• io9
  • science
  • overmind
  • kotaku
  • gizmodo
  • Profile logout login

#watchmen#getkmlhtml#discussed

io9

Share Cancel
   
Upload an image | Add an image URL
×

logging in
  • FAQ. Include # before tag:
  • #observationdeck,
  • #tips,
  • #calendar,
  • etc.

San Francisco, 10:40 AM
Fri Dec 11
26 posts in the last 24 hours

Team

Tip your editors:

Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |

News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |

Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |

Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |

Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |

Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |

Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |

Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |

More:
io9 on Facebook
follow io9 on Twitter

SUBSCRIBE TO io9 RSS

New: Breaking news and daily top stories via email
1428 Subscribers
io9
  • Your version of Internet Explorer is not supported. Please upgrade to the most recent version in order to view comments.

    Dsmvwl  Admin  Promote to frontpage Approve user Ban user ×
    Image of reddingofish reddingofish
    12/09/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    "promising Virtuality" ?
    That show was lame. I hate shows that kill the most interesting character in the first episode. I want to watch a space travel drama to see them travel through space. Not to fight the Civil War in virtual reality, with a dead guy.
     Reply
    reddingofish was starred reddingofish was unstarred
    Image of Wookie1972 Wookie1972
    12/09/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    I would also add the last two seasons of X-Files. I really felt that Carter lost the plot. literally.
     Reply
    Wookie1972 was starred Wookie1972 was unstarred
    Image of Wookie1972 Wookie1972
    12/09/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    Wow. I agree with all of the,. Although I also agree with ejp1082 that all the pre-2009 Trek projects from this decade deserve to be on this list.
     Reply
    Wookie1972 was starred Wookie1972 was unstarred
    Image of gigshaft gigshaft
    12/09/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    Am I the only one tired of hearing people whine about the final episode of BSG? I happened to like it. Most of my educated, media-savvy friends happen to like it. And yes, I can see the flaws, too, but I'd hardly call it a top ten disappointment.

    The most griping seems to come from doctrinaire atheists upset with the fact that a show with spiritual themes running through its entirety decided to highlight them for its wrap-up.

    Had Ron Moore replaced "God" with "Multi-Dimensional Self-Aware Hyperspacial Super-Computer" I suspect there would have been fewer complaints.
     Reply
    gigshaft was starred gigshaft was unstarred
    Image of ravenmaid37 ravenmaid37
    12/09/09

    @gigshaft:I completely agree, those that act surprised about the religious content in the final episodes need to go back and re-watch the series. There are so many times when Six says to Baltar "I am an angel of God sent here to protect you," the problem is all of us thought she was lying. Look at the scene when she rescues Baltar from the crashed ship on Kobol, she's dressed all in white (for the first time mind you) and radiates a golden glow when she reaches out her hand to save him. The religious content was always there and always important, and it shouldn’t have been a surprise when Head Six turned out to be exactly what she said she was.

    Like others, I do have problems with the finale: I would have preferred if Kara was better explained (I think if her Father was the 7th model Daniel and she was the first hybrid it would have been better), if Adama hadn't left forever (I prefer to think he went off for a few months than rejoined his son), and if the last five minutes didn't exist (roombas!), but otherwise I think it was a moving, satisfying end to what I think is one of the greatest shows of all time.

    Can anyone name a GOOD conclusion to a science-fiction show? At 28, most of the shows I have loved fizzled out long before the end. I'm glad Lost has also chosen its end date but I have a feeling it too will end up being considered a disappointment. If so, I'll just have to remind myself again that it's about the journey and not the destination. I can watch Battlestar and Lost over and over again because I love the characters, not the secrets.
     Reply
    SJ_Edwards approved this comment ravenmaid37 was starred ravenmaid37 was unstarred
    Image of Motoki Motoki
    12/09/09

    @gigshaft: Well clearly those who disliked it must be uneducated and media ignorant.

