Just pretend you are talking to your friends. What would "Jane" say in response to Hargon of Crusteax's demand for the planet's macadamia nuts. #writing
@twophrasebark: Or pretend you are channeling your friends. You know your friends better than anyone, recreating them through speech and text, and mannerisms, is the best way to bring characters to life. #writing
In the context of 'hardboiled' crime fiction, where the purpose is to immerse you in a milieu, the consistent voice really works:
George V. Higgins - The Friends of Eddie Coyle
Carl Hiaasen - Tourist Season
Thomas Perry - The Butcher's Boy, Metzger's Dog
and particularly in 'lowlife', 'outsider', crime capers:
James Grady - Six Days of the Condor
Donald E. Westlake - The Hot Rock
Jay Cronley - Quick Change, Good Vibes
I don't think it's a coincidence that nearly all of those were made into very good films (particularly in the early Seventies).
120 minutes is just right to learn to love a 'voice' for what it is and not long enough to learn to loath it for what it isn't. #writing
Charlie Jane, what are your thoughts about writing in different accents to show off characters' upbringing or place of origin?
Does it destroy the flow of the dialogue when the reader has to figure out written pronunciations of a particular accent? and are you better off just using word choice and sentence length and all the other tricks you describe above? #writing
@Anekanta - Go Play!: As a reader, I loathe that particular device. Rather, "Ah loathe that pahti'clar dee-vice." *twitch* It makes me want to break fingers.
On the other hand, I am reading a novel where the protagonist is from Liverpool, and he's back in his hometown after escaping to Oxford many years before. The author stresses some of the Liverpool-specific pronunciation because it grates on the protagonist. He's lost the ear for the accent that used to be his own, and it sounds strange to him. It works. But it's small and almost an aside as the character rides the bus, so it's a very light touch.
@Eridani: Yeah, that's what I was thinking--that in small doses it might be okay, but too much is pretty cheesy and a bit insulting to the reader.
The question is: how much is just enough? I guess another way to handle it is to simply tell the reader there is an accent at the beginning of the story and then not to worry about it. #writing
@Anekanta - Go Play!: Writing in accents is fraught with peril. Generally speaking, if it isn't an access that you yourself can speak flawlessly, you shouldn't attempt it. #writing
@Anekanta: This is a bad idea. Accents look cheesy, disruptive, or just plain silly to the reader ... unless you are crafting a totally new accent from scratch. Which is a whole other (detailed) endeavor in itself. #writing
@pH-unbalanced: It's a trick to use with extreme caution. I'm reading a book called White Teeth used really well, but I've read some books were the trick killed the book.
What enrages me is author who use the same accent for every character that speak a language, even if they come from different places (a French-speaker from Quebec, one from Paris and one from Lyon is not going to speak the same way at all. Just like a New-Yorker, a Londonian and a Texan doesn't speak the same way) #writing
@pH-unbalanced: Agreed. Though I would say that doing some research as to the region of your character -is- worthwhile.. making sure your Brit character talks about soccer rather than football, your American character says pop vs. soda, depending on their native state, etc. Those are little swaps you can add in to lend them voice, without the icky, forced sound you get from trying to write an actual dialect you're not familiar with outside of wikipedia. #writing
@Dr.ClaytonForrester: Yes--crafting a realistic new accent takes some understanding of linguistics, as does inventing new languages for your characters to speak. But it's often worth it to learn.
But artificial languages are like accents in that regard--you can't use too many strange words, or the reader gets overwhelmed, and perhaps annoyed. #writing
Dialogue: definitely one of my worst fears in writing.
But it's funny you brought up Joss Whedon. I was just thinking about a particular Buffy episode where Buffy and Faith switch bodies. And so you have Sarah Michelle Gellar speaking with Faith's idiosyncrasies, and Eliza Dushku talking like Buffy...
The whole body switch trope has been done a lot on TV and it usually sucks, but between Whedon's writing and Dushku & Gellar's acting ability, when Buffy & Faith switched voices (and mannerisms) it was completely, awesomely believable. #writing
@Anekanta - Go Play!: I have to admit that that episode was pretty good. But I still say Whedon, Cody, Tarantino and especially Kevin Smith have a tendency to write to be quoted. Actually, I think that's a good rule: never write dialogue with intention of being quoted. #writing
@Wookie1972: Actually, I'd say you should aim for *one* quotable per piece, because giving the memorable zinger can be important. Maybe two. But more than that feels wrong. #writing
@pH-unbalanced: Indeed... bombarding the reader with good quotable dialogue is often a waste of good material. Then again, when I read a book, I keep a pad of post-it notes handy, in case I need to mark a page.
