Eh. The first movie had a certain charm; the second one completely lacks that small magic. I was actually rather bored sitting through it. The acting was stilted, the cinematography was unimaginative, and the pacing was comatose.
I still like the books. They're cute. Nice to read when you feel like crap and don't want to think much. The movies? not so much.
I didn't read Twilight, I saw the first movie and that's it. It's getting harder and harder for me to care that much. Taking out the issues with Edward's controlling behavior and literal stalking, if other people want to have that kind of relationship dynamic, that's up to them. I don't, but I really don't care what other people want as long as they're not hurting each other and don't expect me to want the same.
But it's not about whether Bella is "passive" or not. In fact, the paradigm where a woman is allowed agency only so far as to be put down because of it can be a lot more problematic than her not having it at all. Bella doesn't need to be an ingenue to play into classic tropes about the need for women's sexuality to be controlled by men. Bella as the sexual aggressor and instigator can, in fact, play right into that.
But that's about as far as I'm going to go with it because... well, I don't think anyone's pretending Twilight is some kind of feminist manifesto except maybe Stephanie Meyer, and given what you can see flipping through television, it can see pretty tame in terms of any its problematic aspects.
Just to reiterate an earlier point: Twilight is about an 18 year old girl in love with a vain and emotionally abusive man something like 90 years her senior. Also, he's a vampire who's still in high school for some reason. No one should read these books let alone impressionable teenagers.
I'm no expert (being a man and having never read nor seen anything Twilight), but it seems like Bella just isn't a good role model for women (of any age) in any respect. When Twilight does so well, it makes me wonder, is this all women really want? In some ways, it seems to setting the feminist movement back a bit, or am I off base?
@TemporalSword: I am SO tempted, as much as I loathe to say it, read the Twilight books. Just to see what the hell is going on in the minds of our youth. I really don't want to do it, but damn my soul... I think I'll probably do it.
@TemporalSword: i don't think there's anything wrong with wanting marriage and a family, but i don't think it's a great idea to give girls the idea that those things are the priority in life.
@cmg: What better priorities could you have? Your job? Yourself? We begin and end with family. Why not applaud those who make the choice to put that first?
@Friedhamster: i understand that temptation. masses of my coworkers were reading them and i almost caved. then i remembered there were about a million other books i'd rather read.
@anomaly_kid: as is said, nothing wrong with it, but i hate that some people think that life is less fulfilling if you're not married and procreating. family is what you make it and for some people that means friends and not necessarily a spouse and children.
@anomaly_kid: Healthy and stable relationships, family, and children are laudable things. But I think the main point is not "family and children", the main point is becoming a person who has wants, needs, and interests other than just finding your studly undead stalkerish boyfriend and being with him forever.
Bella's relationships with others are incredibly unhealthy; without someone (preferably male) to define who she is, she has nothing. She has no friends when Edward or Jacob are around, because they're her world. The banal world of friendship is a distant second to this idealized fiction of soulmates. Basing your world around one, very fallible person (even if he is a supernatural being) isn't the most well-adjusted attitude towards life. She doesn't want anything... unless it's her man. Family doesn't really define what Bella is looking for. She abandons her family without a qualm in order to essentially succumb to a death wish and stay young and pretty forever.
@anomaly_kid: It's not that Bella puts wanting a family first. The problem is that the man she's attracted to is vain, emotionally distant, and a stalker.
@TemporalSword: Having just seen the New Moon movie yesterday, I was struck by a scene in the film towards the beginning where the characters are watching Romeo and Juliet in class. (I can't remember if this scene was in the book or not.)
It's obvious that in both R&J and Twilight, the couples suffer from an extremely obsessive kind of love. Obsessive love is prevalent in literature of all kinds. Wuthering Heights is another example that comes to mind.
Clearly, Twilight is not in the same league as these famous works of literature. I just wanted to point out that this type of relationship is nothing new. Girls have been obsessed with these stories for generations!