    Nevertheless I will say that no it was not simply the fact of the god element since the door was left open to interpret it as some sort of ancient alien life form, ascended being etc ("...God..." "You know it doesn't like to be called that) if one so chose to do so.

    The "spiritual themes running thought its entirety" started out as some throwaway line of "God is love" that Ron Moore has Six make without any real meaning (clearly he was listening to Deepak Chopra audio tapes that day) then some suit at NBC/SciFi, oh excuse me, SyFy liked it and told him to do more with it and so the cylons got a religion that didn't really mean a hell of a lot because Ron Moore wasn't sure where he was going with it and decided to put that off and figure it out later.

    The Opera House visions (another thing they added because they though the Orpheum theater in Vancouver was cool though they had no idea what it meant or where they were going with it) turned out to be all of carrying a little girl 20 feet to a command room.

    Starbuck went poof without really going into who or what they hell she was.

    The rest of them abandoned all their technology and science (if you had an illness that need to be treated too bad!) and apparently everything they ever invented, thought and learned has been completely lost since they are our ancestors yet we know nothing of them.

    Oh yeah, according to Ron all of their knowledge exists in the collective unconsciousness to be re-discovered again and again. Must have been listening to Deepak Chopra again that day.

    And last but not least the entire show, the characters loves, hopes, losses and dreams and in fact our own entire existence amounts to the machinations and manipulations of some ancient non-coporeal magical robot angels who flippantly make bets over the rise and fall of entire civilizations while billions of lives hang in the balance.

    Then cut to the ominous robot ending to leave the whole show on a Me play gods! Me go too far! note.

    Of course these problems I and many others had with a show that was literally completely made up as it went along and major plot points which change the direction of the show were added without knowing where they were going because someone thought they were cool are entirely because we are ignorant uneducated and media unaware.

    Surely if we had more learning such as yourself and listened to CNN then we would learn to love the show such as you.
     Reply
    Motoki was starred Motoki was unstarred
    Image of Supernatural_Canary Supernatural_Canary
    12/09/09

    @Motoki: @Motoki: Wow. Ouch. It must provide immense satisfaction to shit on someone over their opinion about a TV show. Especially someone who's opinion appears to be in the minority. That'll teach him! Stupid minority.

    And I like how you insinuated that gigshaft’s opinion about a piece of entertainment is linked to his/her intelligence and cable news preference. Very astute. I wonder if you’d like to share the data modeling that led you to such a conclusion. I’m sure the Brookings Institute would be interested in your methodology.

    And the collective unconscious!? I agree. How silly. C.G. Jung was a know-nothing hack. I eagerly await your treatise on the appearance of nearly identical mythological and psychological motifs in the human psyche. I’m especially interested in your explication of how some of these motifs have been shown to appear concurrently in disparate cultures on opposite sides of the globe. Should be a fascinating read.
     Reply
    Supernatural_Canary was starred Supernatural_Canary was unstarred
    Image of Motoki Motoki
    12/09/09

    @Supernatural_Canary: Go back and RE-READ Gigshaft's original post and then read my reply. You will see it was he/she that brought up educated and media savvy and that my reply was merely sarcastically commenting on that.

    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion obviously. Gigshaft has his/hers and I have mine and that's fine. It was the part that Gigshaft added about the educatedness and media savvy that set me off. Who cares? It has nothing to do with it.

    I wasn't shitting on his/her opinion but rather the conceit that his/her opinion and that of Gigshaft's friends was somehow more valid because they were "educated" and "media savvy".

    I am not sure why you selectively singled out that part of my REPLY while ignoring those references in the ORIGINAL POST, but I did not bring those subjects up.

    Personally I could care less about someone's education in reference to their opinions. There's all sorts of educations, intelligence and learning and one does not need to have a PhD to write a review of a television show, movie or book, nor would a review of a person with a PhD carry more weight.