You should have seen my copy of Dune... there was a post-it on like every third page. #writing
@Anekanta - Go Play!: I meant that you shouldn't strive to have something quotable. People don't talk in real life in the hopes of being quoted. #writing
One thing that always helps when I'm writing conversations is, and I recognize that this might not work for everybody, is actually having the conversations aloud and doing both characters 'voices'. If you know how they sound in your head, and you can get the cadences and their vocabularies worked out, it usually really helps to get their voices sounding different. And recurring words or turns of phrase are absolutely always helpful in my opinion. There are plenty of people in my life who have their own little catch phrases, whether they're aware of it or not. #writing
Maybe it's just the ones I read, but I find that detective/crime writers generally do a great job with dialog. Some of my favorites are
Robert B. Parker
Elmore Leonard
Raymond Chandler
James Ellroy
Martin Cruz Smith
that I could recommend as examples. Of those, Elmore Leonard writes dialog that I'm tempted to (and sometimes do) read aloud, it's so interesting. #writing
@Chip Overclock: Besides, I wonder if it's not a bad idea to read outside of the genre in which you are trying to write. Just for inspiration, or new ideas, etc.
Not that I could write fiction if my life depended on it, but I long to write a science fiction western taking place in 1890. Or a circa 1950 noir about a private detective that foils an alien invasion plot. Or... you get the idea: mashups of favorite genres. #writing
@Chip Overclock: As the current trend in SF seems to be turning away from the Future we're going to be seeing a lot of stories like that. As a fan of History and its Alternates I can deal with that but I hope writers do more than put characters in period costumes and have some horses around. (Y'ever notice how often Fantasy writers ignore the work one has to put into caring for horses? It's not like you just park them and hop off.)
People had very different mindsets in the past. Heck, 50 or 60 years ago beating your spouse was seen as a the basis for high-larious jokes. Go back further in some cultures and infanticide was a wise economic move. (Yeah, this stuff still goes on today in some regions) Even enlightened and sympathetic characters should not have present-day attitudes.
This is getting off Charlie's topic but It's been on my mind lately. Sorry. #writing
@Grey_Area: I remember years ago a novel by Bruce Sterling (hmmm, ISLANDS IN THE NET maybe?) where the main characters were husband and wife who spent a significant part of the book having to feed the baby, put the baby to bet, comfort the baby.
A friend of mine (who had three kids of his own) remarked it was an unusually accurate portrayal compared to other books that kind of ignored the realities of stuff like that.
I also recall reading the reason wealthy Victorians had lots of servants was (besides what the Game Theory folks would call "signaling" their wealth) was that the typical large household was tremendously labor intensive to maintain.
In his Westerns (e.g. ALL THE PRETTY HORSES) Cormac McCarthy has a lot of great detail about the care and feeding of the characters' horses.
Takes a good writer though to present that level of detail in their novels, whether SF, Victorian, Western, etc. without making it sound like a lot of exposition. Makes for good world building, though. #writing
@Chip Overclock: Indeed. It's stuff like that that I find intimidating as a would-be writer. I'm aware of how little I know about so many things, like caring for horses or babies, or understanding Norse culture, or life in Bangladesh.
Some of these things I can learn, some are just out of my reach because I lack the means to travel or because the culture / skill / detail in question is lost to history.
It's that whole "write what you know" thing. A lot of it you can get from books, or community college classes, but that only goes so far.
I'm often amazed at how much a given writer has had to learn just to write believably. #writing
@Anekanta - Go Play!: The flip side of that is what Connie Willis warns about: getting so involved in the research, which for many is the fun part, that you forget to earn a living by producing a book. #writing
@Chip Overclock: BTW, I see this happen in high-technology product development: developers get hung up in the research part and forget that they have to produce a product. (That's where project managers come in handy, fulfilling the same need I suppose as editors.) So it's not just a problem for writers... we really do seem to be hardwired to learn new things. #writing
@Chip Overclock: We're naturally curious creatures; and writers--and engineers--are often explorers of a sort, so it makes sense.
