I can't recommend Libba Bray's Gemma Doyle books enough they are just so amazingly well written and have such a great feminist message with great atmosphere, gothic melodrama and girls doing magic.
I'm in favor of books where girls do magic and have powers. I will read anything where girls do magic or have powers.
Also, seriously, why all the hate on YA? There are so many great classic works of literature that are YA (Robert Cormier and Judy Blume come straight to mind as well as Robin McKinley's stuff).
It's historical fiction not sci-fi/fant but I would also heartily recommend the last National Book Award Winner "What I Saw and Why I Lied" by Blundell (who's- fun fact- only other titles she's written were Star Wars books targeted for 9 year olds). It's flipping amazing.
Another great war/historical one is Peet's "Tamar" which is a fantastic WW2 intrigue/spy novel. There's loads more but I'm prattling on...
I'm just saying it's not all Twilight and Gossip Girl people.
I think that YA literature can be a good starting point for kids to give them the confidence to tackle books with more complicated themes.
My daughter was reading a lot of YA but then she read some Margaret Atwood books and now she finds that much of the YA doesn't satisfy her anymore. I have begun to lend her my books that I think that she will enjoy and hopefully save myself a few dollars as well. #books
YA literature has gotten a LOT better in the past 10 years. Markus Zusak alone makes up for all the trash from the 60's and 70's (I honestly believe that The Book Thief is one of the greatest books ever written, even if it was "intended" for 16 year-olds). Libba Bray is a really great one too--her writing is very atmospheric-- and does a lot for YA fantasy/historical fiction. As for contemporary authors, Sarah Dessen is amazing.
So basically, all of you calling YA trash need to actually read some of the recent YA lit. #books
@ctuley: Have you tried Zusak's last novel "I am the Messenger?" Flipping blew my socks off. It doesn't even necessarily need to be a teen book either.
@Sunshineyness: I love that one! It's not as powerful as The Book Thief but it's up there. The parts with the runner are my favorite; there was something really moving to them.
(I really hope he writes something new soon) #books
Wow, what's with all the YA hate? There is a lot of bad YA out there, but there's a surprising amount of REALLY GOOD YA that I and a lot of adults I know are really into, and it's more than just dumbed-down adult sci-fi. #books
@bookling: Seriously, I used to work the YA section when I worked in a bookstore. It has some good stuff, y'all! It's not just "blah, blah, pretty vampire boys" there's depth and issues! #books
@bookling: (puts up hand) my name is Jeremy Tapsell, and I'm an adult who likes Young Adult fiction.
The main problem I have, however, with most YA fiction is that it is written in a way that treats its audience like idoiots. Young people are not stupid. They may lack worldly experience, but they still love reading things that challenge the mind.
In that sense, I find that literature aimed at that audience is much better when written by people who also write adult works. For example, Heinlan, Andre Norton, Orson Scott Card, Robert Jordan, Neil Gaiman (I know, I know this is looking a little too fantasy), Edith Nesbitt, C.S. Lewis, etcetera!
When the author is an adult who only writes fiction for YA then we get filtered, usually publisher dictated, stories that are not didatic enough and they end up straying into the trashier, non challenging end of the spectrum. ESPECIALLY when it comes to sci fi. I am not refering to all published YA fiction here, but there seems to be a trend.
YA sci fi readers, like myself when I was younger, will tend to go straight to the main stuff, because it doesn't pander to teenage cliches which I would posit most YA readers who like sci fi would find uniteresting and turn them off the story.
So if we have more Adult Sci Fi writers writing for teenagers, then perhaps we might have more good YA sci fi, and less YA sci fi hate. #books
When I was young enough for the Young Adult section, I mostly ignored it. The only books I remember reading from that section were Choose Your Own Adventure, Madeleine L'Engle's books, some of CS Lewis' Narnia books, and The Hobbit. I was reading Lord of the Rings when I was 11, Starship Troopers when I was 12 and Stranger in a Strange Land when I was 13 or 14. Then again, as a kid, my mom's bedtime stories included not only Winnie the Pooh but also Beowulf and Gawain and the Green Knight. #books
@Bill-Lee: I have a similar story, although you can replace Tolkien and Heinlein with Douglas Adams and then Kurt Vonnegut. Shamefully, I never got around to reading the LOTR books until just before the movies came out (seriously). I do, however, remember really liking the Robert Asprin Myth books. Easy enough for a young person to read, yet "adult" enough to seem like something grownups would read. #books
@Bill-Lee: I was way too intimidated by the serious sci-fi and fantasy when I was in the Young Adult category to do more than stick my toe in and run screaming away from Orson Scott Card. I would have killed to have the Where To Start With Young Adult Science Fiction back then.