    I'm not even sure what "media savvy" means since there are all sorts of media outlets, some of which vary greatly in what they choose to present, and further I fail to see the relevance of that on interpreting the quality of a story.
     Reply
    Edited by Motoki at 12/09/09 12:35 PM Motoki was starred Motoki was unstarred
    Image of PhDelish PhDelish
    12/09/09

    @Motoki: What bothered me the most was that they actually placed that whole world in a timeline relative...with Hera as the "human" ancestor. I think he didn't need to place it at all, and it bothered me that he outlined the weird technological regression (like...ok what about cavemen? you certainly didn't go back to that...)
     Reply
    Motoki promoted this comment PhDelish was starred PhDelish was unstarred
    Image of CitizenC CitizenC
    12/09/09

    @Supernatural_Canary: Motoki was criticizing Ron Moore for including really wishy-washy philosophy. Carl Jung could at least discuss his beliefs intelligently. Moore came off sounding like a college freshman trying to impress his parents at Christmas.

    And (s)he only "shat on" gigshaft because gigshaft's "media savvy friends" line was completely pretentious. The rest of his post was a well done explanation of why he and many others thought the end was disappointing. You resorted to way more personal attacks than (s)he did.
     Reply
    Motoki promoted this comment CitizenC was starred CitizenC was unstarred
    Image of Motoki Motoki
    12/09/09

    @PhDelish: From everything I've read, it seems that Ron Moore came across the concept of Mitochondrial Eve and thought it was cool so just sort of latched onto it and forced the ending of the story to work around it.

    That for me is symptomatic of what went wrong with the show. They would find these concepts and ideas they thought sounded cool and insert them with only the most cursory understanding of them then force the whole framework of the show to work around them rather than developing the story naturally and resolving already existing story elements.
     Reply
    Motoki was starred Motoki was unstarred
    Image of Adam Whitehead Adam Whitehead
    12/09/09

    @Motoki: Some interesting points there.

    I think the main problem with the finale is that a lot of people seem to think it's amazing because they think that Moore wanted to deliberately create an ambiguous, you-work-it-all-out-for-yourself ending as an expression of artistic integrity. This, of course, is pure drivel.

    What really happened is that the writers of the show never planned ahead. They never came up with an answer when asking the question (something that would fail any basic Writing 101 course in the world). So 'All Along the Watchtower' is in the show because Moore wanted to use it in a TV show no matter what, and when he was refused permission to use it on ROSWELL he worked it into BSG instead, ignoring the fact it didn't make any sense or that he didn't have an answer for why that piece of music existed in the BSG universe (whilst of course pretending he did).

    Similarly, they picked the Penultimate Four Cylons based on what would be cool or what would shock the audience, rather than what made sense. The original idea (from some early Season 3 scripts) was that the Final Five would be ultra-mysterious individuals handing orders down to the other models. They weren't originally supposed to be familiar characters until Moore decided that them ALL being familiar characters would be cool, no matter how nonsensical it was. Tyrol as a Cylon? Makes sense. Tigh? No, utter nonsense included for shock value alone.

    The ending of BSG does not make sense. It does not track with the Temple of Athena/Arrow of Apollo revelations. You know, the story that spanned nine episodes at the end of Season 1 and the start of Season 2? It's okay, Moore and the other writer-producers completely forgot about that story as well. They only included, by RDM's own admission on the episode commentary, the Opera House stuff because they suddenly realised they could fit it in into the finale in the hallway scene, otherwise it would also have gone completely unmentioned.

    Listening to the BSG commentaries and podcasts for the whole show, Moore spends the whole series going, "Well, that seemed like a good idea at the time, although I have no idea what it means or how it makes sense, but it appeals on an emotional level", which is no basis for writing a mythology-heavy, mystery-based TV show. You'd have thought that more TV writers would have learned from the example of THE X-FILES what happens when you try to make this stuff up as you go along.