@anomaly_kid: We may begin with family but we don't end with it. And just because we begin with it doesn't make it all that great. There is more to life then getting hitched and knocked up. There is research and learning and exploring the world around us. Adding to the knowledge and understanding of the world. Meeting new people and creating connections. The problem with every one putting marriage and family first is that we end up with a bunch of inexperienced kids running out and getting married and having babies before they are ready. And with out people who put other things, like careers, first; we would not have some of the greatest doctors and scientists that have existed.
Evil Tortie's Mom: R.O.A.C.H. promoted this comment
brentbent: C.O.C.K.R.O.A.C.H. )for all the queer super villians out there( was starred
brentbent: C.O.C.K.R.O.A.C.H. )for all the queer super villians out there( was unstarred
@TemporalSword: I don't think it's setting anything back, or at least it's not setting it back before proto-feminism, when feminists were actually after realistic and achievable goals. I'm probably going to make enemies by saying this, but the anti-male pseudo-fascism that often passes for feminism these days is a little scary.
Like it or not, some things are just inherent to our gender--they are in our genes. Now, that doesn't mean I believe women should be confined to the kitchen and men are destined to lead or any such crap like that. What I mean is, I think Twilight acknowledges something basic and honest about human nature, or at least female nature (the males are much less realistic though)--females form strong attachments to the males they become attracted to and are more easily devastated when relationships are severed. It's just the way it is. There is a sound evolutionary reason for this, having to do with holding onto men to help raise and protect the offspring. Males, however, are genetically prone to spreading their seed far and wide.
Of course, recognizing this is true doesn't mean we must idealize it--that would be playing into the naturalistic fallacy. But by the same token we should recognize the limitations of our respective genders and not try to whitewash them.
@TemporalSword: By the way, the idea that we are somehow handicapped in our opinions of issues affecting females because we're male is as ridiculous as the idea spouted by some parents that unless you have kids you just don't understand. Can you say genetic fallacy? I knew you could. ;-)
@Starwatcher: Is Bella from Venus and does that mean Edward is coming from Mars?
As a woman AND a feminist, I actually agree with you. I vouch for the equality in rights and duty for both halves of the human population. Period.
I had a History teacher at University who was the scariest anti-male pseudo-fascist ultra-feminist ever. Amongst other bold and barmy assertions, she liked to repeat that the "supposed" differences between the male and female skeletons were all made-up, the result of some patriarchal state conspiracy.
Twilight certainly possesses the foundations of a great story, as a metaphor for genre exploration... Where it fails (I'm not even talking of the crappy style and tacky writing) is into providing with an actually credible heroine who would represent women at her age properly: struggling with their instincts and their curiosity and their fear, but eventually taking real choices in life, whatever those choices might be.
Submission or emancipation? That's not even important, because it would be part of the plot. What matters is that Meyer seems incapable to see further than the (mostly dubious) limitations of her heroine's gender.
This obvious message underlying Meyer's series, that not only doesn't a woman need to, but MUST not stand for herself, is to me the most shocking and ridiculous leap backwards into the Victorian fallacies that we could imagine.
It's a pure negation of all things feminist, because it simply doesn't take in account female nature, which might make a woman prone to wish for a sedentary, stable life with a single partner, but not by any means become a doormat.
PS: most women I know are actually allergic to long-term engagement, while men dream of a wife, kids & the white picket-fence. Is this Evolution, I wonder?
@TemporalSword: Sir, you have petted one of my peeves - quite unintentionally, I know. The following rant is not directed at you, but at a more general audience.
I am so, so tired of the feminist role model tripe. It's like somewhere along the way, women got this Role Model Index that we hold every other woman up to. If she's somewhere south of strong, independent sainthood, she's declared a bad role model and we all heap scorn upon her. We apply this RMI to females of all walks - celebrities, singers, politicians, working mothers, housewives, even our fictional women. It's like the scarlet letter of the 21st century. Not every female (whether, real or imagined) is going to be the perfect 2009 Feminist Role Model - but we'll slag any uppity bitch that dares to be less, since we're all perfect ourselves. Nobody tears a woman down like another woman.
