San Francisco, 11:50 PM
Mon Dec 7
26 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
If he is the first guy (whiplash) then how can he get hit repeatedly by the car and not be hurt? He didn't have any armor (outside of a bulletproof suit).
If he is a combo of the two it makes more sense because he may have armor underneath his pants.
I keep telling myself that there's a reason for the whips, that it's easier to electrocute someone with a solid connection rather than through the air, that it can be made to make some kind of sense.
GitEmSteveDave_JustAddLabCoat promoted this comment
smartboydan is banned from Deadspin :( was starred
smartboydan is banned from Deadspin :( was unstarred
@Frunobulax2099: Look, when the military innovation you bring to the table is a 'Whip that is made of energy!' it's clear your grasp of tactics is not iron-fisted. Okay? Tony Stark can shoot laser beams, Whiplash has to flail them around like an idiot at close range.
@Frunobulax2099: Gladiators had similar designs for their armor. They had their unarmored bits on their dominant side and defended that side with their weapon. Let's say Iron Man attacks Whiplash's unarmored side, assuming Whiplash is right-handed, he can defend his naked shoulder and leg with with his weapon on his stronger side. His weaker, left side is protected with armor.
second , everytime theres a movie version of comic character. the comic artist always kisses the movie`s butt , by making them look similar if not the same as the movie version.
@♠Final ♠: NO CAPES! The off-the-shoulder was a concession, yes, exposed but---oooh so, daring. You agree, yes? Of course you do. Marco, dahh-ling! You really make that look work for you! Love the mask.Très butch.
@disatess: Yes, but the writers do everything in their power to make the comic as unlike the film as possible so that there is no crossover potential from the movie.
Examples:
Spider-Man a big hit at the box office - let's make him magical and give him stingers.
The Dark Knight hits big at the box office - let's kill this guy off.
Iron Man huge with audiences - let's make Tony Stark the least likable guy in the whole Marvel Universe.
X-Men starts the whole superhero movie box office domination - Well, the X-Men are way to complicated to begin with, so this is practically a gimme. (Sadly, also the reason I love X-Men comics).
@Paul_Is_Drunk: yes but for the films duration they kiss it`s butt . They bulleyes like one in the film ,when th movie came out , they muck more of wolverine`s already screwed-up origin adding somewhat the movie`s story as well . So here we go again .
@Paul_Is_Drunk: I don't think it's really the writers consciously trying to distance themselves from the movie though (btw Civil War was done about a year before the IM movie came out).
Usually, I see that they'll just have a simple 1 or 2 issue mini arc the month before and during the movie's release, featuring the movie's villain, which they use to try and spoon feed current continuity to newbies.
After that, every development is just business as usual.
12/01/09
12/01/09
12/02/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
[en.wikipedia.org]
or this guy:
[en.wikipedia.org]
or some combination of the two?
If he is the first guy (whiplash) then how can he get hit repeatedly by the car and not be hurt? He didn't have any armor (outside of a bulletproof suit).
If he is a combo of the two it makes more sense because he may have armor underneath his pants.
09/30/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
But, damn. Goofy-looking.
09/30/09
Yeah, I have a whip guy.
09/30/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
Barney is awesome
09/30/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
..And its not a bad look
09/30/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
09/30/09
Whip it. Whip it good.
09/30/09
. . . it chaffs.
08/17/09
So Whiplash's right shoulder and right upper leg are exposed? Boom. Weak spots. Aim for the right shoulder, Tony. You'll take him down in one blast.
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
second , everytime theres a movie version of comic character. the comic artist always kisses the movie`s butt , by making them look similar if not the same as the movie version.
08/17/09
08/17/09
@Grey_Area:
08/17/09
08/17/09
Love the mask.Très butch.
08/17/09
08/17/09
AFTER April 1st. Fashion you know...
08/17/09
08/17/09
Villainous Safety Concerns < Dramatic Flare
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
@Grey_Area: you think THAT is bad?
08/17/09
That's the 1st thing that comes to mind when I see that outfit.
08/17/09
Examples:
Spider-Man a big hit at the box office - let's make him magical and give him stingers.
The Dark Knight hits big at the box office - let's kill this guy off.
Iron Man huge with audiences - let's make Tony Stark the least likable guy in the whole Marvel Universe.
X-Men starts the whole superhero movie box office domination - Well, the X-Men are way to complicated to begin with, so this is practically a gimme. (Sadly, also the reason I love X-Men comics).
It goes on.
08/17/09
08/17/09
Usually, I see that they'll just have a simple 1 or 2 issue mini arc the month before and during the movie's release, featuring the movie's villain, which they use to try and spoon feed current continuity to newbies.
After that, every development is just business as usual.
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
08/18/09
08/17/09
08/17/09
... Slash?