    Every single TV writer and executive producer who is even thinking about writing a serialised, arc-based TV show should be made to sit down and watch THE WIRE and BABYLON 5 in their entirety to see how you do it properly. You can have ambiguity, you can have spiritualism, you can have unanswered questions, but you cannot use "We wanted the audience to make their own mind up," to cover your own writing and planning ineptness.
     Reply
    Adam Whitehead was starred Adam Whitehead was unstarred
    Image of Islandkiwi Islandkiwi
    12/09/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    Can we hold off until the end of the year, so we can give Avatar a shot to qualify?
     Reply
    Islandkiwi was starred Islandkiwi was unstarred
    Image of Alessar Alessar
    12/09/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    I think that this line about Heroes "Most of all, the show ducked out on its very title, opting to show us histrionics and family squabbles in place of actual heroism" best summarizes the core problem with the show. That above everything else, even revolving door characterization, defines where it went awry.

    I liked this article. It was a good critical commentary and I liked the specificness of it. For instance, calling out the BSG *finale* but not the show. I just wish more of the site's readers would pay closer attention to detail like that.
     Reply
    Alessar was starred Alessar was unstarred
    Image of Cash907Censored Cash907Censored
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    "and the burial of the promising Virtuality."

    Are you joking? Virtuality was Defying Gravity without the inappropriately quirky music and lame flashbacks.
     Reply
    Cash907Censored was starred Cash907Censored was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    I really don't get what so many people see in Firefly. I watched the first 15 minutes of the pilot and thought it was incredibly boring.

    Superman Returns lacked a good story, a menacing Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey's Lex was anything but), and a superman with presence. On the plus side, Clark Kent was spot-on: the actor couldn't make him any more of a wimp than he (the actor) already appears in real life.
     Reply
    Edited by Roklimber at 12/08/09 10:14 PM Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of Imagism Imagism
    12/08/09

    @Roklimber: I don't know. I have friends who don't like it either. But its just a show in space, about cool cowboys, being badass, independent, rebellious, and snarky. I guess if that's not your cup of tea, then it won't work for you. But you'd admit that if that was your thing, you'd be signed on as a Browncoat, yah?
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment Imagism was starred Imagism was unstarred
    Image of JTF JTF
    12/09/09

    @Roklimber: "I really don't get what so many people see in Firefly. I watched the first 15 minutes of the pilot and thought it was incredibly boring."
    You're joking, right? Who'd dismiss *any* show after 15 minutes?
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment JTF was starred JTF was unstarred
    Image of GeneralBattuta GeneralBattuta
    12/09/09

    @Roklimber: The pilot sucked. You need to watch more of the show, it'll hook you.

    I actually watched Serenity (the movie) first, which was a great intro for me, but completely spoils what will happen to the characters.
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment Edited by GeneralBattuta at 12/09/09 12:20 AM GeneralBattuta was starred GeneralBattuta was unstarred
    Image of Sharpstyx Sharpstyx
    12/09/09

    @Imagism: What i liked about firefly and serenity, NO ALIENS, ZOMBIES, VAMPIRES, WORMHOLES, LIGHT SPEED MACHINES or any of the other tricks and hacks that most shows use to paint themselves out of a corner. With the exception of River being 'intuitive' theres no super powers or any of that stuff. I mean it could happen, really happen just the way the show tells it. Think about it, i mean these people are flying around in an old hunk o shit getting into adventures, but theres really nothing that screams 'BULLSHIT' at you like some other shows.

    /my 2 cents
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment Sharpstyx was starred Sharpstyx was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/09/09

    @JTF: No, I wasn't joking. If the 15 minutes are truly bad, then that's a long enough time to tell me that I won't like the show.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/09/09

    @GeneralBattuta:

    "The pilot sucked. You need to watch more of the show, it'll hook you."

    That's possible, but I'm also not into westerns, be in on Earth or in space.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/09/09

    @Sharpstyx: That's a pretty fair statement.