I think there is room for stories about insecure girls like Bella because there are a lot of those out there. Not every story has to end, "... and then she left home, went to college, worked at NASA and was the first woman to reach Alpha Centauri!" It's okay for some stories to end with the heroine happy with a husband and her baby in a modest home. I see a lot of talk about how it's 'setting us back.' But that seems to imply that every woman who's happy with her husband and her baby in her modest home is an oppressed victim who should be demanding more.
Okay, I think I hit all the high points of my rant. Sorry about that. It's just been on my mind.
@Eridani: Not every story has to end, "... and then she left home, went to college, worked at NASA and was the first woman to reach Alpha Centauri!"
I agree with your basic point, which is that women in stories should be represented as real people, with all the flaws and strengths that come along with that. But it wouldn't hurt to have just a few stories with the plot you mention above. I've never read a story that ended that way, but clearly you have. Any recommendations for stories that have heroines who work at NASA and go to Alpha Centauri?
@Bill-Lee: And emotionally abusive, don't forget that. Great role model for a relationship, don't you think? If we are training young girls to be attracted to men who will control every aspect of that girl's life for her own good, because he is so very much wiser than she is, then we might as well get rid of suffrage and such while we're at it.
@Heriloke: Just in reference to your PS--that has also been my experience. A lot of women are terrified of commitment, and a lot of men dream of a quiet life with the right woman.
I guess that says that quite a lot of the differences between men and women (especially the kind that comedians and entertainers tend to base their material on) are more a matter of socialization than something we are born with.
@Eridani: You make a good point--fictional characters shouldn't necessarily be forced to fit some ideal, or they lose their real power.
But it is Young Adult fiction, specifically aimed at impressionable girls. If I had a daughter, I'd certainly want to talk with her about the themes in these stories if she were reading them.
Specifically, the themes of obsessive love, sex associated with death or undeath, and attaining a state of static perfection (in death).
Those are unhealthy but attractive ideas to an teenage mind--I've gone through them myself, and while I suppose every teenager does, I also would want to help my children to have a healthier outlook on life.
@cmg: As biological beings, we exist solely to pass on our genes. You know, have kids.
To consider ourselves above biology is arrogant.
But that's humans for you.
@SNForrester: But in Wuthering Heights Bronte makes a huge point that Heathcliff is an ass. The character of Isabelle falls hook, line, and stinker for the ol' "he's not bad, just misunderstood" finding him to be a romantic hero and not the vengeful jerk he really is.
She gets brutally destroyed because of it. I always wondered how many people who find that book "romantic" forgot completely about that character.
@TemporalSword: This is kind of for everyone not just you TemporalSword.
Can we give teen girls a little more credit here? I ate up VC Andrews as a young teen. Am I now (or have I ever been) yearning for some nice incest or horrifying rape? Good god no. The fiction I read in that time of my life was FULL of crappy role models, stalker boyfriends, obsessive love, and other such nonsenses that I in no way, shape, or form want in real life.
I also involved into a fairly confident, self-proclaimed feminist.
What we read CAN influence us, that's for sure, but sometimes we read things for fantasy, or morbid curiosity.
The problem, IMHO, is not that girls want these things but rather the Say Anything syndrome. I worry that because girls eat these stories up young boys will think, "well, that's what they want, right?" And go and reenact some of this crap not connecting that jut because it works in books/movies doesn't mean it does in real life.
@cmg: If the book was about that, maybe it'd be worth something. By the third book, you've got a high-school aged werewolf falling in love with a mary sue vampire baby that clawed her way out of Bella's womb and can talk by the time she's a month old or something.
@SNForrester: Meyer once claimed in an interview something about being a better writer than Shakespeare or Bronte because she understood "True Love."
Apparently, Bella loves Wuthering Heights, again, because of the "true love" in the book.
What does this mean? Meyer doesn't fucking understand literature, especially when it comes to books that were obviously about the fact that idealized romances don't exist.
@Heriloke: I got the impression that the book was just about wish fulfillment and getting what everyone wants want: being attractive forever and having a family that loves you.
I don't think the message is that you shouldn't stand up for yourself. Stephanie Meyer's really hung up on this idea of "true love," and I think that's what all of Bella's actions stem from.