@golddiggersof2033: I used to recommend Ender's Game as a YA title, until I actually read it. I was stunned at how messed up it was (and I still am a little leery when people say it's their favourite book). #books
@golddiggersof2033: I keep trying to read Orson Scott Card. Something about his work sort of rubs me the wrong way. Not that he's a bad writer, I just not sure that I like his work. #books
@Bill-Lee: I met him when I was 13 (I won a fiction contest with a story named after a Lita Ford song!) and after that I kept trying to read him. I remember picking up one of his books specifically because there was a mermaid on the cover and struggling through about 30 pages with no mermaids and going back to Anne Rice in defeat. #books
@Bill-Lee: Heinlein actually wrote a lot of YA fiction and 'Family' sci/fi in his early years, giving that up int the 60's for more adult fiction.
I think kids who like sci fi tend to read up. That is, get straight into the meatier adult stuff, rather than the YA which they see as juvenile. Its not always true, as you mention a prime example of Enders Game, which I do look at as a YA novel, no matter its themes. It is exactly what YA sci fi should be! Decent and didactic! #books
@Jeremy Tapsell: You know, with a couple of exceptions, I totally skipped Heinlein's juvenile fiction. I remember reading have Space Suit Will Travel around the time I read Starship Troopers. ST was originally submitted as a juvenile novel but rejected by the publishers, so I guess, technically I've read two of his juvenile books. #books
There's an article in the Culture & Books section of the current American Prospect on the popularity of Twilight. The author's overall argument was that the "girliness" (her term) that's made Twilight a success has caused the series to be mocked by so-called hardcore sci-fi/fantasy geeks. She argues that Edward is so popular because he is not sexually threatening to the average teenage girl. This dynamic in turn holds no interest for the teenage boy and therefore results in the series being marginalized.
It's an interesting read and I recommend it for those that get AP. Unfortunately I think you have to be a subscriber to access the online version of the article. #books
@EdificeComplex: I don't think Twilight is exactly marginalized. It pretty much dominates the teen section at the store where I work. What is true, however, is that there is very little in the YA section for boys. Teen boys seem to read either a) novelizations of video and role playing games b) comic books c) adult science fiction and fantasy and d) sadly, nothing at all, with d being the largest group.
I also read James Bond at the time because it was titillating, although now I can see that they are not the best for a young man whose images of women are being formed. I'm never sure what to recommend to teen boys. #books
Ok so do they explain why all the heroines are beautiful girls who spend all their time moaning about how hard everything is while all the hot guys through them selves at the girl?
"Oh woe is me. I am a beautiful young girl with a multitude of options for my future and all the hot boys want me. Life is just so hard. Excuse me while I pout is such a way that all the boys will come running."
I have read several of these popular new YA books and none of them deal with war, self-harm, gender, existentialism and what little sex and drugs they deal with are so absurd at best that they make you want to burn the book. #books
@Purple Dave: The reason that Twilight's vampires are so "non-threatening" is that Stephenie Meyer is writing from her Mormon upbringing - "no wild thing without the wedding ring" - which means her guys are self-restrained and the girls are virtuous. Lame but true. #books
One theory? They're easier to read. I don't' mean that as a slight on their quality, but more as a comment on the attention span and reading ability of modern readers. And before you yell at me keep in mind I've burned through both Hunger Games books while Stephenson's Quicksilver looks at me longingly wondering when I'll get tear through it.
Also... YA novels are easier to hold while "taking a meeting" than say a 1k+ page tome.
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: Also, they have all of the action with much less of the actual responsibility. Fewer old flames, credit problems or mortgages. #books
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: I'm just finishing up Stephenson's The System of the World. If it helps you over the mental hurdle and gets you into this terrific series remember that each of these huge books is made up of smaller books, so by the time you have finished Quicksilver you'll already have burned through the first three books of The Baroque Cycle. #books
@robinrising: Yeah I know I can do it, but I was just having an issue switching gears to the past after falling in love with Cryptonomicon. I liked my Root fighting Japs and Nazis and now he's giving Ben Franklin a lift?