    I, personally, don't care at all for zombies and don't much like vampires, but aliens and wormholes are fair game in sci-fi. Light-speed travel is an exaggeration, I agree, but we've all come to live with it.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of GeneralBattuta GeneralBattuta
    12/09/09

    @Roklimber: Well, I'm not either, but the strength of the show has nothing to do with the setting and everything to do with the characters, who do not come off well in the pilot compared to their later showings.
     Reply
    GeneralBattuta was starred GeneralBattuta was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/09/09

    @GeneralBattuta: Ok, well, then maybe I'll give it a second shot. Now that most TV shows are going on a long hiatus might be a good time to do it.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of JTF JTF
    12/09/09

    @Roklimber: I guess you didn't watch Veronica Mars either. The first 20 minutes or so are more or less the usual teen drama.

    And that's just one example. There are preciously few shows you only need to watch the first 15 minutes of - unless you've got additional negative feedback and reviews to base an opinion on.

    Your opinion is your opinion, of course. But you're really missing out, that's all I'm saying.
     Reply
    JTF was starred JTF was unstarred
    Image of benizdead benizdead
    12/09/09

    @JTF: "Who'd dismiss *any* show after 15 minutes?"

    The Fox Network?
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment benizdead was starred benizdead was unstarred
    Image of DocSeuss DocSeuss
    12/09/09

    @JTF: Anyone watching a half-hour show. It's a little ridiculous to judge an hour-long drama based on 15 minutes, but a half-hour sitcom? Not as much.
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment DocSeuss was starred DocSeuss was unstarred
    Image of deworde deworde
    12/09/09

    @Roklimber: I'd try "Ariel" as an example of the show at its best.
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment deworde was starred deworde was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/09/09

    @JTF: Actually, I did watch the pilot and a few more episodes of Veronica Mars.

    Here's the thing, though. I'm a TV junkie. I watch a ton of shows and, over the years, I've developed a strong sense of what I'll like and what I won't like. Also, I can't watch everything, so I have to be selective.

    I'm sure it's not perfect, but usually I can tell from the pilot whether or not I'll be interested enough to continue watching.
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of ingenieur ingenieur
    12/09/09

    @Roklimber: kill your television
     Reply
    Roklimber promoted this comment ingenieur was starred ingenieur was unstarred
    Image of Roklimber Roklimber
    12/09/09

    @ingenieur: I have, a long time ago. Everything I watch I watch on my computer. Now, you're not going to suggest that I kill my computer too, are you? :)
     Reply
    Roklimber was starred Roklimber was unstarred
    Image of TrueCrime TrueCrime
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    I also enjoyed Watchmen, but I understand its place on this list.

    This was supposed to be the movie that converted the masses. Non sci-fi friends were supposed to go up to us, buy us drinks and say, "My God! You were right along along!" Amazed viewers were supposed to rush to comic book stores, and once they got done with whatever they bought, they'd finally want to talk about something other than football. Hot girls were supposed to want to come back to our apartments to see our collections of Y: The Last Man and Kingdom Come. Everything was supposed to change.

    At least, that was the hype.

    Of course, things never turn out like that, and the movie didn't capture the mainstream's attention. It was serviceable in some parts, brilliant in others, and terrible at times. It really shouldn't have come as a surprise.
     Reply
    TrueCrime was starred TrueCrime was unstarred
    Image of Chuck Chuck
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    I find your lack of "Enterprise" disturbing...
     Reply
    Chuck was starred Chuck was unstarred
    Image of Burke Burke
    12/08/09

    @Chuck: Enterprise had it's moments. In fact, I think it had better moments, on the whole, than Voyager did. (with the exception of the Queen Arachnia episodes)
     Reply
    Lassus promoted this comment Burke was starred Burke was unstarred
    Image of Lassus Lassus
    12/08/09

    @Burke: God yes. Voyager made me want to cry.
     Reply
    Lassus was starred Lassus was unstarred
    Image of techgoddess: Only .002 cents per byte techgoddess: Only .002 cents per byte
    12/08/09

    @Chuck: I thought it was good enough not to be a disappointment.
     Reply
    techgoddess: Only .002 cents per byte was starred techgoddess: Only .002 cents per byte was unstarred
    Image of Chuck Chuck
    12/08/09

    @Burke: I thought it had potential, but (to me anyway) all of the latter-day Star Treks have taken at least three-four seasons to start getting good, and this one died before it got a chance to.

