plants, and coal power stations are unregulated w.r.t. radiation. They can just dump radioactive ash (that would be classified as high-level radioactive waste if produced by a nuke plant) into a landfill.
04/29/09
04/29/09
It's all relative - you can argue that it's the worse accident in the US, and it's had quite an impact on the use of the technology in the US.
I'm right there with you - I think that nuclear power is an incredibly helpful thing, just so long as you have competent people at the controls. An engineering friend told me that one of the problems was that there was a button that told the coolant valves to open, except that the light that was supposed to alert you that the valves were open only let you know that you threw the switch.
04/30/09
disclosure: i once worked in a nuclear radiation lab and still have a strange fondness for the subject.
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
...I'll get my coat.
04/29/09
It could replace coal burning powerplants overnight.
[en.wikipedia.org]
04/29/09
I'm not entirely sure, because almost nothing about the anti-nuclear movement is talked about.
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
04/29/09
"Today, gave Marie Curie cancer. Kinda felt bad about that."
04/29/09
Nah, that's enough snark for today.
"Made a scientist's balls fall off. Asshole kept prodding me and trying to dismantle my very core being."