But thanks for the motivation! I can do it! #books
@Garrison Dean: R.O.A.C.H.: I do agree with you there but that's also the same with a number of high best selling adult writers.
Dan Brown isn't exactly the most dense writer in the world nor is James Patterson and all his "co-writers." I can't imagine anyone with a HS level education having difficulty getting through any of those. #books
I think it's a little unfair to blame people trained in the humanities for all this negativity. There is widespread disappointment with the sciences since the Golden Age of SF, because "Science" as an institution has really failed to deliver most of the things that the Golden Age promised us.
I include things like easy space travel and AI in there, but mainly I'm talking about solving our social problems. We have technology now that was unimaginable even a hundred years ago, but for all of this the world has become a more dangerous place, and the gap between rich and poor is at least as wide as it was then.
It's hard to maintain a sense of wonder in the face of all of that. Unfortunately, a sense of wonder is a luxury that most people on this Earth can no longer afford.
Most people used to get their sense of wonder from connecting with nature. That's hard to do living in a city, tangled up in the rat race and numbing your brain with reruns of "reality" TV shows; a tiny cog in a social machine that rewards greed and punishes honesty.
Well, it's easy to see why many people are rather disillusioned with science and progress. Science is a wonderful and even necessary thing, but it's not sufficient for a balanced life. Wisdom is required too.
Edited by Anekanta - killed by a cacodemon at 09/23/09 11:29 AM
Anekanta - killed by a cacodemon was starred
Anekanta - killed by a cacodemon was unstarred
@Anekanta: Is what you said really the fault of science itself though? We have the technological capacity to feed everyone on the planet. Yet hundreds of millions of people (if not billions) go hungry every day. So science hasn't failed; its the political and economic policies that have failed to deliver that science. Which goes back to what you said about a social system that rewards greed and punishes honesty and fairness.
@The Architect of Tartaros: Yes--absolutely. I don't think I was blaming science itself though--at least, I didn't mean to. What I meant was that science has given us many benefits, but it hasn't given us maturity. We need something else for that. Science is not sufficient by itself.
Edit: I guess I did blame science directly in my opening paragraph--sorry--just meant to say that it hasn't lived up to all its hype.
Edited by Anekanta - killed by a cacodemon at 09/23/09 12:27 PM
Anekanta - killed by a cacodemon was starred
Anekanta - killed by a cacodemon was unstarred
@Anekanta: I see, I misunderstood your original post. I agree, science itself has not brought with it the maturity level necessary to use said science. I mean, thermonuclear weapons and all.
@The Architect of Tartaros: Indeed, I find myself asking if it's possible to use our toys in more mature ways, or if the nature of the tool (or weapon) implies the mindset to use it. We've got to stop making guns and bombs and start making space habitats and urban farms and water purification plants.
Particularly in science fiction juveniles? I'm not so sure about that. Most of the adult novels I can recall reading that were written in the past 20yrs. have humanity as outnumbered, outgunned, and outmatched by any alien or technology they encounter. And I don't think this is the result of the authors being trained in the humanities so much as it is the maturation of writers and readers since the Golden Age. Just like our sitcoms aren't The Andy Griffith Show or I Love Lucy, our science fiction isn't Starman Jones.
Is it also possible that publishers might be hoping to capitalize on teen angst by picking up darker, edgier YA science fiction?
This person may have been giving too much credit to those who have degrees in the humanities. The shallow reason the authors may represent science negatively is that they are intimidated by science and are recalling their frustration with math and science--subjects they may have felt were pointless. Professor Sturgis may have been being charitable as she likely has friends and colleagues she has to work with every day and doesn't want to cause friction.
There may be some animosity between the fields of the arts and sciences. From my personal experience, some science professors will interject snide things about English majors in the middle of lectures, such as, "If this is too hard for you, go get an English degree."
Science has grown exponentially, to a point where some areas have hit a temporary stalemate. Consider that the human race has made more breakthroughs in technology and science in the last 5, 10 years than in the last 5,000. Sci Fi writers of the past could imagine ahead a world of technology as a dawning of the greatness of man far easier than we can now, for that very reason. They weren't advancing as much as we are today, when we measure tech progress in days and weeks, not months or years. This, I believe, is the main root of this supposed pessimistic shift of sci fi today.