Well, the actions that aren't guided by stupidity, anyway.
@Sunshineyness: Now, the question I want to ask you is did you idealize the characters of VC Andrews into The Perfect Man? It certainly sounds like you didn't. Many of these folks do idolize the obsessive stalker and I'm more worried that one of them will end up in a mess because of one of those obsessive stalkers than I am of a new generation of obsessive stalkers sprouting from the ideas in these books. As a teenager male I can safely say that most of us who weren't already displaying obsessive tendencies are damn sure if we tried any of that we'd get arrested, if her father didn't shoot us first.
@ggodo: I live in a country when citizens, even fathers, are not allowed to have guns at home. And my family mustn't be fulfilling every Meyer-approved standards, because my father would be more the type who tries to open discussion. Unlike my mother, who could probably tear someone open with one glare. That is why I chose not to bring anyone at home and rather sort my relationships out on my own, dealing with the stalkers myself.
But I like to dream that someplace else, 100-something, obsessive, emoweirded sickos get arrested, possibly by firearm, whenever they get caught sneaking on poor girls' rooms at night. A punch in the face will do for daytime sneakery.
Next time I get bugged by a dumb drooling representative of the mankind, I shall make him a lecture on the Twilight syndrom.
@DocSeuss: OMG! I think you're on to something... Twilight's Bella was reading Wuthering Heights before she met Edward so her lack of self esteem should be blamed squarely on Emily Bronte. This is proof that girls blindly follow whatever fictional role models are in right front of them.
BTW in no way shape or form do I think Meyer is a great writer. She's average at best and mostly got lucky by creating something that became such a phenomenon.
@Sunshineyness: Nobody who reads Wuthering Heights really wants that life. It's just a story about a really weird relationship between Heathcliff and Catherine.
Similarly, Twilight is about a girl and the vampire who loves her because she smells so delicious. It's just a different kind of weird relationship.
@ ggodo, the man: That's a good point. I read those for the morbid curiosity factor I think. (I've read many articles about why her books are so popular with a young teenage crowd and most say that). My idealized loves at that age were Buffy and Angel, which had it's components of obsessive stalker stuff, true, but Buffy managed to get out of it and be her own person without Angel. I had a friend who read all the Twilight books hoping that would be the ending and she was really mad that it wasn't. She had been really pulling for the point of the story to be about untangling yourself from those kind of relationships and emerging as your own person and that, probably, would have made the story better.
@Heriloke: I'm with you. I've always preferred romances where the couple bicker a lot or loathe each other and then fall in love.
My favorite romantic comedy when I was 16 was 10 Things I Hate About You and I watched Empire Strikes Back for the Han/Leia love affair more than any of the other SW pics for it. Raiders of the Lost Ark was another favorite for similar Marian/Indy relationship.
@SNForrester: Don't blame Bronte because Myers/"Bella" only read the Cliff Notes version of Wuthering Heights.
Apologies. That book is one of my favorites and it really guts me that Myers seems to be pushing that the book is some big romance when it is the exact opposite. Pity the poor English teachers who are slamming their heads against their desks with the piles of gooey essays on "true love" they are forced to read now because of it.
Hell, we got in to the store Twilight-ish covers of that book with the note "Read Bella and Edward's favorite book!" stamped on the cover with new copy on the back making it seem like a sappy romance novel and it pissed the shit out of me.
@anomaly_kid: what's wrong it that most of the time family first translates to family first, last & always OVER yourself - doubly so if you are female - that irks me. that is not healthy for anyone.
whatever happened to balance? the idea that to each event there is a season?
@Heriloke: serial monogamy with a little adultery on the side ~ seems to be the latest take on human evolution/good for the genes idea so perhaps it is.
@the_wiggle: Actually, we, in all our modern societies, are not very "balanced" people. Everything we want, we must obtain here and now.
Always acting this way, I don't think you get to grow up properly. It's simply childish.
Of course it's good have a family, if that is what you want. But perhaps we should think about growing up before we have kids. And becoming an adult implies you have lived a little, and got enough experience of live to provide future citizens of the world with at least some knowledge and good sense.