I think the other thing about research is that it's often expensive as well as time consuming. So, hopefully if you're planning to travel to Europe to research a new book, you're already successful enough to afford it, and disciplined enough not to let the trip stop you from writing.
That's the great thing about it, though. You can take a laptop or even a paper notebook just about anywhere, and write while you're there. #writing
@Grey_Area: Please go write that book - an epic fantasy tale told from the perspective of the horse-keeper who stays in camp and has to piece together the grand narrative based on the horses' conditions and stories from footsoldiers heard around the campfires.
Thanks, Charlie Jane, for the advice. I'm considering writing a book and I ran into the "Making each chartacter have their own voice" roadblock. This article is gonna help me a lot. #writing
I only see it getting worse. Think of the people who are celebrated for their "snappy" dialogue: Quentin Tarantino. Diablo Cody. Kevin Smith. and, of course J*ss Wh*d*n. Cody and Tarantino especially take it to an extreme where it's as if they're not writing dialogue, they're writing entries for the IMDB Memorable Quotes page. Might as well be writing T-shirt slogans.
There is one modern master of dialogue: Elmore Leonard. Just read his stuff and you should be okay. #writing
This past spring I attempted to read the second novel in a gritty space techno-thriller series hoping that the bugs from the somewhat promising first book were worked out.
The story started off with a raid on an O'Neill space habitat with half a dozen super soldiers out of hundreds zooming around in powered armor and rocket packs. Sounds bitchin' right, how could that go wrong?
Well, with all these super soldiers screaming or growling variations of "They got Wallinsky!"
"He was expendable, we're all expendable!!"
"We gotta get to the airlock!!!"
"GET TO THA CHOPPAH!!!"
Often without dialog attribution, none of this namby-pamby "He said", "Smith growled", "Wallinsky screamed". I had no idea who was who and it really didn't seem to matter--Attack of the Cookie-Cutter Commandos. The soldiers find the President and his guards who they are trying to rescue and-- they spoke just like that too.
"Mr. President we've got to get you to tha choppa!!"
"I'm not the President, I'm Wallinsky!"
"Really, I thought you bought it at the last airlock!?!"
"Really? You're right! Who the Hell am I?!?!!!"
"It doesn't matter, we're all expendable!! I'm the President, GET ME TO THA CHOPPA!!!!"
This went on for 300 pages. I could not finish the book. Awful stuff. #writing
How do you keep your characters from all sounding the same? First, you keep Diablo Cody far away from your manuscript...
Cheap jokes aside, I had a writing workshop instructor who said he'd go to the mall or some other public place and sit down with a off walkman (this was a while ago) and basically pretend to listen to the headphones, but really eavesdropping, b/c it was like having camouflage and people would say all kinds of things when they didn't think anyone could hear.
Personally, I'm not even sure the headphones were even necessary, but it's an interesting way to get dialog. #writing
Aw, man, they used to make us listen to how people talk in my playwriting class. We had to secretly tape and/or tanscribe a conversation and bring it to class.
What you learn from this exercise is that most people talk like fucking idiots. I'm not exaggerating--you tend to ignore how many "ums" and "likes" and hideous gaping silences and misused words and incomplete sentences you use in regular conversation. We kind of just blot all that stupid bullshit out, and our brains knit what we're hearing into something coherent.
Something, by the way, that often has no bearing at all on what the other person was saying, which is something else you learn from overhearing conversations in coffee shops.
@braak: Oh yeah, good point. Dave Eggers talks about how he made a point of editing all the "Dude"s out of people's speeches in A Heartbreaking Work etc. So it wasn't just "Dude, she died" and stuff. #writing
@braak: Oh yeah, good point. Dave Eggers talks about how he made a point of editing all the "Dude"s out of people's speeches in A Heartbreaking Work etc. So it wasn't just "Dude, she died" and stuff. #writing
@braak: I was going to talk about this. My major was in Linguistics, so I ended up transcribing quite a lot of these.
You haven't lived 'till you've transcribed a thirty minute four-party conversation timeline fashion so that you can go back and analyze the interruptions.