As an avid reader of YA Sci Fi, and an aspiring YA writer myself, I don't see a presence of negativity in the new teen protagonists, I see them overcome the loss of technology, the determination to rebuild their world. Just as with Asimov, negativity from outside is what spurs the characters on. Some of the many YA Sci Fi books I've read are post-Apocalyptic, but its the survival beyond that thats heartening. Science without humanity is deadly, as we've seen in history, and this is what authors are pointing at, whether by will or no.
And frankly, this overall generalization is angering. Examples of this pessimism please?
Books, as in science, must evolve with the times, and the wonder that the good Professor says is lacking is mainly due to the lack of newness of the new technology. Its expected now, rather than hoped for. Now is the time to look inward to ourselves. Shouldn't we advances as a world society before we advance on the universe? Its the sign of the ages, and thats what writers write about.
Anyone remembers that show? :)
Not sure, if this fits here :P
Anyways, it's not the fault of technology but of greed, power struggle, misuse etc.
Maybe this generation isn't anymore surprised by all the high-tech stuff because new developments appear faster? (thought, I'm not a Singularity-believer)
Or it's just that shallow stuff, which teenagers are absorbing through TV, stupid movies, pseudo punk bands (e.g. Tokio Hotel)?
Or is it just simple disappointment because we don't have flying cars and stuff?
Also, hasn't this kind of sci-fi been around us since the 60's? Hal 2000 was the epitome of the "evil computer" and really all these YA oppression sci-fi books are just pulling from Logan's Run.
There was a fun looking one that came in the other day at work that looked neat. Name's escaping me, but it was YA. The plot was pretty much Disturbing Behavior but it sounded pretty neat.
I actually notice more "oppression" style sci-fi for teens where the parents or society is keeping the young people down.
11/05/09
I'm in favor of books where girls do magic and have powers. I will read anything where girls do magic or have powers.
Also, seriously, why all the hate on YA? There are so many great classic works of literature that are YA (Robert Cormier and Judy Blume come straight to mind as well as Robin McKinley's stuff).
It's historical fiction not sci-fi/fant but I would also heartily recommend the last National Book Award Winner "What I Saw and Why I Lied" by Blundell (who's- fun fact- only other titles she's written were Star Wars books targeted for 9 year olds). It's flipping amazing.
Another great war/historical one is Peet's "Tamar" which is a fantastic WW2 intrigue/spy novel. There's loads more but I'm prattling on...
I'm just saying it's not all Twilight and Gossip Girl people.
11/05/09
My daughter was reading a lot of YA but then she read some Margaret Atwood books and now she finds that much of the YA doesn't satisfy her anymore. I have begun to lend her my books that I think that she will enjoy and hopefully save myself a few dollars as well. #books
11/05/09
So basically, all of you calling YA trash need to actually read some of the recent YA lit. #books
11/05/09
11/05/09
(I really hope he writes something new soon) #books
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
The main problem I have, however, with most YA fiction is that it is written in a way that treats its audience like idoiots. Young people are not stupid. They may lack worldly experience, but they still love reading things that challenge the mind.
In that sense, I find that literature aimed at that audience is much better when written by people who also write adult works. For example, Heinlan, Andre Norton, Orson Scott Card, Robert Jordan, Neil Gaiman (I know, I know this is looking a little too fantasy), Edith Nesbitt, C.S. Lewis, etcetera!
When the author is an adult who only writes fiction for YA then we get filtered, usually publisher dictated, stories that are not didatic enough and they end up straying into the trashier, non challenging end of the spectrum. ESPECIALLY when it comes to sci fi. I am not refering to all published YA fiction here, but there seems to be a trend.
YA sci fi readers, like myself when I was younger, will tend to go straight to the main stuff, because it doesn't pander to teenage cliches which I would posit most YA readers who like sci fi would find uniteresting and turn them off the story.
So if we have more Adult Sci Fi writers writing for teenagers, then perhaps we might have more good YA sci fi, and less YA sci fi hate. #books
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
I think kids who like sci fi tend to read up. That is, get straight into the meatier adult stuff, rather than the YA which they see as juvenile. Its not always true, as you mention a prime example of Enders Game, which I do look at as a YA novel, no matter its themes. It is exactly what YA sci fi should be! Decent and didactic! #books
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
It's an interesting read and I recommend it for those that get AP. Unfortunately I think you have to be a subscriber to access the online version of the article. #books
11/05/09
I also read James Bond at the time because it was titillating, although now I can see that they are not the best for a young man whose images of women are being formed. I'm never sure what to recommend to teen boys. #books
11/05/09
"Oh woe is me. I am a beautiful young girl with a multitude of options for my future and all the hot boys want me. Life is just so hard. Excuse me while I pout is such a way that all the boys will come running."