Now, all societies that consider individuals as only destined for marriage and procreation do tend to infantilize women - so they cannot teach their daughters, and their sons as well, to become respectful, egalitarian, wise people.
Wouldn't this "balance" require that we get to know ourselves, before we let obscurantist ideas of romance cloud our better judgement into believing that passion is enough to build a life upon?
@Sunshineyness: I was a pretty firm support of Xander's position on Angel. "At the end of the day, I think you're pretty much a vampire." Even though I eventually came to enjoy Angel's show better than Buffy, Angel is Chaotic Evil, and always will be.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is the difference between YA science fiction and "regular" science fiction? I'm a 40 year old guy. When I was a teen, I was reading regular science fiction because I wanted to read the same books that my father was reading. What defines YA science fiction? Are the main characters teenagers? Is the sexual content toned down?
@UndineElephnot: Honestly, a novel only what a publisher decides it is. YA is a pretty new term which is why you often see old classic sci-fi novels catagorized in "regular" sections and "teen" sections. Take Ender's Game or Have Space Suit Will Travel, for example.
Not all stories involving teenagers are necessarily YA and not all stories that only involve adults is "regular" fiction, but there are certain standards. It's mostly defined as fiction that has an intended audience of teenagers. Often, the sexual themes can be toned down or on par with more adult titles. The sky is really the limit on YA.
@Rasselas: While the latter would be my first cynical reaction, when it comes to the YA industry I think that young people are more excited than ever to read. The demand in that market is huge because of HP and Twilight, but that leads to kids actually branching out and reading things that aren't endorsed by MTV. It's sad that those two series were stepping stones, but I'd rather have a kid read something than nothing at all.
@Rasselas: A lot of the most popular stuff isn't fantasy at all, but *very* science fictional. And as I've detailed in several posts in the past, there's a *TON* of post-apocalyptic and dystopian future YA, where only a couple of young people realize how messed up everything is.
Way to go ladies, you and your dad are Winners in more ways than one! I hope other kids will be inspired and keep working hard to overcoming their dyslexia.
11/26/09
I still like the books. They're cute. Nice to read when you feel like crap and don't want to think much. The movies? not so much.
11/25/09
But it's not about whether Bella is "passive" or not. In fact, the paradigm where a woman is allowed agency only so far as to be put down because of it can be a lot more problematic than her not having it at all. Bella doesn't need to be an ingenue to play into classic tropes about the need for women's sexuality to be controlled by men. Bella as the sexual aggressor and instigator can, in fact, play right into that.
But that's about as far as I'm going to go with it because... well, I don't think anyone's pretending Twilight is some kind of feminist manifesto except maybe Stephanie Meyer, and given what you can see flipping through television, it can see pretty tame in terms of any its problematic aspects.
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
#calendar
11/25/09
Bella's relationships with others are incredibly unhealthy; without someone (preferably male) to define who she is, she has nothing. She has no friends when Edward or Jacob are around, because they're her world. The banal world of friendship is a distant second to this idealized fiction of soulmates. Basing your world around one, very fallible person (even if he is a supernatural being) isn't the most well-adjusted attitude towards life. She doesn't want anything... unless it's her man. Family doesn't really define what Bella is looking for. She abandons her family without a qualm in order to essentially succumb to a death wish and stay young and pretty forever.
11/25/09
11/25/09
It's obvious that in both R&J and Twilight, the couples suffer from an extremely obsessive kind of love. Obsessive love is prevalent in literature of all kinds. Wuthering Heights is another example that comes to mind.
Clearly, Twilight is not in the same league as these famous works of literature. I just wanted to point out that this type of relationship is nothing new. Girls have been obsessed with these stories for generations!
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
Like it or not, some things are just inherent to our gender--they are in our genes. Now, that doesn't mean I believe women should be confined to the kitchen and men are destined to lead or any such crap like that. What I mean is, I think Twilight acknowledges something basic and honest about human nature, or at least female nature (the males are much less realistic though)--females form strong attachments to the males they become attracted to and are more easily devastated when relationships are severed. It's just the way it is. There is a sound evolutionary reason for this, having to do with holding onto men to help raise and protect the offspring. Males, however, are genetically prone to spreading their seed far and wide.
