Wanted: Affordable way to launch satellite into space. Does not need to reach sustainable orbit, just needs to go high enough to qualify as "space". Expect return of satellite after recovery of launch vessel.
Does anyone get the feeling that Sir Richard Branson has a hidden volcano island base somewhere in the Pacific, and is slowly progressing on his giant space cannon?
@Mecharine: I thought that you were comparing him to the astronaut Jeff Tracy, but I didn't think that Sir Richard had that many sons, or a friend named Lady Penelope.
@burlybax: Yeah, mine is built out of a large Weber Kettle, with some snazzy solar panels and an antenna to broadcast my clandestine "Radio-Free Utah" broadcasts.
Do these people take us for fools? They can try to use biofuels "wherever" possible" but the unalterable fact is that it costs some $20k to get a kilogram into low earth orbit. There's nothing in this puffery that would alter that equation significantly. Space travel is by its very nature incredibly energy-intensive. It might still be worth it. But people shouldn't pretend there's a green option.
I hate to admit it, but it's becoming more and more obvious that advancement in space flight is going to have to come from the private sector. Gods forbid that NASA should do something fucking useful.
That's a awful lot of faith in a company that calls itself "Virgin Galactic" when their only space vehicle, which hasn't even gone on test flight yet, is barely suborbital.
Huh? How is one going to get up into space without the use of extremely hazardous materials aka rocket fuel that is full of stuff like Chlorine and Benzene?
Unless someone can manufacture pixie dust, then I say bullshit.
@ManchuCandidate: Well, the notion of doing it greener doesn't imply NOT using hazardous chemicals, but perhaps LESS of them. For example, lighter ship frames using composite materials and more aerodynamic craft designs could reduce the amount of fuel required to get a ship in orbit.
In the end it really comes down to weight as far as how much propellant is used, right?
10/14/09
-Kle.
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
@Mecharine: I thought that you were comparing him to the astronaut Jeff Tracy, but I didn't think that Sir Richard had that many sons, or a friend named Lady Penelope.
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
10/13/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
That's a awful lot of faith in a company that calls itself "Virgin Galactic" when their only space vehicle, which hasn't even gone on test flight yet, is barely suborbital.
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
Unless someone can manufacture pixie dust, then I say bullshit.
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
In the end it really comes down to weight as far as how much propellant is used, right?