<![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party - io9 Comments]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party - io9 Comments]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> I worked on Superman Returns and saw the animatics for what it was to be under McG's direction. It was total crap. Just watch 5 minutes of any Charlie's Angels movie and you'll see the limits of his abilities. Might as well throw some aliens and predators in T4. Thanks Hollywood.

hopskipper

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> I hope they do a big deluxe treatment of the Batman films, like Alien Quadrilogy or LOTR style. There's so much there to hear about!

CapnCalamity

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> I liked Nick Stahl as John Connor too. Surely, somewhere in this wide world there must be a third?

Didn't McG direct/produce/something The Fast and the Furious? If nothing else, that proves he can handle action. If the new Terminator flick is indeed the adventures of John Connor in the dystopian future (*cue me hyperventilating* -- those segments were always my favorites), that doesn't bode ill.

Pouncer

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> Bana isn't masculine enough? Did he see him as Hector in Troy? Him and Saffron Burrows were the ONLY good part of that movie. But I guess all he's seen is The Hulk, where Bana was going out of his way to be more sensitive, in order to accentuate the difference!

Fucking McG.

aspiringexpatriate

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> @PVIII: Yes, you are the only one who wants Nick Stahl back.

And I'd like to reiterate that T3 was a steaming pile of crap that would best be ignored in the Terminator story, the same way that the Nightmare on Elm St. movie makers realized they had no choice but to completely ignore part 2. The plot, dialogue, production values, and nearly everything else were substandard. The current TV show which isn't even that great trumps it.

Zlevee

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> Eric Bana not masculine? Has this clown not watched Chopper?

mydogisdexter

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> Bana was pretty bad ass in Troy, Black Hawk Down, and Munich. I mean he's no Bale, but who is?

PVIII

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> So, this "McG" character flat out said that Eric Bana is too much of a pussy to be the terminator?

I guess I can understand a guy thinking that, but it seems kind of harsh to just say it.

braak

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> "good" terminators with 3 laws built in, "bad" terminators as replicants?

Mathmos

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> Uh, I hate triple-dipping DVD suits. I already bought the collector's edition of Batman Begins, WTF? I think I'm the only one that wished they'd bring back Stahl for Salvation...oh, well.

PVIII

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> I don't know if McG has made enough movies yet to formulate a definitive opinion about his filmmaking abilities. However, he was a producer for "The Search for the Next Pussycat Doll." So it doesn't look promising.

extracrispy

]]> <![CDATA[Batman's Area and McG's Manliness at the Warner Bros. Museum Party]]> The Terminator and Asimov ideas? I think it's safe to say that the Terminator is a prime violator of the First Law of Robotics.

NefariousNewt

]]>