io9 
Enter your username and password.
-
posts about #topologicaldefectsinspacetime more → 
Cosmic Strings May Be Headed Towards Us Already
San Francisco, 1:06 AM
Fri Dec 11
26 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
| posts about #topologicaldefectsinspacetime more → |
Cosmic Strings May Be Headed Towards Us Already |
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
07/07/09
[www.librarising.com]
07/07/09
07/07/09
Where is the preview checkbox?
Anyhow; lets try again: [www.yourprops.com]
07/07/09
I'm going to go kill myself immediately.
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
PS: Nexus? Is that you???
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
07/06/09
Basically it's okay, but whenever I read any articles in New Scientist on a topic I actually know anything about, I tend to cringe.
That said, I have the same reaction to a lot of articles published in peer-reviewed journals, so maybe I'm just too harsh.
07/06/09
Additionally, simply being on arXiv doesn't have anywhere near the same weight as a peer-reviewed article. So even though New Scientist sourced it from there, that doesn't mean the original authors had more than the barest scrapings of proof, or legitimacy, to their claim.
07/06/09
It won't be in-depth, but it won't be WTF? either.
07/06/09