San Francisco, 6:04 AM
Sat Dec 19
30 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I think Y is the bot. Y instantly locks onto a target through floors and walls before even seeing the target. And once Y is done with one target he locks onto another.
X moves his aim around in a slower more deliberate way as if looking around the screen at his surroundings, not locked to a target.
@twophrasebark: No but we'd better start practicing for when the robots rise up and take over because then when you can't act like a computer you will be terminated.
Like the original Turing test, this doesn't really prove much. The scope of its intelligence is still limited to highly constrained tasks (shooting and dodging) in a highly constrained environment where all the variables are known.
@Anekanta: "Like the original Turing test, this doesn't really prove much."
O_o
I'm sorry, but thats just a scary thing to say.
Do you mean, if I showed you an AI that you could chat with freely and not tell the difference between it and a human, you still wouldnt consider it alive?
"chatting" is in NO way a highly constrained task.
Communication from sentient-being to sentient being is probably one of the most open, complex and least-constrained tasks possible.
Programing AI to wonder around and shout insults, by comparison, is nothing.
09/11/09
X moves his aim around in a slower more deliberate way as if looking around the screen at his surroundings, not locked to a target.
09/10/09
09/10/09
I made it a whole minute before reaching the same realization.
09/10/09
09/10/09
(It could be judged by bots)
09/11/09
09/11/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/11/09
09/11/09
O_o
I'm sorry, but thats just a scary thing to say.
Do you mean, if I showed you an AI that you could chat with freely and not tell the difference between it and a human, you still wouldnt consider it alive?
"chatting" is in NO way a highly constrained task.
Communication from sentient-being to sentient being is probably one of the most open, complex and least-constrained tasks possible.
Programing AI to wonder around and shout insults, by comparison, is nothing.
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09
09/10/09