But it does give you a great ear for, you know, conversation. #writing
@pH-unbalanced: I spend a lot of my professional life transcribing the things that middle school kids (ages like 10-13) say (about science, but that's neither here nor there). I'm pretty sure that by the end of the day, I'm stupider than the beginning. None of these children make any sense whatsoever! When I'm sitting there interviewing them, it all seems to kind of be coherent, but going back and transcribing from the tape, the actual words on the page look like utter nonsense.
But what it's really highlighted for me is the extent to which everyone fills in the blanks and, basically, rejects everyone else's reality and substitutes their own. When we ask these kids a question, more often than not their answer isn't for the question that was actually asked, but an alternate version of that question, which they formulate in their own head, that more closely meshes to what they actually want to talk about, or a belief they already have. So you get Q and A dialogues where neither party is actually truly responding to the other, they're just slotting their own pre-existing inner monologue into what passes for a conversation. #writing
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
George V. Higgins - The Friends of Eddie Coyle
Carl Hiaasen - Tourist Season
Thomas Perry - The Butcher's Boy, Metzger's Dog
and particularly in 'lowlife', 'outsider', crime capers:
James Grady - Six Days of the Condor
Donald E. Westlake - The Hot Rock
Jay Cronley - Quick Change, Good Vibes
I don't think it's a coincidence that nearly all of those were made into very good films (particularly in the early Seventies).
120 minutes is just right to learn to love a 'voice' for what it is and not long enough to learn to loath it for what it isn't. #writing
11/04/09
Does it destroy the flow of the dialogue when the reader has to figure out written pronunciations of a particular accent? and are you better off just using word choice and sentence length and all the other tricks you describe above? #writing
11/04/09
On the other hand, I am reading a novel where the protagonist is from Liverpool, and he's back in his hometown after escaping to Oxford many years before. The author stresses some of the Liverpool-specific pronunciation because it grates on the protagonist. He's lost the ear for the accent that used to be his own, and it sounds strange to him. It works. But it's small and almost an aside as the character rides the bus, so it's a very light touch.
Everything in moderation, I guess. #writing
11/04/09
The question is: how much is just enough? I guess another way to handle it is to simply tell the reader there is an accent at the beginning of the story and then not to worry about it. #writing
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
What enrages me is author who use the same accent for every character that speak a language, even if they come from different places (a French-speaker from Quebec, one from Paris and one from Lyon is not going to speak the same way at all. Just like a New-Yorker, a Londonian and a Texan doesn't speak the same way) #writing
11/05/09
11/05/09
But artificial languages are like accents in that regard--you can't use too many strange words, or the reader gets overwhelmed, and perhaps annoyed. #writing
11/04/09
But it's funny you brought up Joss Whedon. I was just thinking about a particular Buffy episode where Buffy and Faith switch bodies. And so you have Sarah Michelle Gellar speaking with Faith's idiosyncrasies, and Eliza Dushku talking like Buffy...
The whole body switch trope has been done a lot on TV and it usually sucks, but between Whedon's writing and Dushku & Gellar's acting ability, when Buffy & Faith switched voices (and mannerisms) it was completely, awesomely believable. #writing
11/04/09
11/04/09
It's the second half of a two part episode.
11/04/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
You should have seen my copy of Dune... there was a post-it on like every third page. #writing
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
Robert B. Parker
Elmore Leonard
Raymond Chandler
James Ellroy
Martin Cruz Smith
that I could recommend as examples. Of those, Elmore Leonard writes dialog that I'm tempted to (and sometimes do) read aloud, it's so interesting. #writing
11/04/09
Not that I could write fiction if my life depended on it, but I long to write a science fiction western taking place in 1890. Or a circa 1950 noir about a private detective that foils an alien invasion plot. Or... you get the idea: mashups of favorite genres. #writing
11/04/09
People had very different mindsets in the past. Heck, 50 or 60 years ago beating your spouse was seen as a the basis for high-larious jokes. Go back further in some cultures and infanticide was a wise economic move. (Yeah, this stuff still goes on today in some regions) Even enlightened and sympathetic characters should not have present-day attitudes.
This is getting off Charlie's topic but It's been on my mind lately. Sorry. #writing
11/04/09
A friend of mine (who had three kids of his own) remarked it was an unusually accurate portrayal compared to other books that kind of ignored the realities of stuff like that.
