Vampires got clowned. If one of their own didn't break up the rave, it would have been close. You can't let the human get away AND have Wesley Snipes beat you all down at your own party.
@EdificeComplex: Oh, no question. Although I've seen mummies really kill it on the dance floor too. (Uh, no pun intended? Seriously...my puns aren't that bad.)
I have to say, after editing together a trailer for an assignment earlier this year, this is just BRILLIANT. I can't say I'm in love with the very end where the melodrama starts, but overall it's pretty solid.
It reminds me a bit of the fake Umbrella ads made for Resident Evil. I like cleverness in film advertising.
So... I'm supposed to bop the eldritch horrors from beyond space and time in the head with the book, then?
I mean, half of them don't even have heads, much less anatomies that would ensure any sort of success should you actually land a blow on an extrusion resembling a head...
Especially Warhammer 40k? I mean, zombie robots, soul-eating psychic demons, more aliens than the American Southwest, armored genhanced supermen, and planet-eating bugs? What more could you want?!
@RexMaximus: Hate to say it, but so far the 40K RPG books have been kind of light on material. Lots of fluff and setting and whatnot, but lacking in the raw amount of information like you'd get in the old Monster Manual.
@daveNYC: Guess you're right, though I haven't played 40k since Second Edition and back then you could still find First Edition materials on shelves. Both of them were just treasure troves of stuff on the background, setting, aliens and weapons of the 40k world.
I can't speak about the current editions, but at least the wikis tell you almost all there is to know.
Also: I know the profiled books are RPGs, but shouldn't tabletop gaming be included too?
@Belabras ate my dingo!: If you've seen the regular trailer, you should be safe to watch this. It all looked like footage from that trailer cropped down with a soothing PSA voiceover. It's still pretty cool though.
@Belabras ate my dingo!: it's just a trailer, there's really no content in it at all you haven't already been exposed to. except maybe a super cheesey 'to farm them for blood' voiceover.
honestly though, you shouldn't take my word for it. i don't belive there's ever a point were one knows just enough about something until they know all of it. if it's not a good movie why not 'spoil' it and find out now instead of 2 hours and $11.50 later?
Sometimes the process of discovery is the only appeal a movie has. Of course, a good movie has far more going on and is watchable even if you already know everything about it, but for mediocre movies that isn't true.
@Jesse Astle: but opinions are not spoilers, they are fundamentally different things.
@Belabras: now with Kung Fu grip!: again, for myself at least, i'd rather find out ahead of time and save myself the time and money to discover something that really wasn't worth my time or money. to each his own i guess. at least your honest about the logic driving the position, plenty of spoilerphobes will try and pass it off as if the logic applies equally to everything.
@Belabras: now with Kung Fu grip!: I completely agree, I think if I had known absolutely nothing about Transofmers 2 it might have actually been bearable.
However, Daybreaks has me interested enough I will probably pursue every bit of spoilery goodness.
@Not a fan boy: From most of the literature on vampires, the consensus is that it's not necessary for them to feed on blood to survive, but doing so lets them remain young and vital. Without it, they age quickly and lose a lot of their strength and abilities.
Hell, even Dracula was like that; when Jonathan Harker first came to him, he was a decrepit old man, but as the process of securing Dracula's London residence progressed, he began to feed on village children to regain his vitality.
@Not a fan boy: With the whole "not being able to enter without being invited in" and "having to say blah all the time" Vampires really are pretty lame.
@Not a fan boy: they qualify as a weakness of anything but they are vampire specific in that they are a vampries only weaknesses.
i would consider the immortatility of vampiresm a jip if i couldn't eat anymore. i wouldn't mind drinking blood for sustinance if i could still enjoy a rare beef wellington with a side of asparagus smothered in hollandaise sauce and a hazelnut crème brûlée served with a double shot of espresso for desert.
@RoboBagins: fuck that noise. the ability to learn everything would far outweight any disadvantages inherent in immortality. unless it's some kind of cheesy immortality where you keep growing older and older or you live through everything that would normally kill you and end up hacked and mangled.
Just when I had lost faith in vampires in entertainment I saw the previews for this movie. I'm still withholding judgment, but a vampire movie where vampires are the norm and humans are the minority is already on the right track.
03:50 PM
03:45 PM
03:56 PM
04:20 PM
04:30 PM
04:44 PM
Look, I'm going to purchase a very fast automobile and date an exotic dancer as irrefutable evidence of that fact.
03:39 PM
03:32 PM
04:34 PM
03:23 PM
07:10 PM
07:30 PM
03:19 PM
11/18/09
It reminds me a bit of the fake Umbrella ads made for Resident Evil. I like cleverness in film advertising.
11/18/09
11/18/09
I mean, half of them don't even have heads, much less anatomies that would ensure any sort of success should you actually land a blow on an extrusion resembling a head...
11/18/09
11/18/09
Very appropriate for a movie where vampires and normal humans have swapped roles.
11/18/09
11/18/09
Especially Warhammer 40k? I mean, zombie robots, soul-eating psychic demons, more aliens than the American Southwest, armored genhanced supermen, and planet-eating bugs? What more could you want?!
Oh, and pauldrons. Lots and lots of pauldrons.
11/18/09
11/18/09
I can't speak about the current editions, but at least the wikis tell you almost all there is to know.
Also: I know the profiled books are RPGs, but shouldn't tabletop gaming be included too?
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
honestly though, you shouldn't take my word for it. i don't belive there's ever a point were one knows just enough about something until they know all of it. if it's not a good movie why not 'spoil' it and find out now instead of 2 hours and $11.50 later?
11/18/09
Sometimes the process of discovery is the only appeal a movie has. Of course, a good movie has far more going on and is watchable even if you already know everything about it, but for mediocre movies that isn't true.
11/18/09
@Belabras: now with Kung Fu grip!: again, for myself at least, i'd rather find out ahead of time and save myself the time and money to discover something that really wasn't worth my time or money. to each his own i guess. at least your honest about the logic driving the position, plenty of spoilerphobes will try and pass it off as if the logic applies equally to everything.
11/18/09
However, Daybreaks has me interested enough I will probably pursue every bit of spoilery goodness.
11/18/09
11/18/09
Apparently they become rabid bat monsters. At least in Daybreakers they do.
11/18/09
Also, aren't most things vulnerable to stakes through the heart, fire and beheading? How do these qualify as vampire specific weaknesses?
11/18/09
Hell, even Dracula was like that; when Jonathan Harker first came to him, he was a decrepit old man, but as the process of securing Dracula's London residence progressed, he began to feed on village children to regain his vitality.
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
i would consider the immortatility of vampiresm a jip if i couldn't eat anymore. i wouldn't mind drinking blood for sustinance if i could still enjoy a rare beef wellington with a side of asparagus smothered in hollandaise sauce and a hazelnut crème brûlée served with a double shot of espresso for desert.
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/18/09
11/19/09