San Francisco, 7:28 PM
Wed Dec 16
24 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
Editor-in-Chief:
Annalee Newitz |
News Editor:
Charlie Jane Anders |
Associate Editor:
Meredith Woerner |
Assistant Editor:
Lauren Davis |
Weekend Editor:
Graeme McMillan |
Contributors:
Joshua Glenn
Stephen Goldmeier |
Ed Grabianowski |
Austin Grossman
Paul Hogan |
Lauren Davis |
Chris Hsiang |
Lynn Peril |
Ann VanderMeer
Alasdair Wilkins |
Graphic Designer:
Stephanie Fox |
Interns:
Tim Barribeau |
Julia Carusillo |
Alex Eichler |
Cyriaque Lamar |
Caitlin Petrakovitz |
Mary Ratliff |
Josh Snyder |
I don't like comic adaptations of episodes of television shows. I want comics based on TV shows to explore things we don't see on screen. I already saw A Hole In The World. Comic adaptations of books can be fun, because they provide a visual to something that had only been in my head before, but adaptations of TV episodes feel like they're just asking for my money.
@Motoki: I'm not sure...they did Smile Time a while back, I think that was the first time I noticed an episode being adapted. I wavered back and forth about buying it because Smile Time was just hilarious. But then I decided that hello, I already knew the storyline, and if I wanted to see it again, I could do what you suggested and just pop the DVD in.
The first time I consciously started noticing, what I now know as the concept of the Uncanny Valley [en.wikipedia.org] , was after reading an article about the 1986 'Betty Blue' [en.wikipedia.org] actress, Beatrice Dalle, in which the interviewer described her as "looking like she had been designed by a committee of perverts".
If her life story since [en.wikipedia.org] , is anything to go by, the future may turn out to be very, very, uncanny indeed ...
I used to animate for Don Bluth. Don developed a distrust of his animators for some reason, and relied more and more heavily on live action reference. I guess you'd call it mo-cap, but the thing became increasingly pervasive.
It reached the point on "Pebble and the Penguin" where we had live action actors acting out scenes for penguins.
Penguin anatomy is not the same as human anatomy.
Also, in live action, every frame is a keyframe.
Suffice to say that animating is hard enough, without being handcuffed to a stack of photostat printouts (at great expense) of a man in a rubber suit, pretending to be a penguin.
God, that was hell.
I see the use of mocap for long shots, crowd scenes, and super real human action that often is unattainable by most animators - but the crapulence in the Zemeckis abominations like "Polar Express" fills me with the desire to stick forks in my eyes.
What annoys me about the UV is that there is a nice little graph that goes along with it, and no one ever points out where in the valley whatever they are discussing belongs. (And I don't think we've hit the valley yet, personally.) If it's as unrealistic as an animated corpse, say that, don't just say 'UNCANNY VALLEY LOL!'
The thing that bothered me the most about that Matrix Reloaded fight scene was how boring it was. I kept thinking how it should be exciting, only it wasn't.
The real Hugo Weaving is far more effective than a bunch of fake Mr Smiths.
That's one of the interesting things about Avatar's CGI vs the scary CGI depicted here. The Na'Vi don't look terribly creepy or unreal. They don't give me nightmares like Benjamin "Does This Composited CGI Old Baby Head Look Real To You?" Button.
@firstanointed: Funny you say that, because the Na'vi are part of what make me unsure about Avatar. They don't look the right amount of real compared to the amazing backgrounds that are Pandora. I guess that puts them in the uncanny valley for me.
the Orville Redenbacher spots were done to test the tech for Benjamin Button...
Zemeckis should have abandoned the method he (and others) uses because it's totally outclassed by what was used for BB and on Avatar...see Dr. Manhattan vs. Benjamin Button...
a better kid is the one in A Series of Horrible Events - a bunch of shots are 100% CG and they looked great...
better de-aging was done in Benjamin Button...but the X-Men 3 stuff was a good, if not entirely sucessful, attempt.
The Beatle and Sunmaid don't really blong here as they are clearly stylized...
there is a big difference between bad CG and badly done CG...
@goldfarb: Yeah but I don't count a grid warp covering up a wrinkle as "CG" I count it as an extreme case of touch-up. When I think CGI I think of something like Button with a full CG head replacement.
@Cribbage Left: Ah, great movie that was. Wish I could remember small details like that :( I have a really poor memory. Hopefully one day there will be a pill to fix my memory.
12/15/09
04:52 PM
12/15/09
12/15/09
12/15/09
Are they adding anything extra to it, filling things in or just adapting the story exactly as aired to comic.
If the latter I am wondering what the point is and why not just go get the DVD if someone wants to see that story again?
12/15/09
12/15/09
It's part of Top Cow's Pilot Season. Hopefully it'll get picked up. I for one want to read more.
12/15/09
12/15/09
The 80 page giant is a throw back to the old days that DC brings up now and again.
[en.wikipedia.org]
12/13/09
If her life story since [en.wikipedia.org] , is anything to go by, the future may turn out to be very, very, uncanny indeed ...
12/12/09
It reached the point on "Pebble and the Penguin" where we had live action actors acting out scenes for penguins.
Penguin anatomy is not the same as human anatomy.
Also, in live action, every frame is a keyframe.
Suffice to say that animating is hard enough, without being handcuffed to a stack of photostat printouts (at great expense) of a man in a rubber suit, pretending to be a penguin.
God, that was hell.
I see the use of mocap for long shots, crowd scenes, and super real human action that often is unattainable by most animators - but the crapulence in the Zemeckis abominations like "Polar Express" fills me with the desire to stick forks in my eyes.
It's not fun to watch.
12/13/09
12/11/09
One of their captions under a screenshot from the ad was "Hello, I'm an abomination against nature, and I'm here to give you a heart attack."
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
The real Hugo Weaving is far more effective than a bunch of fake Mr Smiths.
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
Zemeckis should have abandoned the method he (and others) uses because it's totally outclassed by what was used for BB and on Avatar...see Dr. Manhattan vs. Benjamin Button...
a better kid is the one in A Series of Horrible Events - a bunch of shots are 100% CG and they looked great...
better de-aging was done in Benjamin Button...but the X-Men 3 stuff was a good, if not entirely sucessful, attempt.
The Beatle and Sunmaid don't really blong here as they are clearly stylized...
there is a big difference between bad CG and badly done CG...
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
Caring, Generous, Kind (when she's not stressed out haha)
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
12/11/09
[www.imdb.com]
12/11/09
12/11/09