Of course, recognizing this is true doesn't mean we must idealize it--that would be playing into the naturalistic fallacy. But by the same token we should recognize the limitations of our respective genders and not try to whitewash them.
11/25/09
11/25/09
As a woman AND a feminist, I actually agree with you. I vouch for the equality in rights and duty for both halves of the human population. Period.
I had a History teacher at University who was the scariest anti-male pseudo-fascist ultra-feminist ever. Amongst other bold and barmy assertions, she liked to repeat that the "supposed" differences between the male and female skeletons were all made-up, the result of some patriarchal state conspiracy.
Twilight certainly possesses the foundations of a great story, as a metaphor for genre exploration... Where it fails (I'm not even talking of the crappy style and tacky writing) is into providing with an actually credible heroine who would represent women at her age properly: struggling with their instincts and their curiosity and their fear, but eventually taking real choices in life, whatever those choices might be.
Submission or emancipation? That's not even important, because it would be part of the plot. What matters is that Meyer seems incapable to see further than the (mostly dubious) limitations of her heroine's gender.
This obvious message underlying Meyer's series, that not only doesn't a woman need to, but MUST not stand for herself, is to me the most shocking and ridiculous leap backwards into the Victorian fallacies that we could imagine.
It's a pure negation of all things feminist, because it simply doesn't take in account female nature, which might make a woman prone to wish for a sedentary, stable life with a single partner, but not by any means become a doormat.
PS: most women I know are actually allergic to long-term engagement, while men dream of a wife, kids & the white picket-fence. Is this Evolution, I wonder?
11/25/09
I am so, so tired of the feminist role model tripe. It's like somewhere along the way, women got this Role Model Index that we hold every other woman up to. If she's somewhere south of strong, independent sainthood, she's declared a bad role model and we all heap scorn upon her. We apply this RMI to females of all walks - celebrities, singers, politicians, working mothers, housewives, even our fictional women. It's like the scarlet letter of the 21st century. Not every female (whether, real or imagined) is going to be the perfect 2009 Feminist Role Model - but we'll slag any uppity bitch that dares to be less, since we're all perfect ourselves. Nobody tears a woman down like another woman.
I think there is room for stories about insecure girls like Bella because there are a lot of those out there. Not every story has to end, "... and then she left home, went to college, worked at NASA and was the first woman to reach Alpha Centauri!" It's okay for some stories to end with the heroine happy with a husband and her baby in a modest home. I see a lot of talk about how it's 'setting us back.' But that seems to imply that every woman who's happy with her husband and her baby in her modest home is an oppressed victim who should be demanding more.
Okay, I think I hit all the high points of my rant. Sorry about that. It's just been on my mind.
11/25/09
I agree with your basic point, which is that women in stories should be represented as real people, with all the flaws and strengths that come along with that. But it wouldn't hurt to have just a few stories with the plot you mention above. I've never read a story that ended that way, but clearly you have. Any recommendations for stories that have heroines who work at NASA and go to Alpha Centauri?
11/25/09
11/25/09
11/25/09
I guess that says that quite a lot of the differences between men and women (especially the kind that comedians and entertainers tend to base their material on) are more a matter of socialization than something we are born with.
11/25/09
But it is Young Adult fiction, specifically aimed at impressionable girls. If I had a daughter, I'd certainly want to talk with her about the themes in these stories if she were reading them.
Specifically, the themes of obsessive love, sex associated with death or undeath, and attaining a state of static perfection (in death).
Those are unhealthy but attractive ideas to an teenage mind--I've gone through them myself, and while I suppose every teenager does, I also would want to help my children to have a healthier outlook on life.
11/25/09
To consider ourselves above biology is arrogant.
But that's humans for you.
11/25/09
She gets brutally destroyed because of it. I always wondered how many people who find that book "romantic" forgot completely about that character.
