San Francisco, 1:59 PM
Mon Dec 14
17 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
Just a shout-out to an old high school librarian who's probably dead now. His last name was Johnson. We called him "Wimpy" because of a slight resemblance to the character in "Popeye". On many occasions, somebody would ask him a question about some topic or other, and he'd not only tell you what books to get and EXACTLY where they were in the library (as in "three shelves down, five from the left"), but the pages and paragraphs of the information you wanted. He couldn't always supply that level of detail, but it was far from uncommon, and he was never wrong as far as I know. And he never sent anybody looking for a book that had been checked out.
He was a truly astonishing man who worked without fanfare in a nondescript job in a small Canadian high school.
@Grey_Area: Thanks for getting into the spirit. I was reading about all those methods of accurately storing all kinds of information in your head, and here was a guy who kept a whole library up there.
Gundam is only an acronym in alternative universe of Gundam Seed.
In fact, I'm not sure of where it comes from in classic Universal Century (UC). In UC Lunar Titanium is renamed to Gundarium alloy after being used to armor the Gundam.
@goldfarb: I've never heard of this method before. I wiki'd it, and I have decided that this method, or close to it, got me through high school and college.
When taking a test, or writing an essay, or even verbally answering something, I would recall various pages in the text, and remember where on the page I had seen it, I.e: pg. 53, 3rd paragraph, 4th sentence. (Even where I had read the passage originally [library, bedroom, etc.]) After that, I could remember the necessary information (or quote) almost verbatim.
@Ruthless, If you let me: cool...
sometimes it's called Cathedral Memory...because everyone knew all the different places in a church (nave, apse, altar etc) they could place items to remember is specifics spots...then just walk through their Cathedral to remember things...
@goldfarb: I read a book when I was younger about a mage that recalled spells much like Cathedral memory, except it was a Manor house, with multitudes of rooms. I likened it to a real-life version of that.
@Ruthless, If you let me:
I do somewhat of the same thing when I'm memorizing lines (especially from Shakespeare--I mean, I swear Old Bill sometimes didn't write English...) Anyway, I visualize where the line is on the page and it jogs my memory. I also learn the last line of two of someone else's speech that leads into mine. I'm finding that now I don't need to know that I know the line--the line is there, even if I can't remember it until I need it. Mostly I use something that's close to hypnosis--progressive relaxation then repeat the line in my head. just before I go to sleep.
BTW, the guy who's credited with the "memory palace" where objects are associated with furniture, etc. was Simonides of Ceo, back in 500BC.
AOL? Even in 2000, it was a laughing stock among my friends, best known for having those free CDs at every register in every store- grab a handful each time you were at the store, and in a few weeks you had enough to decorate a dorm room door!
"Airlines will modernise, and increase their efficiency. Nope. Instead, we're stuck with aging fleets, hidden costs, and increasingly insane behavior from the TSA."
Hang on. That's a very US-centric view. Out here in Asia, and indeed in Europe, the airline market has been evolving rapidly towards modern and efficient in the last 10 years.
"Computer processors will hit 10GHz by 2010. We haven't even seen 4GHz yet. Whose law"
Actually this one is correct, if not in the specific number. Instead of just increasing the MHz, chip makers have expanded out into multiple cores, in effect achieving the same increase in processing power. 4 cores with 2.5 GHz is, in all the ways that matter, the same as 1 core with 10GHz. Also, every MHz nowadays is probably more efficient.
@Starlionblue: 4 cores with 2.5 GHz is not the same as 1 core with 10 GHz. Taking full advantage of a quad-core processor requires a shift from the way programs are traditionally written. More importantly, this silly prediction shows that 10 years ago, the press didn't have a clue what was going to be important in computing today.
@Darklighter: It's not the same in architectural terms. However I think you could argue that in terms of processing power we are already beyond a hypothetical single core 10GHz Pentium 4. In other words, the essence of the prediction was correct. Unless of course they were unwise enough to try to predict actual numbers.