I also recall reading the reason wealthy Victorians had lots of servants was (besides what the Game Theory folks would call "signaling" their wealth) was that the typical large household was tremendously labor intensive to maintain.
In his Westerns (e.g. ALL THE PRETTY HORSES) Cormac McCarthy has a lot of great detail about the care and feeding of the characters' horses.
Takes a good writer though to present that level of detail in their novels, whether SF, Victorian, Western, etc. without making it sound like a lot of exposition. Makes for good world building, though. #writing
11/04/09
Some of these things I can learn, some are just out of my reach because I lack the means to travel or because the culture / skill / detail in question is lost to history.
It's that whole "write what you know" thing. A lot of it you can get from books, or community college classes, but that only goes so far.
I'm often amazed at how much a given writer has had to learn just to write believably. #writing
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
I think the other thing about research is that it's often expensive as well as time consuming. So, hopefully if you're planning to travel to Europe to research a new book, you're already successful enough to afford it, and disciplined enough not to let the trip stop you from writing.
That's the great thing about it, though. You can take a laptop or even a paper notebook just about anywhere, and write while you're there. #writing
11/05/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
Tha play is The Rivals. #writing
11/04/09
Note to self: must read Sheridan. #writing
11/04/09
There is one modern master of dialogue: Elmore Leonard. Just read his stuff and you should be okay. #writing
11/04/09
#@! #writing
11/04/09
The story started off with a raid on an O'Neill space habitat with half a dozen super soldiers out of hundreds zooming around in powered armor and rocket packs. Sounds bitchin' right, how could that go wrong?
Well, with all these super soldiers screaming or growling variations of "They got Wallinsky!"
"He was expendable, we're all expendable!!"
"We gotta get to the airlock!!!"
"GET TO THA CHOPPAH!!!"
Often without dialog attribution, none of this namby-pamby "He said", "Smith growled", "Wallinsky screamed". I had no idea who was who and it really didn't seem to matter--Attack of the Cookie-Cutter Commandos. The soldiers find the President and his guards who they are trying to rescue and-- they spoke just like that too.
"Mr. President we've got to get you to tha choppa!!"
"I'm not the President, I'm Wallinsky!"
"Really, I thought you bought it at the last airlock!?!"
"Really? You're right! Who the Hell am I?!?!!!"
"It doesn't matter, we're all expendable!! I'm the President, GET ME TO THA CHOPPA!!!!"
This went on for 300 pages. I could not finish the book. Awful stuff. #writing
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
Cheap jokes aside, I had a writing workshop instructor who said he'd go to the mall or some other public place and sit down with a off walkman (this was a while ago) and basically pretend to listen to the headphones, but really eavesdropping, b/c it was like having camouflage and people would say all kinds of things when they didn't think anyone could hear.
Personally, I'm not even sure the headphones were even necessary, but it's an interesting way to get dialog. #writing
11/04/09
"The Art of Self Invention"
Studying humans, observing their manners, movements, modes of speech. All methods actors use when becoming a new character. #writing
11/04/09
What you learn from this exercise is that most people talk like fucking idiots. I'm not exaggerating--you tend to ignore how many "ums" and "likes" and hideous gaping silences and misused words and incomplete sentences you use in regular conversation. We kind of just blot all that stupid bullshit out, and our brains knit what we're hearing into something coherent.
Something, by the way, that often has no bearing at all on what the other person was saying, which is something else you learn from overhearing conversations in coffee shops.
11/04/09
God, I can't wait to get a cat. #writing
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
11/04/09
You haven't lived 'till you've transcribed a thirty minute four-party conversation timeline fashion so that you can go back and analyze the interruptions.
But it does give you a great ear for, you know, conversation. #writing
11/05/09
11/05/09
But what it's really highlighted for me is the extent to which everyone fills in the blanks and, basically, rejects everyone else's reality and substitutes their own. When we ask these kids a question, more often than not their answer isn't for the question that was actually asked, but an alternate version of that question, which they formulate in their own head, that more closely meshes to what they actually want to talk about, or a belief they already have. So you get Q and A dialogues where neither party is actually truly responding to the other, they're just slotting their own pre-existing inner monologue into what passes for a conversation. #writing