11/25/09
Can we give teen girls a little more credit here? I ate up VC Andrews as a young teen. Am I now (or have I ever been) yearning for some nice incest or horrifying rape? Good god no. The fiction I read in that time of my life was FULL of crappy role models, stalker boyfriends, obsessive love, and other such nonsenses that I in no way, shape, or form want in real life.
I also involved into a fairly confident, self-proclaimed feminist.
What we read CAN influence us, that's for sure, but sometimes we read things for fantasy, or morbid curiosity.
The problem, IMHO, is not that girls want these things but rather the Say Anything syndrome. I worry that because girls eat these stories up young boys will think, "well, that's what they want, right?" And go and reenact some of this crap not connecting that jut because it works in books/movies doesn't mean it does in real life.
11/26/09
11/26/09
Apparently, Bella loves Wuthering Heights, again, because of the "true love" in the book.
What does this mean? Meyer doesn't fucking understand literature, especially when it comes to books that were obviously about the fact that idealized romances don't exist.
11/26/09
I don't think the message is that you shouldn't stand up for yourself. Stephanie Meyer's really hung up on this idea of "true love," and I think that's what all of Bella's actions stem from.
Well, the actions that aren't guided by stupidity, anyway.
11/26/09
11/26/09
I'm a sucker for the good old "they hate each other first then get to know each other" story.
11/26/09
But I like to dream that someplace else, 100-something, obsessive, emoweirded sickos get arrested, possibly by firearm, whenever they get caught sneaking on poor girls' rooms at night. A punch in the face will do for daytime sneakery.
Next time I get bugged by a dumb drooling representative of the mankind, I shall make him a lecture on the Twilight syndrom.
11/26/09
BTW in no way shape or form do I think Meyer is a great writer. She's average at best and mostly got lucky by creating something that became such a phenomenon.
11/26/09
Similarly, Twilight is about a girl and the vampire who loves her because she smells so delicious. It's just a different kind of weird relationship.
11/26/09
@Heriloke: I'm with you. I've always preferred romances where the couple bicker a lot or loathe each other and then fall in love.
My favorite romantic comedy when I was 16 was 10 Things I Hate About You and I watched Empire Strikes Back for the Han/Leia love affair more than any of the other SW pics for it. Raiders of the Lost Ark was another favorite for similar Marian/Indy relationship.
11/26/09
Apologies. That book is one of my favorites and it really guts me that Myers seems to be pushing that the book is some big romance when it is the exact opposite. Pity the poor English teachers who are slamming their heads against their desks with the piles of gooey essays on "true love" they are forced to read now because of it.
Hell, we got in to the store Twilight-ish covers of that book with the note "Read Bella and Edward's favorite book!" stamped on the cover with new copy on the back making it seem like a sappy romance novel and it pissed the shit out of me.
[www.amazon.com]
11/27/09
whatever happened to balance? the idea that to each event there is a season?
11/27/09
11/27/09
Always acting this way, I don't think you get to grow up properly. It's simply childish.
Of course it's good have a family, if that is what you want. But perhaps we should think about growing up before we have kids. And becoming an adult implies you have lived a little, and got enough experience of live to provide future citizens of the world with at least some knowledge and good sense.
Now, all societies that consider individuals as only destined for marriage and procreation do tend to infantilize women - so they cannot teach their daughters, and their sons as well, to become respectful, egalitarian, wise people.
Wouldn't this "balance" require that we get to know ourselves, before we let obscurantist ideas of romance cloud our better judgement into believing that passion is enough to build a life upon?
(And that, was very pompous.)
12:01 PM
08/07/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
Not all stories involving teenagers are necessarily YA and not all stories that only involve adults is "regular" fiction, but there are certain standards. It's mostly defined as fiction that has an intended audience of teenagers. Often, the sexual themes can be toned down or on par with more adult titles. The sky is really the limit on YA.
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
06/18/09
Turtledove (natch) has a whole series of YA alt-hist books which I'd recommend to all kids and many adults.
12/06/08
12/05/08
12/05/08
12/06/08
12/05/08
12/05/08
12/05/08
Jack and Camilla, I'm looking at you!
12/05/08