@Starlionblue: That all depends on how you define processing power, and there's more than enough debate on that. But the fact of the matter is that the software hasn't come close to catching up to changes in architecture, so trying to draw any sort of equivalence between hypothetical super-fast single core processors and existent multi-core processors is useless.
"Computer processors will hit 10GHz by 2010. We haven't even seen 4GHz yet. Whose law?"
Moore's. We have 7GHz single-core processors (admittedly liquid helium cooled) and 2-cpu 4-core 3GHz boxen. 2*4*3 = 24GHz of processing power. Or 4-core 6.5GHz (26GHz) if you want one really fast liquid cooled CPU.
Due to the fact that the die printing process is continually getting smaller (22nm?) we continue to adhere to Moore's law, which has more to say on transistor density than on raw clock rates.
@GothAlice: First, that's not what Moore's Law says. Second, CPUs*cores*frequency is one of the stupidest metrics of performance one could possibly come up with.
12/07/09
He was a truly astonishing man who worked without fanfare in a nondescript job in a small Canadian high school.
12/07/09
Io9 Commentariat, SALUTE!!
12/08/09
Funny...he didn't LOOK like a mentat.
12/07/09
12/07/09
"See you later alligator."
"In a while crocodile."
12/07/09
12/07/09
In fact, I'm not sure of where it comes from in classic Universal Century (UC). In UC Lunar Titanium is renamed to Gundarium alloy after being used to armor the Gundam.
ok. enough Gundam babbling from me.
12/07/09
Thanks io9, for making me fail this semester!!! XD
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
When taking a test, or writing an essay, or even verbally answering something, I would recall various pages in the text, and remember where on the page I had seen it, I.e: pg. 53, 3rd paragraph, 4th sentence. (Even where I had read the passage originally [library, bedroom, etc.]) After that, I could remember the necessary information (or quote) almost verbatim.
12/07/09
sometimes it's called Cathedral Memory...because everyone knew all the different places in a church (nave, apse, altar etc) they could place items to remember is specifics spots...then just walk through their Cathedral to remember things...
12/07/09
12/07/09
12/07/09
I do somewhat of the same thing when I'm memorizing lines (especially from Shakespeare--I mean, I swear Old Bill sometimes didn't write English...) Anyway, I visualize where the line is on the page and it jogs my memory. I also learn the last line of two of someone else's speech that leads into mine. I'm finding that now I don't need to know that I know the line--the line is there, even if I can't remember it until I need it. Mostly I use something that's close to hypnosis--progressive relaxation then repeat the line in my head. just before I go to sleep.
BTW, the guy who's credited with the "memory palace" where objects are associated with furniture, etc. was Simonides of Ceo, back in 500BC.
12/07/09
12/03/09
12/03/09
I will refrain from commenting on those who did their damnedest to ban stem cell research.
12/02/09
12/03/09
This joke was written in 1999
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
Hang on. That's a very US-centric view. Out here in Asia, and indeed in Europe, the airline market has been evolving rapidly towards modern and efficient in the last 10 years.
"Computer processors will hit 10GHz by 2010. We haven't even seen 4GHz yet. Whose law"
Actually this one is correct, if not in the specific number. Instead of just increasing the MHz, chip makers have expanded out into multiple cores, in effect achieving the same increase in processing power. 4 cores with 2.5 GHz is, in all the ways that matter, the same as 1 core with 10GHz. Also, every MHz nowadays is probably more efficient.
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/02/09
12/03/09
12/02/09
Moore's. We have 7GHz single-core processors (admittedly liquid helium cooled) and 2-cpu 4-core 3GHz boxen. 2*4*3 = 24GHz of processing power. Or 4-core 6.5GHz (26GHz) if you want one really fast liquid cooled CPU.
Due to the fact that the die printing process is continually getting smaller (22nm?) we continue to adhere to Moore's law, which has more to say on transistor density than on raw clock rates.
12/02/09