I have read several of these popular new YA books and none of them deal with war, self-harm, gender, existentialism and what little sex and drugs they deal with are so absurd at best that they make you want to burn the book. #books
11/05/09
There are many exceptions to my disguised, which is aimed a books like Daniel X and Twilight. #books
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/06/09
So...lamepires it is? #books
11/05/09
Also... YA novels are easier to hold while "taking a meeting" than say a 1k+ page tome.
11/05/09
11/05/09
11/05/09
But thanks for the motivation! I can do it! #books
11/05/09
All quite easy to read as well.
If I can recommend one YA sci/fi series - The Deepwater Trilogy by Ken Catran.
[en.wikipedia.org] #books
11/05/09
Dan Brown isn't exactly the most dense writer in the world nor is James Patterson and all his "co-writers." I can't imagine anyone with a HS level education having difficulty getting through any of those. #books
09/23/09
I think it's a little unfair to blame people trained in the humanities for all this negativity. There is widespread disappointment with the sciences since the Golden Age of SF, because "Science" as an institution has really failed to deliver most of the things that the Golden Age promised us.
I include things like easy space travel and AI in there, but mainly I'm talking about solving our social problems. We have technology now that was unimaginable even a hundred years ago, but for all of this the world has become a more dangerous place, and the gap between rich and poor is at least as wide as it was then.
It's hard to maintain a sense of wonder in the face of all of that. Unfortunately, a sense of wonder is a luxury that most people on this Earth can no longer afford.
Most people used to get their sense of wonder from connecting with nature. That's hard to do living in a city, tangled up in the rat race and numbing your brain with reruns of "reality" TV shows; a tiny cog in a social machine that rewards greed and punishes honesty.
Well, it's easy to see why many people are rather disillusioned with science and progress. Science is a wonderful and even necessary thing, but it's not sufficient for a balanced life. Wisdom is required too.
09/23/09
09/23/09
Edit: I guess I did blame science directly in my opening paragraph--sorry--just meant to say that it hasn't lived up to all its hype.
09/23/09
09/23/09
09/23/09
Is it also possible that publishers might be hoping to capitalize on teen angst by picking up darker, edgier YA science fiction?
09/23/09
There may be some animosity between the fields of the arts and sciences. From my personal experience, some science professors will interject snide things about English majors in the middle of lectures, such as, "If this is too hard for you, go get an English degree."
09/23/09
As an avid reader of YA Sci Fi, and an aspiring YA writer myself, I don't see a presence of negativity in the new teen protagonists, I see them overcome the loss of technology, the determination to rebuild their world. Just as with Asimov, negativity from outside is what spurs the characters on. Some of the many YA Sci Fi books I've read are post-Apocalyptic, but its the survival beyond that thats heartening. Science without humanity is deadly, as we've seen in history, and this is what authors are pointing at, whether by will or no.
And frankly, this overall generalization is angering. Examples of this pessimism please?
Books, as in science, must evolve with the times, and the wonder that the good Professor says is lacking is mainly due to the lack of newness of the new technology. Its expected now, rather than hoped for. Now is the time to look inward to ourselves. Shouldn't we advances as a world society before we advance on the universe? Its the sign of the ages, and thats what writers write about.
09/23/09
Not sure, if this fits here :P
Anyways, it's not the fault of technology but of greed, power struggle, misuse etc.
Maybe this generation isn't anymore surprised by all the high-tech stuff because new developments appear faster? (thought, I'm not a Singularity-believer)
Or it's just that shallow stuff, which teenagers are absorbing through TV, stupid movies, pseudo punk bands (e.g. Tokio Hotel)?
Or is it just simple disappointment because we don't have flying cars and stuff?
09/23/09
There was a fun looking one that came in the other day at work that looked neat. Name's escaping me, but it was YA. The plot was pretty much Disturbing Behavior but it sounded pretty neat.
I actually notice more "oppression" style sci-fi for teens where the parents or society is keeping the young people down.