    Even DS9 would have disappointed me if all I got was the first three seasons.
     Reply
    Chuck was starred Chuck was unstarred
    Image of Scaramanga9 Scaramanga9
    12/09/09

    @Chuck:
    And I'm pretty sure the first couple of seasons of TNG were ass as well (or at the VERY least, the entire first season.)
     Reply
    Chuck promoted this comment Scaramanga9 was starred Scaramanga9 was unstarred
    Image of Chuck Chuck
    08:01 AM

    @Scaramanga9: Showing my age a bit, I'm afraid -- I was including TNG as a latter-day series :-)

    Just trying to avoid saying it about TOS, since it only went 3 seasons, but 40+ years on I probably have to admit they were crap too -- we just didn't know any better at the time. :-)
     Reply
    Chuck was starred Chuck was unstarred
    Image of shoroko shoroko
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    As much as everyone criticized the actress for Laurie's lackluster appearance in Watchmen, after a few viewings I felt like it was pretty clear that everyone making the movie just didn't care about her. It's not exactly hard to imagine that these guys were all geeking their little hearts about The Comedian and Rorschach, and just weren't really sure what to do with her. But I don't know - Alan Moore said himself that didn't know what to do with Laurie, either, even though when I read the graphic novel I actually felt he did a good job with her. The changes and cuts made in the movie came consistently at her expense. I can't put that all on Malin Ackerman.

    Actually, I'm kind of inclined to be nice to them just for coming up with a viable alternative to giant squid from another dimension.

    As for Heroes, I think I could've watched stupid soap opera drama with superpowers if it weren't for the crazy misogyny. After all, I made it nearly halfway through season 3 for... some reason.
     Reply
    Edited by shoroko at 12/08/09 7:16 PM shoroko was starred shoroko was unstarred
    Image of Lassus Lassus
    12/08/09

    @shoroko: To be clear, it never was a giant squid from another dimension. It was a human creation made specifically to look like a squid from another dimension. :-)
     Reply
    Lassus was starred Lassus was unstarred
    Image of shoroko shoroko
    12/08/09

    @Lassus: Unfortunately, neither works to look not ridiculous when it ends up onscreen.
     Reply
    shoroko was starred shoroko was unstarred
    Image of Dresan Dresan
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    Watchmen's intro alone is enough to take it off this list.
     Reply
    Dresan was starred Dresan was unstarred
    Image of Aidan_ Aidan_
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    I disagree completely about Hulk, the Matrix sequels and Watchmen. But then, I seem to be the only sapient lifeform in the goddamn multiverse that thought the Architect and Neo talking was the best part of the second movie. So...take that as you may.

    Also, what woman was turned into a murderer in the DCU? Is this about that Wonder Woman/Maxwell Lord thing? Because I am prepared to duel over that, madam. :P
     Reply
    Aidan_ was starred Aidan_ was unstarred
    Image of blackcherry_359 blackcherry_359
    12/08/09

    @Aidan_: If I remember correctly Sue Dinby, the elongated mans wife, was murdered by the atoms ex wife, Jean Loring. This was so the superhero community to look to their families and Ray Palmer to want to get back together with her as she missed him. She killed someone and inavertantly set off a chain of events (super villains remebering they were mind wiped, batman getting angsty and creating the OMACs) that led to Infinate crisis, just because she could not pick up a phone and talk. Was just a little odd really.
     Reply
    Aidan_ promoted this comment blackcherry_359 was starred blackcherry_359 was unstarred
    Image of josecanUC josecanUC
    12/08/09

    @Aidan_: The culprit in Identity Crisis, after all the rape and memory erasing mayhem was said and done, turned out to be longtime supporting castmember Jean Loring, the Atom's wife.
     Reply
    Aidan_ promoted this comment josecanUC was starred josecanUC was unstarred
    Image of Moff Moff
    12/08/09

    @Aidan_: I liked that part, and I would argue strongly that there are some straight-up fantastic scenes in the Matrix sequels -- they're just far from enough to hold the movies together as wholes. And I thought Watchmen was fine.

    Hulk was fucking awful, however, and Charlie's take is the best summary of it I've ever seen: Ang Lee was awesome; it seemed like he was a great fit to explore the Hulk as an emotional basket case; and he totally unsucceeded. I mean: "Dr. Krenzler"? What. The. Fuck.
     Reply
    Moff was starred Moff was unstarred
    Image of Jesse Astle Jesse Astle
    12/08/09

    @Aidan_: I agree with you on all three except Watchmen. Hulk is one of the most under rated movies ever made. But then, I seem to have an affinity for movies that nobody likes.
     Reply
    Aidan_ promoted this comment Jesse Astle was starred Jesse Astle was unstarred
    Image of Konman72 Konman72
    12/09/09

    @Aidan_: You are not alone sir. When The Architect came on screen for the first time I think it took me a full 5 minutes just to blink I was so enthralled in what was happening. It took a few viewings and a couple of discussions with friends for my 17 year old self to finally understand EVERYTHING that was being said in that one seemingly simple scene.

    I still contend that the Matrix Trilogy as a whole is one of the finest achievements in cinema and that opinions will slowly change through the years much as they did for 2001 and Blade Runner.
     Reply
    Aidan_ promoted this comment Konman72 was starred Konman72 was unstarred
    Image of Chip Overclock Chip Overclock
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    Aw, hell, I was in a pretty good mood despite -1F temperatures in Denver. Now I'm just depressed. Cold and depressed.

    But rumor has it that Santa is bringing me THE WATCHMEN DVD on Blu-Ray for Christmas. We'll see, we'll see...
     Reply
    Chip Overclock was starred Chip Overclock was unstarred
    Image of geesejuggler geesejuggler
    12/08/09

    In reply to Top 10 Science Fiction Disappointments Of The Past Decade
    What's with all the hate for the Matrix sequels? I love them.
     Reply
    geesejuggler was starred geesejuggler was unstarred
    Image of Aidan_ Aidan_
    12/08/09

    @geesejuggler: Brother! Come, let us go to the cafe so that we may twiddle our berets and talk about epistemology.
     Reply
    Edited by Aidan_ at 12/08/09 6:18 PM Aidan_ was starred Aidan_ was unstarred
    Image of veeerules veeerules
    12/08/09

    @geesejuggler: I loved the second Matrix movie. I had never before (or since) gripped armrests like during the freeway action scene. The introduction of the rest of liberated humanity seemed to give it more depth. I didn't hate the third, but I didn't think it was on par with the others.
     Reply
    geesejuggler promoted this comment veeerules was starred veeerules was unstarred
    Image of geesejuggler geesejuggler
    12/09/09

    @veeerules: The third one was less on the action, so I understand.
     Reply
    geesejuggler was starred geesejuggler was unstarred
    Earlier discussions Other discussions Show all discussions Show featured discussions only Start a new discussion

Login

Enter your username and password.

Please enter a username.
Please enter your password.
logging in
Login via Facebook | Sign Up | Forgot Password?

Reset Password

Please enter your email address to have your password reset.

Please enter your email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
requesting password reset

Register

Registering will give you a user profile and the ability to add other users as friends. To become a commenter, however, you need to audition.

Want to know more? Consult the Comment FAQ and legal terms.

Please enter a username.
Please enter a password.
Please confirm your password.
Passwords are not identical.
Please enter a valid email address.
registration sent, waiting for reply

Submit Your Comment

You don't need to login to comment. Just enter your email address below.

See how your address will be displayed in the Comment FAQ.

Please enter a valid email address.
Please enter a valid email address.
logging in

Login with your Facebook or io9 account.

Sign up here.



  • Archives
  • About
  • Advertising
  • Legal
  • Help
  • Report a Bug
  • FAQ
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.